Dr. Rima Replies: Heroic Nun Resists Vaccination without Informed Consent .
[Sister Cecilia, a nun in Kenya, where Catholic Bishops have accused the public health authorities of promoting vaccines that cause involuntary infertility, has been arrested for resisting the WHO vaccination drive there.]
. Sister Cecilia – 2016 Dr. Rima Health Freedom Prize Nominee
. I wonder if this nun was trying to protect children from the infertility which the Catholic bishops of Kenya once again confirmed had been introduced by the intentionally HCG-tainted vaccines that WHO once again provided to Kenya? Or was she trying to protect them from the impact of MMR vaccines in destroying their immune and nervous systems because of its well documented, but well-denied, association with autism, especially in black male children, especially under the age of 36 months, as CDC whistle-blower William W. Thompson, PhD, made abundantly clear in his devastating revelations last year.
. Or perhaps she was attempting to protect them from the life-long intestinal pain and dysfunction associated with the permanent lodging of the measles virus from the vaccine in their gastrointestinal tract.
. Congratulations, Sister, for your bravery.
Yours in health and freedom,
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Natural Solutions Foundation
Dr. Rima Replies: Catholic nun held in Kenya for blocking immunisation of pupils [Wednesday, June 01, 2016 10:59 PM]: http://amredeemed.com/doctrines/catholic/nun-kenya-arrested-stopping-children-vaccination/
PS – Foundation Counsel Ralph posted this note at the AmRedeemed site:
“I hereby nominate Sister Cecilia for the Dr. Rima Health Freedom Award. Sister Cecilia is a living saint and hero for seeking to protect the universal right to Informed Consent. Please pray for her quick release. Vaccination is an uninsurable risk that courts around the world have held to be “unavoidably unsafe.” In this case the toxins in the vaccines, in the conditions of a developing country, contribute to mass infertility. Which may very well be the purpose of the WHO program. Google “Bill Gates TED talk vaccines reduce population”. And here is a paper delivered last year by Dr. Rima Laibow on the vaccine hoax: http://tinyurl.com/DrRimaIndiaPaper“
Kids, Ebola and HPV: The US Government’s Deadly Game
Dr. Rima replies to an article in Mother Jones, regarding resistant pathogens… what has been called “The Antibiotic Resistance Apocalypse“.* http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/07/phil-gingrey-migrant-ebola-vaccines
First, let me qualify what I am about to say: I am a licensed physician holding licenses in 3 States in the US.
The article you wrote, Tim, is full of both useful information and egregious errors of fact. First, deadly disease: yes, the children streaming across the border might harbor all sorts of diseases, just as the people streaming off airplanes, buses and boats at every port of entry into the US. The sudden flood of children is very worrisome because it has quite obviously been engineered, I suspect, by the same or similar people to those who decided to supply the drug cartel murderers with high power weaponry to make weapons appear more dangerous than otherwise and build public support (among those still left alive, of course) for cancelling the right to bear arms.
My suspicion, of which the preliminary data is supportive, but I cannot assert it with certainty, is that the presence of supposedly disease-bearing children (can’t deport the tots, can’t execute them, can’t do much of anything with them – after all, they are children) is a door opener to “protect” us through the implementation of the Global Health Security Initiative, which I have called “Agenda 21 in a Syringe” — http://drrimatruthreports.com/agenda-21-in-a-syringe-global-health-security-initiative/.
You will not be very happy with what you find there since unelected and uncontrollable agencies have anointed themselves with the power to vaccinate, remove, incarcerate or otherwise treat anyone on the planet to “protect” them from infectious diseases. One of the favored way to reduce both victims AND vectors of infectious disease, the program holds, in writing, is to reduce the population. Voila! Fewer potential vectors, fewer potential victims and either of those classes of now dead people can have offspring who would become vectors, victims or both.
Second, vaccines: you write as if vaccines work. The science is quite clear (as long as it is not paid for by drug companies and conducted by people with conflicts of interest who will gain or loose by reason of the results.
Both the measles and whooping cough vaccine are now officially conceded to have failed by leading scholars in the field (you can look up my articles on their peer reviewed papers) and there is no statistical evidence in untampered-with data that vaccines have reduced the incidence of a single communicable disease. There is powerful epidemiological information that shows conclusively that every infectious disease was declining BEFORE the introduction of the relevant vaccine and that most of them actually INCREASED SHARPLY after those vaccines were introduced.
Polio? The poster child for disease eradication? Even the CDC’s own website states that the cause of polio is vaccination with polio.
Any genuine comparison of vaccinated and unvaccinated people shows the same result: there is literally no comparison between people in those two categories in the incidence of autism (yes, vaccines actually DO cause autism), asthma, neurological function including attention, Alzheimer’s Disease and other forms of dementia, infertility, autoimmune disorders (some of which are, quite literally lethal), fetal loss, and on and on.
Of course, that makes sense because vaccination introduces massively toxic materials directly into the body. And the mistaken belief that vaccine-related antibodies are the same as those antibodies produced by exposure to the unaltered disease-causing organisms has been shown repeatedly in peer reviewed studies to be incorrect. Bottom line? Those children from Central American countries where vaccines are virtually universal have compromised immune systems by virtue of those vaccines, as do any vaccinated individuals.
This is not the party line, but it is what un-corrupted science shows over and over again.
I am a staunch liberal politically (I believe that the State has meaningful responsibility to the aged, the infirm, the vulnerable, the environment and other areas of public trust and that I am also a staunch believer in the concept that each of us owns our own bodies and has the absolute right to make the health choices that we feel are right for us. Therefore, I, too, although anything but a far right political person, have been a member of the AAPS and supported vigorously, in my role as the Medical Director of the Natural Solutions Foundation, the amendment to allow parents to block their children from getting the HPV vaccine which is designed to make money and which does NOT prevent cervical cancer.
What it does do is damage women and girls in astonishing numbers and, perhaps, reduce their fertility permanently, driving some adolescents into irreversible menopause and INCREASE the incidence of cervical cancer by 46.7% in women who already have HPV when they receive the vaccine.
Since HPV is a self limiting disease which has NEVER been shown to cause cervical cancer and resolves spontaneously in more than 98% of cases within 2 years, that means that this dangerous vaccine is actually leading to more cervical cancer cases, and deaths, than occurred before its introduction.
Oh, yes. One more important item. Nano Silver (not colloidal silver) is safe, effective, gentle an non toxic. It is inexpensive, has a very, very long shelf life and can be used by anyone of any age. There is no known toxicity and it is self sterilizing so no cold chain is required. So why are we using vaccines instead of a teaspoon of nano silver when exposed to whatever?
Hmmm… Let’s see: what would big pharma stand to lose? Let me think…..
Good for Senator Gingrey!
Yours in health and freedom, Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Natural Solutions Foundation
Dr. Rima Replies: How Many Homicide/Suicide Producing Psychiatric Drugs Was Elliot Rodgers Taking?
In response to The Guardian’s article <a “http://www.alternet.org/investigations/seven-dead-premeditated-mass-murder-shooting-near-california-college-campus”> Seven Dead in ‘Premeditated Mass Murder’ Shooting Near California College Campus
Which psychoactive drugs was this young man taking, for how long and in what combination?
Sadly, many people have thoughts like these. Psychoactive medication protentiates their being acted upon through suicide and/or homicide.
Guns rarely kill people. Psychoactive drugs often do, sometimes with a gun as a tool, sometimes not.
I made a video called “I am Adam Lanza’s Doctor” in response to a blog from the mother of a young man like Adam Lanza [the video is a metaphor as I make clear in its opening section]. In it I elaborate on the dangerous use of psychiatric medication and how it is inextricably linked with the epidemic of mass murders and suicides we experience in the US and other heavily medicated societies.
I would be more than a little astonished if Elliot Rodger’s despair and desperate actions were not the result not only of psychiatric illness, but of the drugs mistakenly, but all-too-commonly used as if they actually treated the illness.
There are good and effective means to help those with emotional and psychiatric illnesses which do not involve toxic chemicals. I know.
I have been practicing drug free psychiatry and medicine for nearly 45 years.
Find someone who practices nutritional/orthomolecular psychiatry and medicine and treat the issues, don’t make the worse.
You, Sir, are not an atheist. You are an ardent theist (which is fine: you have every right to whatever belief to which you choose to adhere) who is a passionate non-religionist.
But let’s not conflate “I do not believe in what some religions do/hold/promulgate and do not believe in their version of my god” with “I do not believe in god”. They are not even closely related, let alone identical.
I cannot even begin to imagine why you would style yourself an atheist when you are so passionately connected to, and devoted to the study and examination of Jesus from a theological perspective.
He is one of those things you claim not to believe in: a god, or godhead, or son of god or some other theistic entity.
You cannot have it both ways.
I do not care which way you have it but I am disturbed that you wrote a whole book and at least one article identifying yourself and your credo totally incorrectly. Why? For shock value and book sales?
Because as a true non-atheist believer you function like every true believer rejecting whatever does not support our religious preferences?
You share the penchant for jargon (the use of words by ascribing a private meaning to them which is unlike the meaning they generally are believed to have) with globalists who use words like “sustainability” as a cover for rationalizing depopulation and forcing the human population into Agenda 21’s “transit villages” where each of us is allotted 625 square feet of living space and “re-wilding” destroys private property rights for everyone except the favored few?
Nope, sorry about that, but atheism means you do not believe in god, any god, not that you have one you like and because everyone else seems to be getting the PR about that one wrong, you believe in the god, but not what the others are saying about your particular god.
Interesting article except for one thing: as a physician using NeuroBioFeedback, the technology offhandedly dismissed as “neurobunk”, and having published a number of peer reviewed papers on the effects obtained, I can definitively state that it is far from bunk, neuro or not.
NeuroBioFeedback is a powerful treatment modality with enormous potential in pain management, emotional and psychological disorders (including depression, anxiety, panic, schizophrenia and more, attention and learning disorders (including the wildly overmedicated group of people said to have ADD and ADHD), auto immune problems, addictions of all types, neurological disorders (including head injury) and much more.
It works through voluntary training of brain activity and the results are substantial, long lasting and achieved without pharmaceuticals.