The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.
For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Silver is a highly useful natural antibiotic which, if used correctly (and it is hard to use it incorrectly, but can be done – see below) is astonishingly safe. it is known to eliminate malaria, colds, yeast such as Candida, pathogenic bacteria, parasites, and a host of other disease causing organisms. There is only one type of silver which does not, however, kill beneficial bacteria while it kills disease causing ones. All other types of silver kill the good and the harmful organisms in and on our bodies.
Recently the news media made a huge fuss about the man who turned blue from the use of colloidal silver. Apparently, he did not turn blue. And he, himself, is convinced that the problem was not the silver so much as the tap water that he used to make it.
Why would the media invest so much time and effort in a bogus story (Mr. Jones did not turn blue)? Perhaps it is helpful assist to the FDA which has been trying to ban colloidal silver for at least a decade. After all, a safe, inexpensive, easily made, anti viral, anti mycoplasma, antio bacterial agent which people can control for themselves while taking money out of the hands of the pharmaceutical industry (which calls the tune very well for the FDA) would be real threat to the vast antibiotic market now so wel entrenched in the general culture. The FDA appears to be riding the blue man (who is not blue at all) into a golden (not silver) future where this self administered, safe medication is no longer a legal substance in the US and, through the power of Codex Alimentarius, is no longer available everywhere.
This must not be allowed to happen. Keep on using colloidal silver and avoiding drug companies drugs!
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
[We are grateful to Life & Health Research Group, Inc. for permission to re-print the following interview from their newsletter, regarding the colloidal silver user who was said by the news media to have “turned blue” from using colloidal silver. We find it astonishing that the major news media could get a story so wrong, when a simple phone call could have clarified everything. Absolutely no reproduction of any part of this report is allowed without the expressed written permission of the publisher. Copyright 2006, Life & Health Research Group, Inc., PO Box 1239, Peoria AZ 85380-1239]
An interview with Stan Jones, the 2002 Libertarian Senate candidate from Bozeman, Montana who news media outlets have claimed “turned blue†from taking colloidal silver:
Background:
On 10-3-02 a friend in the nutrition industry forwarded to me a CNN news article that had been circulating on the internet. The news article basically stated that Montana Senate candidate Stan Jones had “turned blue†from taking daily doses of colloidal silver between 1999 and 2001. This story soon began circulating widely on the internet, and was even picked up by the British Broadcasting Company (BBC) web site.
On 10-4-02 I called Mr. Jones’ campaign office and left a message on his answering machine introducing myself as a health writer and publisher, and asking him to return my call. I explained that I hoped to be able to speak with him briefly about colloidal silver usage and the information in the news articles that had been circulating on the internet regarding his skin discoloration. I asked if he would clarify some points so that I could relay the information to the readers of my publications who may be interested in the proper and safe usage of colloidal silver. On 10-8-02 at approximately 1:30 p.m. (PST) Mr. Jones returned my telephone call.
Notes:
I began by thanking him for returning my call, and promising not to take up too much of his valuable time. “I know you are in the middle of a busy election campaign so I’ll try to keep this brief. Your case is very unusual, something of an anomaly,†I began. “Yes, yes, very unusual,†he answered, “this normally doesn’t happen with colloidal silver usage.†He continued, “However, the first thing I want to tell you is that I am not as blue as the news media is making me out to be. At certain times there is what I suppose you could call a bluish-gray tinge on the skin under my eyelids and perhaps a little on my lips. And the skin under my finger nails also has a tinge of discoloration to it. On some days the discoloration seems to be more pronounced, and on other days it is barely visible, if at all. Most people who meet me never even notice it, but on occasion some do. The spin that the media has put on this story is not at all accurate. It is highly exaggerated. The discoloration is very minimal. I have not ‘turned blue.’ The extent of skin discoloration is not even remotely near what the news media are saying. It is very minor and generally barely noticeable.â€
I told him I had a number of questions that I hoped he could answer, so that other people interested in using colloidal silver could do so from a more informed perspective. He replied, “Let me tell you what happened first, and that will probably answer most of your questions…I began taking colloidal silver in 1998 while I was living in Washington state. I had done some research on Y2K and learned of colloidal silver and its powerful natural antibiotic qualities through that research…I started out using distilled water to make my colloidal silver, but I soon switched to tap water(1) because I erroneously believed the tap water in Washington State was relatively pure and mineral free. I added saline drops(2) to the tap water to increase the electrical conductivity of the solution. To make the colloidal silver I used a device composed of three nine volt batteries(3) along with two silver wires that were .999 fine in purity. I was making the colloidal silver solution in a small plastic cup(4) at that time. That was my introduction to colloidal silver…In 1999 I moved to Montana. At this time I began drinking about eight ounces a day of colloidal silver, using an eight minute generation period. I was still making it in tap water, and of course, I had no idea what concentration I was making. At that time I kept a two gallon jug of water in the refrigerator, so I started making very concentrated eight ounce batches of colloidal silver, and adding it to the two gallon jug of water in the refrigerator(5). To make these concentrated batches, I used a one hour generation process. I was still using tap water to make these initial highly concentrated(6) eight ounce batches of colloidal silver which I was then adding to my drinking water(7).â€
At this point in the conversation I interrupted and told Mr. Jones about the research from the late 1960’s in which doctors had given rats extremely high dosages of silver in water, relative to their body weights, and discovered that the silver solution at those high dosages had a very toxic effect on the rat’s livers. This toxic effect on their livers appeared to shut down the process by which silver is carried from the body and excreted. I explained that the doctors had discovered something very interesting: when they supplemented the rats with vitamin E and selenium, the liver damage and resulting toxicity was completely negated, and the rats were then able to ingest these relatively large dosages of silver with no problem. I asked Mr. Jones if he was aware of this research, and he said he was not. I asked if he had been taking a daily multi-vitamin/mineral supplement containing vitamin E and selenium at all during the period of time he had been using colloidal silver in Washington state and Montana, and he said he did not think he had been. He stated, “Of course we know for a fact that the body is able to process colloidal silver quite well, if it is made correctly and the dosage levels and concentrations are not too high. I think it is when colloidal silver is incorrectly made using tap water or sources other than distilled water, and is taken at higher dosages and concentrations for long periods of time that minor problems like the one I’ve experienced can result.â€
He then stated that since he first started noticing the minor skin discoloration a year ago, he began studying colloidal silver usage more carefully, and has learned there are many variables to take into consideration when making colloidal silver. He said, “Even things like the type of water you use to make your silver solution, the size of the silver wire you use, the length of the time and the electrical voltage at which you generate the silver, the resulting concentration you produce in terms of parts per million, and many other factors, all of which can make a big difference in the final result.†He stated that he has since learned that some people strain their homemade colloidal silver through a paper coffee filter in order to remove larger particles, so that they are only ingesting the tinier particles that make it through the filter. He said he now believes the tinier particles are easier for the body to process.
I asked him if he had any advice for users of colloidal silver, in terms of things they can do to avoid the apparently minor problem he has encountered with skin discoloration. He said that people should be sure to use nothing but pure distilled water to make their colloidal silver, and that they should be very careful in regards to the dosages and concentrations they take. “Don’t use tap water to make your colloidal silver. Use pure distilled water only. And don’t take very large dosages or strong concentrations for long periods of time.â€
I asked him how he felt about the media’s take on his story, and he stated once again that he felt it was highly exaggerated, and in fact was being blown out of proportion. “I am not blue,†he reaffirmed, “but there is some minor skin discoloration in small areas on my face and hands which is occasionally noticeable, though not always.†I asked him why he felt the skin discoloration seemed to be more noticeable on some occasions and barely perceptible on others, and he stated that he did not know.
I further asked if he felt the FDA would attempt to use his case in order to bolster their attempts to ban colloidal silver. He stated, “It doesn’t matter if they do, because we now know how to produce colloidal silver ourselves. We don’t need the FDA. We have the means of production at our fingertips. They can’t stop us from using it. I am convinced it is a very powerful and effective natural antibiotic, and that it is relatively safe when made and used correctly.â€
I asked whether he was still taking colloidal silver and he said “No. Not at this time. I stopped using it last year after I first noticed the slight skin discoloration. But I can feel a cold coming on right now, so I am going to start using it again.†He stated that during the entire time he had been taking colloidal silver he had not been sick, not even so much as a cold. “Now that I’ve learned more about how to make colloidal silver correctly using distilled water, and to watch the dosage and concentration levels, I will start using it again.â€
At this point in the conversation Mr. Jones was interrupted by the arrival of guests (I could hear him telling someone to come in and take a seat and that he’d be with them momentarily). I assumed he was calling from his campaign office. I thanked him profusely for taking time out of his busy schedule to speak with me. He asked me to name the two nutritional supplements that helped prevent silver toxicity in the study I had mentioned earlier, and I told him they were vitamin E and selenium, and that the daily dosages I had read about were 200 to 400 IU of vitamin E and 200 micrograms of selenium. He stated that he thinks the daily vitamin/mineral supplement he now uses has those levels of vitamin E and selenium in them. I asked if he wanted me to send him a copy of the research on vitamin E and selenium in conjunction with silver usage, and he said it would not be necessary. He concluded by stating once again that he is convinced colloidal silver usage is completely safe as long as it is made properly, and the dosage levels and concentrations are not overly high.
I then wished him luck on his campaign for the Senate seat in Montana. He said “thank you†and we hung up.
Barbara Loe Fisher, the tireless vaccine freedom advocate, has published an excellent partial summary of the growing grassroots opposition to the forced vaccination of children. Here it is:
Grassroots Vaccine Freedom Movement Gears Up
by Barbara Loe Fisher
The grassroots vaccine safety and freedom movement in America, which was launched by parents of DPT vaccine injured children in 1982, has been gaining public support during the past quarter century as the numbers of vaccines medical doctors force children to get has more than doubled. From New York and New Jersey to Missouri and Mississippi Americans young and old in big towns and small cities around the nation are joining together to talk about how to change the increasingly oppressive mandatory vaccination laws in their states so they can make informed, voluntary decisions about vaccination.
It is no surprise that decades of collective denial and neglect by the medical community has led to a demand for fewer and more flexible vaccine laws. The calls jamming the phone lines and the emails and letters from desperate parents pouring into the National Vaccine Information Center have never been more alarming or heartbreaking than they are right now.
Mothers describe how they took their child to a pediatrician or public health clinic for a scheduled well baby “check-up” or sick child visit and witnessed nurses and doctors injecting their child with 5 or 8 or 12 vaccines all at once, Then, they say, they watched their children regress into chronic poor health and disability. Many of the children have suffered previous vaccine reactions, which were ignored or dismissed as “a coincidence” by doctors insisting the children be re-vaccinated. Other children are sick and on antibiotics. Others have been born premature or have personal or family histories of severe allergies and autoimmune and neurological disorders.
Over and over again, mothers describe in identical terms what they witnessed, their babies and children suffer following vaccination – seizures, high pitched screaming, collapse, unconsciousness, high fevers, body rashes, head banging, flapping, profound personality changes – cognitive and physical regression that changes the child physically, mentally and emotionally forever. And over and over again, mothers describe how their pediatricians stubbornly deny the vaccines just given had anything to do with what happened.
As someone who has witnessed the proliferation of vaccines and vaccine laws devastate the health of three generations of children, there are no words to adequately describe the pain, despair and fear that has destroyed the once joyful time of young parenting in America today. Children and their parents have become unwilling victims of a medical- industrial complex driven by the profit motive and powered by an ideology that has a callous disregard for individual human life.
It is no wonder that more and more Americans, young and old, are demanding the right to make informed, voluntary vaccination choices for themselves and their families. The grassroots vaccine safety and freedom movement in America is taking root in many states, particularly in those with the fewest exemptions and most vaccine mandates inflexibly implemented.
The conscientious belief exemption to vaccination should be added to the religious exemption in every state and medical exemptions should be widened to provide enlightened physicians with the power to write exemptions for those who do and do not have medical conditions conforming to the narrow one-size-fits-all contraindication guidelines of the CDC and AAP.
The right to informed consent to use of any pharmaceutical product or medical procedure, which carries a risk of injury or death, is a human right. Vaccination should be no exception.
NVIC supports the efforts in every state to change vaccine laws to allow informed, voluntary vaccine decision-making. In Mississippi, parents will be meeting March 17, 2008 at 6 p.m. at the Flowood Public Library, 103 Winners Circle, Flowood, MS to talk about adding a conscientious belief exemption to Mississippi state laws, which only allow a medical exemption. Go to http://parents.m eetup.com/465/ for more information.
***********************************************************
“As states move to require more vaccines for school-age children, an increasing number of parents are saying no to some of the inoculations. They are seeking exemptions from the state in growing numbers….Rita M. Palma, of Bayport, N.Y., sought a religious exemption from vaccines for her three sons but was turned down after a hearing with school officials. She said she had become increasingly uncomfortable with the vaccines the boys were getting…..After submitting a written request for a religious waiver, she was questioned at a two-hour hearing by the lawyer for the Bayport-Bluepoint School District and turned down last February by the school board. The New York Civil Liberties Union is now pursuing her case. “It is unbelievably traumatic to have your religious convictions questioned,” Mrs. Palma said. “For schools to be in the religious sincerity business is just outrageous.” Sue Collins, co-founder of the New Jersey Alliance for Informed Choice in Vaccination, said parents often face a variety of roadblocks when seeking vaccine exemptions in the state. “We see schools decline letters, or tell parents that clergy must write letters,” she said. “Parents are being harassed and being asked to do things above and beyond the law.” Assemblywoman Charlotte Vandervalk, a Republican from Bergen County, who introduced a conscientious exemption bill for vaccines, said parents shouldn’t have the burden of proving a religious or medical reason to refuse vaccines. “This is America; you don’t force it on everybody,” Ms. Vandervalk said.” – Fran Silverman, New York Times, (March 2, 2008)
http://www.nytimes.com/ 2008/03/02/nyregion/nyregionspecial2/02Rvaccine.ht ml? _r=3&pagewanted=1&ref=nyregionspecial2&oref=slog in&oref=slogin
“The point of it is the parents should be in charge of the health care needs of their children,” said Drumright, whose daughter is 8 and sons are 6 and 4. “It’s not up to the state to dictate to parents how they should make important health care decisions about their children.” Sen. John Loudon, R-Chesterfield, said he’s considering backing a proposal for a personal exemption. He has headed similar efforts in the past, most recently in 2003. “I am always open to it,” Loudon said of the idea of a personal exemption. “I think when a parent does their diligence and has cause for alarm, they should have the authority over government to control the health of their children.”……Missouri parents once had the right to exempt their children from immunizations without needing to provide a reason. But the law changed in 1992, and now parents can only opt out of their kids’ shots for religious or medical reasons…..”As more and more vaccines are being added to the list, that is where you’re getting some pushback by parents, and legitimately so,” said Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center, a vaccine safety watchdog agency in Vienna, Va. She said parents are feeling pressured and powerless with all the vaccine mandates. “The one- size-fits all approach to vaccinations … is simply not medically responsible,” Fisher said. “Parents have to be given more flexibility.” – Andale Gross, Associated Press (February 29, 2008)
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/new s/stories.nsf/missouristatenews/story/6B1F6136D15D 8F1F862573FF00201C8D?OpenDocument
“Tyler’s father, Chris Holzinger, said, “After his 2-year-old vaccinations, he became less verbal; eye contact ceased. He started swaying, head-butting, doing a lot of these autistic characteristics.” Tyler’s parents and 200 others are active in an online support group backing a bill giving Mississippi parents the choice to not have all vaccines….Kellie Bischoff, president of the support group, said,”Well, that’s a scary thought, but if you look at the other 48 states with nonmedical exemptions, it really is not an issue. They do not have outbreaks.” Just like the other 48 states, the support group wants religious and philosophical exemptions added to the bill. Mississippi and West Virginia are the only states without the exemptions. Even though it’s risky, the support group president stopped vaccinating her oldest daughter, Emma, at 2 years old because she had seizures. Her youngest, 2- year-old Addie, hasn’t been vaccinated yet. Bischoff said, “If something were to happen and there were a serious vaccine reaction, the parent is ultimately responsible for taking care of this child, not the doctors, not the state, not the school board.” – WAPT-TV (ABC affiliate in Jackson, MS) (February 11, 2008)http://www.wapt.com/news/15276018/detail.html
The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.
For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
“babies are often taken into custody – a couple of times a week at the Royal Alex alone – and judgments are made in each case about necessary security measures.”
Who is your child’s custodian? You or the State? At one hospital in Canada, Royal Alexandra Hospital in Calgary Alberta, several children are taken into custody each week. Why? Are parents so dangerous to their Chidren or have the intrusive policies of the State become so astonishingly invasive that “several children” are taken away from their parents each week?
In the US, at least, what happens to these children is literally harrowing. Forced drugging, sexual abuse, emotional and physical abuse, separation from people who love them, perhaps starting with their parents and then often from foster care givers. What are we doing to our society? And why?
Could this increase have anything to do with the change perpetrated by the FDA to make children in foster care subjects for drug experimentation without the nicety of an informed consent signed by anyone? That means that the state is paid by drug companies for experimentation on the most vulnerable and most defenseless members of our society: children in foster care.
This lack of informed consent extends to prisoners, too. Could that be why the numbers of prisoners are increasing nearly exponentially in every state in the US?
If this is not the reason for these increases, I hope that someone can tell me what the real reason is.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Mom steals own baby
Takes one-day-old child from hospital without legal custody
By NICKI THOMAS AND GLENN KAUTH, SUN MEDIAA communication breakdown may have allowed a 19-year-old mother to abduct her own child from hospital yesterday – but there are no problems with security measures, says a Capital Health official.
“This was not a random child abduction by a stranger. This is not something that should cause a lot of anxiety to other parents. This is a case that does happen very rarely when social services are involved,” said spokesman Steve Buick.
Just after 10 a.m. yesterday, police were alerted by staff at the Royal Alexandra Hospital that a woman had left the building with her one-day-old child, of whom she did not have legal custody.
Minutes later, the woman – who cannot be named under the Youth and Family Enhancement Act – boarded a bus heading toward Castledowns.
“She didn’t have anything on the baby except a blanket. We thought it was a doll,” said Arlene, who was on the bus with the woman and later called a social worker at the hospital when she became concerned about the mom’s behavior.
“I was thinking that it wasn’t a baby – the way she was holding it. It was almost like a rag doll in her arms,” said Arlene, who didn’t want her last name used.
She added the mom was very fidgety and seemed paranoid.
The mom got off the bus near 122 Avenue and 97 Street and took a cab to her home at the Evergreen Mobile Home Park, where police located her and the baby.
Children’s Services spokesman Heather Massel couldn’t say specifically why the mom had lost custody of the baby, but said an apprehension order is generally carried out when a parent is unable or unwilling to care for the child.
She said the baby is safe and in the care of children’s services. Buick said that babies are often taken into custody – a couple of times a week at the Royal Alex alone – and judgments are made in each case about necessary security measures.
“It’s hard to predict the way a new mom will react to the news that her baby is going to be taken into custody. Everybody involved makes their best judgment about how an individual mom will react and most of the time, that judgment is (that) it will be OK. Once in a blue moon, literally every few years, that judgment won’t work out the way that people had in mind and the mom will just react badly and run off with the baby,” he said, adding the last time this happened was six years ago.
Despite losing custody of her child, the mother was allowed regular access to the baby, said Buick.
“Her being with her baby was exactly as it should have been. The judgment about apprehension does not necessarily mean that the mom shouldn’t have any contact with her newborn baby,” he said.
Buick admitted there may have been a breakdown in communication between staff and social services regarding the apprehension order and Capital Health will be looking into what happened.
“In a busy unit like this with a number of patients going through it, it’s very possible that someone who had just come on shift didn’t know that this order had been made and may have given mom a wrong impression,” he said. “We should have been watching more closely than we were and if there’s any improvement we can make, we’ll look for how.
“The bottom line is there wasn’t any extra security required, so it wasn’t really a breach of the security measures. There’s no way that it would be good for this family or any other family for us to start putting armed guards outside every door in these units. This is a risk we have to manage and it’s a very, very tiny risk.”
Police will not be laying charges against the mother.
Got a News Tip?
The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.
For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
This interesting piece is a compendium of quotes, with attributions that will make the concerned person’s hair stand on end. mine is.
Share this information widely.
And don’t forget to give generously to the Natural Solutions Foundation so we can keep bringing important and timely information, and taking strong and effective action, to protect your health and health freedom.
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
Profits before Safety
Quotes
[You can see how child safety doesn’t feature in the medical cartel’s agenda. Years after they find a vaccine is found to be “unsafe” (that’s just more unsafe than usual) in one country, it may eventually get withdrawn in others. Then they just sell it to a third world country, another weapon in their covert ploy to reduce the world’s population. And naive folk think they make vaccines to save children’s lives, and that they really think MMR is safe!]
1. Use up stock even though proven unsafe or use cheaper less safe vaccines
2. Use flawed or fraudulent methods to get vaccines on market
3. Avoid long term safety studies for obvious reasons
3b No government vaccine testing
4. Change the law to limit liability to government not vaccine companies so removing one of the main drivers for safe vaccines
4b Formulate a vaccine damage law (VICP) so it is very difficult to claim & prove vaccine damage against the government
5. Buy up the vaccine experts so you are less likely to lose vaccine damage cases that prove vaccine dangers
6. Keep safety data secret from government regulators
7. Government vaccine regulators & medical doctors “controlled” by vaccine companies
7b. Industry funds vaccine “Nonprofit” Groups
8. Buy up the media so investigative journalism on vaccine safety & dangers is almost non-existent:
9. Disregard for safety can be seen in the selling of withdrawn vaccines to third world, and unethical vaccine experiments
10. Non vaccine examples
“Clear and certain medical knowledge, namely that the BCG-vaccine is not only ineffective but also harmful, was kept quiet for 27 years (in Germany) while the vaccine continued to be used and children were being harmed by it….almost 500 (estimated) cases of vaccine damage per year.”–The Decline of Tuberculosis despite “protective” Vaccination by Dr. Gerhard Buchwald M.D. p119/117.
NAAR should know that I was on the WHO immunology panel for 20 years and continually urged discontinuation of thimersol in vaccines. The only ones who listened were the Scandinavian countries (esp. Finland, where I hold an honorary Ph.D.). Those countries banned thimersol in 1992.—–H. Hugh Fudenberg, M.D.
” Goldman also reports that shortly after communicating on authorship issues with health officials associated with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) concerning the shingles data and analysis, he was threatened with legal action if he published the manuscript in the medical literature. He said, “Whenever research data and information concerning potential adverse effects associated with a vaccine used in a human population are suppressed and/or misrepresented by health authorities, not only is this most disturbing, it goes against all accepted scientific norms and dangerously compromises professional ethics.”” ATA REVEALS THREAT OF SHINGLES EPIDEMIC FROM VACCINE USE Health Officials Threaten Legal Action Against Researcher
1. Use up stock even though proven unsafe or use cheaper less safe vaccines:
“DOCTORS have been told to come clean about Infanrix, the safer whooping cough jab available on the NHS – but only if directly challenged about it by parents. The compromise means that parents who ask no questions will have their children injected with the cheaper DTwP jab laced with ethyl mercury – a substance ordered out of US medicine on health grounds.”–Media Feb 2003
“For decades, American pharmaceutical companies have known how to produce the safer DPT vaccine but decided not to bring it to market because it would increase production costs and lower the drug’s 50% or higher profit margins.”–Money Magazine
“Drug companies keep DTP alive because it is less-expensive to make, offers a bigger profit margin and can be easily dumped on developing countries……Because many pediatricians prefer to reduce office visits by giving the combined DTP-HiB shot and because many HMOs use about 50 percent DTPH, as many as 30 percent of American infants still get reactive whole-cell pertussis.”–NVIC http://www.909shot.com/gnssafet.htm
“The British drug company Glaxo Wellcome allowed thousands of British babies to be inoculated with toxic whooping cough vaccines it knew had not passed crucial safety tests.”–Media July 2001
“MERCURY, one of the most dangerous substances known to man, is being used in a series of infant vaccines – in spite of a warning from NHS advisers that its use as a cheap preservative “may be toxic” to babies aged under six months….. “The very low thiomersal concentrations present in the pharmacological and biological products are relatively non-toxic in adults,” the UKMI report says. “But it may be toxic in utero [in the foetus] and during the first six months of life.” It is the first time any UK health official has admitted to the danger posed by mercury in vaccines…..The list includes four out of the seven flu vaccines issued this year by the government, a pneumonia vaccine and four of the 11 child vaccines. The main source is the triple DTwP jab, for whole-cell diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis. “–Media Jan 2003
“They say there is growing concern that a mercury compound in the three-in-one DTP vaccine may cause autism and brain damage. The vaccine, which protects against diphtheria, tetanus and pertusis or whooping cough, is given to infants of eight weeks and older. However, the Department of Health has said there is no cause for concern and that the vaccine is safe for children….”–Media Jan 2003
“Michigan had made too much DPT in its Lansing laboratory and wanted to sell it to other states. That required FDA testing and approval, as with any other manufacturer. However, the FDA denied approval and returned the vaccine, saying It was 300 percent too potent. State health officials disagreed and decided to test the vaccine on children in Ingham County (Lansing). Despite more adverse reactions than usual, health officials released 400,000 doses of the DPT vaccine for use throughout the state a month later.”—Fresno Bee DPT report 1984
“They began using MMR in April 1989 and by July doctors were already warning of side-effects, but the government didn’t take any notice because it was not convenient for them. They kept using it for another 3 years, securing the profits for the manufacturers”.—Shunsuke Fuji
“Congress requires records to be kept of the lot numbers of vaccines for which unusually large number of “adverse events” (side effects) are reported. But the information is then simply ignored. The “hot lots,” as they are called, are not destroyed, but continue to be injected into infants and children. (no use throwing out expensive vaccines–dollars are worth more than lives, just as in the U.K.) “—Dr Rimland
“SENIOR government advisers said as early as 1989 that vaccines could provide a route by which BSE could be transferred to human beings.”–Media report
“Up to 300 cases relate to this brand of vaccine – Pluserix – which was banned by the Department of Health in 1992 after being linked with meningitis. This was two years after an identical vaccine was banned in Canada.”–Media
“THE Department of Health has told doctors they must use stocks of a mercury-based vaccine for infants even though it is being phased out for safety reasons.”–Media Aug 2001
“According to one memo, SV40 was found in three of 15 lots of the oral vaccine seven months after the federal directive was issued in March 1961. Lederle released the contaminated vaccine to the public anyway, the memo shows. The documents also suggest that the company failed to test the monkey- kidney seed strains used to make the bulk polio vaccine for contamination, despite a written warning from Dr. Albert Sabin, who developed the oral vaccine.”–Media
“In 1990, scientists from the Queen’s Medical Centre Nottingham found some children developed a form of meningitis after receiving it. But despite this the Government went on using it for more than two years. The Canadian Government, also using the vaccine, immediately switched to a safer version. It was not until September 1992 that the UK Department of Health issued pharmacists with emergency supplies of a safer brand with instructions to withdraw existing batches.”–Sunday Express
“The British drug company Glaxo Wellcome allowed thousands of British babies to be inoculated (late 60’s-early 70’s) with toxic whooping cough vaccines it knew had not passed crucial safety tests.”–Media July 2001
2. Use flawed or fraudulent methods to get vaccines on market:
“The Prevnar pre-licensure clinical trials, which Wyeth Lederle paid Kaiser Permanente to conduct, compared two experimental vaccines against each other. To compound this basic methodological flaw, Kaiser and Wyeth Lederle, allowed most of the children in the trial to be given the more reactive DPT vaccine rather than use the safer, less reactive DTaP vaccine. This placed the children in that five-year experiment in greater danger and allowed the drug company to write off the seizures that occurred as being caused by DPT and not Prevnar, when in fact, they didn’t know. Even so, the groups of children who got Prevnar suffered more seizures, higher fevers, more irritability and other reactions than did the children who got the other experimental vaccine. It was a no-brainer as far as I was concerned: Kaiser and Wyeth Lederle had proved nothing about Prevnar vaccine safety.”–Barbara Loe Fisher
“The evaluation of safety and efficacy and federal approval of Prevnar is laden with ethical questions. Many of the doctors directly involved in the testing and approval process appear to have significant conflicts of interest. The efficacy of the vaccine is questionable and safety testing has been terribly inadequate. There are no long-term studies (i.e. more than 5 years) of the chronic, debilitating and life threatening diseases that this vaccine may cause. The fact that the vaccine is bio-engineered by combining various types and portions of bacteria should require it to undergo considerable scrutiny. Assuming the vaccine has any efficacy at all, the need for universal vaccination needs to be reexamined in light of the small number of children who might be at risk from serious complications from pneumococcal disease. “—Michael Horwin, MA
3. Avoid long term safety studies for obvious reasons:
JABS has not been able to find any properly conducted trials where the safety of the vaccines has been monitored for more than a few weeks. JABS has not been able to find any studies of the long-term consequences of the use of the MMR vaccines
Why Does The MMR Vaccine Need To Be Suspended? http://www.argonet.co.uk/users/jabs/mmrsuspend.html
“The anthrax vaccine was approved without every doing a controlled clinical study. There is no long term safety data on the anthrax vaccine. The government admitted this in congressional hearings. It is a distortion of the truth to say there is substantial safety data.”–Bart Classen
“Longest safety trial of of the triple vaccine (MMR, all live attenuated viruses) was three weeks.”–Dr Fudenburg MD
“I have minutes from a CDC Study Group Meeting on the Hepatitis B vaccine held in March, 1997. The minutes of the meeting show that it would take at least a 60 day study to show the onset of MS. Clinical studies done by the two manufacturers were four and five days in length, respectively. It should be noted that the afternoon session of this meeting was chaired by Dr. Robert Sharrar of Merck.”–Betty D. Fluck
3b No government vaccine testing:
“FDA virologist Peter Reeve…….. acknowledged that the FDA suspended its own independent tests of vaccine purity 15 years ago, leaving it entirely up to the manufacturers to ensure the vaccine is contaminant free.”–‘The Virus and the Vaccine’: Atlantic Monthly http://www.whale.to/vaccines/sv409.html
“In addition, the U.S. Office of Technology, one of the few semi-reliable agencies of the U.S. government, says there is no current system utilized by the CDC to determine if the vaccines do work or how dangerous they really are.”–Dr Douglass M.D.
4. Change the law so liability is limited to government not vaccine companies which removes one of the main drivers for safe vaccines:
“Vaccine manufacturers and others are sheltered from product liability lawsuits by a special 1986 act of Congress. (See the US Code 42 USC 300aa for details.) This act set up a fund to compensate those who can prove serious injury from vaccines.”–Roger Schlafly
“But instead of selling the safer Japanese (DPT) vaccine, Warchafsky says, U.S. manufacturers asked Congress to limit their liability for adverse reactions to any vaccine mandated by the government, hinting they might stop producing children’s vaccines without it. ” —-Congressional Quarterly Researcher
4b Formulate a vaccine damage law (VICP) so it is very difficult to claim & prove vaccine damage against the government
Vaccine law quotes
5. Buy up the vaccine experts so you are less likely to lose vaccine damage cases that prove vaccine dangers:
“And then the industry started buying up the experts,” he contends, citing the example of James Cherry, a widely recognized pertussis expert who has served on both the ACIP and the AAP’s vaccine advisory committee.”—-Congressional Quarterly Researcher
CASE No. 82-1232, Cossette Krause, vs F.K. Abbousy, MD et al (State of Ohio), transcipt of videotape deposition of Dr Edward Mortimer September 6, 1984.. On page 11 reads the following:
“Several years ago, because of the increasing amount of litigations over DTP, members of the so-called Red Book Committee of the American Academy of Pediatrics agreed in a sense that we would sort of divide up the cases to try to help the manufacturers in these lawsuits, and therefore I and a number of my colleagues agreed to serve as expert witnesses.”
6. Keep safety data secret from government regulators:
“FDA virologist Peter Reeve…….. acknowledged that the FDA suspended its own independent tests of vaccine purity 15 years ago, leaving it entirely up to the manufacturers to ensure the vaccine is contaminant free.”–‘The Virus and the Vaccine’: Atlantic Monthly http://www.whale.to/vaccines/sv409.html
“Since the 1920s, virtually all continuing medical and public health education is funded by pharmaceutical companies. In fact, today, the FDA can’t even tell health scientists the truth about vaccine contaminants and their likely effects. The agency is bound and gagged by proprietary laws and non-disclosure agreements forced upon them by the pharmaceutical industry. Let us not forget that the pharmaceutical industry, as a special interest group, is the number one contributor to politicians on Capital Hill.”–Leonard Horowitz
“Since vaccine development information is considered proprietary (protected by nondisclosure policies) government officials and researchers must shield potential safety issues from public scrutiny. This censorship is rationalized by the all too persuasive argument that vaccines cannot be criticized lest the public become non-compliant in taking them. Finally, this silence is buttressed by the small number of people capable of critically evaluating vaccine manufacturing and safety testing procedures. In essence, health care professionals and the general public know little about the possible dangers of live viral vaccines.”–Dr Martin
7. Government vaccine regulators & medical doctors “controlled” by vaccine companies
Vaccine Conflict of Interest Quotes
7b. Industry funds vaccine “Nonprofit” Groups quotes
8. Buy up the media so investigative journalism on vaccine safety & dangers is almost non-existent:
quotes Rare instances: Fresno Bee report Money Magazine William Carlsen
9. Disregard for safety can be seen in the selling of withdrawn vaccines to third world, and unethical vaccine experiments
“Using kids as guinea pigs in potentially harmful vaccine experiments is every parents’ worst nightmare. This actually happened in 1989-1991 when Kaiser Permanente of Southern California and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) jointly conducted a measles vaccine experiment. Without proper parental disclosure, the Yugoslavian-made “high titre” Edmonston-Zagreb measles vaccine was tested on 1,500 poor, primarily black and Latino, inner city children in Los Angeles. Highly recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), the high-potency experimental vaccine was previously injected into infants in Mexico, Haiti, and Africa. It was discontinued in these countries when it was discovered that the children were dying in large numbers.”–Dr Alan Cantwell MD
“To determine the effect of different amounts of the vaccines, researchers at the hospital inoculated newborns from mostly lower-income black families with doses ranging up to more than 100 times the dose recommended for adults.”–Media
On september 14, 1992 two measles vaccines (Pluserix & Immravax) were banned in the UK after it was revealed that children had developed meningitis. On Sept 16, 1992 the New Zealand government withdrew Pluserix
1997 Brazil:
OUTBREAK OF ASEPTIC MENINGITIS ASSOCIATED WITH MASS VACCINATION WITH A URABE CONTAINING MMR VACCINE
2002:
“Officers are also investigating how a consignment of potentially dangerous mumps vaccine was sent to one of Direct Health 2000’s suppliers. The vaccine sent by a German distributor turned out to be of the Urabe strain, banned in Britain since 1992 as it can cause viral meningitis in babies. “–Media 2002
10 .Non vaccine examples
“The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulation Agency found from information that had been in its possession for more than a decade that high doses of the anti-depressant can lead to aggression and thoughts of suicide. But instead of revealing the truth to the 17,000 people taking high doses and the other half-million Britons on a safer dose, the MHRA sat on its findings. Astonishingly, I was actually threatened with legal action by Professor Kent Woods, chief executive of the MHRA, if I revealed this.”—RICHARD BROOK
In the same year, the Washington Post (3) published the fact that Ritalin which is prescribed to very young children had never been tested on that age group (under 6’s) and yet, between 150,000 – 200,000 children between the ages of 2 and 4 were prescribed Ritalin. Hilary Butler letter to BMJ 2004
Nov 15, 2004 Pharmaceutical giant Merck & Co Inc. had evidence by 2000 that its painkiller Vioxx, which was pulled off the market on Sept. 30, was not safe [Media Nov 2004] Merck Knew Vioxx Was Unsafe by 2000
[Media aug 2001] Drug scientists ‘put profits before lives’
CJD warnings ignored
[Media March 2004 Seroxat] Why I resigned over this disgraceful “happy pill” cover-up
[Home]
Food prices are rising as biofuel uses up farm land and farmer’s time. Worse, Codex compliant foods, shipped long distances, add much more to global warming than locally produced and consumed foods (whose nutrients are more available and taste better, too). But all over the world, food is becoming so expensive, and the food shortages of food in storage are becoming so extreme that the ability of the poorest members of society to obtain food is becoming more and more difficult.
The following Australian article notes that a the price of a cow has increased in the past year from $700 Australian dollars to $1400 this fall. What this means to the poorest is cataclysmic. What it means to the middle class is difficult. What it means to the international corporations that control the production of food (Big Agribiz and Big Biotechna) is what disease means to Big Pharma and the rest of the illness care industry: profits, and big ones at that.
The David Suzuki Foundation notes that a basic North American meal could travel about 1,500 miles to get to your dinner table?
Transporting food causes greenhouse gases that lead to global climate change while locally grown foods help conserve farmlands and wildlife habitats. Local food also reduces the environmental costs of food transportation and is more likely to be fresh than food shipped long distances.
In fact, local eating has a new name: locovores. People whose diet consists primarily of food grown in their local areas have taken on the characteristics of a new type of human. Locovores celebrate the seasons and eat what their region produces all year long. Locovores can be meat eaters, non meat eaters, vegans, raw foodists or whatever they please. But whatever they fill their plates with, it did not travel long to get there. They are saving fuel, saving time, saving costs and saving the planet. And their food tastes better, too. Not a bad deal.
Grow and eat local organic produce to stem this tide of manipulated sticker shock and failing food supplies. Better yet, grow some or all of your own food in your own gardens or in community gardens. Find out more about community gardens from Canadian Health, the American Community Gardening Association (http://www.communitygarden.org/).
Do yourself and the planet a favor. Help counter the global food shortage by buying and eating locally.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Food fear beats climate change
Article from: The Advertiser, Australia
CLARE PEDDIE, SCIENCE REPORTER
January 17, 2008 09:30pm
A WORSENING global food shortage is a problem far more urgent than climate change, top Australian scientists have warned.
The Australian Science Media Centre briefing heard why prices for some staple foods had risen by as much as 60 per cent in the past year, and how dramatic price rises are expected to sweep across all staples in the near future.
Executive director of the Australian Farm Institute Mick Keogh said dairy products, grain and poultry had seen the strongest price rises in recent months.
Beef and lamb were forecast to follow, with nationwide livestock shortages taking the average price for a cow from $700 a head 12 months ago to $1400 a head going into autumn.
Key speaker at the national science briefing Professor Julian Cribb said the security of our food supply is “the global scientific challenge of our time”.
The problem was more urgent even than climate change, said Professor Cribb, from the University of Technology in Sydney, because it will get us first . . . through famine and war. “By 2050 we will have to feed the equivalent of 13 billion people at today’s levels of nutrition,” he said.
“This situation brings with it the very real possibility of regional and global instability. Investment in global food stability is now defence spending and requires proportionate priority.”
A “knowledge drought” – the lack of innovation to address farm productivity challenges – had added to the crisis, Professor Cribb said.
He called for a massive increase in public investment in agricultural research and development.
Farmers face challenges posed by drought, climate change, rising oil prices, erosion and nutrient loss combined with more demand for food stocks and biofuels.
Global grain stocks have fallen to their lowest level since record-keeping began in 1960, while Australia’s sheep flock is at its lowest since the mid-1920s, with about 86 million.
In September last year 2007 the Australian Bureau of Statistics found consumers were paying 11.9 per cent more for basic food items than they were two years before. That is almost double the Consumer Price Index rise of 5.9 per cent during the period.