Archive for Blog / Vlog – Page 202
http://www.free-press-release.com/news/200907/1248753747.html
Over a million emails sent through Health Freedom USA.org web site: Decision makers protect the right of people to self-shield in the event of a declared pandemic emergency instead of vaccination.
For Immediate Release:
(Free-Press-Release.com) July 28, 2009 —
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Media Release
Over One Million eMails Demanding Right to Self-Shield,
Protection from Untested “Swine Flu Vaccine”
Washington DC – July 27, 2009: Natural Solutions Foundation President Maj. Gen. Albert N. Stubblebine III (US Army, Ret.) announced today that over one million email messages have been generated through Natural Solutions Foundation’s website, www.HealthFreedomUSA.org, putting decision makers, including President Obama, Health Secretary Sibelius, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Neapolitano, members of Congress, Governors and state legislators on notice that Americans demand the right self-shield in the event of a declared pandemic emergency. Current State and Federal legislation could mandate Pandemic vaccines for Swine Flu or incarceration for those refusing it. Self Shielding is a third path for those who do not accept being vaccinated or incarcerated/quarantined
Gen. Stubblebine, focusing on the notice in the Federal Register on June 26, 2009, stated, “Health and Human Services Secretary Sibelius admits that the untested swine flu vaccine ‘may be effective’ and then, again, maybe not. Certainly, the threat to public health of a dangerous, unproven, untested and uninsurable pandemic vaccine should trigger the Precautionary Principle under which a vaccine may not be used until it has been shown to be safe. No such concoction should ever be approved for public use no matter how profitable. But, that is exactly what the Secretary intends. And she says that vaccinating our children and pregnant women first we ‘will just have to wait and see’ what the level of harmful side effects turn out to be! The Secretary said we will have to hope that there ‘are not too many adverse events’ but does not say how many would be too many. We say that even one is too many for an uninsurable, unnecessary and untested vaccine. Let us remember the fiasco of the last ‘swine flu’ vaccination in 1976 which killed far more people than did the non-event that flu turned out to be.”
Through its innovative Self Shielding Initiative, http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27275, the Foundation and its hundreds of thousands of supporters are calling upon Congress and the state legislatures to recognize and protect the right of people to self-shield in their own homes in the event of an actual pandemic, rather than being subjected to either a “voluntary” or “mandatory” vaccination or incarceration/quarantine, as provided for in multiple state and federal laws and Executive Orders. Those who wish to maintain the right to refuse vaccination without risking incarceration can go to the Foundation web sit, http://www.HealthFreedomUSA.org, and read the Foundation’s White Paper, “Stay Home – Stay Alive”, http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=2752, to send a message through demanding that right through its free automated submission system which will send messages to state and federal legislators and all relevant Federal Officials plus the Governor of the sender’s state.
A draft bill, prepared by the Foundation’s legal staff, the Protecting Americans’ Self-Shielding Act, forbids the use of Federal funds, agents or resources to involuntarily remove self-shielding people from their own homes. Members of Congress who support health freedom are considering introducing this bill if enough support for it reaches the desk of other members of Congress, making widespread action urgent for those who do not accept either vaccination or incarceration.
Rima E. Laibow, MD, Foundation Medical Director indicated, “Under Red Cross and standard medical guidelines, self-shielding during a pandemic is a preferred and time-honored way to prevent the spread of disease.” She also advises people to follow the advice offered by FEMA to its people to prepare a 30 day supply of food, water, medicines, vitamins and other essentials. If self shielding, these supplies will be indespensible. Instructions on Self Shielding may be found at http://www.HealthFreedomUSA.org under “Health Freedom Blog” and “Self Shielding” buttons.
Ralph Fucetola JD, Foundation Counsel said, “The common law and UN Declaration of Universal Rights enshrine the protection of people in their homes. Article 12 of the Declaration provides, “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home…” The Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution recognizes “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses…”
The Natural Solutions Foundation, established in 2004, the Voice of Global Health Freedom, is coordinating a global “push back” effort to protect the public from the dangers of not just untested and uninsurable vaccines, but also undeclared GMOs (genetically modified organisms), toxins, antibiotic and other chemical residues and the clear and present threat of industry friendly, but health hostile, international food regulations that permit these dangers, through Codex Alimentarius (the so-called “world food code”). Approximately a quarter of a million health freedom advocates world wide are members of the Health Freedom Action eAlert list, spreading the Foundation’s message of natural solutions to millions around the globe.
Despite its recent admissions that laboratory tests do not accurately identify Swine Flu (AH1N1), most cases identified as “Swine Flu” have not been labeled by lab tests, – most people infected (or suspected of infection) with Swine Flu recover without any medical intervention or the need for any treatment other than fluids and bed rest – that the virus is so low in disease-causing potential that vaccine manufacture is very slow, leading to WHO declaring it will re-engineer the virus, fueling belief that WHO engineered the novel Swine Flu virus, – new cases will no longer be counted, – all respiratory cases are being counted as Swine Flu, thus inflating case number to absurdly high levels, – drug resistant strains of the Swine Flu are emerging, WHO and CDC continue to insist that a grave public health danger exists.
These organizations are forging ahead with guidance and plans for mass vaccination, in some countries, through mandatory programs. FDA states that it intends to approve the Swine Flu vaccine before safety testing can be completed and the UK says that it will accomplish this feat in a mere 5 days after the vaccine is received although WHO cautions against such hasty approval.
Americans, in record numbers, reject the notion that an untested, uninsurable, unsafe vaccine should be injected into their bodies and those of their children in a rush to “prevent” an inconsequential disease. They understand that if the Swine Flu did mutate as threatened by WHO and CDC into a deadlier form, the Swine Flu vaccine in production now would be powerless to prevent it since once a virus undergoes significant mutation, any vaccine prepared for the previous version is totally ineffective against the new version.
They would rather stay home and stay alive. And the Natural Solutions Foundation’s Self Shielding initiative is helping them to do just that!
 |
|
News, alerts, and Other Relevant Health Freedom information |
|
INDEX |
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
August 19, 2009 Update – Media Announcement: Citizens Petition tells FDA – STOP the “Swine Flu” Vaccine Rush to Approval – Respect Our Rights!
http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=3312
[This blog links from our July 24, 2009 Health Freedom Action eAlert, posted at:
http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=3178 ]
Reactions to the Threat of Pandemic Vaccine Panic:
Don’t Jab Us!
Sue for an injunction? Rely on your Sheriff to protect you? Complain to the FBI?
Everybody’s jumping on the band wagon… and that is a good thing! We’re facing an engineered pandemic to force an unproven, untested** and uninsurable “pandemic flu vaccine” on the public. As usual, Natural Solutions Foundation led the way, demanding that governments respect our fundamental human right to Self-Shield in our own homes in the event of a real pandemic, rather than be subjected to The Jab.
Now the “health freedom movement” is reacting, and many actions are being suggested.
Making sense out of the legal confusion.
Well meaning people are initiating steps to stop globalization of the planet and mandatory, weaponized vaccination. We applaud their efforts. Some of these efforts are brilliant, some of them may be somewhat effective and some are misguided.
Herewith a guide to their implications in the United States…
Complaint charging Baxter, WHO, Obama, UN, etc., with conspiracy to commit Crimes against Humanity, filed investigative reporter Jane Burgermeister.
This outstanding effort has fired the imagination and informed millions of people, making it a worthy effort on that score. Jane Burgermeister is brilliant and we salute her effort. Since we are not experts on Austrian/EU law, we do not know the likelihood of this suit being accepted in the Austrian courts, or of the FBI responding to her well-reasoned, well-researched information linking the drug companies and the globalist population-reduction-by-any-means agenda.
Since the “accidental” contamination by Baxter of the Seasonal Flu vaccine intended for 18 European countries apparently took place in Austria, it is logical to file suit there. We have written to Ms. Bergermeister expressing our support for her efforts and urge you all to become familiar with them. Spain has a legal structure which holds that crimes against humanity any where on the planet are prosecutable in Spain. We hope that a similar suit is filed there.
Here is one of the many media reports on the action: http://www.fleshandstone.net/healthandsciencenews/burgermeister.html
This suit, which will take a considerable time to process through the Court in Austria IF it is accepted for hearing, has little impact on US law, practice or vaccination policy. Unless and until the Globalists succeed in their plans for a One World Government, laws and judgments in sovereign countries have no impact on other sovereign countries although they might have trade implications, generally sorted out through trade dispute resolutions in the World Trade Organization if another agreement cannot be reached.
So Ms. Burgermeister’s suit is outstanding in Austria, important globally and will probably have no impact legally on the US, certainly not in time to meet the immediate threat.
Injunctions in the United States Delivered to Local Police and Law Enforcement to prevent mandatory vaccination: While it is enormously satisfying to take this action, it is fundamentally meaningless. All of the provisions necessary (e.g, Executive Orders, Homeland Security and Health and Human Services Directives, legislation and policy statements by CDC, FDA and WHO, State Emergency Medical Powers Acts, etc.,) are in place for the “pandemic emergency” leading to mandatory vaccination to be declared. The Natural Solutions Foundation fully expects that to happen, which is why we are urging you so strongly to take our Action Step to demand self quarantine in addition to the current choices you have if mandatory vaccination is declared. You know those choices: take the jab or be subjected to FEMA control… or force Congress to honor your Right* to Self-Shield:
Click here:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27275
Despite the emotional satisfaction involved, however, it is highly unlikely that any court will issue an injunction against something that has not yet happened. The value of this effort is that perhaps, just perhaps, the people at the police station or prosecutor’s office where you deliver this document might read it and they might be less likely to enforce their orders for roundup, deportation, incarceration, vaccination or whatever.
We consider this a poor use of energy and time, and consider that the likelihood of changing the outcome of any order to vaccinate, detain or incarcerate people on the basis of some random people reading some documents – or not – that we cannot endorse this action, even for its educational value.
Universal Right to Refuse Vaccination Petition: The emotional and intellectual appeal of this internet activity is enormous. The political impact is zero. We have contacted the people involved in this activity to congratulate them on their activism and ask them to include the link to our Action Item for self shielding. We received no response. While it saddens us to say it, this intellectually worthy activity is educational to read but meaningless legally and in terms of any protection against vaccination. When the vaccinators are holding their syringe at your skin, explaining that if you refuse the vaccine, you will incarcerated, telling them that you signed the Universal Right to Refuse Vaccination Petition will not offer you protection. Therefore, we do not endorse this action because it provides no gain other than emotional solace in troubled times. [Your typical online or paper petitions have no legal significance. They should be distinguished, however, from formal Citizens Petitions under the Federal Administrative Procedures Act and the First Amendment’s Right to Petition for Redress of Grievances. These legal petitions are the basis of many Federal agency actions and are often a prerequisite for seeking relief in Federal Court.]
Sheriff Resistance: This legal approach holds that, as stated by the Supreme Court, there is no legal authority higher than a sitting sheriff in his own county. This is true and totally irrelevant. Although a sitting sheriff can refuse to comply with orders to vaccinate, detain, relocate or kill citizens and others, the likelihood of a full scale rebellion by a small force (Sheriffs and Deputy Sheriffs) against the United States Army and State or local Police whose authority and loyalty does not come from the traditional common law Sheriff structure, or worse yet, foreign and UN “Peacekeeping Forces” (including Chinese, Belgian, Eastern European and Canadian troops), National Guard and other non-sheriff forces seems absurd to us. Out numbered, out gunned, out commanded, any Sheriff who does oppose the mandate to vaccinate and/or incarcerate will simply wind up either overpowered and “relocated” or dead. This is, in our estimation, an invitation to armed insurrection consistent with an aggressive and non strategic thinking patterns without any likelihood of success. We cannot endorse this.
Armed Resistance: The Natural Solutions Foundation does NOT endorse, condone or support armed or violent resistance of any type for two reasons: first of all, we believe that there are better ways to fight injustice, oppression and fascism. Second, we know that the other side is better armed with weapons that can drop a resister at a mile and a half in a seizure without the resister even getting a telescopic sighting on the other side.
This is the wrong approach, guaranteeing death, incarceration or vaccination, or a combination of all of the above. Why give the other side what it wants?
For the record, with reference to the domestic terrorism law and other terrorism laws, regulations and executive orders, universally, the Foundation does not morally (or otherwise) support acts that are dangerous to human life, violate criminal law and “appear to be intended” to “intimidate or coerce a civilian population” or “influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion . . .”
We believe that push back, not revolution, is the answer to solving, not worsening, the situation.
Seemingly rational people say things like “I have my rifles and my guns – if they try to make me take a vaccine, they’ll have to take me down first”. They will, and they will do a good job of it, too.
How long can a militant hold out before the ammo runs out, the tear gas over comes him/her or the food and water run out? Or before the other side looses patience and he/she is the target of another Waco or Ruby Ridge?
If that is your preference, please understand that one such incident could serve as the “excuse” for martial law and worse.
The Natural Solutions Foundation urges you to take this moment seriously and act prudently:
1. Take the ACTION STEP
Click here:
http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/568/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=27275
2. Do whatever you can to motivate everyone you can reach to do the same and propagate this action. Our friends in Congress are considering introducing the self shielding legislation we have proposed to give us all that option. This is far more likely to happen if we can generate enormous support for it.
Read our White Paper: Stay Home; Stay Alive: Your Right to Self-Shield which has a link to the proposed bill and important information on preparations for Self-Shielding.
Click here: http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=2752
3. Stock up on supplies for Self-Shielding. FEMA is advising its people, we have been told, to lay in a 30 day supply of water, food, vitamins, drugs, etc. If that is good enough for FEMA, it is good guidance for us.
4. See our evolving Online Vaccine Resources Portal: http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=3085 and please share this link with everyone.
The Foundation has two main focuses: (1) defending your Health Freedom and (2) discovering, developing, demonstrating and disseminating Natural Solutions to social problems. Even in defense of your rights, we are focused on Natural Solutions. This “pandemic panic” — artificially created as it is — is a clear and present danger to us all, but we will not allow it to prevent us from “keeping our eyes on the prize” — a better world, where all people are free to seek out natural ways and means to achieve and maintain a healthy self and healthy community.
Thank you for your continued support in this effort!
Donations: http://drrimatruthreports.com/?page_id=189
Yours, for Peace, Hope and Freedom…
Ralph Fucetola JD
Natural Solutions Foundation Trustee and Counsel
Notes:
*The Nuremberg Code forbids experimentation on people to which they do not agree through fully informed consent. The Helsinki Declaration says that people have strong rights to determine their own health course. The United Nations Declaration of Human Rights states that people have a right to health, clean food and environment. These documents, excellent as they are, have little legal weight in the United States. We find in these documents moral justification for our common law right to Self-Shield. To protect that right, we need Congress to acknowledge and recognize the right, and to give it “teeth” by forbidding federal funds to be used to involuntarily remove anyone from their own home while self-Shielding.
The early 20th Century case of Jacobson v Massachusetts which vaccine promoters take as their legal justification for mandatory vaccines has been recently questioned as such justification in a scholarly article that has significant implications for the Right to Self-Shield. See: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1449224
That case, however, when read in light of recent discoveries regarding the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccination, supports recognition of the right. The Supreme Court said, in 1905, “We are not to be understood as holding that the statute was intended to be applied to such a case, or, if it was so intended, that the judiciary would not be competent to interfere and protect the health and life of the individual concerned.”
** Well, they are about to “test” it… NOT. How can you test the efficacy of a vaccine for a pandemic that doesn’t exist? The following article shows that we are the test subjects to see how many of us will be crippled or killed by this dangerous concoction. Even the Secretary of “Health and Human Services” has admitted that she is willing to sacrifice our young, saying that our children, pregnant women and the elderly will be among the first experimental subjects for a vaccine whose short and long term dangers cannot be known before it is used on them and that the government will (we quote her) “watch and see” to find out whether there are “too many” adverse events!
Associated Press – July 22, 2009 11:55 AM ET
WASHINGTON (AP) – The government is calling for several thousand volunteers to
roll up their sleeves for the first swine flu shots, in a race to test whether a
new vaccine really will protect against the virus before its expected to rebound
in the fall.
The National Institutes of Health’s infectious disease chief, Dr. Anthony Fauci,
tells The Associated Press that scientists first will test different
doses of the swine flu vaccine in healthy adults and, if there are no immediate
safety concerns, quickly begin testing babies and children.
The studies will begin at eight medical centers around the country – in
Baltimore; Iowa City, Iowa; St. Louis; Nashville; Seattle; Atlanta; Cincinnati
and Houston…
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Draft NO HARMonization Bill
H.R. ________: To amend the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act, Title 7 of the United States Code (Agriculture) and for other purposes.
HR _______
111th CONGRESS
1st Session
To amend the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act and Title 7 of the United States Code regarding harmonization of United States food regulations with international regulations or guidelines, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
July _____, 2009
[Co-Sponsors]
A BILL
To amend the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act and Title 7 of the United States Code regarding harmonization of United States food regulations with international regulations or guidelines, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ‘Food Regulations No Harmonization Act” and may be referred to as the “No Harm Act.”
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
1. International regulations or guidelines include the Guidelines adopted by the Codex Alimentarius or other bi-national, multinational or international bodies or agreements.
SEC. 3. CONGRESSIONAL FINDINGS REGARDING HARMONIZATION.
The Congress of the United States has determined:
1. The stated policy of the Food and Drug Administration of harmonization of United States food regulations with international guidelines announced in the October 11, 1995 issue of the Federal Register (60 FR 53078) should not the public policy of the United States.
2. The restrictions on harmonization of United States regulations enacted by Congress as 19 USC 3512 are insufficient to protect the interests of the United States and its citizens.
3. Codex Alimentarius guidelines are not mandatory upon the member nations and are merely “presumptive evidence” of the law to be applied in international trade disputes under the World Trade Organization, with member nations being allowed to adopt other science-based guidelines, laws and regulations.
4. Further restrictions on food regulations are required to protect the freedom of United States citizens to choose natural, unadulterated, nontoxic food products as a matter of national security, to protect the integrity of the national immune system thereby reducing the requirement for excessive medical costs secondary to food-born disease.
SEC. 4. NO HARMONIZATION WITH INTERNATIONAL OR DRUG REGULATIONS.
1. The Department of Agriculture, Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Trade Commission, the Food and Drug Administration and all other Federal agencies are directed to pursue a policy of not regulating food on the basis of harmonization with international guidelines or regulation of Dietary Ingredients. This policy includes all foods, including those offered with claims permitted under the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act, DSHEA. United States food regulation shall support the widest possible availability of recognized safe, high quality, high potency Dietary Ingredients and preserving to United States citizens their right to freedom of choice in health care, health care strategies and options. Organic, biodynamic and/or other non-genetically modified, non-irradiated or additive-free foods and Dietary Ingredients offered with claims to promote health, including all compounded, nutraceutical, bioidentical and functional foods, shall be included in the protections from harmonization enacted herein.
2. Neither the Food and Drug Administration, nor other department or agency of the United States, shall create a regulatory category known as “Complementary and Alternative Medicine (or Modality) Products”, or “CAM Products.” Dietary Ingredients used with informed consent by practitioners of complementary or alternative modalities shall be regulated as foods, generally recognized as safe, and not as drugs.
3. No department or agency of the United States shall issue, promote, support or permit regulations that denigrate the highest scientifically possible standards for organic foods, so that the public may be assured that, when buying foods denoted as “organic” they are buying foods that are only organic in origin and processing. Any deviation, no matter how slight, from strict organic standards must be clearly stated on the product label. These standards shall apply to organic food produced both domestically and internationally which are imported for distribution in the United States. Processes and conditions such as irradiation, gas sterilization, fumigation or other non-organic processes, which are prohibited for domestically produced organic foods shall not be permitted in foods imported into the United States and labeled or presented for sale in the United States as organic.
4. No department or agency of the United States shall issue, promote, support or permit regulations that allow irradiation of foods without that fact being prominently stated on the product label.
5. No department or agency of the United States shall issue, promote, support or permit regulations that allow Genetically Modified (GM) ingredients in foods without that fact being prominently stated on the product label. All foods which contain genetically modified (GM) ingredients or ingredients derived from genetically modified (GM) sources shall state that fact prominently on the product label.
6. No department or agency of the United States shall issue, promote, support or permit regulations that forbid purveyors of foods that are free of Genetically Modified (GM) ingredients from stating that truthful and not misleading fact on the product label.
7. All Food and Drug Administration regulations, guidances and policies that require the irradiation of food (including Dietary Supplements) or prohibit the truthful labeling of food (including Dietary Supplements) as non-irradiated, not genetically modified or toxin free are hereby repealed. This provision shall apply to imported foods as well as domestically produced foods, including Dietary Supplements.
8. Relationship of international food safety and claims agreements, including Codex Alimentarius to United States law and State law: United States law to prevail in conflict. No provision of any of international food safety and claims agreements, including Codex Alimentarius, nor the application of any such provision to any person or circumstance, that is inconsistent with any law of the United States shall have any effect. This statute may be cited as governing by any party to a dispute in any Court in the United States where such provision shall be in controversy.
9 No US agency or representative at Codex Alimentarius or other bi-national, multinational or international forum may bring forward, support or accept any standard, guideline or other international decision which conflicts with US food law or regulation, including DSHEA. US representatives must declare their opposition to, and reservations regarding, any such regulation.
10. If any international body, including Codex Alimentarius, adopts or ratifies (by vote, consensus or otherwise) a policy, guideline or standard which conflicts with US law or policy, non-adoption of which could result in World Trade Organization sanctions or trade sanctions by any other international body, the US shall take those steps necessary to adjust US law and regulation to protect it from such trade sanctions, such as adopting other science-based guidelines and laws or regulations derived therefrom, consistent with this Act.
Draft 1.2 rev.07.20.09
|
|
News, alerts, and Other Relevant Health Freedom information |
|
INDEX |
.jpg)