Author Archive for rima – Page 83
http://tinyurl.com/cheesyFDARed Meat Is Not the Enemy, FDA Is
.
Aaron E Carrolll’s March 30, 2015 NY Times article, Red Meat Is Not the Enemy[1] makes an excellent point but misses the main one: if our food is contaminated with agrochemicals and errant genes that neither we nor the bacteria that populate our gut know how to cope with, digest or survive intact genetically and epigenetically, then we will be sick. Inevitably.
.
We are the sickest nation on earth. We have an absolutely shameful infant mortality. We spend so much money on illness management that we are drowning in the costs of our inefficient and ineffective, chemical based problem care.
.
.
We are collectively and individually delusional in our believe that because something looks, perhaps smells and even tastes vaguely like food, it can be as contaminated as we (or the corporations that control the failed regulatory process in this country) would like but still provide meaningful nourishment for our bodies and all the components of those bodies.
.
There is plenty of evidence to the contrary: real, healthy nutrition from real, healthy animals and crop lands with plenty of minerals but no agrochemicals and foreign genes supports health. In this aggregate, the common term for such nutritional materials is “food”. The other stuff, the packaged, processed, tortured, polluted, contaminated, irradiated stuff clearly does not support either life or health. Look at the US for confirmation thereof.
.
Look at the excellent points that Mr. Carroll raises: just about any food is both good for you and bad for you [and here is the part he left out] DEPENDING ON WHETHER IT IS CLEAN, NOURISHING FOOD OR CONTAMINATED, GENETICALLY MODIFIED, COLORED, PROCESSED, DEGRADED MAKE BELIEVE NUTRITIONAL MATERIAL WHICH GOES BY ANOTHER NAME: “PHUDE“.
.
Unless and until we return to consuming nutrient dense uncontaminted, non genetically modified FOOD, we will continue to be obese, infertile, ill, unhappy and perplexed about why we cannot get well.
.
By the way, I have spent the last 45 years as a physician and psychiatrist treating people without any drugs whatsoever and seeing them nearly always get better from their chronic, degenerative diseases and ailments.
.
.
My tools are clean, unadulterated food, detoxification, intensive nutrition (oral and IV) and frequency medicine. Patients find doctors like me after everything else has failed. Then, generally speaking, they get well.
.
Clearly, the things we change alter the terrain in which the illness has developed and flourished. If the hypothesis were not correct about the cause of the illness or condition, we would not expect the problem to go away with such wonderful frequency as it does.
.
Organic food is far from perfect, but it holds the only hope that we have and should be enhanced and strengthened for the sake of all of us.
.
GMOs must be labeled despite the scientifically unsound, but commercially useful, doctrine of “substantial equivalence” created by the scientifically illiterate, but heavily Monsanto-invested, President George H W Bush in 1994.
.
Our genome is worthy of protection and part of that protection is the absolute avoidance of GMO anything. It is the right of my body’s owner, me, to make that decision unless, of course, my body no longer belongs to me and belongs, instead to the Corporate State.
.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.DrRimaTruthReports.com
@DRimaLaibow
.
[1] Original article: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/31/upshot/red-meat-is-not-the-enemy.html
Why the Sudden Rush to Pass Religion Protection Laws?
Why the Sudden Propaganda Against the Independence of Churches?
Why the Assault on Vaccine Religious Exemptions?
.
Bits and pieces from the recent news about the interaction of government and religion… courts hold that small family-run businesses can refuse to provide insurance coverage that affronts the religious sensibilities of the owners… other courts force small business owners to serve persons in violation of their religious beliefs (the case in question arising from making same-sex wedding cakes)… same sex marriage is now becoming lawful while polygamy and polyandry remain forbidden religion… tens of thousands of pastors are recruited by FEMA and Homeland Security to work with government during “national emergencies” — preaching cooperation with authority, even when being relocated at gun point… several states start to adopt laws to protect religiously motivated discrimination …other states seek to restrict long-recognized religious exemptions from forced vaccinations[1]… and on it goes. Government becomes more and more intrusive in matters of private conscience.
.
Even some who claim to be “libertarians” complain about “religious privilege” confusing church private association exemptions from government impositions (such as taxation) as grants of government privilege. An exemption from coercive authority is not an exercise of coercion!
All this storm and controversy in a country where the national government has no power to make any law –
“…respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
.
There already is a federal law protecting religious liberty, against federal government actions, at least. It is important to note that the federal law operates only to protect religious belief from federal government interference. The state laws are being interpreted to allow private discrimination. There is a strong distinction in law between purely private activities and commercial activities in the public.
.
.
.
.
.
“If the law does create a substantial burden, we may still uphold it if it serves a compelling government interest in the least restrictive manner possible. 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb-1(b). *** A statute burdens the free exercise of religion if it “put[s] substantial pressure on an adherent to modify his behavior and to violate his beliefs,” Thomas v. Review Bd. of Ind. Employment Sec. Div., 450 U.S. 707, 718 (1981), including when, if enforced, it “results in the choice to the individual of either abandoning his religious principle or facing criminal prosecution.” Braunfeld v. Brown, 366 U.S. 599, 605 (1961). A substantial burden must be more than an “inconvenience.” Worldwide Church, 227 F.3d at 1121.” Guam v Guerrero, Docket No. 00-71247 at 7712-13.
.
.
.
“While the law may promote all sorts of conduct in place of harmful behavior, it may not interfere with speech for no better reason than promoting an approved message or discouraging a disfavored one, however enlightened either purpose may seem… The record reveals… the Boy Scouts is a private association…”
.
.
.
The right to join with other people to promote a particular outlook, known as the right of expressive association, is a necessary adjunct to the right of freedom of speech, which is protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. In Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, the United States Supreme Court found that the Boy Scouts of America had a First Amendment expressive association right to exclude a homosexual adult volunteer. Dale is likely to prove to be one of the most important First Amendment cases of recent years, because the Court enforced a broad right of expressive association against the competing claims of an antidiscrimination law.**
.
In a free society, any person or group of persons has the right to associate with any other person or group of persons willing to associate with him or it on the basis of any standard and for any reason. And likewise, any person or group of persons has the right not to associate with any other person or group of persons on the basis of any standard and for any reason.It doesn’t matter whether a government bureaucrat or a person who was refused association believes that the actions of the refusing person or group are illogical, unreasonable, irrational, hateful, discriminatory, bigoted, or racist. What matters is freedom.The freedom of association is just as important as any of the “First Amendment freedoms.” Neither government nor society has the authority to force a person or group to associate with another person or group that they don’t want to associate with. In a free society, it can’t be any other way.***
.
With this clearly settled law, why the controversy? Let’s remember what Congress determined in 1993: “governments should not substantially burden religious exercise without compelling justification…” and that even “laws ‘neutral’ toward religion may burden religious exercise…”
.
How will the current controversy work out? If Americans remain committed to protecting each other’s liberty, private expressive association will not be burdened by government intervention, even when pretending to be “neutral.” With the extraordinary growth in especially federal government regulation of all aspects of our lives, it is important that legal barriers be erected against government interference with basic religious rights, including the right to religious conscientious objection to forced medical interventions, such as mandated vaccines.
.
.
** http://www.law.gmu.edu/pubs/papers/05-17
The Trustees’ Vax Opinion Series: Part Three[1]
Forced Vaccination as a Barbaric Mind-Control Initiatory Ritual
Required by the Corporate State to Maintain Power
VACCINATION IS RITUAL CHILD (AND ADULT) ABUSE
Be Heard Here: http://tinyurl.com/vaccinationISviolation
Ralph Fucetola JD
.
The Argument Continued
http://drrimatruthreports.com/forced-vaccination-is-a-crime-against-humanity/
.
“Vaccination is a barbarous practice, and it is one of the most fatal of all the delusions current in our time… Its supporters are not content with its adoption by those who have no objection to it, but seek to impose it with the aid of penal laws and rigorous punishments on all people alike….Those who are conscientious objectors to vaccination should …stand alone, if need be, against the whole world, in defense of their conviction.” – A Guide to Health – Mahatma Gandhi (1921, S. Ganesan Pub., Madras, India) [2]
.
I am a “JD” — scholar of the law, a Juris Doctor — not an “MD” — a medical doctor. When I look at vaccination I see a belief system, not a scientific reality. It is important to understand the roots of what is fundamentally an irrational practice which sacrifices the young (and increasingly the not-so-young) on the altar of the “common good” to the profound personal ‘not-good’ of the individual – the foreseeable and uninsurable harms of vaccination.
.
The tension between the alleged public good and the denied private harm has a long history plunging directly back to human sacrifice ‘for the good of the tribe’ which I believe it is instructive to consider carefully in order to understand the current vaccination hysteria and public unwillingness to consider the modern issues around vaccination. We have to look much deeper than immunology or public health.
.
When we look to ancient civilizations and sacrificial communal rituals to understand that with which we are all contending, we see strong similarities: anointed leaders presumed to be infallible pronounce the necessity of the sacrifice which, like the vaccination scenario, makes neither scientific nor rational sense. No matter how many scientific facts are arrayed against the practice, the true believers continue to believe truly.
.
In fact, the strange phenomenon of social demand for universal vaccination can only be understood fully in the context of ritual human sacrifice by the overlords of the State Religion.
.
While our ancestors bequeathed our cultural heritage to us, for which we should honor them, they also bequeathed ancient practices and customs which are absolutely reprehensible to modern, thinking humans. These must be repudiated, no matter how widely endorsed they may be by the priesthood and their faithful, but unthinking minions. Male and female genital mutilation, scarification, prolonged, enforced isolation, the use of terrifying sounds and costumes, potentially lethal tribulations were all used in bonding the younger generation to the immemorial customs of the tribe or other social group. Sacrificing children to Moloch for the “greater good” is an extreme example which made perfect sense to the adherents of that ritual . The widespread and venerable custom of forcing young men into rigidly hierarchical [military] organizations established for the purpose of killing more young men (and others) is just a modern version of age-old tribal customs.
.
Liberty Did Not Exist in the Tribal World or the Ancient City.
Liberty requires a concept of self-ownership. Advocates of liberty can look back to the earliest stirrings of human culture for the beginnings of that concept of self-ownership and the inalienable right to Liberty which it entails. Early cuneiform written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash included the word “amagi” which is generally translated as “freedom.”
.
Sixth Century BCE Chinese philosopher Lao Tse championed personal freedom of conscience. During the subsequent millennia the idea of freedom became ever more a driving force in the development of human culture spreading from one cultural area to another with migration and trade.
.
The concept of personal Liberty has evolved, but not rapidly. It would, however, be an error to consider the Ancient City a place where what, say, 20th Century philosopher, Ludwig von Mises might have understood as Liberty any more than early tribal world-views would have allowed for protection of what we moderns understand as individual Liberty.
.
It is important to note that while we assume all people have felt the same way about personal Liberty, that assumption is not justified. One extraordinary work exploring the governance (which rests upon the personal status of the governed) of the Ancient City is the 1864 master work of jurist and scholar Fustel de Coulanges, The Ancient City. Considering Liberty he writes:
.
“The city had been founded on a religion and constituted a church. Hence its strength; hence, also, its omnipotence and the absolute empire which it exercised over its members. In a society established on such principles, individual liberty could not exist. The citizen was subordinate in everything, and without any reserve, to the city; he belonged to it body and soul. The religion which had produced the state, and the state which supported the religion, sustained each other, and made but one; these two powers, associated and confounded, formed a power almost superhuman, to which the soul and body were equally enslaved… There was nothing independent in man… Private life did not escape this omnipotence of the state… The state allowed no man to be indifferent to its interests… The ancients, therefore, knew neither liberty in private life, liberty in education, nor religious liberty
.
It is a singular error, therefore… to believe that in the ancient cities men enjoyed liberty. They had not even the idea of it. They did not believe that there could exist any right as against the city and its gods…… [Emphasis added – R. Fucetola] The government was called by turns monarchy, aristocracy, democracy; but none of these revolutions gave man true liberty, individual liberty. To have political rights, to vote, to name magistrates, to have the privilege of being archon, — this was called liberty; but man was not the less enslaved to the state…”
.
In contradistinction to the ancient past, the past half millennium has seen very significant advances in Liberty and, in the past century or so, a clear theory of human action, or praxeology, has developed which posits Freedom of Choice as a driving factor in the advance of human civilization, as “dissatisfied” individuals engage in purposeful human action. The Austrian economist and social theoretician Ludwig von Meises hypothesized that all human action is predicated upon dissatisfaction, as did Dr. Sigmund Freud, his contemporary.
.
The minions of State-mediated illness control seek to abolish our hard-won Freedom of Choice. Control over most humans has been maintained for millennia through the use of religious and, later, political ideologies inevitably justifying the dominance of the few over the many, even when the controllers pretend to speak for, and protect, the “majority”. Through the use of what early freedom theorists such as the American abolitionist and theorist Lysandor Spooner saw as the great monopolies created by political power, this strict social control dominated human society for most of its existence.
.
These included the monopolies over conscience embodied by state religions, over the bodies of certain people (e.g., chattel slavery; prisoners, war captives, caste system members, etc.), or the property rights of approximately half of the species (in Europe, the legal “infirmities” of women, etc.) and over property through regal claims to “own” the land and economic activities of a territory (feudalism and mercantilism).
.
But in more modern times the structure of bureaucracy itself has been redesigned to become, not just to serve, the control system. Consider, for, example, how the regulatory structure of the Military Draft was used in the USA during the 1960s and ‘70s to “channel” students into certain fields, such as science, engineering and weapons design, which were considered of benefit to the state.
.
Now we see the same process at work with the incessant demands for ever more vaccines, and for forcing adults and children to receive all the vaccines that crony corporatist-tainted science can concoct without regard for either scientific validation or personal rights.
.
Humans, including infants, instinctively react to assaults by powerful figures. Have you ever really looked in a maternity hospital at the differences between boys who were just subjected to genital mutilation, as compared to boys who were not so assaulted? You will see, in the former, fright, terror, complete shut-down of normal infant behavior. The unmutilated baby boys, on the other hand, are relaxed and open to experience, as are the girls.
.
The Vax Poke is similar to being circumcised. It is an often painful assault that must leave psychological scars, even as puts the child’s health at risk from adverse reactions, for the “greater good.”
.
In this way, we can see the vaccination ritual, repeated at intervals over the couple of decades of childhood, as mind-control training. “We in authority can stick needles into you, making you sick, belittling your discomfort and subsequent illness, compromising your genome and your life trajectory, risking your health while you must remain passive and allow the assault, coming to believe that since it is for the greater good, you do not matter. Then, later, you will present your own offspring for the ritual at increasingly frequent intervals. It is, after all, for the greater good.”
.
Every vaccination of a child or an adult which is required by State constitutes Involuntary Medical Intervention and violates the most basic principle of self-determination: the right to determine what happens to your own body.
.
Central to that right is the basic human right of Informed Consent which absolutely and non-negotiably requires the right to say no to any, or every, medical or non-medical intervention. While we like to think that the right of Informed Consent includes the capacity to understand the risks that is not necessarily true. Who decides if the patient truly understands the risks if the doctor (or other State agent) believes so strongly in the procedure (perhaps making a living for him) that in his mind, anyone who refuses could not POSSIBLY understand the treatment being offered. Therefore, in the mind of this hypothetical, but all too frequently encountered, doctor the patient does not understand the risks because he/she is STILL saying “No thank you.” to treatments.
.
The fact is that there can be every reason, or no reason at all, to reject the proffered medical intervention under the doctrine of Informed Consent. Once the patient has been informed, it is up to him/her to consent. If that consent is not forth coming, the consequences must lie with the patient. But if a harmful treatment is given, the consequences must lie with the doctor and the provider – but, with vaccines, the government has abrogated that responsibility by providing manufacturer and purveyor with absolute immunity so they can harm by vaccination with impunity. There is no legal recourse against the harming doctor or harming vaccine manufacturer. There is therefore no incentive not to harm.
.
Informed consent means, in its most fundamental aspect, that it may lead to a decision NOT to accept the intervention.
.
The Right to Refuse is a cornerstone of any definition of personal Liberty since without it, Liberty dissolves.
.
There can be no right more sacred or hallowed, in fact, than that of defining the conditions of servitude, activity and resistance for the free human being by either accepting or declining the proffered intervention, offer, job, food, spouse, etc.
.
In the case of State v Biggs (46 SE Reporter 401, 1903) the North Carolina Supreme Court dealt with what we today would call “natural health.” That Court held that there could be no “state system of healing” p.402 and while “Those who wish to be treated by practitioners of medicine and surgery had the guaranty that such practitioners had been duly examined…those who had faith in treatment by methods not included in the ‘practice of medicine and surgery’ as usually understood, had reserved to them the right to practice their faith and be treated, if they chose, by those who openly and avowedly did not use either surgery or drugs in the treatment of diseases…” p.402.
.
The Court concluded, over a century ago, “Medicine is an experimental, not an exact science. All the law can do is to regulate and safeguard the use of powerful and dangerous remedies, like the knife and drugs, but it cannot forbid dispensing with them. When the Master, who was himself called the Good Physician, was told that other than his followers were casting out devils and curing diseases, he said, ‘Forbid them not.'” (p.405).
.
The lesson that the painful and illness producing jab, for which the child is presented by its trusted parents (or the adult who is led by authority figures to trust and submit to vaccination him/herself) is to teach the child, and the adult, receiver of the Jab(s), is that only (sic) “experts” matter; those in authority have the power to hurt without recourse (vaccination is an uninsurable risk) and that your knowledge of your body is far less important than anyone else’s. Further, your pain and suffering are not real. Only the premises and promises of the authorities mean anything even if what they mean requires faith, not science, to understand.
.
Modern bureaucracy, the hallmark of the “Therapeutic State,” needs mass, involuntary vaccination to maintain its power. Children, and now adults, must be offered to the fires of Moloch… or the (Therapeutic State’s) world will end.
.
Say “NO!” to mandatory vaccination now.
.
Speak truth to decision makers here: http://tinyurl.com/vaccinationISviolation
.
.
———————————————–
UPDATE: I left this note on a Christian Blog discussing vaccination [17 May 2015]:
.
Vaccination is violation. Everyone has the fundamental human right of Informed Consent to say “No!” to vaccination. #vaccinationISviolation
.
Yes the ingredients in vaccines make them an abomination; not kosher; haram… But there is another moral imperative that must be considered. Vaccines are an uninsurable risk. They are, according to the Supreme Court “unavoidably unsafe” and have a foreseeable risk of harm. Vaxx shots kill children (more have died from the measles jab than from the measles in the past decade).
.
This means that when you offer your child up for vaccination the child might die. While you have the right to sacrifice yourself for what you might believe is a higher good, you have no right to sacrifice your children. Not for the false god of herd immunity.
.
Placing your child at such risk is a clear violation of the injunction not to offer your children to the fires of Moloch [Lev. 18:21].
.
I wrote more about that here: http://drrimatruthreports.com/forced-vaccination-as-a-barbaric-ritual/
.
[Posted at: http://www.alabasterliving.com/blog/do-vaccines-violate-the-christian-faith]
.
———————————–
[1] Trustees Vax Opinion Series
Part One: Dr. Rima: http://drrimatruthreports.com/informed-consent-means-you-can-say-no/
Part Two: Gen. Bert: http://drrimatruthreports.com/stand-with-me-against-vaccines/
[2] http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/gandhis-anti-vaccine-views-ring-true-century-laterA
Link to this Article: http://drrimatruthreports.com/do-vaxxers-remember-phlogiston/
.
Thomas Scott-Phillips wrote a breathtakingly idiotic article called “Why Anti Vaxxers Just Know They’re Right” on a site called Ïnfections of the Mind (which might just as well be called “Why Evolutionary Anthropologists Just Know They’re Right”.
.
[INFECTONS OF THE MIND? WOW! Before you read a single word you know you are dealing with an intellectual fascist!]
.
The author of the astonishingly smarmy piece which says that Anti Vaxxers are naive because they do not understand science or, for that matter, reality, is one Thomas Scott-Phhillips, PhD. His advanced degree, which apparently confirred upon him the right to know that he is always right (something no anti vaxxer I know would claim) is in Cognitive Psychology and comes from the University of Edinburgh.
.
Here is what Thom has to say about himself in a paroxysm of modesty:
.
“I study the cognitive and evolutionary foundations of the human mind and human culture. I have published many academic articles in high-profile, peer-reviewed publications, and have received multiple awards and prizes for my research, including the New Investigator Award from the European Human Behaviour and Evolution Association in 2011. My first book, Speaking Our Minds, was published in November, and has been called “the most important and best book ever written on the evolution of language”.”
.
He does not list those high profile publications, nor their location, nor the prizes and awards, nor the publisher of his book. How very endearingly modest of him to not give us enough informaiton to validate his modest self assessmennt.
.
When I read Thom’s astonishingly condescending piece, I wrote a reply and posted it three times on his article’s site. Why three times? Because it was removed twice. The third was apparently a charm and it stuck. But then I thought, who is this Thom and what is he all about? Maybe he is just ill informed, arrogant and foolish with an academic’s prediliction for pompous nonsense. Maybe the lad is not really a shill for the globalist Big Pharma Agenda 21 Crony Corporatist psychopaths at all, just a misguided little lost academic in way, way, way over his head.
.
So I thought I would look up his site and write him a personal note that incorporated and expanded my reply.
.
.Here it is:
.
I responded to your article on why anti vaxxers think they know more than the “experts.”
.
Remember Phlogiston? Anyone, including Priestly, the discoverer of oxygen, who did not believe in Phlogiston as the explanation for combustibility was a fool since it was so well established and “the Science Was Settled”.
.
How about bloodletting and purging, which were the height of modern medicine and good enough for kings to die from at one time. Then there’s symphysiotomy, first advocated for pregnant women first advocated by the French surgeon Severin Pineau in 1597. Never heard of it? That could be because it turned out to be both dangerous and totally unnecessary. But the experts took a long time killing a lot of women in figuring it out (sort of like the dirty coats that spread puerperal fever so well that Semmelweis lost his license and his life over even though he turned out to be absolutely correct.
.
Mercury as a treatment for infections, including syphilis and red lead impregnated gauze for burns? State of the art in their time.
.
Vaccines are powerfully adhered to but woefully poorly supported by independent, reproducible science.
.
I am an anti vaxer because of science, not in spite of it. I am not naive. But I do not follow, herd like, where others want me to go just because they tell me I should.
.
I ask questions like whether the 100 year morbidity and mortality rates for infectious diseases, with and without vaccines developed and deployed somewhere along the way, do, indeed, show that the decline in incidence, deaths and adverse events only occurred after the introduction of vaccines or if the decline was precipitous before the vaccines were introduced.
.
http://tinyurl.com/vaccinationisviolation
.
That happens to be the statistical and epidemiological reality. Hardly naivete, Thom. Hard, cold facts.
.
Then there are the adverse event issues: safety of vaccination is a myth, and a dangerous one. If you care to engage I will be happy to share my large data bank with you on that issue.
.
Then there is efficacy: ditto the above.
.
I do not know what your characterization of nativity is supposed to mean, but it certainly is neither scientific nor just.
.
So I propose a sharing of data and information. If you are a fair minded scientist who is simply stating his opinion and conclusions, that will appeal to you.
.
If you are a shill it will not.
.
You have my email.
I look forward to your response.
.
Yours in health and freedom,
.
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.DrRimaTruthReports.com
@DrRimaLaibow
Trustees Vax Opinion Series
Part One: Dr. Rima: http://drrimatruthreports.com/informed-consent-means-you-can-say-no/
Part Two: Gen. Bert: See Below
Part Three: Counsel Ralph (Coming Soon)
.
General Bert: Here I Stand!
Stand With Me Against Vaccines Here:
http://TinyURL.com/VaccinationISViolation
Direct Link to this Article: http://drrimatruthreports.com/stand-with-me-against-vaccines/
.
For my 32 years of military service I said “Yes”.
.
“Yes, Sir! I will go to war.”
.
“Yes, Sir! I will wage a war-like peace.”
.
“Yes, Sir! You own my body and I will take all the vaccines you tell me I should.”
.
“Yes, Sir! Authority knows better than I could possibly know about my body”.
.
I know better now.
.
Now I say “NO! NO, SIR! You do not own my body. I fought for freedom to own it, not to surrender that freedom. I fought for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, not slavery, experimentation and the pursuit of profitable illness at your pleasure. No, Sir!”
.
“I will defend your right to say NO! just as vigorously as I defend my own right to that precious word. I will however, defy coerced authority.”
.
Of course, that means that I need you by my side in the battle telling the would-be enslavers who want to control what is rightfully ours – our bodies – that you are having none of it, just as I am having none of it.
.
That means pushback: putting our strength (huge numbers and real science) against their weakness (tiny numbers and the lies of corrupted science). Create Push Back by taking this Action Item every day!
.
http://TinyURL.com/VaccinationISViolation
Then mobilize every person you can help muster to do the same, taking this action viral before their induced viruses — and worse — do indeed sicken us — and worse.
.
I look to you to join me in saying “NO! Sir!” to medical tyranny in all of its form, starting with the syringes pointed at you right now.
.
Yours in health and freedom,
.
Gen. Bert
.
