Archive for Vaccination – Page 29
| One, Two Punch: Codex Attacks Nutrition; Countering the Vax Threat |
|
Keep Health Freedom Free! Donate: http://drrimatruthreports.com/?page_id=189 |
|
To unsubscribe from this Health Freedom Action Alert, click here and enter your email address. To manage your subscription preferences, click here. |
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
The Voice of Global Health Freedom™
Health Care Choice in National Health Debate
Supporting Dr Ron Paul’s Proposal to
Protect Health Care Choices in the National Health Care System
Here is the Health Care Choice Amendment that was offered as Section 402 of HR 3962:
“An individual may not be denied access to a federal health care program for failing to comply with a vaccination requirement, or any other required form of medical treatment, under federal law or under a federal health insurance mandate.”
This important protective language was NOT added to the bill that passed the House on November 7, 2009 — if you want your United States Senators to add this language to any bill that passes the Senate, please use this Action Item to communicate with your representatives.
Action Item:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=1677
Push back now! Stop Medical Fascism before it starts!
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
The Voice of Global Health Freedom™
UPDATE: ANOTHER STATE BACKS OFF –
SUSPENDS ITS MANDATE JUST LIKE NY DID LAST MONTH!
Here is the report from Philly.com: http://bit.ly/72xJdA
Well, every time the Health Freedom Movement threatens to sue in Federal Court, challenging FDA vaccine approvals, with legal “standing” based on state-level mandating of the Federal vaccine “recommendations” the state backs off. In both NJ and NY, the public health officials cited a supposed lack of enough vaccines, even though 167 million doses of the Swine Flu vaccine, for example, have been purchased by Federal agencies. We think this justifies our triumphant belief, once again, PUSH BACK WORKS!
Since there is now an alleged “seasonal flu vaccine” shortage we predict a very light annual flu season this year.
[Pssst… don’t tell the vaccine pushers, but we’re not done with the Stop the Shot case yet…]
Ralph Fucetola JD
Foundation Trustee and Counsel
—————————
Previous blog posting:
“Stop the Shot” Federal Court Lawsuit Challenging Swine Flu Vaccinations
Looking for New Jersey Parents of Flu Vaccine Mandated Toddlers
Report on the Case: http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=3933
Natural Solutions Foundation, Foundation for Health Choice, Dr. Rima E. Laibow MD, Dr. Gary Null PhD and several NY health care workers (who the state had ordered to take all flu vaccines “recommended” by Federal authorities) brought a law suit in Federal Court challenging the FDA’s September 15, 2009 approval of the uninsurable, un-safety tested 2009-H1N1-A “Swine Flu” vaccines. When NY state backed-off after strong public “push back” and suspended its mandate, the Federal judge determined that without the mandate, plaintiffs did not have “standing” to challenge the approvals. Judge Walton of the DC Distrcit Court however intimated that a new complaint involving a state mandated vaccine would be considered. There is one other state with a state-wide flu vaccine mandate; that state is New Jersey. The state requires all children in daycare, childcare or preschool aged 6 months to 5 years who go to day care, pre-school, etc. to receive a flu vaccine annually.*
We are therefore seeking New Jersey parents who object to this mandate and who are willing to become plaintiffs along with Drs. Null and Laibow in “round two” of the Stop the Shot litigation. To do that, the parents need to complete a Declaration that can be used in Court.
We’ve set up the format for the information we need to create the Declaration at:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=1676
Please complete that form and send back to us as soon as possible. We will then contact the group selected to join the case as plaintiffs. Our goal is to file the revised complaint the week of November 9, 2009.
Questions: ralph.fucetola@usa.net
About the case: http://vitaminlawyerhealthfreedom.blogspot.com/2009/11/federal-court-tells-us-to-come-back.html
Thank you for volunteering!
Ralph Fucetola JD
Natural Solutions Foundation Trustee &
PS – if your computer system does not let you procede to the automatic system, just “copy” and “paste” the questions below into your email browser, answer the questions and email them to ralph.fucetola@usa.net with “NJ Parent” in the subject line.
————————————————–
Please type the information requested below each numbered item. This system will send the information to Natural Solutions Foundation legal department and we will contact those NJ parents who are being invited to participate in the “Stop the Shot” legal challenge to the September 15, 2009 FDA approvals of the H1N1 “Swine Flu” vaccines. We are looking for the parents of children from 6 months to 5 years, who are mandated by New Jersey to receive an annual flu vaccine.
All information will be held in confidence and only provided to the Court as part of the Complaint and other documents.
Here is the information we need from you:
1. Your full name and address with zip code; where both parents want to be plaintiffs, please list the information for each.
2. Phone numbers, including cell phone.
3. e-mail address [very important!]
4. Initials and birth dates of all your minor children.
5. Please express your objections to your children receiving an annual flu vaccine from age 6 months to 5 years.
6. Please confirm that you agree that Natural Solutions Foundation and Foundation for Health Choice and their attorneys represent your interests in the proposed lawsuit.
7. Does your child attend licensed child care now? If not, when do you expect to start same?
————————-
* NJ Regulation: http://www.nj.gov/health/cd/documents/vaccine_qa.pdf – – “8:57-4.19 Influenza vaccine: Children six months through 59 months of age attending any licensed child-care center or preschool facility on or after September 1, 2008, shall annually receive at least one dose of influenza vaccine between September 1 and December 31 of each year.” [Note, the 09/01/08 dated was changed to 12/31/09.] [Note: 11/24/09 – Mandate suspended!]
This important article highlights three different problems: First, drugs and vaccines which have NOT been either studied or approved for pregnant woman are being used as if their unique biochemical and physiological needs (remember, their bodies have adapted to the unique stress of feeding and forming another being within their own bodies) and those of the baby within can be ignored because it is more convenient to forget about them and just use drugs and vaccines that are handy, or with which the doctor is familiar. Second, marketing pressures and propaganda lead doctors and their associates to use vaccines and drugs in pregnant woman and their babies EVEN THOUGH they are know to be dangerous to these woman and their babies. Third, safe, effective and well-known treatments exist for each of the conditions for which dangerous pharmaceutical treatments are widely, and unwisely, used. For example, if there were a danger from a virus like H1N1 or from urinary tract (or other) infections, the use of nano silver would eliminate it since it safely kills pathogens while leaving vital probiotics in place without danger to the fetus or mother.
Antibiotics, psychiatric medication and vaccines are three perfect examples of dangerous drugs widely, but unwisely, used in these vulnerable people: mothers and unborn babies. In the PDR (Physicians’ Desk Reference (R) ) and package inserts pertaining to such drugs, caution is urged stating that the drugs in these classes should be used in pregnant woman, and in the case of psychiatric drugs, in women of child bearing age, only where there are no other options or when the benefit overrides the risks to mother and child.
OK. Risks are supposed to outweigh benefits. But in the case of vaccines for H1N1, what benefits? The disease is mild and inconsequential despite the hype. There is no additional risk to pregnant women and their babies from H1N1 infection unless they are treated with the dangerous antiviral. None. A close investigation of the statistics, as Dr. Russell Blaylock has provided, http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/11/03/What-We-Have-Learned-About-the-Great-Swine-Flu-Pandemic.aspx, makes that clear.
What are the risks? Well, since no testing has been done on the safety of the vaccines in pregnant women and on fetuses, the risks are, as the vaccine package inserts make clear, totally unknown. ALL multidose vials of injectable H1N1 vaccine contain mercury and the risks of mercury to the fetus are well characterized and well known. Astonishingly, the FDA and CDC now say that pregnant women should expose their fetuses to the well established dangers of mercury in order to receive the “benefits” of the H1N1 vaccines without explaining how the risks of mercury have been either eliminated or overcome.
Additionally, GSK’s vaccine is adjuvanted with squalene and under an Emergency Use Authorization, the FDA now permits its store of injectable squalene to be used as an additive to the injectable vaccines in the 90,000 injection stations. Since the only way that squalene can be drawn up and mixed with the vaccine is to add it to the mercury-containing multi-does vials, and it is the multidose vials which contain mercury, this guarantees that mothers and babies will be dosed with high doses of mercury AND squalene.
Since squalene is known to cause severe disease when injected and has previously never been approved for injection in humans, there is little or nothing known about its impact on either pregnant mothers or their babies. What is known, however, is that squalene injected at the doses which are indicated in the 1998 patents for its use, which appear to be the same doses in the planned admixture with the vaccines, can also cause to cause permanent, irreversible sterility. That means that the pregnancies these woman are carrying will be their last. Will their children also be permanently and irreversibly sterile? We do not know.
Psychiatric drugs are strongly contraindicated in pregnant woman and in women who might become pregnant. Yet the United States Congress, under the influence, I presume, of the huge numbers of pharmaceutical lobbyists and their even more vast funding abilities have passed a bill which requires psychiatric “screening” to detect and drug pregnant women and new mothers with drugs to “treat” post partum depression with drugs whose impact on the fetus and nursing child can be literally cataclysmic.
This study makes it clear that antibiotics are similarly dangerous. They, like vaccines and psychiatric drugs, have been little studies in pregnant women, but what is known makes it clearly inadvisable to use any of them in pregnancy without the strongest of indications.
The article below makes it clear that drugs taken for granted by patients and doctors for safety in pregnancy should not be lightly regarded despite the general mistaken consensus that they are safe, effective and harmless. Vaccines, antibiotics, psychiatric drugs, and, indeed, all drugs require such caution and replacement by safe, effective and widely available non-pharmaceuticals for pregnant and nursing women. My own preference, of course, as a physician who has practiced drug-free medicine and psychiatry for the best part of 40 years, is that all drugs, except those in the ER, should be so replaced.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Valley of the Moon(TM) Eco Demonstration Project
www.NaturalSolutionsFoundation.org
Valley of the Moon(TM) Coffee – Freedom’s Coffee: GMO-Free, Pesticide-Free, Supporting Health Freedom!
www.ValleyoftheMoonCoffee.org
Natural Solutions Virtual Stores
www.Organics4U.org
www.NaturalSolutionsMarketPlace.org
Common antibiotics tied to birth defects
Study: Drugs to treat urinary infections could cause heart, brain problems
Mon., Nov . 2, 2009
CHICAGO – Researchers studying antibiotics in pregnancy have found a surprising link between common drugs used to treat urinary infections with birth defectshttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2.gif. Reassuringly, the most-used antibiotics in early pregnancy — penicillins — appear to be the safest.
Bacterial infections themselves can cause problems for the fetus if left unchecked, experts said, so pregnant women shouldn’t avoid antibiotics entirely. Instead, women should discuss antibiotics choices with their doctors.
The new study is the first large analysis of antibiotic use in pregnancy. It found that mothers of babies with birth defects were more likely than mothers with healthy babies to report taking two types of antibiotics during pregnancy: sulfa drugs (brand names include Thiosulfil Forte and Bactrim) and urinary germicides called nitrofurantoins (brand names include Furadantin and Macrobid).
It was the first time an association had been seen between urinary tract treatments and birth defects, said lead author Krista Crider, a geneticist with the Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2.gif, which funded the research. “Additional studies are going to need to be done to confirm these findings.”
Before rigorous safety testing
Used for many decades, the antibiotics in question predate the Food and Drug Administration and its requirements for rigorous safety testing. The FDAhttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2.gif now grades all drugs for safety to the fetus based on available research, but rigorous studies are so lacking in many cases, that no antibiotics get the highest grade of “A.”
Sulfa drugs are the oldest antibiotics and some animal studies have found harm during pregnancy. Nitrofurantoins previously have been viewed by doctors as safe to treat urinary tract infections during pregnancy.
The study, appearing in November’s Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, may cause doctors to change the drugs they choose to treat pregnant women with infections. The findings were released Monday.
Dr. Susan Mehnert-Kay, a family practice doctor in Tulsa, Okla., who has written about diagnosing and managing urinary tract infections, said the research is “very interesting” and would cause her to reconsider antibiotic choices in early pregnancy.
The study is important because it looked at drugs that have been used for decades without large studies of their safety in pregnant women, said Dr. Michael Katz of the March of Dimes.
“Some physicians are not as attuned to this as they ought to be, so patients have the right to ask questions,” Katz said.
The researchers analyzed data from more than 13,000 mothers whose infants had birth defects and nearly 5,000 women who lived in the same regions with healthy babies.
The women were interviewed by phone from six weeks to two years after their pregnancies. Those who remembered taking antibiotics during the month before conception through the first three months of pregnancy were identified as exposed to antibiotics.
The women’s memories could have been faulty, a substantial weakness of the study, which the authors acknowledged. About one-third of the women who took antibiotics couldn’t remember the specific type of drug they took.
It’s also unclear whether the birth defects were caused by the drugs or by the underlying infections being treated, Crider said.
Birth defects linked to sulfa drugs included rare brain and heart problems, and shortened limbs. Those linked to nitrofurantoins included heart problems and cleft palate. The drugs seemed to double or triple the risk, depending on the defect.
“These defects are rare. Even with a threefold increase in risk, the risk for the individual is still quite low,” Crider said.
Katz of the March of Dimes said anencephaly, a fatal brain problem linked to sulfas, affects about 1 in 10,000 births in the United States. Cleft palate occurs about 20 per 10,000 births.
Crider said the findings give doctors another opportunity to caution against overuse of antibiotics. Viral illnesses like colds and flus shouldn’t be treated with antibiotics, she said.
Women in 10 states, including California, Texas and New York, were interviewed as part of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.
The FDA recommends that pregnant women discuss medications with their doctors, said FDA spokeswoman Sandy Walsh. The agency has proposed changes to prescription drug labeling that would require more complete information for women of childbearing age, pregnant women and those who breastfeed, Walsh said.
http://msnbcmedia1.msn.com/i/msnbc/Components/Sources/Art/APTRANS.gif
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
The Voice of Global Health Freedom™
11/10/09 Update: URGENT – NJ Toddler Parents needed for “Round Two” of the Stop the Shot law suit: http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=3970
11/05/09 Update: “Round One” – Federal Court Tells Us to Come Back Later:
http://vitaminlawyerhealthfreedom.blogspot.com/2009/11/federal-court-tells-us-to-come-back.html
Stop the Shot Lawyers’ Video Report
Money Bomb! We need to build a fund to prepare for continued litigation or an appeal, as needed.
http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=3686
Here is a brief report on the current status of the Stop the Shot litigation in the Washington, DC US District Court.
We filed our Court Complaint on October 9, 2009
We then filed aMotion for an Injunction on October 15, 2009.
Judge Reggie Walton issued an Order to Show Cause on October 21, 2009 requiring us to file a Memorandum on Standing showing our right to sue, which we did on October 23.
On October 29 the United States Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss and last night, November 2, 2009, we filed our Memorandum in Response and a Motion to Amend, seeking to broaden the case to include all Flu Vaccines and to include children who are mandated to take these vaccines.
This coming Thursday, November 5, 2009 we will be in Court in Washington to argue the Motions. Our legal team, including Dr. Gary Null’s lawyer Leslie Fourton (who will argue the Motion), Jim Turner of Swankin and Turner in Washington (for the Foundation for Health Choices), several volunteer attorneys and experts, including Larry Becraft Esq. and Dr. Paul G. King, PhD (and yours truly) have been preparing for our day in Court. If we succeed this week, the case will go forward toward a trial on the merits; if we do not prevail, we will need to file an immediate appeal.
I will be tweeting the events as they happen on www.Twitter.com/HealthFreedomUS
Thank you for all your support!
Ralph Fucetola JD
Natural Solutions Trustee and Counsel
Donations:
http://drrimatruthreports.com/?page_id=189