Archive for vaccines – Page 2
In response to Marina Watt’s Article Time to Vaccinate Restaurant Workers Against Hepatitis A
To Take Action Click Here.
There has been a lot of discussion about why celebrities should not be taken seriously when they say they distrust/fear vaccines because they are not scientists or physicians. Well, I am a scientist and a physician and therefore, by this logic, should be taken seriously when I say that I am an Anti Vaxxer and proud of it.
In fact, once you understand what is science and what is pseudoscience in the magical mystery tour which is vaccine propaganda, you will become a proud Anti Vaxxer right along with me.
Let’s start with the fact that in science, as opposed to, say, politics or religion, the answer must make sense. And injecting known toxins like mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and foreign protein (including stealth viruses like the SV40 virus which causes leukemia and which the CDC has publicly acknowledged they knew was contaminating the polio vaccines that 98 million American’s received) and other dangerous compounds into humans simply does not make sense.
If you trust the government to regulate industries like the pharmaceutical and vaccine industry, then you must be comfortable with the following facts:
1. Regulators move from industry to the FDA and CDC, etc., on a revolving door basis and back again. They make lots ad lots of money in their industry positions and the take government positions at a lot less money where they show their loyalty to their corporate buds and are rewarded with even higher paying jobs
2. There is no such thing as a conflict of interest in their world. Someone like Dr. Paul Offit (rhymes with profit) can hold the patent for a vaccine and then sit on the panel that approves it, garnering himself at least $25 million (a very conservative estimate) the next year alone and bringing the vaccinated children serious pneumonia and meningitis complications.
3. Vaccination is so risky that no insurer in the world will provide insurance coverage. To deal with this problem, the FDA and the US Congress have exempted the vaccine manufacturers from ANY financial liability for any damage their products cause, regardless of its severity or how clear a vaccine adverse event it is.Instead, every antigen is taxed – in a tax paid by the recipient or parent – to fund the Special Masters Vaccine Court which has already paid out more than $2 Billion to compensate victims of vaccine injury.
4. Every infectious disease for which a vaccine has been introduced was in decline BEFORE the introduction of the vaccine because of the generalized availability of clean water, clean and more nutritious food, better general hygiene and living conditions. Most infectious diseases showed a meaningful increase in incidence AFTER the vaccine was introduced.
5. Every vaccine in the US must, under US law, be tested both for safety and efficacy. No vaccine has ever been evaluated for either. If studies are done, the placebo is invariably a toxic substance (often mercury itself or another known high-toxicity vaccine like the rabies vaccine). In the ONLY methodologically meaningful placebo controlled double blind study EVER conducted on a vaccine (a current flu vaccine), the level of protection did not reach statistical significance (meaning it was accounted for by chance) but those who received the vaccine had nearly 5 times the incidence of serious pulmonary infections (pneumonia).
6. There is no possibility of a genetic trend asserting itself in less than 45 years. When I graduated from medical school in 1970, autism occurred 1 time in 10,000 children, world wide. The latest figures are horrifying: 1 Somalian child in 36 in Minneapolis is autistic while CDC tells us that 1 child in 68 in the general population is autistic and, no, the criteria are pretty much the same. Since vaccines are what have changed, not genes, the CDC muddied the water on March 28th of this year by saying “US data shows autism rates up 30%, but condition not necessarily ‘more common'”. Still trusting that ol’ gubb’ment o’ yours?
7. Vaccines do not prevent disease. To “prove” that vaccines generate antibodies in the people who receive them (which is inaccurately believed to be the same as the development of immunity) Merck fraudulently added canine antibodies to “beef up” the antibody count to blood supposedly taken from humans who had received the mumps vaccine. Aluminum and squalene, both highly dangerous substances when in your bloodstream, are added to vaccines to increase the number of antibodies produced although they add nothing to immunity and vaccine antibody count does not equate to enhanced immunity.
In fact, immunity is damaged, decreased and diminished by the injection of these immune irritants (“adjuvants”) resulting in high increases of chronic degenerative disorders, just as we see wherever vaccine rates rise. The statistics are abundantly clear.
As a scientist, I could go on and on and on. It would be wonderful if we could dismiss the reality of vast and deadly cover up collisions between indemnified manufacturers and industry regulators. Tragically, we have endless documentation on this collusion from Simpsonwood, FOIA documents and the real data behind the cooked books of “scientific” studies showing that vaccines do not work, do cause damage and are, in essence, probably the largest scam in the history of science or pseudoscience.
So, there you go: I am not a celebrity. I am a doctor and scientist and I am a proud and enthusiastic Anti-Vaxxer!
Click Here To Take Action.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
.
Access to our SBS Hoax Webinar: 3.5+ Hours
With world-class experts exposing the lie.
http://tinyurl.com/SBShoax
.
In response to Matt Stroud’s article on “The Verge” Parents Are Going To Prison For A Medical Diagnosis That May Not Exist
.
Don´t Accept Mandatory Vaccines. Take Action Here.
.
Short answer: it is impossible to cause the triad of signs seen in so called “Shaken Baby Syndrome” without additional injuries. In fact, it is one of many adverse reactions to vaccination in vulnerable children. But it is an adverse reaction for which parents go to jail, sometimes for life.
.
For those interested not in acrimony or supposition, but the science of whether or not it is possible to shake a baby to death (or serious injury) with the findings these children show (it is not) and what actually causes the injuries for which parents are being sent to jail, sometimes for life, I invite you to visit http://TinyURL.com/SBSHoax. You will be able to access the webinar that the Natural Solutions Foundation did on this troubling and very important subject with video presentations by world class scientists and other experts. You will also receive a heavily referenced ebook and a special Shaken Baby Syndrome Resource Guide for Parents, Professionals, Police and Prosecutors.
.
This ground breaking presentation is a must see for anyone concerned with these issues.
.
Click Here To Take Action.
.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
In response to Bill Marer’s Article Time to Vaccinate Restaurant Workers Against Hepatitis A
To Take Action Click Here.
When you suggest that food workers should be forced to receive the Hepatitis A Vaccine you are making a suggestion that bars pregnant women from becoming food workers since CDC says that the vaccine should not be used in pregnant women.
You are also calling for a mandate to inject not only 1440 EL.U. of viral antigen, but also 0.5 mg of aluminum as aluminum hydroxide, a dangerous pro-oxidant associated strongly with Alzheimer’s Disease and other major neurological disorders.
In addition, the infertility material, polysorbate 20 (0.05 mg/mL) and up to 0.5 mcg/ml of MRC-5 cellular proteins along with up to 40 ng of neomycin sulfate, an aminoglycoside antibiotic included in the cell growth media.
All this when hepatitis A, a self limited disease, can be stopped from spreading by simple soap-and-water hand washing?
Oh, let’s not forget that immune-compromised people should not be vaccinated, so anyone who ever had chemotherapy is out of a job, folks with liver disease should not receive the vaccine, either.
So your dictum, that any food handler, has a massive set of problems associated with it in terms of the food handlers’ health. But that does not address the underlying problem in your argument, however well-intended.
Vaccines do not work. They are based on immunology, bacteriology and virology which has been long since discredited but which persists for one very simple reason: money.
That simple reason, however, comes in two flavors:
1. Sheer, simple profit for the manufacturers and sales agents of the vaccines themselves, which are classified as an uninsured risk, and against any type of liability the manufacturers and administrators of the vaccines are indemnified and
2. Follow on marketing. Since vaccines introduce foreign proteins and stealth viruses, along with heavy metals and infertility agents into the body, over and over and over again, the follow on markets for cancer, infertility, autoimmune disorders and more, is enormous and pretty much supports the entire medical industrial complex, among the largest industries on the planet consuming 16% of our GNP or more in the US alone.
So you won’t hear about the dangers and uselessness of vaccines from the official sources or the lap dog media. But science is not a popularity contest and the reality is quite clear: vaccines are a bad choice all around.
Mandates are even worse for both health and for freedom.
Because, and here is the surprise, food handlers own their own bodies just as you do. Forcing them to submit to having worthless toxins injected in their bodies is the worst form of tyranny. Requiring hand washing is a totally different matter since the long-term consequences are non-existent and the science is stunningly clear.
To Take Action Click Here.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Image courtesy of sscreations / FreeDigitalPhotos.net
In response to Dr. David Brownstein’s article Should You Get A Shingles Vaccine?
To Take Action Click Here.
Wait – don’t I recall that the Shingles vaccine is ineffective in up to 99% of cases? Yes, I do, as a matter of fact, based on the Cochran Report data. And don’t I recall that 1 person is harmed for every 2.8 people vaccinated, with serious adverse events up to, and including, death?
So why would anyone in their right mind recommend the use of this dangerous, and strikingly ineffective nostrum? Money, maybe? Knee jerk compliance, perhaps? Vaccinism blindspot-ism?
Perhaps because of manipulated data as presented in this article and others like it:
“The Shingles Prevention Study, involving more than 38,000 adults 60 years and older, showed that the herpes zoster vaccine prevented approximately half of all episodes of acute zoster and approximately two thirds of all episodes of postherpetic neuralgia (N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2271-2284).”
Well, no, actually, it did not show that at all.
Here is an interesting take on these numbers by Dr. David Brownstein:
“The report states that, over a median surveillance period of 3.12 years, with over 52,000 participants, there was a 51% relative risk reduction in confirmed cases of herpes zoster in those that received the vaccine. Furthermore, the author stated that among those aged 60-69, the number needed to treat to prevent one case of shingles was 50. Among those 70 years and older, the number needed to treat was 100.
These numbers show that, in those aged 60-69, the shingles vaccine was ineffective for 98% (forty-nine out of fifty) of those studied. For those aged 70 and older, the vaccine was 99% ineffective, since 99 out of 100 received no benefit.
I am incredulous that anyone looking at this data could proclaim that the shingles vaccine was effective. In fact, it wasn’t.
According to this data, the shingles vaccine was a 98-99% failure.
Assuming the cost of the vaccine is $200 (a generous assumption), we would have to vaccinate 50 subjects aged 60-69 years to prevent two cases of shingles at a cost of $10,000 per case. For those over 70 years, 100 patients need to be vaccinated to prevent one case of shingles at a cost of $20,000. Clearly, this vaccine is not cost effective in these tough economic times.
Finally, the author summarized the adverse effect risk of the shingles vaccine. The number needed to harm from the vaccine was 2.8. That means for every 2.8 vaccines given, one patient was harmed. Furthermore, for every one hundred subjects vaccinated, one had a severe adverse reaction such as rash, fever, or hospitalization.
To Take Action Click Here.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
In response to Dr. Caplan’s Article Your Kid Has No Right to Make My Kid Sick!
To Take Action Click Here.
You are absolutely right, Dr. Caplan. If your kid gets vaccinated and is shedding infectious viruses which make my kid sick, your kid’s vaccination has endangered my kid and neither of you has a right to do that (nor do you or your wife, for that matter, given that people shed infectious organisms for 21 days or longer after nasal vaccination and other vaccinations!).
Further, if your kid is unlucky enough to be vaccinated (and I am sure he/she would be, given your public positions on the topic) and develops the increasingly common phenomenon of vaccine failure (getting the disease against which your kid has been vaccinated), your kid’s infection threatens my kid’s health during the incubation period before symptoms emerge, given that these infectious diseases are often more virulent than those which occur from native strains in un-vaccinated people.
Let’s face it, Dr. Kaplan: herd immunity does not exist. If your kid’s vaccine is effective, your kid won’t get the disease(s) against which he/she has been protected by the vaccine. If my kid is unvaccinated, and you can be sure that he/she will be, complete with legal exemptions, the only dangers from vaccines are 1) contagion originating among the vaccinated and 2) the legal bullying which your continuing harangues support and are used to justify.
There are two possibilities that I can see here:
1. You really are so genuinely scientifically uninformed that you believe what you are saying. After all, you are a bio ethicist, not a scientist. You offer up opinions but are not trained as a scientist. Dr. Paul Offit, whom I believe you know, says that we need ‘Journalism Jail’ for people who write and speak about vaccine science without proper qualifications. Bio Ethics is hardly a proper qualification to speak on scientific matters.
In that case, I suggest that you take the time to become informed enough to revise your positions on vaccinations since they are not supported by either reproducible science or epidemiology. I will remind you that Sanjay Gupta, MD, who is trained in these areas, recently decided that his position on hemp was wrong and publicly revised it, much to his credit.
2. You serve another master besides truth or ethics and it is profitable for you to disseminate incorrect information. If that is the case, there is something very biological about this, since the impulse to acquire goods and power is part of the biological matrix we are built upon, but there is certainly nothing ethical about it.
Find the Action Item here.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima