• Resources
    • Videos/Speeches/Articles
    • The Art of Health Freedom
    • Good Books
    • Recommended Videos
    • Recommended Links
    • Radio Show Archives
    • Trustee Interviews
    • Newsletter Archives
    • Internet Links
  • Rave Reviews
    • Testimonials
    • Video Testimonials
  • Take Action
    • Create Pushback
    • Tell Your Friends
    • Become an Organizer
    • Send Letters
  • Wellness Stores
    • Buy our products
    • Valley of the Moon Coffee
  • 5 Big Lies
    • Drugs & Vaccine
    • Chemtrails
    • G.M.O.
    • Radiation
    • Food
  • Home
  • Support
    • Support Health Freedom
    • Coffee
  • Events/Press/Media
    • POD Casts/Radio Shows
    • Webinars
    • Press Release
  • About Us
    • Mission Statement
    • Accomplishments
    • Board of Trustees
    • NSF History/Vision
    • Contact Webmaster
    • Customer Service
  • Dr. Rima’s Blog/Vlog
    • GDS
    • Codex Alimentarius
  • eBook Download

Archive for Rima E. Laibow MD – Page 12

Money Bomb! Funding War Council, “Stop the Shot” Lawsuit, Codex and more…

By Administrator on October 21, 2009 No Comments

MONEY BOMB! MONEY BOMB! MONEY BOMB!
Natural Solutions Foundation
The Voice of Global Health Freedom™
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

Funding Thermometer

Money Bomb!

IT’S MONEY BOMB TIME!
To Fund Health Freedom’s Next Victory!
Health Freedom Money Bomb – Round Three!
December Annual Giving Season

TOGETHER We’ve held off the uninsurable, un-safety tested, martial law-friendly “Swine Flu” H1N1 vaccine panic… and the Senate delayed voting on the (sic) “Food Safety” bill, S.510 after nearly a hundred fifty thousand emails to the committee and Senate…

Congratulations to US! We won a couple rounds! Our Push Back and Stop the Shot law suit forced the US to effectively “cancel” the H1N1 Pandemic. Oh, there are the usual “talking head” announcements about how dangerous H1N1 still is and a bizarre National Emergency Declaration from the President that seems to contradict his own Secretary of Health, but the juice is gone: there is no serious threat either from the disease (there never was) nor, with insufficient supplies, from the vaccine (which is where all the danger really lay). Both New York and New Jersey, the only two states with flu vax mandates, suspended theirs after we went to court on one and threatened to do so on the other. But we have a long way to go before we are finished with these threats.

This Money Bomb’s continued success can be our most powerful Push Back to the President’s “National Emergency Declaration” of October 23, 2009 regarding the alleged “swine flu pandemic”. See: http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=3763

The depopulationists / globalists / pharma-terrorists and their government/WHO/UN henchmen and henchwomen (such as Napolitano, Sebelius and Hamburg) will be back again. By the time they mount their next terror tactic, we will be stronger, even better organized and ready to beat them back on that one, and the next, and the next, all because of your help.

Null, Laibow, et al v FDA Lawsuit UPDATE:

Round One: NY Health Care Workers’ Flu Vaccine Mandate:
http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=3933

Round Two: NJ Toddlers’ Flu Vaccine mandate:
http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=3970

Round Three… [But that’s a secret; we have cooperating plaintiffs and are preparing to file.]

Oh, by they way, did you forget about Codex? We didn’t. In fact, now that Gen. Bert and Dr. Rima can safely travel without fear of deadly injections, they went to the most recent Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses (CCNFSDU), whose Chairman is the notorious Dr. Rolf Grossklaus.

They attended this meeting in Dusseldorf from Nov 2-6, and all workshops and associated meetings – for you. As usual, they did daily video updates, radio specials and so on. You know you can count on them to tell you what is happening and make contacts with delegates from around the world that can change history – just as we did with the H1N1 scam-for-death-and-money.

Codex Meeting UPDATE: http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=3942

You’ve probably heard about the powerful protective effect of Vitamin D on the immune system. There are 3 ‘D vitamins’ in Health Freedom:

DONATE
DISSEMINATE – forward each of our emails and Action Items as widely as you can
DO – take each of our Action Items once for every member of your household

2010 Health Freedom USA War Council! http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=4308

You know where you can donate to Health Freedom — right here:
http://drrimatruthreports.com/?page_id=189 – and it’s tax-deductible!

We need you to help us generate the funds needed to move our seminal legal challenge to the entire vaccine approval travesty forward, fighting any appeal that the FDA and other defendants may initiate and we need the funds to make sure that we can continue our Codex work. We need funds to update our Codex book and make sure that every Head of State, every Minister of Health and Agriculture and every Codex delegate gets that publication along with a clear explanation of how to use this information. Despite the (ill-informed) Nay-Sayers, when Austria, Hungary and the Netherlands used our Codex Two Step Process, they won their cases in the WTO, escaping both trade sanctions AND Codex in those instances!

We need money to help reclaim the production of food here at the Valley of the Moon(TM) Eco Demonstration Project. Right now the government of Panama is asking us to help them turn ALL cattle farming in the breadbasket province of Chiriqui into BeyondOrganic/Biodynamic farming. They are asking us to help them do the same with their agricultural production, as well. We need money to support volunteers who provide hands, heads and hearts to make this project work so that we can teach farmers and non farmers alike how to grow clean, abundant food for life and health here and elsewhere.

What does that have to do with you and your health? A lot. First, we can create products which, because of their excellence, will violate Codex guidelines and standards and can then be shipped internationally, helping to further crack Codex apart. Second, we are creating a teaching center to help farmers from the developing world, where more and more of your food comes from, to grow their food in a way that is healthy for them AND for you. That means, of course, that their countries, too, will need to follow our Two Step Process to ship and sell their products.

AND we need serious funding to complete the Health Freedom Documentary which we began, but did not have enough funding to complete.

So much to do. So much to do for you. How can we do it all? Simple: we need the resources and then we can do it all – you know that you can trust the Natural Solutions Foundation to be on top of issues before they arise and find the solutions. You know you can trust us to use every single penny for the Foundation’s work since none of the Trustees takes a penny for our much-more-than-full-time work. You know that we are 100% supporter supported so that our only focus is what is good for health, and for freedom. We are there for you.

Now it is time for you to be there for Health Freedom with a powerful, decisive Money Bomb!

Lay it on us so we can keep health freedom free. Just think! Today you are free of the threat that was looming over our heads: the voluntary-but-really-mandatory adjuvanted vaccine for a made-up, make-believe disease. And we, you and the Natural Solutions Foundation, did that together. What else can we do? Let’s find out. It’s Money Bomb Time!

Valley of the Moon(TM) Coffee - Give the Gift of Health Freedom!

[/caption]



Click <a href=here, http://drrimatruthreports.com/?page_id=189, to set up your generous tax deductible recurring donation. Click here, http://www.ValleyoftheMoonCoffee.org , to order Health Freedom’s own coffee for everyone on your personal and corporate gift lists – and for yourself! Remember, Valley of the Moon™ Coffee is Free — free from GMOs, Pesticides, Herbicides, Fungicides and all other toxic chemicals. And it’s tax deductible, too! 80% of your purchase is a donation which you can deduct from your taxes, making Valley of the Moon(TM) Coffee the best health freedom bargain in the world!

And just WAIT until you taste it! You’ll agree that our Valley of the Moon™ Coffee IS a Little Bit of Heaven in a Cup™.

Donate! http://drrimatruthreports.com/?page_id=189

Want more ways to support the Natural Solutions Foundation? Visit http://www.Organics4U.org and http://www.NaturalSolutionsMarketPlace.org to find outstanding products for your health and support the Natural Solutions Foundation at the same time!

Thank you for your continuing vital support. Health Freedom IS Our First Freedom.

Yours in health and freedom,

The Trustees of the Natural Solutions Foundation

Maj. Gen. Albert N. Stubblebine III (US Army, Ret.)
President & Oath Keeper
Rima E. Laibow, MD – Medical Director
Ralph Fucetola, JD – Counsel

Categories : About Codex Alimentarius, Activism, Blog / Vlog, CODEX Consequences, CODEX Industries, Compulsory Drugging, Intensive Urban Agriculture (IAU), International Cooperation, Organics, Vaccination
Tags : Depopulation, Dr. Rima, FDA, General Stubblebine, Globalists, H1N1, health freedom, Money Bomb, Napolitano, Natural Solutions Foundation, NSF, Pandemic Vaccine, Rima E. Laibow MD, Sebelius, Stop the Shot Law Suit, Trade Sanctions, Untested vaccines, vaccines, Valley of the Moon Coffee, WHO

Squalene: Be Very Afraid Part II

By Administrator on September 27, 2009 No Comments

Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org

WHO Developing Infertility Vaccines since 1974.  Is Swine Flu Vaccine the Next Generation?

WHO Developing Infertility Vaccines since 1974. Is Swine Flu Vaccine the Next Generation?

URGENT ACTION ITEM for everyone you can reach: Say “NO!” to “Voluntary” vaccines when refusal means incarceration and indefinite quarantine. http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27275 Sign once for every member of your household, then activate your community of influence.

Natural Solutions Foundation suing FDA to prevent release of Swine Flu vaccines. We’ll be entering our papers this week. We are restricting our suit to a narrow objection although we know that the vaccines are genocidal (see below) and worse. But we have to use what the law gives us and that is the fact that the law was broken on September 15, 2009 when the vaccines were licensed without any safety testing being completed (or even carried out).

Be aware that we are not satisfied with a mere delay, but it is where we start tactically. Winning this suit would prevent the release of the vaccines until next June or July, 2010. That is not shabby since it would give us time for more permanent action.

Federal Court Cases are expensive! Please make two recurring tax deductible donations, large or small: Click here, http://drrimatruthreports.com/?page_id=189, to make a donation ending in the number 6 to earmark you donation for the legal case. Now click the link again and make a donation ending in any other number to support the Natural Solutions Foundation so we can continue to serve you and help keep health freedom free. Thanks!

Want to support the Natural Solutions Foundation by drinking Health Freedom’s own coffee (or detoxing with it) and giving it to lucky personal and corporate recipients this Holiday season? Visit http://ValleyoftheMoonCoffee.org and Wake Up to Health Freedom (TM) with pure, clean coffee from our teaching farm in Panama’s Valley of the Moon Eco Demonstration Project, www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org. Want to volunteer at the Valley of the Moon? Glad to have you. Visit http://www.natsol.org.

OK. Now for the tough stuff

The article below details the horrific reality that I wish were not true. The Natural Solutions Foundation has been saying for quite some time that we see clear evidence of a genocidal intention in the overblown, clearly intentional Swine Flu “Pandemic”. When WHO moved the “Pandemic” from Level 4 to Level 5 the disease was so mild and inconsequential that they literally had to change the definition of a Pandemic at Level 5, leaving out the words “with the ability to cause serious illness and death” from the definition because it did not and could not. We believe that this must have been a great disappointment to the folks at the WHO who have been both predicting and involved with genetically engineering one failed pandemic after another. But WHO, you will remember, believes in a “sustainable planet” and that sustainability (favor them, not us, of course) means that they believe, too, that 90% of the world’s population needs to die.

Die

They do not much care how we die as long as we do it on demand and they manage to squeeze out a good dollop of profit as we do so. Some of us, however, will die because we are never born. That, too, is part of the genocidal plan. You may recall that we reported some time back that we had seen official WHO documents from 1985 stating that the real purpose of the current vaccination program taking place in Africa at that time was not disease control (they know perfectly well that vaccines are hokum, without a shred of valid scientific evidence behind them) or prevention, but the dissemination of materials which cause infertility in the women into whom it is injected. At that time, they were using vaccines with strong response patterns laced with Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin (HCG), a reproductive hormone (a glycoprotein, by the way – that figures into this true horror story a little later on). When you train the immune system through injecting it with adjuvants to “break tolerance” or attack the molecules as “not me” that it normally recognizes as “me”, if you prime it properly, you can create an immune intolerance to the hormones or other molecules of your own body.

In this case, and the same system has been used against untold millions (billions?) of women in many third world countries all over the world, the body attacks every molecule of HCG it encounters after that. The problem is that without HCG, the uterus cannot retain the embryo, or the fetus and it will expel the future baby if she were pregnant at the time of the injection. If she were not pregnant, she will never again become a mother. Her body now destroys the very hormone without which she cannot sustain a pregnancy. This damage is irreversible.

But not universal. Apparently, that is the problem: there are still a few people whose immune response is not sufficient to destroy all of their fertility. So now we move, in the march of mad science, propelled by forces of such deep inhumanity that it is difficulty to confront them with clear, calm eyes, to another infertility system.

In 1998 a Patent Application was made for a system which uses a person’s own immune system to render them permanently infertile, sterile, unable to have children. The system is irreversible, once injected.

Knowing that:
– Both Novartis and GSK vaccines “against” the trivial Swine Flu both contain 1 million times more squalene than the devastatingly dangerous Vaccine A which crippled and killed so many Gulf War I military personnel (See Squalene: Be Very Afraid Part I, http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=3592)
– Even a few molecules of squalene injected into the body causes it to “break tolerance” and attack the body’s own molecules to which it is now trained for attack, including the body’s own squalene, a vital component of the Central Nervous System (which accounts for the profound and cataclysmic neurological symptoms of squalene injection
– The WHO, UN and US governments agree on the “need” to reduce population to only 10% of its current levels
– When the WHO declared a Level 6 Pandemic on June 11, offical control of the political and health functions of all 194 countries in the WHO passed to that body, per an agreement signed in 2005 which took effect in 2007
– The haste with which this Level 6 Pandemic was declared makes it clear that the agenda was agreed to whether or not the genetically engineered virus did its job
– FDA/CDC has said that the $1/2 billion stock pile of injectable squalene adjuvant which the US Government admitted it was stock piling will be used to add the squalene to the bodies of people receiving the vaccines which do NOT have adjuvants in them at the time of injection
– The patents for a glycoprotein-containing, squalene adjuvanted H1N1 vaccine were filed in 2007 and 2008 by Novartis, Baxter International and GSK despite the fact that the virus did not yet officially exist, there had never been approval of a squalene adjuvanted vaccine and use of squalene in mass vaccines was illegal through the permanent restraining order of Judge Emmett Sullivan and through the fact that squalene was forbidden to even be tested in the US. The investment of billions of dollars into the development of these vaccines for a virus that did not yet exist, using substances which had never been approved for use in vaccines by 3 separate companies, allegedly competitors in the vaccine industry, is worthy of note all by itself
– The most vulnerable members of society, children and pregnant women, will be vaccinated first.

Now you know what the game is. Since the goal is infertility, what better target population could you choose? With one fell swoop of a needle, a whole generation of “useless eaters” is wiped off the map – the next one while this one is too sick to make much trouble and you clean up like the bandit that you are, if, of course, you are Big Pharma and the global genocidalists!

So now we have mandates for “Influenza vaccines” which are designed to roll the “Swine Flu” up under them. Understand clearly that although your State may offer you exemptions for philosophical, religious or medical reasons, there is every liklihood that there will be NO pandemic vaccination exemptions. The way the federal and state regulations are reading right now, that is the situation. The confusers really do want you to feel
– All vaccinations will be voluntary for the pandemic flu. This is true if by voluntary you really mean “under duress and pain of incarceration, fine and imprisonment.”
– Conventional exemptions will hold for the pandemic flu. This is not true. The pandemic vaccine is governed by separate regulations and laws which do not allow for exemptions.
– Parents will be given the choice of whether to vaccinate their children and themselves or not. This is utterly false unless we take back our freedom to make these decisions for ourselves and our children. Experimental medical procedures are never carried out on the most vulnerable and defenseless first, not until now, that is.

As an aside, do you suppose that President Obama’s children will get the same vaccine that yours and mine will? How would we know? How about the President himself, who bravely agreed to wait until near the bottom of the list. How courageous and public spirited. I will be happy to join him below the bottom of the list and, if all of us have any sense at all, we will all do so by making it abundantly clear to our legislators that this WILL not happen. That is the purpose of the action item, http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27275. So far more than 2,222,940 of your emails have reached the legislative and decision making desks of this country. These people need to hear that the deception is broken, like immune tolerance when adjuvants are injected. We want the right to determine what happens to our bodies. We will not be sickened and die for the depopulationists. We will not be made infertile for the neo-aristocrats. We will not be brought into slavery through a diabolical brew in a syringe of illness, infertility and death..

Now, please read the following article and share it widely while you take the time and effort to mobilize every single person you can reach to help mobilize the groundswell to make it impossible for the vaccine effort to go forward as intended.

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomusa.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Valley of the Moon (TM) Eco Demonstration Project
www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org
Valley of the Moon Coffee: Wake Up to Health Freedom! GMO, Pesticide, Toxin Free
www.ValleyoftheMoonCoffee.org
www.Organics4U.org

Saturday, August 8, 2009
“Swine flu” vaccine has adjuvants that impair fertility, Making people infertile is part of eugenics, thus genocide.

http://dprogram.net/2009/08/07/“swine-flu”-vaccine-has-adjuvants-that-impair-fertility/

August 7, 2009

Daniel Solis from the Czech Republic has researched the side-effects of the adjuvant, squalene, and discovered it is known to destroy fertility as well as causing other forms of damage.

A patent for a vaccine to impair fertility in animals contains squalene.

The plan to use this fertility-impairing adjuvant in the “swine flu” vaccine against a flu that has so far been far less irksome than the ordinary seasonal flu underscores concerns that this H1N1 mass vaccination programme mandated by WHO with the support of pharma companies such as Baxter is designed primarily to cause death and injury, and so significantly reduce the global population.

Is it any wonder that these “vaccines” are classified as bioweapons by the regulators? ….
Daniel Solis has also made a formal complaint against the head of the Czech Republic’s FDA and the Deputy Health Minister for awarding a contract to Baxter worth 1,5 billion CZK without an open tender. More legal action in the Czech Republic is planned with the aim of getting Baxter’s license to manufacture the “swine flu” vaccine at Bohumil suspended and to make Baxter accountable for the incident at the BioTest lab, which detected the live bird flu virus in vaccine material from Baxter on February 6th. Members of the lab had to be treated preventatively for bird flu and were put in quarantine.

Also, a Czech translation of “Evidence-of-the-Use-of-Pandemic-Flu-to-Depopulate-USA” can be found here: http://www.outsidermedia.cz/Obvinuji-Vas-z-masove-vrazdy-1.aspx
http://www.outsidermedia.cz/Obvinuji-Vas-z-pripravy-masove-vrazdy-II-1.aspx

“I have focused on the adjuvants made of monophosforyl lipid A (MPL) MF59TM (containing a polysorbate TweenTM 80) or AS03, AS04 also known as squalene in the proposed vaccines, which are immunosterilant or an immunocontraceptive,” Daniel Solis writes.

“The patent of the veterinary FERTILITY IMPAIRING VACCINE can be found on-line. It mentions both, the lipoid adjuvants squalene and the polysorbate TM80.

Here are the quotes from the patent and further some clinical studies about the toxicity of both.

(WO/1999/034825) FERTILITY IMPAIRING VACCINE AND METHOD OF USE
This application claims the benefit of U. S. Provisional Application No. 60/070,375, filed January 2,1998, U. S. Provisional Application No. 60/071,406, filed January 15,1998
“The vaccine of the invention preferably additionally includes an immunological adjuvant to enhance the immunological response of the subject to the glycoprotein antigen. Examples of adjuvants include Freund’s Complete Adjuvant, Freund’s Incomplete Adjuvant, and an adjuvant comprising an immunostimulant such as synthetic trehalose dicorynomycolate (STDCM) and an oil such as squalene oil (see P. Willis et al., J. Equine Vet. Sci., 14,364-370 (1994)). An adjuvant comprising synthetic trehalose dicorynemycolate, squalene oil, and a surfactant such as lecithin is preferred. Lecithin typically includes phosphatidyl choline. In a preferred embodiment the vaccine comprises oil, preferably a biodegradable oil such as squalene oil. Typically, the vaccine is prepared using an adjuvant concentrate which contains lecithin in squalene oil. The aqueous solution glycoprotein is typically a phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution, and additionally preferably contains Tween 80.”

Abstract:
A vaccine comprising an antigen derived from a zona pellucida glycoprotein is effective to impair fertility in animals, preferably carnivores. The vaccine can be used as an immunosterilant or an immunocontraceptive.
http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?wo=1999034825
Description:
http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?IA=US1998027658&wo=1999034825&DISPLAY=DESC
__________________________________________________________
Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Volume 95, Number 6, December 2005 , pp. 593-599(7)
“Polysorbate 80 was identified as the causative agent for the anaphylactoid reaction of nonimmunologic origin in the patient. Conclusions: Polysorbate 80 is a ubiquitously used solubilizing agent that can cause severe nonimmunologic anaphylactoid reactions.”

Gajdova M, Jakubovsky J, Valky J.
Institute of Preventive and Clinical Medicine, Limbová, Bratislava.
Delayed effects of neonatal exposure to Tween 80 on female reproductive organs in rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 1993 Mar;31(3):183-90. PMID: 8473002.
“Baby female rats were injected with polysorbate 80 at days 4-7 after birth. It accelerated the maturing of the rats and caused changes to the vagina and womb lining, hormonal changes, ovary deformities and degenerative follicles.”
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8473002

The Endogenous Adjuvant Squalene Can Induce a Chronic T-Cell-Mediated Arthritis in Rats
Barbro C. Carlson*, Åsa M. Jansson*, Anders Larsson, Anders Bucht and Johnny C. Lorentzen*
http://ajp.amjpathol.org/cgi/content/abstract/156/6/2057
__________________________________________________________

Now, how can WHO claim the adjuvants is harmless:
http://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/topics/adjuvants/squalene/questions_and_answers/en/index.html

when there is clear evidence of its effects provoking AI diseases:
ANTI-SQUALENE ANTIBODIES LINK GULF WAR SYNDROME TO ANTHRAX VACCINE
http://www.autoimmune.com/GWSGen.html

or

“Dr. Jules Freund creator of this oil-based adjuvant warned in 1956 that animals injected with his formulation developed terrible, incurable conditions: allergic aspermatogenesis (stoppage of sperm production), experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (the animal version of MS), allergic neuritis (inflammation of the nerves that can lead to paralysis) and other severe autoimmune disorders.

Source: : Gary Matsumoto, Vaccine A-The Covert Government Experiment That’s Killing our Soldiers and Why GI’s are Only the First Victims, Kapitola 3. “The Greatest Story Never Told” http://www.vaccine-a.com/excerpt.html”

Daniel Solis, Prague, Czech Republic
http://www.denikpolitika.cz/politici/daniel-solis/blog#31
http://www.czechfp.cz/site/?p=8009

Categories : Activism, Avian Flu, Blog / Vlog, Compulsory Drugging, Disinformation, Genocide, Get Involved, Legislation to Oppose, Medical Hazards, Miscellaneous, Pandemic Threats, Self Quarantine, Self-Shield, Vaccination, Valley of the Moon, Weaponized Avian Flu
Tags : Avian Flu, Big Pharma, Bird Flu, Compulsory Drugging, Compulsory Vaccination, Disinformation, Dr. Rima, FDA, health freedom, Health Hazards, Mandatory Vaccination, medical hazards, mercury, Natural Solutions Foundation, NSF, Pandemic, Pandemic Flu, Pandemic Swine Flu, Rima E. Laibow, Rima E. Laibow MD, Self Quarantine, Self-Shielding, Swine Flu, Vaccination, Vaccinations, Vaccine Dangers, vaccines, Valley of the Moon, Valley of the Moon Coffee, Weaponized Avian Flu

PUSHBACK: Virtual Interview with HHS Secretary Sebelius and Congressional Response

By Administrator on September 17, 2009 No Comments

Natural Solutions Foundation
The Voice of Global Health Freedom™
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org

Dr. Laibow’s Virtual Interview with HHS Secretary Sebelius

September 16, 2009 – URGENT NOTE: Your Action Required Now to Secure Your Right to Refuse the Swine Flu Vaccine Without Incarceration

skull-vaccine

Health Freedom’s best friend in Congress has responded to our Push Back. We’ve sent more than 2 million emails demanding the right to say “NO!” to vaccines without punishment, incarceration or involuntary quarantine. The Congressman knows how important that is to health, liberty and, we have to imagine, sanity. We have been in discussion with his office about introducing a bill modeled on our Draft Legislation to prevent pandemic vaccination which is mandatory, compulsory or taken under duress of any type.

We received a call today from the Congressman’s office telling us that he is close to introducing a new No Compulsory Vaccine Bill to the House. Given the fact that we have sent well over 2 million emails to our State and Federal legislators, HHS Secretary Sebelius, DHS Secretary Napolitano, President Obama and the Governors of every State in the Union, we anticipate that his bill will garner a good deal of support.

NOW IS THE TIME TO TURN UP THE HEAT. WE NEED 2 MILLION MORE EMAILS IN THE NEXT WEEK. CAN WE DO IT? YOU KNOW WE CAN! WE ARE THE NET ROOTS OF HEALTH FREEDOM!

Have you already sent this Action Item once for every member of your household demanding the right to self shield instead of facing mock-voluntary Swine Flu vaccination with incarceration as the consequence of vaccine refusal? If so, thank you. If not, now, more than ever, we need your help in taking this action right now. We need every bit of support we can muster. Once we get Dr. Paul’s bill number and text, we will publish it and then we’ll ask you to do the same thing again: click on the link we’ll give you to support that Action Item as if your life depended upon it. It will.

Click here once for each member of your family and then disseminate as widely as you can: http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27275

And don’t forget that we are 100% supporter supported.

Please set up two (2) recurring donations, whether large or small: one tax deductible donation to support our legal challenge of the legality of the FDA’s approval of the vaccines Secretary Sebelius is referring to in her testimony below. That one should end in the number 6 to ear mark it for our legal fund. The other tax deductible donation can end in any number and it keeps the Natural Solutions Foundation keeping-on. Here is the link: http://drrimatruthreports.com/?page_id=189

Now, on to the all too real, but still very surreal, testimony authorizing the Pandemic Swine Flu vaccines without any, that’s right, any safety testing. On September 15, 2009, a terrible, tragic and tyrannical event in America’s history took place. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius testified before the US House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce and, in that testimony, announced the “licensing” of the “Swine Flu” vaccines. Secretary Sebelius, please allow me to remind you that it is a crime to provide false testimony before Congress.

I was not in the chamber when the Secretary announced the approval of several Swine Flu vaccines using a combination of untruth, falsehood, illogic and deceit. But I would like to present my virtual interview of Secretary Sebelius as she reads her testimony before that Committee and I question her about it. Remember that every word following SKS (Secretary Kathleen Sebelius) is her unedited testimony, with nothing altered or changed in context. I guess she is counting on the declining quality of the educational system in the US to see her through.

Watch for the new Youtube.com.naturalsolutions series in which Secretary Sebelius and I have a virtual interview. Here is the text of that virtual interview. Please read and share as widely as you can.

Thanks for your activism.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomusa.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Valley of the Moon (TM) Eco Demonstration Project
www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org
Valley of the Moon Coffee: Wake Up to Health Freedom! GMO, Pesticide, Toxin Free
www.ValleyoftheMoonCoffee.org
www.Organics4U.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMarketPlace.org

A virtual Interview with Secretary Sebelius on the “Swine Flu” Vaccine Licensing

My comments are in italics, labeled “REL”
Secretary Sebelius’ comments are labeled SKS.

SKS: Preparing for the 2009-2010 Influenza Season

Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius
Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

SKS: Chairman Waxman, Ranking Member Barton, Chairman Emeritus Dingell, members of the Committee, thank you for this opportunity to update you on the public health challenges of 2009 H1N1 influenza. I want to assure the Committee that the Administration is taking these challenges seriously…

REL: These challenges do not exist, Secretary Sebelius. They have been manufactured as a kind of, at best, a cynical windfall of unprecedented proportions for Big Pharma. At worst, you and your conspirators are playing Doctor Death with America, starting with our next generation, children and pregnant mothers.

SKS: and has mounted an aggressive plan to address H1N1 throughout this fall and winter.

REL: The challenges you speak of do not exist. Without any challenge, an aggressive plan is totally unnecessary.

SKS: HHS has a leading role because this is a health event, and we are working in close partnership with virtually every part of the federal government under a national preparedness and response framework for action that builds on the efforts and lessons learned from this spring. Working together with governors, mayors, tribal leaders, state and local health departments, the medical community and our private sector partners, the federal government has been actively preparing for possible H1N1 virus outbreak scenarios that may develop over the next few months.

REL: Madam Secretary, you are saying “MAY develop” but your use of the phrase, “MAY DEVELOP” shows there is no sufficient scientific evidence that the so-called “Swine Flu” is a pandemic threat. You have called it a “novel” virus, which is a condition for there to be a pandemic potential, but you are not treating this vaccine as thought it were a novel vaccine, requiring safety testing. Given the costs in human and financial terms, I am afraid that “MAY DEVELOP” is not sufficient for vaccination of the population, starting with our most vulnerable population.

SKS: Since the initial spring outbreak of 2009 H1N1 influenza, the virus has triggered a worldwide pandemic,

REL: Well, no. Actually a world wide pandemic has been declared without any clear evidence that there actually IS a world wide pandemic. There is NO world-wide pandemic; there is a only legally declared pandemic, made possible only because the W.H.O. changed the definition of a “pandemic” for political reasons. The “pandemic” has been declared without any clear evidence that there is any world-wide threat. How has the Secretary ascertained, in the absence of accurate testing, that H1N1 is the “DOMINANT” flu strain? Australian authorities do not confirm your claim.

SKS: and has been the dominant flu strain in the southern hemisphere during its winter flu season.

REL: Just how is this ascertained in the absence of accurate testing, not just testing, mind you, but accurate testing that H1N1 is the “DOMINANT” flu strain? Australian authorities do not agree with or substantiate your claim.

SKS: The evidence to date shows that the virus has not changed to become more deadly.

REL: At last, Madam Secretary, we have common ground. We agree, and therefore, since both WHO and CDC has said that this H1N1 virus causes a disease that is milder than seasonal flu, requiring no medical intervention, why is major medical intervention required for something that poses no dangers and may, MAY, become a problem at some time, somewhere in the future?

I am sorry, Madam Secretary, but this is absurd, unscientific, dangerous and a ferocious waste of money, sort of like TARP and other corporate welfare programs, but this time for Big Pharma.

SKS: Unlike our typical seasonal flu, we continued to see flu activity in the United States over the summer, notably in summer camps.

REL: But since diagnosis is not being carried out, is it Swine Flu? Allergies to GMO junk food fed to children, perhaps, common colds, maybe? How would you know? The best tests we have are wrong 9 times out of 10. WHO and CDC requested countries not to test for the virus and not to keep accurate counts, just to guess – and it is on these guesses that you apparently are making your pronouncements, judgments and decisions.

SKS: More recently, we have seen an increase in 2009 H1N1 influenza activity in several states

REL: Based on what independently verified data? If you have no lab tests, you would have no idea of what you are seeing.

SKS: and expect this to continue across the United States during the coming months.

REL: All respiratory cases are being assigned the unscientific label of “Swine Flu” without testing. No one has any idea if any of these cases are causes by H1N1, except, apparently you, Secretary Sebelius. Assuming, however, that all of them are, there are no deaths which are not caused by underlying disease or treatments with toxic, but approved drugs such as Tamiflu, which killed a pregnant mother and the baby she gave birth to in Mumbai, India recently.

Diagnosis by symptom picture alone. Right. That is not exactly good science and it certainly is terrible medicine. Swine Flu walks like a duck, coughs like a duck and has a fever like a duck. What makes it a swine? Public relations and nothing else!

SKS: As fall begins, we anticipate that even more communities may be affected than those that saw cases this past spring and summer.

REL: Again I ask you, Secretary, based on exactly, precisely, what?”

SKS: In addition, communities may be more severely affected, reflecting wider transmission and causing potentially greater impact.

REL: I am afraid I have to ask again, based on what? You say that communities may be more severely affected, but the truth is that they may also be less severely affected. Where do you get your crystal ball serviced, Madam Secretary? Could it be the same place that Novartis used when they decided to patent a vaccine for the Swine Flu in 2008 when CDC and WHO declare that this is a novel, never-before-seen virus which arose, de novo, like Athena from the forehead of Zeus, in April, 2009? Could the same shop be servicing Baxter’s decision-making Magic 8 Ball so that they were able to apply for a patent for a Swine Flu vaccine in 2007? If so, Madam Secretary, this crystal ball is a national treasure and should be made available to “We the People of These United States.”

SKS: Seasonal influenza viruses may cause illness concurrently with 2009 H1N1 this fall and winter and it will not be possible to determine quickly if ill individuals have 2009 H1N1 influenza, seasonal influenza, or other respiratory conditions based on symptoms alone.

REL: It may. Or, then again, it may not. There is no hard data on which to make these predictions and the consequences of these predictions, including vaccines are dangerous and unwarranted by any level of fact or reality. I repeat, there is simply no hard data, or at least none that you have presented on your websites, public statements, press releases or here today.

SKS: It is also difficult to predict the severity of the disease that we will see in the coming months from either 2009 H1N1 or seasonal influenza.

REL: Right again, Madam Secretary. So why poison the populace for something whose dreadful menace did not materialize and is not showing any signs of materializing. In fact, its dreadful menace is a lot like the bogyman under the bed: a product of your big brother’s desire to scare you witless so that you will do whatever he says. The parallel is uncanny.

SKS: Influenza is an unpredictable disease and we know that things will change and we will learn more throughout the fall.

REL: So unpredictable, in fact, that seasonal flu vaccines are accurate less than 40% of the time although the toxins injected (mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, foreign protein, MSG, etc., fluoride, etc.) are toxic 100% of the time and become more so with more shots, which are increasingly r4commended by conflict-of-interest-laden ACIP (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) and others of their stripe. By the way, Secretary Sebelius, what is your financial interest in the medical and pharmaceutical industries?

SKS: Shared Responsibility and Science-Based Guidance Slowing the spread and reducing the impact of H1N1…

REL: From nothing to nothing?

SKS: …and seasonal flu is a shared responsibility…

REL: Exactly what does that mean? There is no meaningful impact from H1N1, but there certainly will be from yet another round of vaccines, even if those vaccines are, as falsely stated, but a strain change variation on a theme. Children vaccinated with attenuated live virus vaccines, specifically influenza vaccines, are many times more likely to be admitted to hospitals for all causes, many times more likely to develop serious asthma, etc. There is nothing trivial about influenza shots but, with the guidance of ACIP they are increasingly passed out as if they were either safe or effective. In fact they are neither and, if it is merely a strain change variation, then H1N1 is also neither safe nor effective. It it is a novel vaccine for a novel virus, it is clearly neither safe nor effective since it has never had any safety testing concluded. Were such safety testing to show that it were not safe or effective, then the sales and administration of it would pierce the veil of liability free manufacture, distribution and use which the Federal government has accorded to itself, its agents and to the manufacturers and distributors of these dangerous vaccines as we.. It is therefore in the ir best interest not to have any safety data (or data showing the lack of safety).

SKS: …and we all need to plan for what would need to be done when the flu impacts our community, school, business or home this fall.

REL: When? Shouldn’t the word be “IF” or “just in case” or “In the unlikely chance that it might, given the lack of evidence that it can”?

SKS: Given that flu already is circulating in the United States this fall, it’s important for every American family and business to prepare their own household and business plans and think through the steps they will have to take if a family member or co-worker contracts the flu.

REL: Tuberculosis is also circulating this fall. So are impetigo, gonorrhea, athlete’s foot, head lice and zits. Is the US Government offering a TARP bailout, at the expense of our lives, to the the very wealthy, very powerful Pharmaceutical Industry?

SKS: CDC has provided specific recommendations for what individuals, communities, clinicians, and other professionals can do.

REL: In the face of trivial disease, if it indeed exists in community distribution, for which there is no evidence that has forensic or scientific credibility, these common sense wash-yours-hands, cover your mouth and nose when you sneeze recommendations are more than sufficient the help out a perfectly unthreatened population. My mother taught me that, too, and it sufficed.

SKS: Individuals can take actions to prevent respiratory infections. We emphasize frequent hand-washing as an effective way to reduce transmission of disease. It is very important for sick individuals to stay at home,

REL: Really? Do employers know that and do they refrain from docking them?

SKS: and for parents to keep children who have a fever or flu-like illness home from school, childcare, the playground, or other places children gather.

REL: Flu is not necessarily Swine Flu.

SKS: Similarly, sick individuals should not get on an airplane or any public transport.

REL:This benign-sounding provision will result in persons who have not been vaccinated being denied boarding privileges on public transport in the United States unless we stop this medical fascism now. There is already talk of stainless steel RFID chipped bracelets at state trooper checkpoints. Where accurate or not, this suggestion illustrates how easily this type of tyranny would be to install. Tyrannical control never presents itself as that. it always wants to help, to take care of, to protect you. This process of constitutional abrogation, so well advanced at the state and federal levels, is receiving another set of supporting members in this document, Madam Secretary, and in this dangerous and unwarranted approval.

SKS: Taking personal responsibility for these things will help reduce the spread of this new virus as well as other respiratory illnesses.

We have issued new guidance from the CDC on www.flu.gov for schools, child care settings, colleges and universities, and large and small businesses that also includes strategies for preventing the spread of flu, especially in the early fall when the 2009 H1N1 vaccine will not yet be ready. These comprehensive guidelines provide advice on how individuals and institutions can guard against the flu and mitigate its spread. The CDC also has issued guidance for healthcare providers about appropriate use of anti-viral drugs to treat patients who are at highest risk from complications from the seasonal and 2009 H1N1 flu.

REL: These guidelines offer dangerous pharmacological usage practices which, like the vaccine approval itself, is not supported by science. In fact, the science of the antivirals suggests very strongly that they should not be used and their use, while increasing the liklihood of serious complications and death, does little or nothing to shorten or minimize the severity of the purported “Swine Flu” infection. Remember, it can only be purported because the laboratory testing is not being done, based on the recommendations of the CDC and W.H.O. Why? Because the testing is so inaccurate. Therefore any suggestion about incidence, prevalence or impact is mere fantasy. Tamiflu and Relenza have not been shown to bring about positive outcomes in this diagnostic fantasy matrix, in fact, quite the contrary.

SKS: Additional work is being done on critical guidelines to address infection control and worker safety in healthcare settings. Our recommendations and action plans are based on the best scientific information…

REL: Please refer to what I have said above and my comments below, Madam Secretary.

SKS: …available to help our nation respond aggressively and effectively to the 2009 H1N1 virus.

REL: This may sound awfully familiar by now, Madam Secretary, but why? Where is the justification for aggressive action or the demonstration that effective action is not achieved by the “Personal responsibility” suggestions and by the protection of the collective immune system through avoiding junk foods, chemicals, GMOs and other health degradation substances and processes permitted by your agency, the same FDA which is now so sanctimoniously declaring its benign intent here?

In fact, the same FDA has literally criminalized communications which offer non-vaccine, non-drug options to prevent, treat, mitigate or cure the Swine Flu. It is hard to see how the FDA is working to help our nation respond aggressively and effectively to anything except the need to make the population docile, obedient, sick and profitable in its chronic illness.

SKS: We are working to ensure that Americans are informed and consistently updated with information in clear language. This is a dynamic situation, but it is essential that the American people are fully engaged so they can be part of the response.

REL: Really? To my mind, being fully engaged would require clear, accurate information and, I am very much afraid that your testimony makes it clear that the intention of the FDA is to provide anything but that. You are providing information in easily understood words, but it is distorted and dangerous. If your FDA were interested in that goal, it would be offering abundant information on nutrition, antioxidants, homeopathy, Foods, nutrients, nano silver and supplements designed to support the immune system.

SKS: The federal government, particularly the CDC, will be conducting weekly and, when necessary, daily briefings that will be available at flu.gov to get critical information out to the American people.

Vaccination Campaign The federal government is also preparing for a voluntary national vaccination campaign for the 2009 H1N1 virus starting in October.

REL:The Federal Government has backed off from its earlier stance for mandatory vaccination, which was articulated by HHS on July 23, 2008 and by DHS on the following day in advisory communications.

SKS: With unprecedented speed, we have completed key steps in the vaccine development process — we have characterized the virus, identified a candidate strain, expedited manufacturing, and performed clinical trials.

REL: Clinical trials have not been performed. Brief dose response trials have been initiated, is some cases not even completed before this authorization.

SKS: The speed of this vaccine development was possible due to the investments made through ASPR/BARDA over the past six years in advanced research and development and infrastructure building.

REL: How convenient!

SKS: One-hundred ninety-five (195) million doses of H1N1 vaccine have been purchased from five manufacturers by the U.S. government.

REL:Vaccines have already been purchased, BEFORE their approval? That makes their approval sound very much as if it were pre arraigned. Why the haste? Why the collusion? Your agency declared a national state of health emergency on April 25, 2009, just 11 days after the first so-called death from the so-called novel virus in Mexico. A level 6 pandemic was declared on June 11, just shy of 2 months after the first alleged death. The death toll was reduced in Mexico from 168 to 16, a percentage decrease in mortality of 90.5%. This miracle of biblical proportions was not only ignored, but the decrease in observed mortality was apparently not factored into the response of either WHO or FDA.

SKS: Two types of vaccine will be available: vaccine made from killed virus for injection (flu shot) and vaccine with live, weakened virus administered by nasal spray.

REL: Madam Secretary, our information is that this is simply not correct. We have been informed that there is more than one inactivated live virus preparation. We are checking this out now.

SKS: The vaccines are being manufactured by the same methods used for the production of the seasonal flu vaccines administered every year.

REL: I am afraid that this is simply not true. Conventional influenza vaccines are cultured in eggs. Cell based, rather than egg based, vaccines are not the norm and are not just a simple “strain change” variation of the same old vaccine. MF59, and oil and water adjuvant, is not the norm. The virus is said by both WHO and FDA to be unpredictable and to be a totally novel virus. In that case, there is no possibility that all approved vaccines are merely strain change variations on a well proven, but not particularly safe, theme. FDA can only have it one way or the other, but not both, Madam Secretary.

SKS: NIH is conducting a series of clinical trials on the vaccine to determine the safety and number of doses needed to induce a protective immune response.

REL: Safety trials will not, according to the FDA< be completed until June, 2010. Approval of the novel vaccines before that point constitutes irresponsible dereliction of duty at the very least. Since full disclosure and informed consent are not possible under the conditions of secrecy which prevail in these tests, it is possible that they are illegal and that they constitute crimes against humanity.

SKS: Trials in healthy adults and the elderly began in the first week of August. Complete immune response data from the first trials—those studying two doses in healthy adults—are expected in late October.

REL: The approval of 5 different vaccines was announced today, September 15, 2009. There is no possibility that even the preliminary dosage trials in healthy adults have been completed. No trials in immuno compromised or suppressed people, vaccine injured persons, infants, people with atopic disorders like asthma, eczema, egg allergies, organ transplant recipients, cancer chemotherapy patients or those on steroids, etc., have been conducted. No safety information exists to guide usage or administration. This is consistent with the lack of information which would pierce the veil of liability protection as mentioned before.

SKS: Preliminary data indicate that the vaccines are safe

REL: What preliminary data. Is that sufficient to jeopardize the health of a nation for a non existent threat of a disease?

SKS: and that a single 15-microgram dose induces what is likely to be a protective immune response in healthy adults between the ages of 18 and 64.

REL: We should note that no one says that the dose will be protective since vaccines have never been shown to be protective of diseases for which they are administered. Not a single double blind, placebo controlled study on this question has ever been done. But the antibody production generated by vaccines is assumed, not know, to provide protection. Given the dangerous nature of these novel vaccines for a novel virus, don’t ou think, Madam Secretary, that more information about the conclusive results of carefully designed safety testing, with fully informed consent, would be in order before these vaccines were approved?

SKS: For adults aged 65 and over, the preliminary data indicate that the immune response to the 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine is somewhat less robust, as is the case with seasonal influenza vaccine.

REL: And there is no intermediate or long term safety data on the adjuvanted vaccines whatsoever since no adjuvanted vaccine has ever been approved before in the US. the only two adjuvanted vaccines available in Europe are for patients on dialysis, whose immune function is so suppressed that they are deemed to need the extra “punch” of the squalene adjuvant and, according tot he controlling agency, have such a reduced life span that they are not expected to live long enough to develop side effects and complications from the vaccine and Cervavax, GSK’s competitor to Garadsil, the HPV vaccine.
Parents who continue to state that their daughters were either killed by, or seriously damaged by Cervavax administration are being warned that if they continue to disseminate that information their children will be taken from them.

The suggestions in this data is that although dangerous, the danger is being hidden. Without a good deal of further clarification, the approval of adjuvanted vaccines, or the potential administration of adjuvants by themselves or mixed with unadjuvanted vaccines, as being discussed now by CDC, makes the purchase some months ago of nearly $1/2 billion worth of squalene adjuvants make sense in the limited fashion that injecting a a known poison into large number of humans might be said to make sense.

Squalene, when injected into animals, causes such severe auto immune illness that its use is standard in laboratories where the induction of such disease is desired for research purposes. In that context, it is named after the scientist who discovered that it had that impact and is known as “Freund’s Adjuvant.

SKS: Trials in children began in mid-August, and trials in pregnant women have just begun.

REL:Does that mean that approval for the use of these vaccines for unrestricted use is based on …what? Certainly not science or data.

SKS: Our expectation is that vaccine will be a good match for the virus currently circulating in the United States based on intensive monitoring of the virus.

REL: But the expectation of the FDA and WHO for a “good match” between a circulating influenza virus and the next season’s disease is wrong well over 70% of the time. Secretray Sebelius, you and your Staff’s expectations are less than compelling. The regular administration of the seasonal flu vaccine that ACIP and CDC, both units of FDA, recommend year after year has been shown to increase the incidence of Alzheimer’s Disease by more than 600% while its accuracy in predictng which virus will be circulating is less than 30%.
FDA standards are not very high: according to your official website, the H1N1 vaccine will be considered a success if the anticipated antibody titer response (1:40) is found in 28% of the population. That means that these vaccines are being approved even if the number of people who do not show a robust laboratory antibody response (which is not associated with protection) is as high as 72%. So the risks of these vaccines are not accounted for and the efficacy is not required.

Furthermore, FDA has announced that the unadjuvanted vaccine, the strain change variety, is expected, under the best case scenario, to kill at least 30,000 people. The number who are expected to be maimed and crippled by this is not specified on the offical FDA website. If the 1976 disaster, which Secretary Sebelius says the FDA is looking to for guidance, is any indication, we can expect at least a thousand people sickened and crippled for each person who dies from the Vaccine. The math is hardly conducive to confidence in the FDA.

SKS: We are coordinating this 2009 H1N1 vaccination campaign with the seasonal influenza vaccination campaign, and are working hard with state and local authorities and the clinical community to address the challenges this presents.

From what we know as of today, 2009 H1N1 virus preferentially affects a population different from that affected by seasonal flu. In particular, this virus is infecting more young people including children, younger adults and pregnant women.

REL: What is this data based upon, given the lack of diagnostic specificity and the fact that symptoms are not distinguishable from all other types of colds or flus?

SKS: Typically these groups, particularly young children and pregnant women, are at greater risk of serious complications from any influenza, including the 2009 H1N1.

REL: Again I must ask, Secretary Sebelius, without diagnosis, how can that be ascertainined?

SKS: CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended on July 29 providing initial doses of the new H1N1 vaccine to five groups—approximately 159 million people.

REL: That is over one half of the entire population of the US. Wouldn’t it be more prudent, given that there is no legitimate health emergency, to not vaccinate more than half of the country, specifically the most vulnerable half, with an untested, unnecessary and uninsurable group of vaccines?

SKS: CDC endorsed these recommendations.

REL: Rather than reassuring me, this seems to me to be a clear cause for an overhaul of FDA and CDC with the possibility of criminal charges being investigated.

SKS: These groups are:
pregnant women,
people who live with or care for children younger than 6 months of age,
health care and emergency services personnel,
persons between the ages of 6 months through 24 years of age, and
people from ages 25 through 64 years who are at higher risk for novel H1N1.

REL: Note your use of the term “Novel”, Secretary Sebelius. As stated above, that precludes the claim that these vaccines are mere strain change variations on a well-worn theme.

SKS: because of chronic health disorders like asthma and diabetes or compromised immune systems.

REL: These are the very groups to whom squalene is the most dangerous and the crops to whom contaminates like leukemia-causing virus SV40, found in the line of monkey kidney cells that the Novartis Vaccine has been cultured.

SKS: The H1N1 virus is particularly dangerous to healthy women who are pregnant. Not only has this virus caused greater numbers of pregnant women to be hospitalized, it has also been fatal in a higher percentage of this population than in other affected groups.

REL: Does squalene cross the placenta. Does it damage the fetus? In what way? At what age? It is known that mercury does cross the placenta and does damage the Fetus. Yet the CDC is advising women to take the H1N1 vaccine(s) regardless of whether it has the preservative known as “Thimerisol” (49.6% mercury by weight). No mention has been made of the dangers of aluminum adjuvants, nor of the fact that polysorbate 80 (also called “Tween 80) is associated with infertility when injected?

SKS: The federal government will be working in partnership with states, territories, tribes, and local communities as well as the private sector to help distribute and administer the new H1N1 vaccine. Thanks to support from Congress, the federal government has allocated $1.444 billion for states and hospitals to support planning and preparation efforts. TARP AGAIN.

The large scale 2009 H1N1 vaccine program will begin mid-October with small amounts of vaccine becoming available the first full week in October. The vaccine itself will be available free of charge to the American people, but some public and private providers may charge an administration fee. It will be distributed to providers and state health departments in a manner similar to how federally purchased vaccines are distributed in the Vaccines For Children program. The CDC and states will work with a contractor to get vaccine to where it needs to go. The number of doses shipped will be reported to the CDC daily, and the number of doses administered will be reported to the CDC weekly.

REL: Where will the adverse relations be reported for the general public to track?

SKS: The fact that vaccine won’t begin distribution until October makes preventing the spread of flu even more critical. Again, we need to remind all Americans about the things they should be doing right now: washing hands, staying home if you’re sick, and taking the necessary precautions to stay healthy and avoid getting sick. Flu.gov has good tips for what you need to do to avoid getting the flu.

While the 2009 H1N1 flu virus has been the focus of attention since the spring, it is important that we do not forget the risks posed by the seasonal flu viruses. More than 36,000 people die each year from complications associated with the flu.

REL: This statistic is totally false and misleading. About 600 people per year from the complications of influenza, but marketing concerns have created this oft-repeated number from which bears little relationship to reality as the swine flu case numbers or death numbers.

SKS: CDC continues to recommend vaccination against seasonal influenza viruses, especially for all infants, children, and people at greater risk for influenza complications. Seasonal flu vaccine already is becoming available in many places.

It is not too early to get a seasonal flu shot as soon as it is available. The protection you get from the vaccine will not wear off before the flu season is over.

REL: There is no evidence that the seasonal flu strain in the vaccines is the one circulating but there is considerable evidence that the vaccines are dangerous, despite insistent government and industry denial.

SKS: Closing Remarks – At HHS, we are simultaneously working hard to understand and control this outbreak…

REL: What outbreak? See above.

SKS: …while also keeping the public and the Congress fully informed about the situation and our response. We are working in close collaboration with our federal partners as well as with other organizations with unique expertise that helps us provide guidance for multiple sectors of our economy and society. It is important to recognize that there have been enormous efforts in the United States and abroad to prepare for this kind of an outbreak and a pandemic.

REL: One would have to wonder why.

SKS: Our nation’s current preparedness is a direct result of the investments and support of the Congress and the hard work of state and local officials across the country. While we must remain vigilant throughout this and subsequent outbreaks, it is important to note that at no time in our nation’s history have we been more prepared to face this kind of challenge.

REL: Or more over-prepared to face a challenge which does exist.

SKS: But the government cannot solve this alone and, as I have noted, all of us must take constructive steps. Taking all of those reasonable measures will help us mitigate how many people actually get sick in our country.

We look forward to working closely with the Congress to best address the situation as it evolves in the weeks and months ahead. Again, Mr. Chairman, thank you for the opportunity to participate in this conversation with you and your colleagues. I look forward to taking your questions.

REL: Thank you Madam Secretary. I do think you have told us quite enough disinformation.

Categories : Activism, Avian Flu, Blog / Vlog, Compulsory Drugging, Disinformation, Events, Get Involved, Hall of Shame, Medical Hazards, Miscellaneous, Privacy, RFID Chipping, The Law & CODEX, Vaccination
Tags : Autism, Avian Flu, Big Pharma, Biosecurity, Bird Flu, cancer, Codex Alimentarius, Compulsory Drugging, Compulsory Vaccination, Dietary Supplements, Disinformation, Dr. Rima, FDA, Food Safety, GMOs, health freedom, Health Hazards, International Decade of Nutrition, Mandatory Vaccination, medical hazards, mercury, Natural Solutions Foundation, NSF, Pandemic, Pandemic Flu, Pandemic Swine Flu, Rima E. Laibow MD, Self Quarantine, Self-Qurantine Action Item, Self-Shielding, Swine Flu, Vaccination, Vaccinations, Vaccine Dangers, vaccines, Valley of the Moon, Valley of the Moon Coffee

Vaccine Violations – It’s The Vaccines, Stupid!”

By Administrator on September 8, 2009 No Comments

Natural Solutions Foundation The Voice of Global Health Freedom (TM)
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
href=”http://www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org”>www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org< Autism up injections
Action Steps to Take Once For Each Member of Your Household:
Tell Lawmakers You Want a REAL Choice, Not “Take the vaccine or face incarceration!“http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27275
Support Citizens Petition to Prevent FDA from Approving Swine Flu Vaccines Before Safety Testing, Individuals Sign Here:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27791

Support Citizens Petition to Prevent FDA from Approving Swine Flu Vaccines Before Safety Testing, Organizations Sign Here: http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27793

Donate: http://drrimatruthreports.com/?page_id=189
Support Court Challenge to Prevent FDA from Approving Swine Flu Vaccines Before Safety Testing is Complete (July 2010) -make your recurring tax deductible donation ending in the number “6” to earmark it for the legal fund

Make your recurring tax deductible donation ending in any other number to support the Natural Solutions Foundation

Today there was a treat and a terror in my email box: a new article from William Engdahl. A treat, because William Engdahl is one of my heroes. I do not know whether to admire him most as a writer who researches or a researcher who writes. Looked at either way, however, he is an honest and fearless man whose works tell us what we need to know – and what the self-anointed elite does not want us to know. And they do so with passion, clarity but without the faintest hint of panic or hysteria.

A terror because of the subject: mercury and aluminum in our babies and our own bodies through the mechanism of vaccination. You have heard it before: mercury and aluminum are neurotoxins. The restatement of this information in the context of a clear and focused historical and scientific review of just what we are talking about when we talk about mercury, aluminum and autism. It must be read and shared.

There are a few more facts which help to frame the cataclysmic disaster called “Vaccine Injury”, which is by no means limited to children. Think for a moment of healthy young men and women in coma, developing demyelinating neurological disorders like MS, ALS (now seen in children and adolescents for the first time in history as a new disease called “Juvenile ALS, but only in girls and women who have received Gardasil), diabetes, encephalitis, meningitis, persistent and debilitating rashes, swollen, painful joints everywhere in the body, brain fog, memory loss, depression, loss of IQ, lupus and other auto immune disorders, Alzheimer’s Disease, etc.

They Would Have Died Anyway

Let’s start with the origins of Thimerisol, which is 49.6% mercury by weight. Mercury is more toxic by far to tissues, including the brain, than lead.

It was patented by Eli Lilly, a so called “ethical” drug company (so named because they sell patented medicines) in the 1920s. In 1930, it was administered IV to 22 meningococcal meningitis patients, all of whom were in coma. All 22 patients died.

Eli Lilly, an “ethical” drug company, concluded that Thimerisol was safe because although all patients died, none showed any adverse response to the injected Thimerisol since they WOULD HAVE DIED FROM OTHER CAUSES ANYWAY. Therefore, none died from Thimerisol and it was deemed to be safe. When the FDA was founded, this information was presented to it and accepted. Thimerisol was grandfathered into use. The FDA, always compliant to the desires of industry, bought the insane logic of the “ethical” drug company, to the endless tragedy of our children, our elders and ourselves. This horrific substance is added to our vaccines as a “preservative”.

As a simple side thought, if vaccine manufacturing were strictly clean and sterile, not careless, contaminated and dirty, why would a preservative be necessary? Thimerosal was subsequently introduced for use in vaccines and in over the counter remedies as a preservative to kill bacteria in the product without any additional safety testing of any kind since it had been “grandfathered”. The 1930 study, in which every patient died, remains the only safety testing done on the substance even after being in use for over 84 years.

Aluminum is added to vaccines in order to irritate the immune system and increase the production of antibodies which are ASSUMED to be associated with immune competence with respect to the disease entity on which the vaccine is focused. No compelling (or even non-compelling) scientific evidence exists which demonstrates that this type of antibody production is associated with protection from the disease. In fact, virtually every epidemic in modern times has occurred in fully vaccinated populations.
Aluminum is neurotoxic and is strongly associated with the epidemic of a previously unknown type of dementia which will impact more than half of those who reach the age of 80: Alzheimer’s Disease.

When combined with fluoride, also added to many vaccines, the two toxic metals are strongly synergistic, increasing the neurotoxicity of the other substance by many times, creating a much higher level of impact than either one alone could produce. Since nearly everyone in the US drinks fluoridated water and brushes their teeth with fluoride-containing toothpaste, even without added injected fluoride, the synergistic potential is both untested and very frightening.

These metals are not the only toxins found in vaccines, but they are, individually and in combination, enough to create the public health and private home tragedies which can be laid directly at the feet of Big Pharma and criminal regulators.

Please disseminate this blog as widely as possible with full attribution AND with the Action Items above: they are vital to our ability to stay unvaccinated, all of us, with the new and much deadlier Swine Flu vaccines. Safety testing, if you can call it that, will not be completed until July of 2010. Yet the WHO and FDA (CDC is part of FDA) are rushing to vaccinate our precious children, pregnant women and the chronically ill with a vaccine containing aluminum, mercury AND a million times more squalene than the wildly toxic anthrax Vaccine A which caused the horrific, and frequently lethal, Gulf War Syndrome in hundreds of thousands of Gulf War vets and is still causing the same damage in our soldiers now.

Despite that, the Department of Defense, Governor after Governor and employer after employer are making these untested vaccines mandatory even while the President and Secretary Sebelius of Health and Human Services intone solemnly that vaccinations will be “voluntary”, defining “voluntary” as one option of a pair of options which offer you the unsafe, untested, unnecessary and uninsurable vaccine, all liability for which both the government and the manufacturers have been relieve of in a convenient legislative and regulatory pirouette. The other option is involuntary internment or incarceration, as the public documents from Iowa, Florida, North Carolina and other states makes clear is already being prepared for you. Indeed, “vaccine refusers” in Massachusetts may, under a pending law, be liable to fines of $1000 per day for refusing to be vaccinated AND jailed for up to 30 days [Per day of refusal? For all days of refusal? – REL]

So, indeed, “it IS the Vaccines, Stupid!” as William Engdahl tells the FDA, the media and the rest of the deaf establishment.

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
Valley of the Moon(TM) Eco Demonstration Project
www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org
Valley of the Moon GMO and Toxin Free Coffee
www.ValleyoftheMoonCoffee.org
www.Organics4U.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMarketPlace.org

It’s The Vaccines Stupid!”

F. William Engdahl
Global Research
September 6, 2009

Part I: Evidence Linking Autism Rise in Children to Vaccinations

The WHO and US Government CDC are escalating a public psychological
conditioning to create hysteria and panic among an uninformed public about an
alleged “virus” H1N1 Influenza A, aka Swine Flu, whose alleged effects to
date appear comparable with a common cold. Before people line up in the
streets demanding their vaccinations for their children and themselves, it
would be wise to remember, to paraphrase a 1992 campaign statement of Bill
Clinton to George H.W. Bush: “It’s the vaccination, Stupid!”

By countless scientific accounts, far more dangerous to human health than any
reported incidences of Swine Flu are the dangers of severe health issues
including paralysis, brain damage and even death arising from what is added to
vaccines by virtually every major vaccine maker. Almost without exception, all
commercial vaccines today contain various substances known as adjuvants
designed to make the vaccine “work.” These adjuvants are the source of
horrendous and sometimes deadly damage.

It has been speculated for some time that there might be a link in the
alarming rise in cases of autism among tiny infants and children and massive
multiple vaccinations today given routinely to infants and children from the
first hours of birth. There is clear and
shocking evidence of the link between the two. If you do not have a strong
constitution, you are advised not to read further.

A new study shows a direct link between standard childhood vaccination series,
MMR, and autism-like symptoms in monkeys. The principal scientist involved in
the study, Dr. Laura Hewitson of the University of Pittsburgh, presented the
alarming conclusions as an abstract pending publication at the International
Meeting for Autism Research. It has been presented at scientific conferences
in both London and Seattle, USA.

The study compared vaccinated macaque monkeys with non-vaccinated macaques. No
major flaws in the study have been revealed by any attending scientist. The
vaccines included the popular MMR series. The study found a marked increase in
“gastrointestinal tissue gene expression” and “inflammation issues”
with those monkeys which received vaccinations. They are a common symptom of
children with regressive autism.

The study also found marked behavior changes and development differences in
those monkeys given the vaccines versus those who were not. “Compared with
unexposed animals, significant neuro-developmental deficits were evident for
exposed animals in survival reflexes, tests of color discrimination and
reversal, and learning sets,” the study`s authors reported. “Differences
in behaviors were observed between exposed and unexposed animals and within
the exposed group before and after MMR vaccination.”

US Government-mandated research approved by Congress was t
o begin this year, but the funds were rescinded in early January. Claiming
“conflict of interest” because of ongoing court cases, the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a long-time supporter of infant
vaccinations, withdrew the research plans.

The most shocking of all is the recent and now common medical practice,
reinforced by an aggressive pharmaceutical industry, of giving multiple
vaccines, often virtually within hours of birth, to infants despite the fact
that no study including all of the vaccine series commonly given to children
in the US and UK, about 30 in all, has been conducted until now. The practice
of newborn multiple vaccinations has become widespread in Germany and other EU countries over the past decade. Significantly there have surfaced reports of dramatically increased instances of autism in newborn and infants in various German hospitals over the past decade, precisely the period multiple
vaccinations of newborn and infants has become routine.

US Government coverup

Tragically, the US Government agency theoretically entrusted with guarding
public health, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as with the case of
health dangers of GMO foods, as well with the dramatic evidence of the link
between autism and adjuvants used in typical vaccines, is accepting the
argument of big and politically powerful Pharmaceutical companies.

The Food and Drug Administration considers vaccines safe but, just as with
GMO, they have done no studies into the effects of multiple vaccinations as given in the common childhood series which started in the 1990s in
the USA and spread to the UK and now across the EU.

According to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., son of the late Attorney General and an
attorney active in campaigning to expose mercury (Thimerosal) and other
toxicity dangers in vaccines, recently stated, “as autism is a behavioral
affliction rather than a precisely defined biological injury —
epidemiological studies are critical to establishing its causation. But the
greatest source of epidemiological data is the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD)
— the government maintained medical records of hundreds of thousands of
vaccinated children — which Health and Human Services Department has gone to great lengths to keep out of the hands of plaintiffs’ attorneys and
independent scientists…The raw data collected in the VSD would undoubtedly
provide the epidemiological evidence needed to understand the relationship
between vaccines and autism. The absence of such studies makes it easy for
judges to say to plaintiffs they have not met
their burden of proving causation.”

Autism was virtually unknown in the United States until 1943 when it was
diagnosed and identified eleven months after Thimerosal, a mercury-based
vaccine “adjuvant” was first added to baby vaccines along with various
aluminum compounds in the United States. Thimerosal is often used to stem
fungi and bacterial growth in vaccines despite massive evidence of its severe
effects as a potent neurotoxin. Following independent studies, Russia, Japan, Austria, Denmark, Sweden and Britain have banned Thimerisol from children’s vaccines. Germany to date has no such ban. The toxin was developed in 1930 by Eli Lilly. Tragically in 1991, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary the US Government’s Center for Disease Control (CDC), the same agency fueling the current hysteria over the non-proven H1N1 Swine Flu virus danger, recommended that infants be injected with a series of mercury-containing vaccines in some cases within 24 hours of birth for Hepatitis B and two months for diphtheria-tetanus- pertussis.

Before 1989 US pre-school children received eleven vaccinations— polio,
diphtheria-tetanus- pertussis, measles-mumps- rubella (MMR). By 1999, because of the various CDC recommendations, the number of vaccinations was twenty two before first grade of school. Parallel with this explosive rise in
vaccinations of the very young in the United States, according to Kennedy, the
rate of autism among children. The state of Iowa reported a 700% increase in
autism in children beginning in the 1990’s and along with California has
banned mercury in vaccines. Despite evidence, however the US FDA continues to allow drug makers to include Thimerosal in numerous over-the-counter
non-prescription medications as well as steroids and injected collagen. The US
Government ships vaccines preserved with Thimerosal to numerous developing
countries as well, where some are reporting sudden explosion of autism rates
as well. In China,20where autism was unknown before introduction of Thimerosal by US drug makers in 1999, press reports indicate there are almost two million autistic children.

Instances of autism in the US exploded as some 40 million children were
injected during the 1990’s with Thimerisol-based vaccines, giving them
unprecedented accumulations of mercury poison. The level of ethylmercury in a
vaccine routinely given then to children of two months age was 99 times
greater than the US Government’s daily limit for exposure. As with the
current WHO pandemic declaration around H1N1 Swine Flu, the CDC Vaccine
Advisory Committee is filled with scientists with close ties to the
pharmaceutical industry. Dr. Sam Katz, chairman of the committee was a paid
consultant to most companies producing the vaccines he “recommended.”

The aluminum danger remains

While vaccines available in the US today exist with no Thimerosal (50%
mercury), virtually all vaccines still contain aluminum, which has been linked
to impaired neurological development in children. Aluminum has not replaced
thimerosal as a vaccine preservative; it has always been used in vaccines.

In the recent past, most US children got exposed to both thimerosal and
aluminum simultaneously with the hepatitis B, Hib, DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus
and pertussis) and pneumococcal vaccines. Combining mercury with aluminum
increases the likelihood that the mercury will damage human tissue.

According to a recent report by Michael Wagnitz, an American chemist, “Currently eight childhood vaccines that contain aluminum ranging from 125 to 850micrograms (mcg). These vaccines are administered 17 times in the first 18months of life, an almost six-fold increase compared to the vaccine schedule
of the 1980s.”

Wagnitz adds, “According to the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral
Nutrition, based on IV feeding solutions, a child should not exceed a maximum
daily dose of 5 mcg of aluminum per kilogram of weight per day. That means if
a child weighs 11 pounds, the child should not exceed 25 mcg in a day. This
level was determined to be the maximum safety limit based on a study publishedin the New England Journal of Medicine titled “Aluminum Neurotoxicity in Preterm Infants Receiving Intravenous Feeding Solutions.”

The hepatitis B vaccine, administered at birth, contains 250 mcg.

In a 1996 policy statement, “Aluminum Toxicity in Infants and Children,”
the American Academy of Pediatrics states, “Aluminum can cause neurological
harm. People with kidney disease who build up bloodstream levels of aluminum
greater than 100 mcg per liter are at risk of toxicity. The toxic threshold of
aluminum in the bloodstream may be lower than 100 mcg per liter.” What level
of aluminium toxicity is contained in vaccines routinely given German, French
and other children n the EU is not known. It might be time for a public demand
for such information to be disclosed, and before governments launch mass
vaccination campaigns for untested vaccines against a non-proven H1N1 Swine Flu threat.

Categories : Activism, Autism, Blog / Vlog, Compulsory Drugging, Disinformation, Get Involved, Medical Hazards, Pandemic Threats, Privacy, Self Quarantine, Self-Shield, Vaccination
Tags : Big Pharma, Bird Flu, Compulsory Drugging, Dr. Rima, FDA, Health, health freedom, Health Hazards, Mandatory Vaccination, medical hazards, mercury, Natural Solutions Foundation, NSF, Pandemic, Pandemic Flu, Pandemic Swine Flu, Rima E. Laibow MD, Self Quarantine, Self-Qurantine Action Item, Self-Shielding, Swine Flu, Vaccination, Vaccinations, Vaccine Dangers, vaccines, Weaponized Avian Flu

Eugenics For You, Courtesy of the US Government

By Administrator on September 7, 2009 No Comments

Natural Solutions Foundation The Voice of Global Health Freedom (TM)
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
Take Action Once for Each Member of Your Household.
Say NO to Forced Vaccination or Quarantine Once for Each Member of Your Household: http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27275

Donate to Support Court Case Seeking to Bar FDA from Releasing Untested Swine Flu Vaccines with Squalene: http://drrimatruthreports.com/?page_id=189 Tax deductible donations ending in numeral “6” are earmarked for legal case. Don’t forget to make a second recurring donation to support Natural Solutions Foundation. We are 100% supporter supported and your help makes our work possible.

Join Citizens Petition Demanding Emergency Stay of Approval of Untested Pandemic Vaccines: Action item to Support the Citizens Petition, Individuals Sign Here:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27791

Action item to Support the Citizens Petition, Organizations Sign Here: http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27793

The police power of the state is a well established principle in the US Constitution. What happens when it is used to decide how to make the population healthier, or better, or smarter, or more desirable?

Fascism, both medical and non medical, is the inevitable result.

Many people do not know that the formal concept of Eugenics originated in the US with Stanford University professor Frances Galton, PhD and that it was enthusiastically championed by the select, unelected “masters” like John D. Rockefeller and the Harriman family. So successful were they in selling their loathsome idea that the perfection and purification of the human species could – and should – be accomplished at the discretion of the rulers of humanity, starting, of course, with themselves, that they sold the idea to numerous US State legislatures. The concept was upheld in the Supreme Court of the United States and then, once firmly established through legislation and practice, the idea was exported to Germany preceding the National Socialists. From there, it was enthusiastically embraced by the Nazis who modeled their eugenics laws and programs on the US ones, as the article below details.

Rockefeller set up and funded the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute (clearly long before the Nazis seized power) which was the “scientific” font of this burgeoning atrocity.
The results are history. Or are they?
Perhaps they are part of the current world view of the ruling elite.

The article which follows is of great importance and, although lengthy, is well work a careful read. The information about deadly and abortion-inducing vaccines is especially timely. Please share it with full attribution.

Equally important, please visit www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and take the important action steps related to making sure that you have the right to say NO to a squalene laced vaccine containing one million times more squalene than the devastating Vaccine A given to Gulf War Vets which made at least 25% of them devastatingly ill for the rest of their foreshortened lives.

You read that right. One Million Time More Squalene.

Please visit http://drrimatruthreports.com/?page_id=189 to make two tax deductible recurring donations: one, ending in the numeral “6” which will identify it as earmarked for the legal fund to bring a Court Case demanding a Stay to the FDA’s intended release of weaponized Swine Flu Pandemic Vaccines which have not had any safety testing on them completed. There are significant expenses with a Federal Court Case and we need your help in bringing this urgent request for an Emergency Temporary Restraining Order before the appropriate Court THIS WEEK. The second donation is to keep the Natural Solutions Foundation operating and serving you. We are 100% supporter supported and your donations are our lifeblood.

Here is the article. Read, enjoy, share, take action, donate.

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
Valley of the Moon(TM) Eco Demonstration Project
www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org
Valley of the Moon GMO and Toxin Free Coffee
www.ValleyoftheMoonCoffee.org
www.Organics4U.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMarketPlace.org
The Dark Side of Public Health

Maxwell J. Mehlman, J.D.

The history of public health efforts in the United States in many ways is a story of great accomplishment. In the 19th century, public health officials constructed urban water and sanitation systems to protect the public against filth. With the discovery of germs, they turned their attention to transmissible diseases and instituted measures to inspect and quarantine ships. The original name of the U. S. Public Health Service, in fact, was the “Marine Hospital Service.” (It became the Public Health Service in 1912.) In the late 19th century and early 20th century, public health authorities began mass inoculation programs. This culminated in the spectacular success of polio vaccination in the early 1950s.

Vaccinations were not universally applauded in the early 20th century, however, and one resident of Cambridge, Massachusetts, Henning Jacobson, sued the state public health department after he was fined $5 for refusing to be vaccinated against smallpox, and then jailed when he refused to pay the fine. The case, Jacobson v. Massachusetts,1 went all the way to the United States Supreme Court. Not only was this the first Supreme Court decision regarding the government’s public health powers but it still stands as the leading case acknowledging the scope of these powers.

The Court’s opinion, written by Justice Harlan, analogizes the public health power of the state to the power to defend itself against foreign attack, including requiring citizens to take up arms and risk “the chance of being shot down.” Harlan emphasizes that the common good takes precedence over the “wishes or convenience of the few.” The only constraints on the exercise of this broad public health power are that it may not be either “arbitrary or unreasonable” or “cruel and inhuman.” Accordingly, the opinion states that a person can refuse to be vaccinated if doing so “would seriously impair his health, or probably cause his death.” In the Court’s judgment, Henning Jacobson’s objection that he had had an adverse reaction to vaccination as a child did not meet that test. (Note that the grant of an exception to immunization would not mean that a potentially infected individual would be allowed to circulate freely among the population, since the public health authorities could quarantine the person indefinitely.)

The AIDS Crisis
The AIDS epidemic posed some difficult challenges for public health officials. This was not the first time that they had confronted a sexually transmitted disease (STD). In the early 20th century, the STD of concern was syphilis and the government’s actions were vigorous. During World War I, for example, 20,000 women believed to be at risk for spreading the disease (hence, the reason they were called “spreaders”) were incarcerated in government camps. In the mid-1930s, Surgeon General Thomas Parran developed the techniques of mandatory reporting of infected persons, partner notification and contact tracing that became staples of the public health armamentarium. By the end of World War II, all states required syphilis testing before a couple could obtain a marriage license. Most states repealed these laws in the 1980s but not before many people suffered severe anguish as a result of the 25% false positive rate of the test then in use.

In the early stages of the AIDS epidemic, even more draconian public health measures were proposed. In 1985, the legislatures of Colorado, Florida and Texas considered bills to ban HIV positive individuals from working as food handlers. Rev. Jerry Falwell called for all prostitutes to be placed in quarantine and a bill to that effect was introduced in the Colorado legislature. William F. Buckley called for universal HIV screening. In 1987, Illinois began requiring HIV testing for marriage licenses. (By the end of 1988, 159,000 people had been tested at a cost of $5.6 million. A total of 23 cases were detected.) Also in 1987, then-Vice President George Bush urged the nation to mandate universal HIV screening.

These calls for mandatory action were resisted by AIDS activists and some physicians. Quarantining individuals who engaged in high risk activities was deemed imprudent because it was known that a person could be infected with the HIV virus yet yield a negative test result because of a delay in seroconversion (the ability to detect antibodies to the virus in the blood). Thus, a person who was quarantined would have no way of proving that he or she was uninfected; quarantine, in effect, would have to be for life. The same seroconversion phenomenon bedeviled calls for mandatory testing of patients and prisoners after health care workers, law enforcement personnel or firefighters suffered accidental exposures. This led to an emphasis instead on universal precautions. Furthermore, the stigma attached to AIDS and the discrimination faced by those infected or at risk persuaded health policymakers that, in contrast to the use of mandatory reporting, partner notification and contact tracing that had been employed in the fight against syphilis in the 1930s, more people would obtain HIV testing if the tests were available on a voluntary, anonymous basis.

Yet many in the public health community chafed at anonymous testing, believing that it placed the public at unnecessary risk by tying the hands of public health officials when it came to tracking and preventing the spread of the disease. There were repeated calls to return to the old mandatory public health style of intervention. Gradually, this viewpoint gained support. In 1992, North Carolina public health officials called a halt to anonymous HIV testing, an action that was upheld by the Supreme Court of North Carolina in a case called ACT-UP Triangle v. Commissioner for Health Services.2 As of now, anonymous testing is banned in Alabama, Idaho, Iowa, Mississippi, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota and Tennessee.

What tipped the balance against voluntary, anonymous testing was the development of drug treatment. The FDA approved AZT in 1987, followed by protease inhibitors in 1995. Once these drugs became available, the chilling effect of the stigma or discrimination associated with identifiable reporting of positive HIV test results was deemed to be negated by an individual’s desire to be tested so that treatment could commence.

An indication of how far the nation has gone toward a mandatory public health model in its response to AIDS is the September, 2006, recommendation by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that identifiable, reportable HIV tests be made a part of “routine” medical testing. The CDC states that patients should be notified that they were about to be tested for HIV and given an opportunity to decline, but the CDC also states that physicians should not have to obtain specific informed consent for the testing. At the same time, the CDC did not specific what would count as adequate notice. Conceivably, it might be sufficient if HIV testing were merely listed among the series of other tests on a laboratory order form.

Still, the nation seems to have weathered the AIDS epidemic relatively successfully, without seriously weakening the public health system. The question is whether we will be as fortunate in responding to new challenges, especially the challenges posed by our growing knowledge of genetics and by the War on Terror. In order to understand exactly what is at stake, we need to revisit some less successful public health campaigns of the past.

Sickle Cell Screening
After a rapid, accurate genetic test for the sickle cell mutation was developed, a number of states mandated population screening. In some states, the screening was limited to African-Americans, who comprise about 8 to 10% of those who carry the mutation for the disease. In other states, testing was a prerequisite for public schooling. There was inadequate public education about the significance of a positive test ? result. Many who were merely carriers of the autosomal recessive gene thought that they actually had the disease. People who were homozygous for the mutation did not understand that the severity of the disease varied substantially from one individual to another. Eventually, most of the mandatory screening laws were repealed but not before many people suffered emotional distress and discrimination by insurers and employers.

And in case you thought that winning a Nobel prize for science equips you to make good public health policy, Linus Pauling, who did pioneering work in the late 1940s on the molecular basis for sickle cell disease, not only fully supported the screening laws but, in 1968, urged that every person who was revealed to be a carrier of the sickle cell trait should have an “S” tattooed on their foreheads so that they could avoid reproducing with another carrier.

The U.S. Public Health Service Experiment at Tuskegee

In 1932, the U.S. Public Health Service began a study of 410 African-American syphilitic men in rural Alabama. The purpose of the study was to follow the course of the untreated disease. Subjects were not informed what was wrong with them, and they were not treated, even in the 1950s after penicillin was recognized as standard, effective therapy. In fact, U.S. public health officials actively discouraged treatment by local physicians, the state health department and the army. Subjects were offered a $50 burial subsidy to stay in the study and in 1958 each survivor was given $25 and a certificate of appreciation.

The first paper describing the study appeared in the medical literature in 1936 and reports continued to be published through the 1960s. In 1969, a committee of the CDC reviewed the experiment and authorized it to continue. By the time the press exposed the study in 1972 and it was halted, only 74 men remained alive.

Eugenics
The year 2007 marks the 100th anniversary of the enactment of the first eugenic involuntary sterilization law in history. It may come as a surprise that this law was not passed by the Nazis but by the State of Indiana.

The term “eugenics” was coined in 1883 by Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin. In 1904, he defined it as “[t]he science which deals with all influences that improve the inborn qualities of a race; also with those that develop them to the utmost advantage.” Upon receiving a large gift from the wife of railroad magnate E. H. Harriman, a biology professor named Charles Davenport in 1905 established an organization called the Eugenics Record Office at Cold Spring Harbor, Long Island. (Ironically, this is now a center for genetic research and the home of Dr. James Watson, one of the discoverers of the structure of DNA.) In 1907, as mentioned above, the Indiana legislature authorized the compulsory sterilization of “confirmed criminals, idiots, imbeciles, and rapists” residing in a state institution, provided that a panel of one physician and two surgeons agreed that there was “no probability of improvement” and that it was “inadvisable” for the inmate to procreate.

Eugenics legislation really took off after Davenport hired an Iowa high school teacher by the name of Harry Loughlin to direct the Eugenics Record Office. Loughlin was a tireless advocate of eugenics and, by 1913, 14 states operated active compulsory sterilization programs. Supporters of these programs included many prominent progressives and social reformers. Between 1913 and 1918, a number of the state laws were held unconstitutional on various grounds (including lack of equal protection because they only applied to institutionalized persons; lack of adequate procedural safeguards; and cruel and unusual punishment). In response, Loughlin drafted a new model sterilization law.

One of the states that adopted the new language was Virginia. Under the provisions of the Virginia law, the state sterilized a woman named Carry Buck, who was institutionalized in the Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble Minded, and she then filed a lawsuit ostensibly to challenge the constitutionality of the statute. As legal historian Paul Lombardo discovered, the suit was a sham. Buck was given virtually no effective legal representation; her lawyer, as well as her supporting witnesses, had gotten together with the state officials to concoct the suit in order to convince the courts to uphold the new model law.

Like the earlier Jacobson case, the case of Buck v. Bell also made it all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court and, in 1927, Oliver Wendell Holmes, one of the most respected jurists in American history, upheld the law with the now infamous words:

We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, in order to prevent our being swamped with incompetence. It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes. Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11. Three generations of imbeciles are enough.

Decades later, Lombardo’s research showed that Buck had been institutionalized when she got pregnant after she had been raped by the nephew of the foster family she had been living with. Neither she, nor her mother or child, were “feeble-minded.”

With the constitutional door held open by the Court in Buck, 28 states enacted compulsory sterilization laws by 1931. Georgia passed the last sterilization law in the U.S. in 1937. The number of reported sterilizations in California rose from 322 in 1925 to 2,362 over the course of 1928 and 1929. Nationally, approximately 3,000 operations were reported annually prior to World War II. Many sterilizations that occurred were not reported.

Eugenic sterilization is a form of “negative” eugenics, in that it seeks to prevent the birth of genetically undesirable individuals. The eugenics movement also fostered positive eugenics. During the 1920s, state fairs awarded prizes to “fitter families” and “better babies” alongside champion farm animals. An organization called the Pioneer Fund offered military pilots and crews with three children the equivalent of $45,000 if they fathered a fourth.

The allure of eugenics was apparent to a former German army corporal who read about Loughlin’s model law in 1924 while he was in jail writing a book called Mein Kampf. When the Nazis came to power, the first piece of legislation they enacted was a sterilization law modeled on the Virginia statute. (Loughlin was so revered by the Nazis that the Nazi-controlled University of Heidelberg gave him an honorary degree in 1934.) By 1935, over 150,000 people had been sterilized under the German law, including a number of deaf persons who volunteered as a show of support for the Fatherland. Gradually the scope of the law was broadened into a tool of genocide. The Germans also vigorously pursued positive eugenics, as illustrated by the Lebensborn program, in which selected Aryan women were bred with members of the SS and the resulting offspring raised in state-approved foster families.

Although the revelations of Nazi atrocities chilled involuntary sterilization in the U.S. after the war, the practice did not completely disappear. In 1958, 574 operations were performed in Georgia, North Carolina and Virginia. By the time its law was finally repealed in 1974, Virginia had sterilized over 8,000. In April 2007, a woman who was sterilized for eugenic purposes in Indiana in 1972 participated in a ceremony commemorating the victims of that state’s program.

Current Public Health Initiatives
Are dark episodes like the eugenics movement a thing of the past? Maybe not. There are many current public initiatives that could be considered eugenic in the sense that they discourage the birth of children in certain populations, such as the poor. According to the Alan Guttmacher Institute, for instance, the government in 2001 spent $1.26 billion on reversible contraceptive services and $95 million on sterilization services, virtually all of which were earmarked for the poor. The welfare programs in 24 states stop increasing benefits once a woman has had more than a certain number of children. In Dandridge v. Williams, the Supreme Court upheld this approach in the face of constitutional challenge. The Court found that the state of Maryland did not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment because it had a reasonable basis for the program, namely, “the state’s legitimate interest in encouraging employment and in avoiding discrimination between welfare families and the families of the working poor.” Interestingly, the state itself had articulated an additional goal–“providing incentives for family planning” — which the Court did not mention.

Some commentators object to calling these programs eugenic because, in contrast to compulsory sterilization or screening, they are in a sense voluntary. A woman does not have to get pregnant or accept welfare. Yet there is one mandatory public health program that is becoming increasingly eugenic: newborn screening. This program began in the 1960s after physician Robert Guthrie developed a screening test for phenylketonuria (PKU), an autosomal recessive metabolic disorder that can be treated effectively if detected soon after birth. Guthrie also pioneered a method for collecting and transporting the blood samples used for screening on special filter paper, known as “Guthrie cards.” Massachusetts adopted newborn screening on a voluntary basis in 1962 but after President Kennedy’s Advisory Committee on Mental Retardation recommended mandatory screening, states began to enact newborn screening as a legal requirement. By 1973, newborn screening was compulsory in 43 states. Now it is universal.

Pressure from public health officials and groups like the March of Dimes, combined with faster and cheaper technologies such as tandem mass spectrometry and microchip arrays, are causing programs to screen for greater numbers of disorders. The American College of Medical Genetics currently advocates screening for 29 disorders and California now screens for over 70.

Only Maryland, Wyoming and the District of Columbia currently seek parental consent for newborn screening. (Massachusetts recently has begun doing so in a pilot program.) In Maryland, the consent is for the total screening package; parents are not asked to consent to specific tests. Thirty-three states provide an exemption from screening if contrary to parents’ religious beliefs but it is up to the parents to assert the objection without being asked.

In 2005, the Nebraska Supreme Court rejected a parental challenge to newborn screening on religious grounds in a case called Douglas County v. Anaya.3 After a home birth, the Anayas refused to allow a blood sample to be taken and sued the public health department to block enforcement of the law, which contained no exceptions. The court refused to recognize a religious exemption, noting that “[t]he health and safety of the child are of particular concern…”

By focusing on the health and safety of the child, the court makes the case seem no different from the numerous decisions in which the courts refuse to allow parents such as Jehovah’s witnesses to withhold treatment from children for religious reasons. But courts override a parental treatment decision for religious reasons only when the denial of treatment would be fatal or would seriously impair the child’s health. Routine newborn screening does not have such a direct connection to the child’s welfare. The prevalence of PKU in newborns is only about 1 in 16,000. Of the 29 disorders for which the American College of Medical Genetics recommends screening, 12 have a prevalence of less than 1 in 100,000.

Recently, a federal district court upheld the right of a mother to refuse to allow her child to undergo a spinal tap for suspected meningitis.4 The mother did not assert a religious objection but instead felt that the risks of a spinal tap exceeded the benefit in her daughter’s situation. The court held that “[t]he tipping point–the point at which parents lose their substantive due process right to decline medical treatment for their minor child and the State is allowed to exercise its parens patriae interest to compel the child to undergo the treatment–exists when, considering all the circumstances in a particular case, no reasonable parent would decline treatment.” Based on this principle, the question for the Anaya court should have been: Would any reasonable parent refuse newborn screening? Only if the answer is “no” would the court be justified in overriding the parents’ wishes.

In any event, the Supreme Court of Nebraska did not rest its decision in the Anaya case on the need for screening to protect the newborn’s health alone. In addition, the court observed that mandatory screening was necessary in order to address “the potential social burdens created by children who are not identified and treated.”

The eugenics implications of this statement are all the more striking in view of the changing nature of newborn screening programs. Originally, states only screened for disorders such as PKU for which effective treatment must begin soon after birth. However, some of the tests being added to screening panels detect disorders that do not have to be treated at such an early age or, in some cases, are not readily treatable at all. Moreover, some public health advocates are now calling for abandoning the connection between newborn screening and treatment altogether. Screening for untreatable disorders, they argue, could spare the family years of uncertainty once symptoms emerge, provide the child with adjunctive if not curative interventions and permit the child to participate in research on the disorder. In addition, however, they point to the value of screening as a tool in family planning. As one recent article explains, “[a]rguments for considering broader benefits from the early diagnosis that only newborn screening can provide include…knowledge on which to base reproductive decision-making years before a disease would be diagnosed for the affected child…”5 In other words, screening should be expanded so that parents can avoid giving birth to another child with the same disability.

It is one thing for parents to make reproductive decisions in order to prevent the birth of children with disabilities. It is another thing altogether for the government to establish a compulsory genetic screening program to facilitate this objective. This is not to say that public health programs designed to give parents more information about the health status of newborns are a bad idea or that they are on a par with the atrocities of Nazi Germany. But we shouldn’t kid ourselves that they are not eugenic practices.

Bioterrorism
One of the more vigorous efforts now underway to expand the power of public health authorities is being waged as part of the War on Terror. Beginning immediately after 9/11, and spurred on by the subsequent mail-borne anthrax attacks, inspection of our public health infrastructure showed that it was woefully inadequate and incapable of responding effectively to a major bioterrorism incident. This prompted intense efforts to increase public health spending on equipment and training.

In addition, however, some public health zealots believed that the nation’s public health laws needed to be revamped to give public health officials adequate power and discretion to take whatever steps might be necessary to combat bioterrorism. They proposed language for a model state law and, with funding from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, enlisted the aid of a “who’s who” of public health officials and advocates to draft a Model State Public Health Act.

An indication of the scope of the powers that would be conferred on public health officials under this law can be seen by considering its provisions for mandatory screening and testing. Under the act, a state or local public health agency may establish a compulsory screening program for any “conditions of public health importance that pose a significant risk or seriously threaten the public’s health” (section 5-106(d)(1)). The terms “significant risk” and “seriously threaten” are not defined in the act but the term “condition of public health importance” is defined to mean “a disease, syndrome, symptom, injury, or other threat to health that is identifiable on an individual or community level and can reasonably be expected to lead to adverse health effects in the community” (section 1-102(6).

Under the model act, could a public health agency therefore make prenatal screening for genetic diseases and conditions mandatory for all pregnant women? The answer is yes, so long as the agency believes that the diseases and conditions, if not detected in utero, pose a significant threat to health that can reasonably be expected to lead to adverse health effects in the community. Is such a belief far fetched? Not necessarily: the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology recently called for “routine” prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome”.

Another provision of the model act states that a public health agency may make participation in such a screening program a condition “of participating in or receiving a service or privilege” (section 5-106(d)(2)). Accordingly, women who refused to be screened could be denied health and welfare benefits.

Conclusion
The dark side of public health is most vividly reflected in the eugenics movement, which it championed. It is noteworthy that only three cases involving public health law have reached the U.S. Supreme Court. One, Skinner v. Oklahoma, decided in the middle of World War II, invalidated a state law requiring certain habitual criminals to be sterilized but not others.6 This is the only Supreme Court case in which the justices curbed the public health power of the state. But the Court’s opinion left open the possibility that a law that sterilized all habitual criminals would be constitutional. The other two cases were Jacobson, the vaccination case, and the eugenics case, Buck v. Bell, both discussed above.

What is striking about the Buck, case is that Justice Holmes’s opinion sustaining the constitutionality of Virginia’s eugenic sterilization law cited only one previous case as legal precedent: Jacobson. Holmes felt that the broad public health powers upheld in Jacobson extended so far that the state could sterilize people whose genes were deemed defective. Even more striking, the Buck case has never been overruled.

As Justice Holmes made clear in Buck, public health officials may sacrifice the welfare of individuals in order to promote the welfare of the public. One enduring question is who gets to decide what constitutes the public welfare. Under the Model State Public Health Act, it is the public health authorities and the act places few constraints on their discretion. A second question is how far the authorities may go in achieving a public health objective. Under the model act, their power is virtually unlimited.

A recent news story described a patient with drug-resistant TB who, believing himself to have been treated successfully, refused to wear a face mask. Public health officials accordingly quarantined him in a hospital jail cell, where the jailers refused to allow him to have access to a clock radio, television or cellphone. After news reports pointed out that the man was only under quarantine, not arrest, his cellphone was restored and the authorities promised to return his TV.

Public health practices must strike the right balance between individual and community welfare. The TB patient’s plight may seem trivial. After all, TB is a scourge and drug-resistant TB is on the increase. But the nation was founded on the principle that the power of the state must be exercised within constitutional limits and overly zealous measures in the past have left an indelible stain on the history of public health.
http://www.thedoctorwillseeyounow.com/articles/bioethics/dark_14/

References
1. Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905). return

2. ACT-UP Triangle v. Commissioner for Health Services, 483 S.E.2d 388 (NC 1997).

3. Douglas County v. Anaya, 694 N.W.2d 601 (Neb. 2005).

4. Mueller v. Auker, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13172 (D. Id. 2007).

5. Duane Alexander (NIH) and Peter C. van Dyck (HRSA) 2006: “A Vision of the Future of Newborn Screening” 117 PEDIATRICS 350, 352.

6. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942). June 2007

© 2008 interMDnet Corporation. All Rights Reserved. PRIVACY POLICY

In fact, it was Rockefeller who introduced

Categories : Blog / Vlog, Disinformation, Genocide, Medical Hazards, Miscellaneous, The Law & CODEX, Vaccination, Weaponized Avian Flu
Tags : BioEthics, Compulsory Vaccination, Dr. Rima, Eurgenics, Galton, Harriman, John D. Rockefeller, Medical Fascism, Natural Solutions Foundation, Nazi, Nazis, NSF, Pandemic Vaccine, Rima E. Laibow MD, Ruling Elite, Sterilization, Swine Flu, Vaccination
« Previous Page
Next Page »