Natural Solutions Foundation
The Voice of Global Health Freedom™
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Dr. Rima Responds to the “Skeptical” Comments of a Vaccine Proponent…
For all the snide emotionalism of your comment on Dr. Wakefield, you have both obscured and ignored several important issues in your article.
First, no vaccine, including the dangerous (yes, dangerous) MMR vaccine has been tested for either safety or efficacy, despite the fact that US law requires both. Second, adjuvants are never tested for safety, despite the fact that they are immune system irritants and, like squalene and aluminum, are known nervous system and immune system toxins.
Third, the increases in the incidence and prevalence of autism are directly proportional to numbers of vaccinated children and MMR is an unnecessary shot of no medical worth and considerable medical harm. It, like every other vaccine, has never been subjected to a placebo controlled, double blind study to show if there is any beneficial effect on those who take it, making it an untested and therefore, at least in the US, illegal drug, if enforcement were not selective and shamefully economically, not scientifically, applied.
When a corrupt and dangerous regulatory agency like the FDA threatens that it will turn walnuts into an untested, and therefore illegal, drug if the company that markets them does not remove the independent scientific study from its website that shows that walnuts could be good for your health (as it did with the Michigan Cherry Grower’s Association when they posted 6 articles showing that cherries can help with various types of arthritis) but permits dangerous experimental drugs which have never been safety tested to be injected into millions of children, there is neither logic nor science at work here.
I do not know your background, but I know that your nasty tone and irrational defense of vaccines identifies you as an emotional, not a rational, skeptic. Surely you can do better as a skeptic, (“Etymology: Latin or Greek; Latin scepticus, from Greek skeptikos, from skeptikos thoughtful, from skeptesthai to look, consider – Merriam-Webster Dictionary”) since your skeptical credo requires you not just to attack conventional beliefs (which you are failing to do by blindly accepting vaccines as beneficial – a justified cause for real skepticism – but to explore the scientific basis of the belief.
You are, in fact, doing neither. Instead, your knee-jerk defense of an unproven and dangerous medical practice shows your lack of true evaluative, skeptical thought.
Try again.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
www.DrRima.net
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
Published at http://skepacabra.wordpress.com/2010/05/22/andrew-wakefield-dead-man-walking/#comment-4181, a vicious attack on Wakefield
Seven Questions for Vaccine Science Deniers
That is, questions for those people who refuse to examine the simple, but urgently important question, “How do you know (or why do you believe) that vaccines protect against disease” when:
1. No vaccine has ever been evaluated through a double blind, placebo controlled study to determine if it actually has any preventive or mitigating effect on the disease of interest
2. Epidemiologists can successfully predict pandemics, epidemics and outbreaks of any given disease by tracking vaccination programs: the larger the program, the more widespread the outbreak of the disease.
3. Although US law requires all vaccines to be tested for safety and efficacy, no influenza vaccine has ever been so tested
4. Adjuvants like aluminum, squalene and other oil and water adjuvants, etc., are known to be toxic to multiple organ systems but are never tested for safety before they are added to vaccines
5. Preservatives like Polysorbate 80 (also known as “Tween 80”) are associated with infertility
6. Numerous studies show that influenza shots increase chances of dying from any cause by 3 fold, increase the development of serious conditions such as asthma which lead to hospitalization by 6 fold and, if given consecutively for 5 years, increase the chance of developing Alzheimer’s Disease by 600% although they have been shown not to provide any protection against flu whatsoever
7. Virtually all epidemics and outbreaks of communicable diseases in the modern world occur in fully vaccinated populations.
The scientific evidence is clear while the hysteria is, in fact, on the part of the Science Deniers, that is, those who support the untested, unsafe, unnecessary and unsound practice of vaccination.
For further information, please read my article, “The Syringe of Death” which details the fraudulent history of vaccination, starting with Edward Jenner’s publication of articles detailing the results of studies before the studies were complete, continuing through the epidemic of syphilis created by widespread vaccination of healthy babies with the pus of “cow pox” lesions which were, in fact, syphilitic lesions in the UK, but leprosy lesion in the British tropical empire (where a leprosy epidemic ensued), the shameful whitewash of the cause of that epidemic by the British Parliament and the continuation of the deceit to create dangerous and unnecessary, but astonishingly profitable, vaccinations by the dozens today.
[See: The Syringe of Death: http://drrimatruthreports.com/docs/Syringe_of_death.pdf]
IF you are interested in science and truth, the conclusion is inevitable: at the very least, one must pause to consider why the science supports the dangers of vaccines while public policy supports its continued and escalating use. The answer is not pretty, but then, greed and callous disregard for the truth rarely are.
Oh, Dr. Wakefield? His article was lauded by the medical and scientific world until the vaccine makers realized that it was having a profound impact on their sales. At that point, suddenly, Dr. Wakefield and his colleagues went from publishing a brilliant and tremendously important article to the authors of “shoddy research” and “quackery”. Amazing how scientific standards shifted upwards so radically and rapidly!
By the way, Dr. Wakefield will be my guest on the Dr. Rima Reports, May 30 at www.BlogTalkRadio.com/FreedomizerRadio 10 PM to Midnight (Eastern Time).
I do hope you will join us. I have no doubt whatsoever, having read your article, that you will find a great deal of information of which you are clearly unaware in that interview.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2010/05/here_we_go_again_matt_lauer_to_interview.php#commentsArea




