Archive for Blog / Vlog – Page 101
Vaccine Damage: Not Just for Kids AnymoreIs Alzheimer’s Disease Vaccine-Induced Adult Onset Autism?
Action Item: http://tinyurl.com/VaccineFree
Is Alzheimer’s in the adult equivalent to the increasingly common vaccine injury in children known as autism? I believe so.
When I look at the lost (or never gained) behavior of the autistic person and the losses that the Alzheimer’s patient shows, I see a very similar pattern. In fact, when I look at an Alzheimer’s patient, I see autism with wrinkles. Oh, of course, since people are developing Alzheirmer’s and Senile Dementia younger and younger, sometimes the wrinkles come later, if the patient lives long enough.
I see a deterioration, slower in the adult, to the point where violent outburst are common, inability to learn new things or process new information is a massive hindrance in life, meaningful speech is lost, bodily functions are uncontrolled, gastrointestinal disturbances are common, motor skills are badly interfered with, social signals are not responded to well, or at all, self care is impaired to non-existent, interruption of fixed routines is intolerable, sensory defensiveness is frequent, automatic, repetitive, self-stimulating behavior is common, eye contact is lacking.
The introduction of foreign protein, formaldehyde, mercury, aluminum, stealth viruses, gentimycn and other toxic inputs is a likely culprit for the cause of an astonishing rise in Alzheimer’s Disease, Senile Dementia, cancer, leukemia and a host of other chronic, degenerative diseases. To be fair, by the way, it is necessary to add that the diet of industrialized PHUDE which does not support life adequately and which introduces toxic agro-chemicals and additives, along with known ANTI NUTRIENTS, which further degrade the body, has a major role to play as does environmental toxicity.
But I believe that vaccines are a major factor in the earlier, more widespread and devastating disorders which are claiming more and more minds, hearts, bodies and families.
The new AACIP (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices of the CDC) has just been released. I take it as an already established given that vaccines are directly related to autism and other major disorders now impacting children in astounding numbers everywhere vaccination programs are in place.Let’s assume that common sense, biochemistry, toxicology and physiology are more reliable than drug company/government propaganda for a moment.
The following vaccines, among many others, contain aluminum, long associated with the fibriliary tangles in the brain of Alzheimer’s patients:
Flu Vaccines
Hepatitis A
Hepatitis B
DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis)
Hib vaccine
Pneumococcal vaccine
Gardasil (HPV vaccine)
Dr. David Ayub points out that aluminum is far more toxic than mercury (flu shots typically contain both of them) depending on how the aluminum is distributed.
Dr. Hugh Fudenberg set off a fire storm that resulted in the loss of his license, but not the refuation of his data. In 1997, he presented his findings that people who had 5 consecutive annual flu shots increased their likelihood of getting Alzheimer’s Disease by 10 times!
Although he lost his South Carolina Medical License, his data remain impeccable.
Vaccine injury is not just for kids anymore. So, as I have been warning it would, the pressure to vaccinate you for —
Flu
Herpes
Hepatitis
Yellow Fever
Tetanus
Measles
Mumps
And pretty much everything else under the sun (including depression, smoking, anxiety, cancer and God Knows What All Else) is mounting. Rapidly.
I am a proud Vaccine Refuser. They are calling us Anit-Vaxers as if that were a dirty term. I like it. A lot!
I am an Anti Vaxer.
Become an Anti Vaxer with me and keep the howling dogs of dementia away from your door!
Tell Decision Makers here: http://tinyurl.com/VaccineFree
No autism with wrinkles for me, thanks, all the same! And none for you!
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
PS – And you already know what nutrition super-charges your immune system, don’t you? www.DrRimaKnows.com
THE PROUD ANTI-VAXER VIDEO
Dr. Rima and Counsel Ralph
In response to Bill Marer’s Article Time to Vaccinate Restaurant Workers Against Hepatitis A
To Take Action Click Here.
When you suggest that food workers should be forced to receive the Hepatitis A Vaccine you are making a suggestion that bars pregnant women from becoming food workers since CDC says that the vaccine should not be used in pregnant women.
You are also calling for a mandate to inject not only 1440 EL.U. of viral antigen, but also 0.5 mg of aluminum as aluminum hydroxide, a dangerous pro-oxidant associated strongly with Alzheimer’s Disease and other major neurological disorders.
In addition, the infertility material, polysorbate 20 (0.05 mg/mL) and up to 0.5 mcg/ml of MRC-5 cellular proteins along with up to 40 ng of neomycin sulfate, an aminoglycoside antibiotic included in the cell growth media.
All this when hepatitis A, a self limited disease, can be stopped from spreading by simple soap-and-water hand washing?
Oh, let’s not forget that immune-compromised people should not be vaccinated, so anyone who ever had chemotherapy is out of a job, folks with liver disease should not receive the vaccine, either.
So your dictum, that any food handler, has a massive set of problems associated with it in terms of the food handlers’ health. But that does not address the underlying problem in your argument, however well-intended.
Vaccines do not work. They are based on immunology, bacteriology and virology which has been long since discredited but which persists for one very simple reason: money.
That simple reason, however, comes in two flavors:
1. Sheer, simple profit for the manufacturers and sales agents of the vaccines themselves, which are classified as an uninsured risk, and against any type of liability the manufacturers and administrators of the vaccines are indemnified and
2. Follow on marketing. Since vaccines introduce foreign proteins and stealth viruses, along with heavy metals and infertility agents into the body, over and over and over again, the follow on markets for cancer, infertility, autoimmune disorders and more, is enormous and pretty much supports the entire medical industrial complex, among the largest industries on the planet consuming 16% of our GNP or more in the US alone.
So you won’t hear about the dangers and uselessness of vaccines from the official sources or the lap dog media. But science is not a popularity contest and the reality is quite clear: vaccines are a bad choice all around.
Mandates are even worse for both health and for freedom.
Because, and here is the surprise, food handlers own their own bodies just as you do. Forcing them to submit to having worthless toxins injected in their bodies is the worst form of tyranny. Requiring hand washing is a totally different matter since the long-term consequences are non-existent and the science is stunningly clear.
To Take Action Click Here.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Image courtesy of sscreations / FreeDigitalPhotos.net
In response to Dr. David Brownstein’s article Should You Get A Shingles Vaccine?
To Take Action Click Here.
Wait – don’t I recall that the Shingles vaccine is ineffective in up to 99% of cases? Yes, I do, as a matter of fact, based on the Cochran Report data. And don’t I recall that 1 person is harmed for every 2.8 people vaccinated, with serious adverse events up to, and including, death?
So why would anyone in their right mind recommend the use of this dangerous, and strikingly ineffective nostrum? Money, maybe? Knee jerk compliance, perhaps? Vaccinism blindspot-ism?
Perhaps because of manipulated data as presented in this article and others like it:
“The Shingles Prevention Study, involving more than 38,000 adults 60 years and older, showed that the herpes zoster vaccine prevented approximately half of all episodes of acute zoster and approximately two thirds of all episodes of postherpetic neuralgia (N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2271-2284).”
Well, no, actually, it did not show that at all.
Here is an interesting take on these numbers by Dr. David Brownstein:
“The report states that, over a median surveillance period of 3.12 years, with over 52,000 participants, there was a 51% relative risk reduction in confirmed cases of herpes zoster in those that received the vaccine. Furthermore, the author stated that among those aged 60-69, the number needed to treat to prevent one case of shingles was 50. Among those 70 years and older, the number needed to treat was 100.
These numbers show that, in those aged 60-69, the shingles vaccine was ineffective for 98% (forty-nine out of fifty) of those studied. For those aged 70 and older, the vaccine was 99% ineffective, since 99 out of 100 received no benefit.
I am incredulous that anyone looking at this data could proclaim that the shingles vaccine was effective. In fact, it wasn’t.
According to this data, the shingles vaccine was a 98-99% failure.
Assuming the cost of the vaccine is $200 (a generous assumption), we would have to vaccinate 50 subjects aged 60-69 years to prevent two cases of shingles at a cost of $10,000 per case. For those over 70 years, 100 patients need to be vaccinated to prevent one case of shingles at a cost of $20,000. Clearly, this vaccine is not cost effective in these tough economic times.
Finally, the author summarized the adverse effect risk of the shingles vaccine. The number needed to harm from the vaccine was 2.8. That means for every 2.8 vaccines given, one patient was harmed. Furthermore, for every one hundred subjects vaccinated, one had a severe adverse reaction such as rash, fever, or hospitalization.
To Take Action Click Here.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Loved-Out or Revved-Up?
Can you be too forgiving? Can you be so highly conscious that you lose track of the outside world while perfecting your relationship to the inner (and higher) one?
I think so.
Two days ago I was a guest on a radio show. It was a vital and interesting discussion for the host and for me so he asked me to join a round table with other hosts on the show a couple of hours later. I was happy to do it.
The other hosts on the show were highly articulate people with a deep connection to truth and change. They spoke deeply about their own inner journeys and the need to correct the inner issues before we could be effective at correcting the outer ones. They concurred that old patterning first molds and then holds us.
I agree. Emphatically.
I added to the discussion, however, the idea that while we need to do our inner work, that is not enough. We must find solutions to the outer problems, the globalization, the depopulation, the injustice, the mandatory vaccination, the Chemtrails.
I know as well as a few, and more than most, the power of intentionality, the power of conviction and the power of determination.
I also know very well that, whether its principles are right or wrong, the fatalism of the New Age philosophy was seized upon, and funded, by the same forces that want us bemused, befuddled and bewildered, sapped of our vitality and change agency by belief and bonds of all sorts.
Acquiescence and apathy , whether induced by fluoride or gurus, serve the would-be controllers and keep us in our place, whether we feel a sense of inner liberation or not.
Understand, please, that I have a personal practice based on my own spiritual beliefs and experiences and it is very precious to me, defining the core of my life. But, at least for me, to be engrossed with following the inner path without seeing, and acting on, the outer reality is to cut off an essential part of our humanity, our responsibility not just to our own welfare and energetic structures, but to our fellow humans.
We are, after all, all connected and if I am free but you are still a slave, then I am not really free at all, am I?
In short, for me, at least, inner clarity unconnected to outer reality is not worth very much. But, then again, correcting outer reality without inner clarity is only worth slightly more since at least it can help others even if it cannot help oneself very profoundly.
So while it is beguiling to become blissed, staying there without a commitment to blissing the world, too, is ultimately as selfish as not caring at all about anything except your own creature comforts.
We have been warned of this “falling short of the mark” by philosophers for millennia. In the Buddhist tradition, for example, there are the Bodhisattvas, the enlightened, who return to the life of the world pledging to remain in service until all beings attain enlightenment. In another tradition, Faith without Works is seen as essentially tragic.
Certainly, “Follow your bliss!”
But, remember, the whole world needs healing.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
www.HealthKeepersOath.orgIn response to Dr. Caplan’s Article Your Kid Has No Right to Make My Kid Sick!
To Take Action Click Here.
You are absolutely right, Dr. Caplan. If your kid gets vaccinated and is shedding infectious viruses which make my kid sick, your kid’s vaccination has endangered my kid and neither of you has a right to do that (nor do you or your wife, for that matter, given that people shed infectious organisms for 21 days or longer after nasal vaccination and other vaccinations!).
Further, if your kid is unlucky enough to be vaccinated (and I am sure he/she would be, given your public positions on the topic) and develops the increasingly common phenomenon of vaccine failure (getting the disease against which your kid has been vaccinated), your kid’s infection threatens my kid’s health during the incubation period before symptoms emerge, given that these infectious diseases are often more virulent than those which occur from native strains in un-vaccinated people.
Let’s face it, Dr. Kaplan: herd immunity does not exist. If your kid’s vaccine is effective, your kid won’t get the disease(s) against which he/she has been protected by the vaccine. If my kid is unvaccinated, and you can be sure that he/she will be, complete with legal exemptions, the only dangers from vaccines are 1) contagion originating among the vaccinated and 2) the legal bullying which your continuing harangues support and are used to justify.
There are two possibilities that I can see here:
1. You really are so genuinely scientifically uninformed that you believe what you are saying. After all, you are a bio ethicist, not a scientist. You offer up opinions but are not trained as a scientist. Dr. Paul Offit, whom I believe you know, says that we need ‘Journalism Jail’ for people who write and speak about vaccine science without proper qualifications. Bio Ethics is hardly a proper qualification to speak on scientific matters.
In that case, I suggest that you take the time to become informed enough to revise your positions on vaccinations since they are not supported by either reproducible science or epidemiology. I will remind you that Sanjay Gupta, MD, who is trained in these areas, recently decided that his position on hemp was wrong and publicly revised it, much to his credit.
2. You serve another master besides truth or ethics and it is profitable for you to disseminate incorrect information. If that is the case, there is something very biological about this, since the impulse to acquire goods and power is part of the biological matrix we are built upon, but there is certainly nothing ethical about it.
Find the Action Item here.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima