Author Archive for rima – Page 68
Breast Cancer Month: Through a Glass Pinkly
RUN FROM THE “CURE!”
.
Informed Consent means that you are presented with truthful information. Breast cancer month means exactly the opposite. You WILL be lied to, through a glass pinkly. They want your dis-informed consent, which is no consent at all! Before you read this important article, make sure you have your Advance Vaccine Directive in place.
.
Get it here, www.DrRimaTruthReports.com/AdvanceVaccineDirective, and then come right back!
.
Share this message with anyone who has breasts: http://drrimatruthreports.com/breast-cancer-month-through-a-glass-pinkly/
.
.
How about some Pink Ribbon to wrap up your coffin?
.
Yes, all over the world it’s Pink Ribbon Time again. Welcome, wherever you live, to Breast Cancer Awareness Month, 30 days of lies, hype and hypocrisy.
.
Let’s start with the bottom line: Breast Cancer Awareness Month is nothing more than a crass, but beautifully designed money-making sham designed to keep the cancer profits rolling in. It is pink-a-fied fear-based marketing and it is brilliant!
.
It has nothing, absolutely nothing, to do with either the prevention or cure of breast cancer because both of those would be very, very bad for business. And Breast Cancer Awareness Month is nothing but a deceptive, dangerous marketing ploy designed to benefit, first and foremost, the mammography industry and the makers of the expensive, ineffective and dangerous drugs that women are given to “treat” or “prevent” breast cancer.
.
Using mammograms to “prevent” cancer, of course, makes no sense whatsoever, given that exposing breast tissue to mammogram radiation is a known cause of breast cancer.
.
In fact, each annual mammogram in a pre-menopausal woman increases her chances of developing cancer by 1% – and the effect is cumulative. 10 mammograms? 10% increase in your chances of getting breast cancer.
.
As you well know, however, if you have been listening to Natural Solutions, taking sufficient Vitamin D, getting enough exercise and eating a healthy diet while managing stress well are the best methods to prevent breast cancer.
.
Mammography is, of course, highly inaccurate, missing about 1/3 of all breast cancers (false negatives) AND misdiagnosing an equal number of NON-cancers as false positives. It would be better if you just flipped a coin…
.
The tragedy of missing a cancer or the disaster of treating a cancer that does not exist will be a reality for about 2/3 of the tumors involved. That means that, at best, this cancer-causing procedure will get a grade of about 40 out of 100. But we keep running for the cure, don’t we.
.
Just where did Breast Cancer Awareness Month come from, anyway?
.
Here’s the official, but highly inaccurate, line: “Breast Cancer Awareness Month (BCAM), also referred to in America as National Breast Cancer Awareness Month (NBCAM), is an annual international health campaign organized by major breast cancer charities every October to increase awareness of the disease and to raise funds for research into its cause, prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure. The campaign also offers information and support to those affected by breast cancer.”[1]
.
Um, charities? AstraZenica is a charity? Hardly. It’s hardcore Big Pharma, to the Max. AZ makes tamoxifen and other cancer-causing, but very expensive, breast cancer drugs. For example, the NFL, not quite a charity, creates a sea of pink and donates money raised through its “Catch for the Cure” campaign. In 2012 the NFL donated $1.5M to the American Cancer Society, which suppresses, not supports, real cures for cancer that do not involve money makers like chemotherapy. That was, by the way, 0.0188% of the NFL’s operating revenue. Charity begins at home, but surely does not extend to the football stadium!
.
Then there’s General Electric, maker of mammography devices. GE also fails to quality as a charity but it is making out handsomely since every woman “needs” mammograms and that means we all need lots more GE mammography devices at about $1M per.
.
Oh, the one charity in the mix is the Susan G. Koman foundation, a charity which took in over $400 MILLION US in 2012 and whose CEO, Susan G. Koman’s sister Nancy Brinker made $684,717 in fiscal 2012, a 64 percent jump from her $417,000 salary from April 2010 to March 2011.
.
Last year, the Koman Foundation claimed net assets of $429,302,116. What did they actually do with this substantial amount of money besides market and pay for themselves? Hard to tell, despite the beautifully designed and compelling brochure of their annual report.[2]
.
After all the puffery has been swept aside, the answer appears to be, “Not much!”
.
You see, cancer is really relatively easy to treat and cure. I know. I have practiced drug free medicine for more than 45 years and this is an area of special pride for me.
.
But all of these organizations have one common agenda: milk the breast [cancer] for all that it is worth – and it is worth a LOT of money.
.
If any of these organizations were truly interested in your breast health, they would supply thermography devices, not mammography. If they were interested in a cure, they would be sponsoring trials of natural methods, from Vitamin C intravenous treatment to DMSO to GcMAF and beyond. But that would mean sacrificing their profits for the common good of humanity.
.
Oops! What was I thinking! That’s not going to happen. Not while there are “cures” to run for!
.
Where did this brilliant marketing ploy come from? NBCAM was founded in 1985 as a partnership between the American Cancer Society (whose by laws are widely believed to require it to disband in the event that a cure for cancer is actually found[3]) and the pharmaceutical division of Imperial Chemical Industries (now part of AstraZeneca, producer of several anti-breast cancer drugs including the hugely profitable tamoxifen, listed by the WHO as a carcinogen).
.
World-wide2001 sales of tamoxifen in 2001 were $1.024 billion.[4] Once the patent expired in 2002, tamoxifen is now available globally as a generic drug. By 2004, tamoxifen had become the world’s largest selling hormonal drug for the treatment of breast cancer.[5]
.
The aim of the NBCAM from the start has been to promote mammography as the most effective “weapon” in the fight against breast cancer.
.
But let’s take a quick recap look at mammograms:
.
- Mammograms do not save lives. They CAUSE cancer!
- False positives and negatives will create cancer diagnoses where they do not exist and miss cancers which are there with dreadful frequency, a total of 2/3rds of the time.
- False positives are common mistakes in mammography.
- Cancers that were never there are easily “cured” after surgery, radiation and chemotherapy.
- Radiation and chemotherapy themselves cause
.
Outcomes in women with and without mammography are no different. Screening does not save lives. The outcomes for women who receive mammography screenings are either the same as, or worse than, the non-mammography-screened population. Profits to mammography and medical companies, however, with and without mammography are vastly different.
.
All this pink ribbon nonsense is run by the companies that make the dangerous, unnecessary and wildly profitable mammography devices and the dangerous, unnecessary and wildly profitable supposed breast cancer drugs which, like mammography, actually causes cancer.
.
Screening is not prevention. Never was, never will be. Women who are screened are 38% more likely to have breast surgery, post-screening, than women who did not have mammograms, but the survival rate of post-mammography women is much the same as that of unscreened women. This suggests to me that the mammography group actually fared worse since they were more likely to have nothing wrong with them despite lumps “discovered” on examination, which did not exist. That says to me that extra women died in that group to equal the number of women who died from breast cancer without benefit of irradiated breasts.
.
Corporations make money when you are sick, not well, and real prevention would take money out of the pockets of those dedicated illness industries that pretend your healthy pinkness matters to them. It doesn’t. But your breast cancer certainly does.
.
So let me ask you one more time: How about some Pink Ribbon to wrap up your coffin?
.
Yours in health and freedom,
.
Dr. Rima
.
PS – And you know when Pink Month is over, it’s time for the Annual Flu Scare… time to get your Flu Vaccine — not! Sex sells. Fear sells even better. And they want you to be in fear.
.
It’s time to assert your courage and assert YOUR right to Informed Consent! Do so here: http://DrRimaTruthReports.com/AdvanceVaccineDirective
.
.
.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Breast_Cancer_Awareness_Month
[2]http://ww5.komen.org/uploadedFiles/_Komen/Content/About_Us/Financial_Reports/Susan%20G%20Komen%202013%20Annual%20Report.pdf
[3] I could find no such clause in the bylaws: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/documents/document/acspc-031718.pdf
[4] “Cancer the generic impact”. BioPortfolio Limited. Archived from the original on 2008-05-16. Retrieved 2008-11-14.
[5] Vose B. “AstraZenecain Cancer: Slide #15:” (PDF). AstraZeneca Annual Business Review. www.astrazeneca.com. Retrieved 2009-03-28. 2004 tamoxifen market share: 70% Source: IMS HEALTH, IMS MIDAS Monthly. July 2004. Aromatase Inhibitors + Tamoxifen
REAL PEOPLE EAT REAL FOOD
.
This is from our good friend, Richard Sachs, host of the Lost Arts Radio Show — which is to be carried on our new network: www.OpenSourceTruth.com. He could not be more right.
“I just was reminded yesterday that in the US govt policy is to remove the remaining natural food sources of real nutrition. It is becoming de facto a crime to eat raw organic nuts in one’s diet, just as it is to consume raw milk products. So that no one will recognize the tyranny, it is being done for our safety.
.
FDA is now moving to crack down on any natural food chains or others that dare to sell organic raw nuts and seeds because they are a potential deadly threat from salmonella. It is planned to eliminate the sale of these items. They are one of the best remaining sources of certain raw fatty acids and proteins, but especially the fats. Eliminating the fats will ensure much higher rates of dementia, neurological problems, etc. and will add to the disease and death rates without an obvious association being made between cause and effect. The organic raw natural food items are where the nutrition is. This was confirmed by Pottenger’s cat experiments for those that need further understanding of the vast difference between raw and cooked food nutrition.
.
So what that means is that people who don’t want to lose access have to get connected to local or online farmers who can still give them the raw food, uncorrupted by heat, radiation or both. I realized I need to start explaining this in radio shows as people are still trusting the food authorities and letting themselves be nutritionally starved and poisoned. Every local community in every country needs to immediately put energy into food self-sufficiency to offset the already underway culling. It reminded me of what you said your elite client had told you.
.
I hope you and General Bert are doing well and wish you the best in all you are doing.”
Richard is exactly right.
.
If you are worried about the likes of salmonella, take a cap full of Nano Silver 10 PPM — www.NSFMarketplace.com — to support normal immune system function. Healthy humans carry around on and in their bodies literally trillions of bacteria, viruses, yeast and what-not. That is called our “microbiome” and it is an essential part of our immune system. Keeping it healthy helps keep us healthy and protects from the overgrowth of any particular critter that might, if not kept in due balance, be of concern.
.
If you are worried about too many healthy people not dying quickly enough and not taking enough drugs and vaccines while they do that for you, you will do just what Richard describes the FDA as doing: go to war on all the best sources of real nutrition and pump, or should I say “pimp” the PHUDE alternatives that look like, smell like and might even almost taste like real life sustaining, nourishing FOOD. Whether its raw nuts, raw milk, cheese made with natural wooden cheeseboards (which impart the right natural microbiome balance) or any other natural food, there is no reason for FDA to waste taxpayer dollars regulating natural foods that don’t need the heavy hand of Washington, while hundreds of thousands of Americans die every year from the FDA’s approved drugs and vaccines.
.
Wake up FDA! You have become the chief threat to the health of Americans!
.
Tell the FDA that you want them to leave our natural foods alone! http://tinyurl.com/CheesyFDA.
.
In reality, of course, these synthetic disastrous PHUDE substitutes are of no value to us, only to our would-be masters.
.
You still have a choice: you can swear off the crap-o-la PHUDE and choose the real stuff and take the above Web Form Action Item to demand that FDA leave real food alone or you can submit and succumb.
.
The choice is yours, at least for now.
.
Yours in health and freedom,
.
Dr. Rima
.
And, is your AVD card in your wallet?
www.DrRimaTruthReports.com/AdvanceVaccineDirective
You HAVE an Exemption. Why Aren’t You Using It?
This Link Could Literally Save Your Life:
www.DrRimaTruthReports.com/AdvanceVaccineDirective
.
I am really upset with you and I’ll tell you why: You, in all likelihood, are not one of the small number of wise people who have protected themselves and their families from compulsory vaccination.
.
Why not?
.
If you are already protected, share this with everyone! Use this short link: http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=25863
.
If you are not, keep reading and then act to protect yourself and your family.What in the name of the merciful Lord are you waiting for? Do you really think the syringes and guns are not coming for you and for your precious loved ones?
.
Here’s what I don’t get: although you and your family already have a legal exemption to all vaccines (regardless of which of the 126 countries that have signed the Geneva Conventions that you live in) it’s likely you are one of the millions of people not using it.
.
Why or… Why not?
.
Would you rather they stick needles with God-Alone-Knows-What in your body? Because, frankly, if you don’t use this exemption now, affirmatively, they most certainly will do exactly that.
.
Here’s the deal: If you are reading this, the likelihood is that you believe that you own your own body and do not want anyone forcing you to put anything into it, including vaccines.
.
Seems reasonable to me, but The Powers That Think They Be have a very different future in store for you. Knowing that they have at least 271 new vaccines (including behavior-controlling ones) in their pipeline, they are bound and determined to come up with laws that allow them to stick every sort of vaccine into your body that they can come up with. Did you know that the American Medical Association thinks that you should be compelled to submit to experimental vaccine testing so more of them to be required? Doctors, when did you forget your Oath to your patients?
.
Unless you have been living in a very deep lead mine you know that vaccine mandates are hitting us hard and heavy all over the world.
.
But if you live in any country, anywhere in the world, that is a signatory to the Geneva Conventions, then I have good news for you and very, very bad news for the globalists who want you injected, sick and quite possibly dead.
.
You already have the right, which your country must protect, and which healthcare personnel must respect, to refuse all vaccines and other unwanted medical experiments and interventions.
.
And you have the right to do so unmolested by pressure or penalty.
.
BUT, and you knew there would be a but, you MUST affirmatively assert that right.
.
Otherwise, you are assumed to have waived it, surrendered it, passed it up and given your rights to the people with the syringes.
.
The Trustees of the Natural Solutions Foundation set out to find the best, most durable and robust way you – and we – could assert that right and we found it: an Advance Vaccine Directive card which, like a Living Will or Advance Health Care Directive, speaks for you and asserts that right.
.
Every member of your family must be individually protected with a signed, dated card in their wallet, purse, diaper bag or back pack.
.
Parents sign for children (“John Smith (parent) for Mary Smith (minor)”) and adults sign for themselves.
.
Then carry this card with you. Everywhere. It really is that simple.
.
Here’s my question: You are one of several hundred thousand people receiving this email and potentially one of millions reading this blog or receiving the email by forwarding from a friend.
.
You have reservations about vaccines, I have no doubt. Perhaps you have great resistance to them and, like me, are a Vaccine Refuser. A Conscientious Objector.
.
Why don’t you have your card in place? Are you waiting for the door to door armed guards with the syringe-wielders? Are you waiting for your child to be kicked out of school or taken away from you because she did not have a valid vaccine exemption in place and CPS came for her and accused you of Medical Neglect?
.
Do you think they will pass you over when you try to board a plane or cross a border, even one between States?
.
Go here, now: www.DrRimaTruthReports.com/AdvanceVaccineDirective.
.
Make sure you have your cards. Use them. Get them for your grandchildren.
.
Share this link with everyone you can possibly reach. The modest cost covers our expenses and helps us continue to assert your right to health freedom!
.
As General Bert says, “Informed Consent IS the defining issue of the 21st Century.”
.
Will you let it define your death?
.
Yours in health and freedom,
.
Dr. Rima
.
Secure Your Advance Vaccine Directive Card Here.
#VaxxFreeWorld
General Brief on Behalf of Informed Consent
Ralph Fucetola JD
.
Law Note on Informed Consent and the Geneva Conventions:
http://drrimatruthreports.com/the-sources-of-the-law-the-right-of-informed-consent/
2019 Citizens Petition to FDA Demanding Suspension of All Vaccine Drug Approvals as IllegalPoint One: The Legal Basis for Informed Consent
Point Two: Legitimate Government Regulation
Point One: The Bill of Rights’ Speech, Privacy and Association Rights are the Basis for Informed Consent.
Implementing the general law as applied to the protection of human life is mandated, in the instance of vaccination, by the United States Supreme Court, which held that the courts “are not without power…” regarding vaccination in the case of Jacobson vs Commonwealth of Massachusetts[1].
“Every human being of adult years and sound mind has a right to determine what shall be done with his own body; and a surgeon who performs an operation without his patient’s consent commits an assault for which he is liable in damages.”[2]
The public has a right to know, and the governments on the federal and state levels have an obligation to provide, clear information regarding the Informed Consent, to the end that government approvals, requirements, mandates and recommendations are understood to be subject to the Right of Informed Consent. Intervention by the courts must vindicate this Right.
Promoting FDA-Approved Vaccination Mandates in Violation of Informed Consent.
That Court held that there could be no “state system of healing” p.402 and while “Those who wish to be treated by practitioners of medicine and surgery had the guaranty that such practitioners had been duly examined… those who had faith in treatment by methods not included in the ‘practice of medicine and surgery’ as usually understood, had reserved to them the right to practice their faith and be treated, if they chose, by those who openly and avowedly did not use either surgery or drugs in the treatment of diseases…” p.402.
There is no compelling government interest in controlling people associating together for the improvement of their well-being.
.
The North Carolina Supreme Court concluded, nearly a century ago in State v Biggs, supra., at p.405:
“Medicine is an experimental, not an exact science. All the law can do is to regulate and safeguard the use of powerful and dangerous remedies, like the knife and drugs, but it cannot forbid dispensing with them. When the Master, who was himself called the Good Physician, was told that other than his followers were casting out devils and curing diseases, he said, ‘Forbid them not.‘” (p.405).
FDA approved drugs, including vaccines, remain in an experimental state, which the FDA calls “Phase 4” of the clinical trials system.[10]
After the horrors of the Second World War, including the murder and abuse of millions with the complicity of the “health care” authorities of various warring parties, the international community developed conventions and declarations to the end that “Never Again!” would – or could – the health system or health professionals be used to harm either individuals or whole populations. Those prohibitions and protections remain binding today.
.
.
Among the Post World War II protective codifications were the Universal Declaration of Rights, Geneva Declaration[14]and the Nuremberg Code which state, concerning the rights of all human beings and the obligation for ethical action by health personnel:
.
“The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved, as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.”[17]
.
.
“Informed consent is a process for getting permission before conducting a healthcare intervention on a person… In the United Kingdom and countries such as Malaysia and Singapore, informed consent in medical procedures requires proof as to the standard of care to expect as a recognized standard of acceptable professional practice (the Bolam Test), that is, what risks would a medical professional usually disclose in the circumstances (see Loss of right in English law). Arguably, this is “sufficient consent” rather than “informed consent.” … Medicine in the United States, Australia, and Canada take a more patient-centric approach to “‘informed consent.’” Informed consent in these jurisdictions requires doctors to disclose significant risks, as well as risks of particular importance to that patient. This approach combines an objective (the reasonable patient) and subjective (this particular patient) approach.”[20]
.
Even a “…diminished expectation of privacy does not diminish the… privacy interest in preventing a government agent from piercing the… skin. And though a blood test conducted in a medical setting by trained personnel is less intrusive than other bodily invasions, this Court has never retreated from its recognition that any compelled intrusion into the human body implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests…” (page 15; emphasis added).
If the removal of blood “implicates significant, constitutionally protected privacy interests…” it is fair to assume that other invasive medical techniques including the introduction of vaccine toxins into the body that have been held to be “unavoidably unsafe”[22] will also give rise to such concerns.
.
“…if it be apparent or can be shown with reasonable certainty that he is not at the time a fit subject of vaccination or that vaccination, by reason of his then condition, would seriously impair his health or probably cause his death.” [Emphasis added.][23]
In a regime of verbal obfuscation of fundamental Right, only the clear assertion of the Right will prevent degradation of the Right “by a thousand (bureaucratic) cuts…” If McNeely had not engaged in protected speech stating he did not consent, the taking of his blood would probably have been allowed.
.
.
.on the Constitutionally Protected Right to Informed Consent
.
.
We do not pretend to more expertise on the issue than the Court’s own pronouncements.
More recently the Court applied the principle to First Amendment speech rights arising from expressive association issues directly in point here where First Amendment protected religious expressive association is involved. In Speiser v Randall, 357 U.S. 513, 526 (1958)
.
“In practical operation, therefore, this procedural device must necessarily produce a result the State could not command directly. It can only result in a deterrence of speech which the Constitution makes free.”
And finally, of particular note is the statement in Perry v Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 597 (1972):
.
“…this court has made it clear that even though a person has no ‘right’ to a valuable governmental benefit and even though the government may deny him the benefit for any number of reasons, there are some reasons upon which the government may not rely. It may not deny a benefit to a person on a basis that infringes his constitutionally protected interests – especially, his interest in freedom of speech. For if the government could deny a benefit to a person because of his constitutionally protected speech or associations, his exercise of those freedoms would in effect be penalized and inhibited. This would allow the government to “produce a result which (it) could not command directly.”
Government Agents and those “Acting Under Color of Law” are forbidden by long-standing United States and International Law from coercing vaccination. The 14th Amendment to the US Constitution also guaranteed that the “privileges or immunities” of Federal Citizens could not be invaded by state and local governments.
It was not for no reason that the Founders grouped together in the First Amendment Religious Liberty, Speech, Assembly and Petition Rights. Rather, these stated Rights have been held by the Supreme Court to be, together, “expressive association.”
.
We consider meaningful Informed Consent to be the sine qua non of humane health care required by International Humanitarian Law. Truly, no free person should be forced to consent to mandated medical interventions.
Ralph Fucetola JD
Attorney at Law in New Jersey
1971 – 2006
PS: I’d like to recommend Mary Holland’s spirited defense of Informed Consent here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyRR-srQeVE&feature=youtu.be
Some updates to this information here:
2015: http://drrimatruthreports.com/the-21st-century-tyranny-acts/
2016: http://drrimatruthreports.com/three-brutal-govt-attacks-on-informed-consent
———————————————-
Downloaded July 8, 2015: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/ucm143531.htm
agreements of 1949, negotiated in the aftermath of the Second World War (1939–45), which updated the terms of the first three treaties (1864, 1906, 1929), and added a fourth. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Conventions
[21] Missouri vs McNeely, 569 US 141 (2013) http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/11-1425_cb8e.pdf – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missouri_v._McNeely – The recent June 27, 2019 Supreme Court case of Mitchell vs Wisconsin (No. 18-6210), in holding that a warrant is not needed for a blood-draw from an unconscious arrested person further shows the important role of expressing one’s refusal to grant Informed Consent.
Hate is sexy. It has a powerful fascination and power. And it is wrong.
There is always someone around to hate. And who to hate is an ever-changing question. Right now, it is increasingly fashionable, for example, to regard pedophiles as merely people with unusual sexual preferences but to blame increasing globalist disasters on Jews, on Zionists; to wisely lay a finger along side the nose and say, AH! It is THEM we must hate. THEY are the problem. Next month it will be the Arabs again. Or the anti-vaxxers… or the feminists, or capitalists, or this or that. And HATE is so very useful for the globalist elitists who want to “divide and conquer.” Which they may, if we don’t see through this manufactured HATE.
.
Keep reading so I can share what I wrote to a correspondent of mine (name omitted) after another email from him telling us that David Duke (for Heaven’s sake!) has it right: the problem is the JEWS.
.
Stop it! The problem is the globalists. They have no religion, creed, nationality. They have their own allegiance to themselves, and they love it when we turn on each other.
.
STOP IT!
.
Yours in health and freedom,
.
Dr. Rima
——————–
.
Dear xxx, I have a problem…
.
Well, really, a couple of them.
.
I do not believe for a microsecond that any of the wildly and terribly traumatized people whom I know who survived the holocaust in Europe had “propaganda tattoos”. That is, frankly, bullshit.
.
I knew them, I treated them, I treated their children and I treated their grandchildren. I am a psychiatrist and not much of a fool: I know PTSD and secondary PTSD when I see it.
.
I know familial transmission of trauma so deep that the soul is shattered when I see it.
.
These people told very similar versions of the same stories of ghettos, cattle cars, death camps, labor camps, loss of their loved ones under horrific conditions.
.
I know these people. I read their auras. I listened to their stories. I saw their eyes.
.
You can say what you like, and I honor your right to say it, but you are wrong.
.
My second problem is that I am Jewish. Am I a globe-destroying monster, bent on the destruction and subjugation of everything worthwhile in humanity and on the earth? No, I am not.
.
Do I believe the evil attributions you and the likes of David Duke and so, so many others in the fashionable anti-Antisemitism of the current internet subscribe to and disseminate? Do I believe that the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is anything but a fraud and hate tool? No, I do not.
.
Do I believe that the upsurge of anti-Jewish thought, feeling, emotion, etc., is, once again, tediously and wearily, well-orchestrated to create another external enemy to distract from the real enemy? Yes, I do.
.
Do I believe that Ban Ki Moon, Gates, Kissinger and their ilk are monsters? Yes, I do.
.
Do I believe that they mean all of humanity ill and that they hope to enslave and kill most of it? Yes, absolutely I do.
.
Do I believe that we have as chance to keep them from succeeding? Absolutely I do.
.
But not if we buy into their orchestrated obscenities of dividing and turning us against each other.
.
Sadly, your positions of anti Jewish/Semitic, or whatever you want to call it, rhetoric feeds their schemes.
.
I would urge you to rethink your positions.
.
I join you in working against the globalists, the oppressors, the murderers, the depopulationists and the would-be neo-aristocrats who would plunge us all into a neo-feudal trans-humanism enslavement from which, in their plans, we will no longer have the ability to recover.
.
They are evil. They are white, black, Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, etc. They are not our brothers.
.
But please, please, put aside their puerile propaganda and see them for what, and who, they are, and stop using their external enemy tactic in your ongoing search for Truth.
.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima