The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.
For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based campaigns, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Scientists – they’re not always right
Date Published: 22/05/2002
Author: Peter Mansfield
Why do we assume scientists have all the answers? And what do we do if those scientists are the problem?
Last week I was asked by a group of anti-vivisectionists to discuss on radio a WHO report about the use of primates in medical research. I declined, despite strongly held views. Sound bites may be the oxygen of broadcasters, but they make for very unsatisfactory debates.
It always comes down to what you choose to assume. No science is possible without making some assumptions from which questions are framed for the scientist to answer. To start with, we assume that the methods of science are appropriate for answering questions.
That in itself may not be a problem. The trouble is that we let scientists ask the questions as well as answer them. That is unwise, because scientists tend to ignore the big picture in favour of their special interests. Inevitably, they frame questions which they will enjoy tackling. They then invariably find that the answer, at least in part, is the need for more research.
In consequence, we find ourselves endorsing a huge haze of abstract ideas we do not understand. We, our politicians and commentators avoid challenging these ideas, lest we appear foolish. The scientific establishment, meanwhile, seldom admits to the fragility of its ideas – far less its assumptions. It has awarded itself a god-like status, and we tolerate that.
But what if scientists’ undeclared assumptions are in fact false? In that case, any questions and answers that follow from them will merely compound the initial falsehood.
Take research on primates – or any other animals, come to that. The initial assumption goes like this: human rights supersede animal rights. It matters not that the human disease being researched might result from self-abuse – the wrong food, or too little exercise, for instance. No, we conduct research on animals to find cures for our self-inflicted illnesses, instead of looking at what we are doing wrong so as to stop these illnesses from occurring in the first place.
Secondly, we assume that similar genetic codes mean similar animals. Yet the few genes that distinguish us from other mammals cannot possibly account for the striking contrasts in form, function and talent. Genes are the same in all the cells of one individual, yet different cells within the same animal have radically different forms and functions. What makes one cell part of your eye, another your heart and another your brain? Hi-tech gene-speak only camouflages our ignorance.
OSTRICH MENTALITY
In September 1997 The Lancet – an internationally-respected journal of medical science – published an analysis of the findings of a series of scientific trials of homoeopathic medicine. It set out to check whether the apparent benefits of homoeopathic medicine were actually just examples of the placebo effect – in plain language, self-delusion.
The result was positive. The studies found that homoeopathic remedies did indeed have a net positive effect after self-delusion, bias and all other confounding factors had been carefully ruled out. The paper then survived review by at least two other experts before The Lancet agreed to publish.
Even then, in the same edition The Lancet published not one but two leading articles by placebo sceptics. One simply refused to accept the result at face value – ultimately, because ‘the “infinite dilutions” of the agents used cannot possibly produce any effect’. The other conceded that ‘there is enough in the study to [ask] for good controlled trials’, but doubted whether ‘resources [for] these trials can be justified when a rational basis for… homoeopathy… is lacking’.
In other words, even though a system of medicine has effectively been acquitted of quackery in the highest available scientific court, it remains in the dock because the scientists don’t know how it works.
That’s as philosophical as it gets. Fixed mind-sets and vested interests are the usual obstacles. The UK’s Medical Research Council (MRC) is, for example, about to publish its thoughts on how to fill the embarrassing black hole in research on the fluoridation of water.
A fabric of dogma, constructed through 70 years of tendentious research, hailed water fluoridation as the best way to correct inequalities in dental health. That dogma began [you can guess where!] in the US with the then reasonable assumption that people only obtained fluoride from water. But Americans don’t drink much tea, which is a rich source. And then toothpaste became fluoridated anyway, and food items began to be processed and manufactured with fluoridated water.
Now, the facts are that many people in non-fluoridated areas consume as much fluoride as those with fluoridated water supplies. Sometimes they consume a lot more flouride than could ever possibly be good for them. This effectively rubbishes all the studies that compared populations simply on the basis of the fluoride content of their water supply.
Yet it took a systematic scientific review and about five years to force dental academics – their banners long nailed to fluoridation – to take into account personal consumption of fluoride from all sources. We have yet to see if this concession finally makes it into the MRC report.
I can’t help noting the parallels between the fluoridation saga and the way the MMR story is unfolding. Creating MMR was little more than an act of technical cleverness. But it also exceeded nature, and was, therefore, wrong in principle. But so little do its protagonists care for public opinion that they intend to compound the error by adding chicken pox vaccine to MMR. It will then become a quadruple hit. A pathologist friend of mine reacted to this proposal with dismay: ‘Two immuno-suppressant viruses in the same vaccine? Whose bright idea was that?’ Were he a Pharmaceutical industry employee instead of a private practitioner, he wouldn’t have to ask.
This sort of ‘science’ abuses both the resources and trust of the public. As Richard Asher said: ‘If you can’t explain a complex technicality to your landlady’s daughter, you don’t understand it yourself.’ Nor are you earning your corn.
MORE DETAIL ON BIOWARFARE VECTOR OF VACCINES AND CANCER VIRUSES KNOWLEDGE
Frankly I think all the data says it very clearly. Merely from above: [ http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/02/311032.shtml]
First, From 1911, US military vaccines made manditory. Psychopathic USA elites (you know, the people who brought you German eugenics and the USSR funding simultaneously*) think that with all the information they got about their own ‘quarantine experiments’ in the late 1800s in the USA (see below***), they were ready to spread the disease?
Second, it states in comments that the flu pandemic started in the USA among troops ready to be sent into Europe, and thus, ready to be sent (intentionally? likely) to infect the entire world like an overglorified bunch of tainted mosquitoes. It further states that this was ignored at the time, for some “unknown” purpose, though they were sent overseas anyway. The U.S. in later wars has experimented on its troops with unknown vaccines, likely for “perfecting” various debilitations by design–since all these vaccines that were used both in Bush I’s Gulf War and Bush II’s Gulf War Ongoing were entirely unauthorized and untested by the way. The military operation makes a nice social environment of command and control to test out illegal human experimentation.
Third, it states in other comments about the influenza as well as the treatment frameworks themselves combined being responsible for high mortality since other treatment ideas that are far less destructive and far more naturopathic (and thus no money to be made in them by the pharma-companies that have always been conected to eugenics interests**) led to much better survival rates.
citations:
*
Wall Street and Hitler, by Antony Sutton;
http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-hitler.html
Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, by Antony Sutton,
http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-bolshevik-rev.html
free copies at a website I have nothing to do with, they are only free here.
**
War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race, by Edwin Black;
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1568582587/qid=1108792104/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/102-2617314-8848149
State Origin: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS, by Boyd E. Graves, J.D.
http://www.boydgraves.com/
MORE ON VACCINES AS THE VECTOR IN PLANNED HOLOCAUSTS:
***
The History of the Development of AIDS–AND THE HISTORY OF EUGENICS/MYCOPLASMA ALWAYS CONNECTED, FROM 1889 WHEN MYCOPLASMA FIRST ISOLATED
Chapter Excerpt from “State Origin: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS”
by Boyd E. Graves, J.D.
The true history of the origin of AIDS can be traced throughout the 20th Century and back to 1878. On April 29 of that year the United States passed a “FEDERAL QUARANTINE ACT”.
The United States began a significant effort to investigate “causes” of epidemic diseases. In 1887, the effort was enhanced with the mandate of the U.S. “LABORATORY OF HYGIENE”. This lab was run by Dr. Joseph J. Kinyoun, a deep rooted-racist, who served the eugenics movement with dedication.
Two years later, 1889, we were able to identify “mycoplasmas”, a transmissible agent, that is now found at the heart of human diseases, including (AIDS) HIV.
In 1893, we strengthened the Federal Quarantine Act and [LO AND BEHOLD, SUSPICIOUSLY] suddenly there was an explosion of polio. [THAT COULD BE TEST MANAGED AND DATA GATHERED THANKS TO THE LAWS QUICKLY PUT IN PLACE BEFOREHAND.] [This mycoplasma=’polio’ symptom is a vector that The Ecologist’s article fails to go into by the way, even though it was mentioned that the symptoms of polio get thrown around in multiple classifications and are attitubed to many different things. “Polio” merely as the same type of operation as the AIDS’s “grab bag” category of later 20th century?]
In 1898, we knew we could use mycoplasma to cause epidemics, because we were able to do so in cattle, and we saw it in tobacco plants. [Then, we see wider cattle experimentation perhaps, as mentioned in the early 1900s where the US Government killed off all those cattle with vaccine programs…to see if they could….]
In 1899, the U.S. Congress began investigating “leprosy in the United States”.
In 1902, We organized a “Station for Experimental Evolution” and we were able to identify diseases of an ethnic nature.
In 1904, we used mycoplasma to cause an epidemic in horses.
In 1910, we used mycoplasma to cause an epidemic in fowl/birds.
In 1911, Vaccines made mandatory in the US military.
In 1917, we formed the “Federation of the American Society for Experimental Biology” (FASEB).
In 1918, the influenza virus killed millions of unsuspecting. It was a flu virus modified with a bird mycoplasma for which human primates had no “acquired immunity”. It started in the USA military camps in the American Midwest, and was spread to Europe. Caused more deaths as a percentage of population than Europe’s Black Death bubonic plague of 1348-50s.
In 1921, lead eugenics philosopher, Betrand Russell, publicly supported the “necessity for “organized” plagues” against the Black population.
In 1931, we secretly tested African Americans and we tested AIDS in sheep.
In 1935, we learned we could crystallize the tobacco mycoplasma, and it would remain infectious.
In 1943, we officially began our bio-warfare program. Shortly thereafter, we were finding our way to New Guinea to study mycoplasma in humans.
In 1945, before the U.S. dropped bombs dropped on civilians of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Atomic Energy Commission writes a classified report on a covert human test of a “small atomic bomb” on Black Americans at Port Chicago, California. It was intentionally detonated in the middle of the night, when only Black American “dispensible” porters would be in the harbor. The Atomic Energy Commission refuses to say why it was flown there to conduct the investigation and report, of what was publically was discussed as only an “accidental munitions explosion.”
In 1945, we witnessed the greatest influx of foreign scientists in history into the U.S. biological program. Operation Paperclip will live in infamy as one of the darkest programs of a twisted parallel government fixated on genocide.
In 1946, the United States Navy hired Dr. Earl Traub, a notorious racist biologist.
A May appropriations hearing confirms the existence of a “secret” biological weapon.
Same year, future pharmaceutical czar George Merck reported to the US Secretary of War, that he’d managed to weaponise the toxin extracted from the Brucella bacterium and to isolate it into an indestructible crystalline form using only the DNA particles–exactly the same technique of crystallization for the tobacco mycoplasma in 1935. Merck of course was making the first polio vaccines as well…that were knowingly contaminated with the monkey virus.
In 1948, we know that the United States confirmed the endorsement of “devising a scheme” in which to address the issue of overpopulation in certain racial groups. State Department’s George McKennan’s memo will forever illuminate the eugenics mendacity necessary for genocide of millions of innocent people.
In 1949, Dr. Bjorn Sigurdsson isolates the VISNA virus. Visna is man made and shares some “unique DNA” with HIV. See, Proceedings of the United States, NAS, Vol. 92, pp. 3283 – 7, (April 11, 1995).
In 1950s, aerial spraying of the Brucella crystals via chemtrails was deployed on Chinese and Korean populations during the Korean War (a war actually run as a “police action” from the United Nations, not the United States, and the United Nations person in charge of organizing police action aginst USSR incursions into South Korea was…surprisingly a USSR general.) Many U.S. veterans of the war later developed Multiple Sclerosis. The army recognized that the MS was Brucella-related and paid the veterans compensation. Although the Brucella micoplasma can lay dormant for decades, it was learned that it can be usefully triggered by vaccines. That set some people to thinking…
In 1951, we now know our government conducted its first virus attack on African Americans. Crates in Pennsylvania were tainted to see how many Negro crate handlers in Virginia would acquire the placebo virus.. They were also experimentally infecting sheep and goats. According to author Eva Snead, they also held their first world conference on an AIDS-like virus.
In 1954, Dr. Bjorn Sigurdsson publishes his first paper on Visna virus and establishes himself as the “Grandfather of the AIDS virus.” He will encounter competition from Dr. Carlton Gajdusek.
In 1955, they were able to artificially assemble the tobacco mosaic virus. Mycoplasmas will forever be at the heart of the U.S. biological warfare program.
In 1957, future U.S. president, Rep Gerald Ford and others gave the U.S. Pentagon permission to aggressively deploy offensive biological agents. There are no recorded cases of AIDS prior to the 1957 creation of “Special Operation-X.” (The SOX) program served as the immediate prototype program for the Special Virus program to begin in 1962.
By 1960, Nikita Kruschev had been let in on the biological weapon. His 1960 statement will long reflect the arrogance of the secret blend of communism and democracy. The two countries would go to a November 1972 agreement to cull the Black Population.
In 1961, scientist Haldor Thomar publishes that viruses cause cancer. In 1995, he and Carlton Gajdusek informed the National Academy of Sciences that “the study of visna in sheep would be the best test for candidate anti-HIV drugs.”
In 1962, under the cover of cancer research, the United States charts a path to commit premeditated murder, the “Special Virus” program begins on February 12th. Dr. Len Hayflick sets up a U.S. mycoplasma laboratory at [Skull and Bones founded] Stanford University. Many believe the “Special Virus” program began in November 1961 with a Phizer contract.
Beginning in 1963 and for every year thereafter, the “Special Virus” program conducted annual progress reviews at Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA. [Hershey, PA, was an entirely privately and corporate run city, run by Mr. Hershey, thus without any public government so it was a politically safe test site for mass experimentation.] The annual meetings are representative of the aggressive nature in which the United States pursued the development of AIDS.
In 1964, the United States Congress gave full support for the leukemia/lymphoma (AIDS) virus research.
In 1967, the National Academy of Sciences launched a full scale assault on Africa. The CIA (Technical Services Division) acknowledged its secret inoculator program.
In 1969, Fort Detrick told world scientists and the Pentagon asked for more money, they knew they could make AIDS. Nixon’s July 18 secret memo to Congress on “Overpopulation” serves as the start of the paper trail of the AIDS Holocaust.
In 1970, President Nixon signed PL91-213 and John D. Rockefeller, III became the “Population Czar.” Nixon’s August 10 National Security Memo leaves no doubt as to the genocidal nature of depopulation.
In 1971, Progress Report #8 is issued. The flowchart (pg. 61) will forever resolve the true laboratory birth origin of AIDS. Eventually the Special Virus program will issue 15 reports and over 20,000 scientific papers. The flowchart links every scientific paper, medical experiment and U.S. contract. The flowchart would remain “missing” until 1999. World scientists were stunned. The flowchart will gain in significance throughout the 21st Century. It is also clear the experiments conducted under Phase IV-A of the flowchart are our best route to better therapy and treatment for people living with HIV/AIDS. The first sixty pages of progress report #8 of the Special Virus program prove conclusively the specific goal of the program.
By June 1977, the Special Virus program had produced 15,000 gallons of AIDS. The AIDS virus was attached as complement to vaccines sent to Africa and Manhattan. However, because of the thoroughness of authors, like Dr. Robert E. Lee, we also learn the Stanford Mycoplasma Laboratory issues one of the first papers with AIDS in the title. “Viral Infections in Man Associated with Acquired Immunological Deficiency States.” The primary scientist, Dr. Thomas Merigan, was a “consultant” to the Special Virus program.
Progress Report # 8 at 104 – 106 proves Dr. Robert Gallo was secretly working on the development of AIDS with full support of the sector of the U.S. government that seeks to kill its citizens. Dr. Gallo can not explain why he excluded his role as a “project officer” for the Special Virus program from his biographical book. Dr. Gallo’s early work and discoveries will finally be viewed in relation to the flowchart. We now know where every experiment fits into the flowchart. The “research logic” is irrefutable evidence of a federal “Manhattan-style project” to develop a “contagious” cancer that “selectively” kills.
Dr. Gallo’s 1971 paper is identical to his 1984 AIDS announcement.
Progress Report #8 at 273 – 286 proves we gave AIDS to monkeys. Since 1962, the United States and Dr. Robert Gallo have been inoculating monkeys and re-releasing them back into the wild.
Thus, even government scientists are baffled that both HIV-1 and HIV-II would “suddenly emerge” from two distinct monkey ancestral relatives during the last 100 years. A 1999 Japanese study will ultimately prove the Man to Monkey origin of Monkey AIDS. The monkey experiments summary definitively proves Monkey AIDS is also man-made.
In 1972, the United States and the Soviet Union entered into a biological agreement that would signal the death knell for the Black Population. The 1972 agreement for collaboration and cooperation in the development of offensive biological agents is still U. S. policy.
In 1973, we find that world scientist, Garth Nicolson reports on his project, “Role of the Cell Surface in Escape From Immunological Surveillance.” His report is accompanied by seven published papers. Dr. Nicolson worked in conjunction with the Special Virus program from 1972 until 1978. Dr. Nicolson is considered by some to be Dr. Gallo’s “West Coast” counterpart. It is strongly held that because of Dr. Nicolson, Dr. Robert Gallo and Dr. Luc Montagnier would secretly meet in Southern California to coordinate what they would and would not say about the special virus development program.
In 1974, Furher Henry Kissinger releases his NSSM-200 (U.S. Plan to Address Overpopulation). It is the only issue of discussion at the World Population Conference in Bucharest, Romania. The men in the shadows had won, the whole world agrees to secretly cull Africa’s population. Today it is Africa and other undesirables. Tomorrow it may be you.
In 1975, [unelected and entirely appointed] President Gerald Ford signs National Security Defense Memorandum #314. The United States implements the Kissinger NSSM-200. Dick Cheney is made Ford’s Chief of Staff. Ford’s Secretary of Defense is Donald Rumsfeld. Rumsfeld helps to bring Cheney on board the Ford White House.
In 1976, the United States issues Progress Report #13 of the Special Virus program. The report proves the United States had various international agreements with the Russians, Germans, British, French, Canadians and Japanese. The plot to kill Black people has wide international support. In March, the Special Virus began production of the AIDS virus, by June 1977, the program will have produced 15,000 gallons of AIDS. President Jimmy Carter allows for the continuation of the secret plan to cull the Black Population. The background on Carter: the appointed Ford’s appointed VP is Nelson Rockefeller–who almost becomes President in a coup within a year or so after three assassination attempts on Ford’s life. When that didn’t work, the next elected president, Carter, has his whole Administration full of personal appointees of David Rockefeller, called “Trilaterials”. David Rockefeller is the early 1970s organizer of the Trilaterial Commission, an internationalist “global harmonization” policy organization between The U.S. , Japan, and Europe. All Trilaterals are personally picked by David Rockefeller. Carter, along with over 20 of his appointees to his administration, are Trilaterals. George H. W. Bush is appointed as CIA Director by the unelected and strictly appointed Ford White House. Carter removes Bush from this position. George H. W. Bush was a Trilateral. Trilaterial Commission organizer David Rockefeller and Ford appointed VP Nelson Rockefeller (who as Governor of NY State, with his financier brother David Rockefeller, built the WTCs) are both in turn brothers of John D. Rockfeller, III, the “Population Czar.” George H. W. Bush has been connected to the Rockefellers since the early 1900s, through railroad connections via the Harrimans.
In 1977, Dr. Robert Gallo and the top Soviet Scientists meet to discuss the proliferation of the 15,000 gallons of AIDS. They attach AIDS as complement to the Small pox vaccine for Africa, and the “experimental” hepatitis B vaccine for Manhattan. According to authors June Goodfield and Alan Cantwell, it is Batch #751 that was administered in New York to thousands of innocent people. This government will never be able to repay the people for the social rape, humiliation and out right prejudice people with HIV/AIDS face on a daily basis. The men in the shadows of the AIDS curtain accurately calculated that you would not care if only Blacks and gays are dying. In fact you don’t care that nearly a half million Gulf War veterans are encumbered with something contagious. Soon there will be no more Black people and a confused military, older White people will start suddenly dying and you still won’t get it. Be here now for us, give us a chance to be there for you.
Suddenly, just as President Nixon had predicted, there was explosive death. On November 4, 1999, the U.S. White House announced,…. “Within a period as short as five years, all new infections of HIV in the United States will be African American….” At some point our experts must be allowed to begin the interface process of allowing the history of this virus program to count. It is ludicrous and preposterous to fail to review the U.S. virus program in which to elucidate the etiology of AIDS.
More of the history of the secret virus program can be found in the archives of Dr. John B. Moloney. A review of the files under Dr. Moloney’s name would further pinpoint additional dates and records consistent with one of the greatest hunts, capture and proliferation of disease in the history of the human race. We have found the missing link. It is the guts of the research logic of a federal program that seeks to kill. We have found a curtain of AIDS. We can identify some of the people who work in the shadows of the curtain. Dr. Robert Gallo and Dr. Garth Nicolson must lead us in review. In light of the attack mechanisms available in which to inhibit AIDS, it is time that not another person be stricken with this relic, synthetic mycoplasma chimera.
Help those of us who are still here to realize full and contributory lives. We are all one people.
In May of 1987 the austere Times of London reported on its front page that the smallpox vaccine administered by the World Health Organization had triggered AIDS. 100 million vaccinated Africans were at risk. Areas with the largest amount of inoculations showed the greatest concentrations of AIDS cases. Robert Gallo was quoted in the article as endorsing the figures and stating that, “AIDS researchers…will keep their mouths shut because they are paid to do so.”
In 1992 WHO director David Heymann stated that, “The origin of AIDS is of no importance to science today.”
In 1995 the Catholic charitable organization Human Life International accused the WHO of attempting population control in Africa and elsewhere.
On September 28, 1998 Boyd Graves filed suit against the United States for the “creation”, “production” and “proliferation” of AIDS. On November 7, 2000, the appeals court agreed with the lower court and held AIDS bioengineering as “frivolous.” The world continues to wait for the court to rule on the resubmitted issues. The court can not continue to simply brush aside our experts and the government’s flowchart.
In April 2000 the Observer newspaper reported that the pharmaceutical leviathan GlaxoSmithKline sponsored experiments on children at Incarnation Children’s Center in New York City. Children as young as four were given multi-drug cocktails. In other experiments, six-month old babies were injected with double doses of a measles vaccine. More than 100 orphans and babies were used in 36 experiments.
March 2003, Haruna Kaita, a pharmaceutical scientist and dean of a Nigerian university took samples of the latest WHO vaccine to India for analysis. Serious contaminants were found including sterility agents.
2004: This sort of experimentation has occurred with increasing frequency. Last year, 2004, the Environmental Protection Agency received $2.1 million from the American Chemistry Council to conduct studies on children from impoverished families in Duval County, Florida. The children will be exposed to a variety of known toxins over a two year period. The study will determine how chemicals are absorbed, ingested and inhaled by children ranging in age from infants to 3 year olds. For taking part in the study, families will receive $970 and a tee-shirt.
December 2004: The Times also reported last December that Gulf War Syndrome had been positively linked to vaccines. More than 100,000 veterans currently suffer from the syndrome contracted in 1991 during Desert Storm. 20,000 veterans have died so far.
Boyd Graves writes: I have been asked to give my perspective with regard to the federal program MK-NAOMI . MK-NAOMI is the code for the development of AIDS. The “MK” portion stands for the two co-authors of the AIDS virus, Robert Manaker and Paul Kotin. The “NAOMI” portion stands for “Negroes are Only Momentary Individuals.” The U.S. government continues to orchestrate silence from the very top echelons of the Congress and military. At present there is no accountability. The good people will ultimately create a tsunami of public outrage. We can not allow the state an autocratic right to govern outside of the Constitution. Our society is structured to hide crimes committed by the state, while punishing citizens for minor indiscretions. Their strategy focuses on the general confusion they can create via manipulation of the media. They are very good at what they do. We must become more focused in our continued presentation of the flowchart. The flowchart is the absolute missing link in proving the existence of a coordinated research program to develop a cancer virus that depletes the immune system. New diseases do not create old illnesses.
This compilation of court documents and correspondence is the true effort of one man’s achievement in solving the mystery of the origin of AIDS. We have found the origin of AIDS, it is us.
http://www.boydgraves.com/timeline/
Fortune Presents Gifts Not According To The Book
Luis de Gongora (1561-1627)
Fortune Presents Gifts Not According To The Book
When you expect whistles it’s flutes
When you expect flutes it’s whistles
What various paths are followed in distributing honours and possessions
She gives awards to some and penitent’s cloaks to others
When you expect whistles it’s flutes
When you expect flutes it’s whistles
Sometimes she robs the chief goatherd of his cottage and goatpen
And to whomever she fancies the lamest goat has born two kids
When you expect whistles it’s flutes
When you expect flutes it’s whistles
Because in a village a poor lad has stolen one egg
He swings in the sun and another gets away with a thousand crimes
When you expect whistles it’s flutes
When you expect flutes it’s whistles
The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.
For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based health freedom campaigns, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!A friend of mine sent me this article which he received from his investment firm, Fidelity. He asked me in his email if I thought that the public is being softened up for the term “New World Order” buy usage like the following. Indeed I do. I think the Security and Prosperity Partnership and the recently-repudiated North American Union, along with the tanking dollar and the waiting-in-the-wings Amero are all parts of that “softening up”.
The New World Order is global fascism, including chips, vaccines, drugs, Codex-compliant foods, criminalized natural medicine – you know: the science fiction stuff of the last couple of decades which now seems all to likely. If that is not OK with you, get mad, get active and get involved. Click here (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=187) to subscribe to the free Health Freedom eAlerts and here () to make a generous, tax deductible contribution to help keep health freedom alive. It would be hard to see a better time than now. Recurring donations help us greatly.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Latest Market Headlines
March 17, 2008
Fidelity.com
Banks face “new world order,” consolidation: report
12:19 p.m. 03/17/2008 Provided by
By Walden Siew
NEW YORK (Reuters) – Financial firms face a “new world order” after a weekend fire sale of Bear Stearns and the Federal Reserve’s first emergency weekend meeting since 1979, research firm CreditSights said in a report on Monday.
More industry consolidation and acquisitions may follow after JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM) on Sunday said it was buying Bear Stearns (BSC) for $236 million, or $2 a share, a deep discount from the $30 price on Friday and record share price of about $172 last year.
“Last evening the Bear Stearns situation reached a crescendo, as JPMorgan agreed to acquire the wounded broker for a token amount of $2 per share,” CreditSights said. “The reality check is that there are many challenged major banks, brokers, thrifts, finance/mortgage companies, and only a handful of bona fide strong U.S. banks.”
CreditSights said it lowered its broker, bank and finance company recommendations to “market weight” due to the credit crisis and stresses in the market.
In the event of future consolidation, potential acquirers identified by CreditSights include JPMorganChase, Wells Fargo, US Bancorp, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America (BAC), once it works through its recent agreement to acquire Countrywide Financial Corp, (CFC) the largest U.S. mortgage lender.
Possible foreign bank acquirers include HSBC, Barclays and Canadian firms, said CreditSights, which said the Bear Stearns deal should be good for bondholders.
“The debt side whether at the parent level or on the broker/dealer levels seems to be in rather good shape with the capital structure to be assumed by JPMorgan at deal close,” which is expected in about 90 days, CreditSights said.
Financial stocks are likely to trade lower but the overall market may begin to stabilize, according to Morgan Stanley’s chief U.S. credit analyst.
“I view the stabilization of Bear Stearns coupled with the liquidity action by the Fed as constructive for the proper functioning of the lending system,” said Gregory Peters, chief U.S. credit analyst at Morgan Stanley. “Financial stocks will trade lower, but these are important steps in the path of trying to stabilize the credit markets.”
Global stocks fell sharply on Monday, and U.S financial stocks tumbled in early trading, led by a 86 percent slump in Bear Stearns. Lehman Brothers (LEH) shares sank more than 35 percent.
Financial share prices could fall further by as much as 50 percent, Oppenheimer & Co. analyst Meredith Whitney said.
“As we believe we will begin to see goodwill write downs during the first half of this year, we believe investors will focus more on tangible book value and stocks will quickly revalue to far lower levels,” Whitney wrote in a note to clients.
(Editing by Andrea Ricci)
Copyright © Reuters 2005. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.
Home link: Fidelity Investments, Smart move.
Natural Solutions Foundation: More Than Just Talk!
The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.
For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
There is a really nasty computer threat out there and you need to know how to protect yourself from it. It will destroy your computer.
This is information taken directly from www.Snopes.com. Interestingly, on items like this they do a pretty good job. On health and freedom related items, the do not. For example, they maintained for a long time that Codex was merely an urban legend which, of course, we all know that it is not.
In any case, this article has very important information for us all. Please use it and circulate it.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Postcard
Virus: You’ve Received a Postcard from a Family Member!
Status: Real virus.
Examples: [Collected via e-mail, June 2007]
Subject: You’ve received a postcard from a family member!
Good day.
Your family member has sent you an ecard from notme.hk.
Send free ecards from notme.hk with your choice of colors, words and music.
Your ecard will be available with us for the next 30 days. If you wish to keep
the ecard longer, you may save it on your computer or take a print.
To view your ecard, choose from any of the following options:
——–
OPTION 1
——–
Click on the following Internet address or
copy & paste it into your browser’s address box.
http://notme.hk/?6e47840d8e117868911e6c3
——–
OPTION 2
——–
Copy & paste the ecard number in the “View Your Card” box at
http://notme.hk/
Your ecard number is
6e47840d8e117868911e6c3
Best wishes,
Postmaster,
notme.hk
*If you would like to send someone an ecard, you can do so at
http://notme.hk/
Variations: Other subject lines used with this message include the following:
* You’ve recieved a Hallmark E-Card!
* You’ve received a greeting card from a school-mate!
* You’ve received a greeting ecard from a class mate!
* You’ve received a greeting ecard from a neighbour!
* You’ve received a greeting postcard from a partner!
* You’ve received a greeting postcard from a worshipper!
* You’ve received a postcard from a family member!
* You’ve received a postcard from a neighbour!
* You’ve received a postcard from a worshipper!
* You’ve received an ecard from a colleague!
* Class-mate sent you an ecard from vintagepostcards.com!
* Colleague sent you a greeting ecard from postcardsfrom.com!
* School mate sent you a greeting ecard from greetingcard.org!
* Family member sent you a postcard from dgreetings.com!
* Neighbour sent you a greeting ecard from NetFunCards.com!
* School-mate sent you an ecard from mypostcards.com!
* Worshipper sent you an ecard from greetingcard.org!
* Colleague sent you a postcard from egreetings.com!
* Neighbour sent you a greeting ecard from all-yours.net!
* School friend sent you an ecard from postcards.org!
* Holiday e-card
* Movie-quality e-card
* Love postcard
* Birthday e-card
* Thank you card
* Musical postcard
* Funny postcard
Origins: Many web sites offer a service that allows a user to send a customized “greeting card” (or “postcard”) to a relative, friend, or acquaintance, delivered
as an e-mail message containing a hyperlink which the recipient follows to visit the originating site and view the card. Sending out phony e-card notifications is therefore an effective method of camouflaging viruses and inducing unwitting recipients into clicking on links that install malicious programs onto their computers.
A wave of malicious messages (like the one reproduced above) sent out in June 2007 employed that very technique, arriving in inboxes bearing subject lines such as “You’ve received a postcard from a family member!” The messages contain URLs that recipients are supposed to visit to retrieve their e-cards, but those URLs actually point to servers hosting a variety of malware (including a variant of the Storm Trojan, “an aggressive piece of malware that has been hijacking computers to serve as attacker bots” since early 2007) that is furtively installed onto victims’ PCs. (Generally, only unpatched Windows-based systems are vulnerable.)
The underlying worm is the same one that has appeared in messages with subject lines as “Sending You All My Love,” the “Laughing Kitty,” the “Dancing Skeleton,” as well as several game and music download offers. According to spamtrackers.eu:
The storm network is large enough to cut off internet access from any institution its operators choose to attack via a “distributed denial of service attack,” in which hundreds or thousands of computers request files from a server simultaneously. The entire country of Estonia was brought down that way last year. The network is actually available for rent for anyone who wishes to use it to send spam, host illegal websites, or stage denial of service attacks.
Storm is a serious threat for several reasons. It communicates “peer-to-peer” instead of via a “command and control” network. For that reason, you can’t just disable a few computers that are feeding instructions to the others. The virus download is encrypted, so it is difficult for antivirus programs to recognize, and infected computers are updated by the peer network on a daily basis to keep antivirus programs from recognizing it once they are updated to recognize previous editions of the virus. The number of infections worldwide is massive, and a quarter of them are on major networks in the US like SBC, Comcast, and Roadrunner. That means that a bank or other business under denial of service attack can’t simply block all traffic from certain segments of the internet, because it would be blocking its own users that are sharing those same internet addresses with storm infected computers as they log in and out of the internet. It is believed that Storm’s operators are located in St. Petersburg, Russia, are known to the Russian government, and enjoy its protection.
Since antivirus programs will not protect your computer, the most important thing is for people to be extremely suspicious about where they go and what they click on. Never click on any link in an email from someone you don’t know. Never click on a link in an advertisement on the internet — if you want to visit that site, look up the address yourself.
Since many of these malicious messages imitate notifications from legitimate e-card sites, recipients should get into the habit of never clicking on links contained within e-card notification e-mails. Instead, go directly to the web site of the card company, find the card pickup page within that site, and enter the ID code included in the e-mail. (If the message was a fake, the worst that will happen is that you won’t get a card.)
NOTE: Readers should take particular care not to confuse the real postcard/greeting card virus with the “Virtual Card for You” hoax that has been circulating for several years. Some of the “Postcard” warnings contribute to this confusion by including within them a link to our article about the “Virtual Card for You” hoax. They’re not the same thing, despite some e-mail warnings that erroneously present them as such. Other versions of the postcard virus warning mistakenly combine it with the Invitation virus hoax:
Get this E-mail message sent around to your contacts ASAP. PLEASE FORWARD THIS WARNING AMONG FRIENDS, FAMILY AND CONTACTS! You should be alert during the next few days. Do not open any message with an attachment entitled ‘Invitation’ OR ONE CALLED ‘POSTCARD,’ Regardless of who sent it to you. It is a virus which opens an Olympic Torch OR A POSTCARD IMAGE, which ‘burns’ the whole hard disc C of your computer. This virus will be received from someone Who has your e-mail address in his/her contact list. This is the reason why you need to send this e-mail to all your contacts. It is better to receive this message 25 times than to receive the virus and open it.
If you receive a mail called ‘Invitation’ even though sent to you by a friend, do not open it. Shut down your computer immediately. This is the worst virus announced by CNN. It has been classified by Microsoft as the most destructive virus ever. This virus was discovered by McAfee yesterday, and there is no repair yet for This kind of virus. This virus simply destroys the Zero Sector of the Hard Disc, where the vital information is kept.
COPY THIS E-MAIL, AND SEND IT TO YOUR FRIENDS. REMEMBER: IF YOU SEND IT TO THEM, YOU WILL BENEFIT ALL OF US.
Additional information:
http://vil.nai.com/vil/Content/v_142621.htm W32/Zhelatin.gen!eml
(McAfee)
Last updated: 18 February 2008
The URL for this page is http://www.snopes.com/computer/virus/postcard.asp
Urban Legends Reference Pages © 1995-2008
by Barbara and David P. Mikkelson
This material may not be reproduced without permission.
Sources Sources:
Einstein, David. “Electronic Greeting Card Just a New Take on an Old Scam.”
San Francisco Chronicle. 13 August 2007.
The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.
For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Given that flu vaccination (96% of all available doses contain high levels of mercury, the rest contain high-enough-levels to damage the recipient, too!) is being pushed for babies and children, the elderly and everyone in between and that the CDC recently stated that it misses the flu viruses causing this year’s seasonal flu at least 60% of the time, it is truly astonishing that the CDC is none the less pushing the annual vaccination of all children and seniors RIGHT NOW! QUICK, DON’T WAIT ANOTHER SECOND! with a vaccine which is dangerous, may be deadly, can shed the disease-causing viruses it contains to infect other, does the same with a large number of recipients and is medically worthless. Astonishing, that is, until you realize that the CDC never met a vaccine it did not love (including the deadly Rotovirus vaccine which, despite the fact that it it opens children to high incidences of seizures and pneumonia and, alas, death, is being approved non-the-less) and is willing to engage in deep cover-ups of vaccine injury to protect the industry it is supposed to be regulating. One has to conclude that the “Fact of Life” conflicts of interest in regulators that Ted Kennedy said were to be expected, not stringently routed out, when he proposed the lamentably successful “FDA Revitalization Act, S. 1810 in last year’s Congress are, in many cases, “Facts of Death” and “Facts of “Tragedy” and “Facts of Shame.
I am proposing the entire vaccine industry, without exception, for the Natural Solutions Foundation Hall of Shame. I am also proposing that the Administration and Staff of Arizona State University Join them. For Shame!
Read on. These are quotes taken from publicly available media about the proliferation of vaccination and the new “Marketing Partnerships” emerging to vaccinate everyone, even those for whom risk is rediculously low, except from the vaccine. Note that the strategy includes more adolescent vaccinations to encourage more adult vaccines, needed or not, deadly or not, dangerous or not.
For Shame!
Now get angry, and get everyone you know to join the Natural Solutions Foundation No-Forced-Vaccination Forum (http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/NSF-Panama/join) and get involved. NOW! The option is to NOT get involved and watch as you and everyone you know and love is vaccinated with God Knows What, over and over and over and over.
Now is the time to stop this horror story.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Influenza Resource Center
Seasonal influenza epidemics are annually responsible for between 3 million and 5 million cases of severe illness and between 250,000 and 500,000 deaths worldwide. On average, approximately 36,000 deaths due to seasonal influenza occur in the United States each year. Influenza viruses can also cause pandemics, such as that of 1918 which killed at least 20 million people. Global health authorities are increasingly worried that the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza in several areas of the world poses a serious, widespread threat to humans in the future, and the evolving situation is being closely monitored. Preparedness is the key to minimizing the effects of flu epidemics and pandemics, however. This collection of Medscape resources for clinicians provides essential information on influenza epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, and management. For a comprehensive review, see the ACP Chapter, Respiratory Viral Infections.
http://www.medscape.com/resource/influenza?src=rcupdate#2
Medscape Infectious Diseases
Expert Column
Influenza Vaccination: Challenges for Adolescent and College Healthcare
Posted 01/15/2008
Allan L. Markus, MD, MS, MBA
Seasonal Influenza: Burden of Illness
According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, influenza and pneumonia combined were the eighth leading cause of death in the United States.[1] Furthermore, in a 1993 article by Sullivan and colleagues,[2] it was estimated that over 4.1 million people had excess respiratory illnesses due to influenza and that this translated to 16.6-17.9 million restricted activity work days. In a study by Molinari and colleagues,[3] they estimated that in 2003, the cost of caring for influenza in the United States alone would be $10.4 billion with another $16.3 billion in lost earnings and productivity — with a total economic cost of $87 billion.
Seasonal Influenza: Clinical Presentation
Typically patients become infected with influenza by inhalation of respiratory droplets from another infected individual. There is a 1- to 4-day incubation period, and once sick, the patient can be infectious up to 10 days after the onset of symptoms. Typical symptoms include significant malaise, fever, body aches, headache, sore throat, and cough. Unlike common cold symptoms, rhinorrhea and sinus congestion are not as prominent symptoms. Clinical symptoms alone cannot either rule in or rule out the presence of influenza, and rapid testing is now available for both influenza A and B. Secondary bacterial infections are possible, including staphylococcal pneumonia, usually heralded by a rapid worsening of the pulmonary picture and fevers in a patient with previously diagnosed influenza. The influenza virus may also cause a primary viral pneumonia. Most patients recover from influenza with little or no residual problems, although the malaise may last for 2-4 weeks in some cases.[4] [Emphasis mine -REL]
Seasonal Influenza: Vaccine and Treatment Rates
Although there are studies that show ranges of efficacy that can be up to 70% to 90% depending on the year for the inactivated influenza vaccine, the vaccination rate in the general population is low
(only 48% in 2004).[5] Despite medication being available for those who are diagnosed with the flu, it has been estimated that only 15% of primary care physicians prescribe this medication for those with the flu, and more importantly, 24% who met the criteria did not receive the medication.[6]
Seasonal Influenza: Implications of Vaccination of Low-Risk Populations
Adolescents and college-age students represent groups that are not at high risk for serious disease or mortality, [Emphasis mine – REL] but because of their living and going to school in such close quarters, they can easily spread the infection. Although there are segments of this population that are at higher risk for severe infections, such as those with asthma, HIV, and those who are pregnant, [in] the vast majority are healthy adults for whom there are little trial data to show clinical or economic benefit for mass influenza vaccination. Thus, with its low mortality in this younger population, making a case for universal vaccination of the adolescent and college-age population requires one to look beyond influenza’s mortality potential. [Emphasis mine – REL, comment: this requires one to lood beyond influenza’ mortality potential to its profit potential -REL]
Healthy Adults
There are a few studies, however, that have looked at the impact of vaccination of healthy adults. In one of the only placebo-controlled, randomized trials of 2375 healthy adults, vaccination when well matched (efficacy over 80%) provided protection against influenza-like illness, excess physician visits, and lost workdays by 34%, 42%, and 32%, respectively.[7] This came at an overall cost of $11 per person vaccinated for the healthy adult. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has recently put out its 2007 update of its 2006 recommendations and stated that all healthy people, including school-aged children, who want to reduce their risk of becoming ill with influenza should be vaccinated.[8] {Emphasis mine – REL]
College-Age Students
College-age students do not get vaccinated as often as those who are older. Some studies have shown that vaccination is linked to individual health beliefs on susceptibility to influenza and a higher degree of fear about side effects, but also may be related to costs.[9,10] In her August 2007 article, Middleman[10] proposed more use of mandatory vaccinations in adolescents to improve vaccination rates for other vaccines. She noted, however, the potential backlash for making certain vaccinations mandatory. This may be especially true in cases in which the benefit for certain populations in terms of economic outcomes has not been conclusively shown. [Emphasis mine, shame, hers – REL] Developing new models to get messages on susceptibility, safety, and costs to students on influenza vaccination could be an important method to increase the number of students choosing to become vaccinated. [Emphasis mine – risk, yours -REL]
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/568193
Seasonal Influenza: Novel Preparedness Approaches at Arizona State University
Arizona State University (ASU) is a 63,000-student university located in the greater Phoenix metropolitan area. Its largest campus is the Tempe campus, having 55,000 students who attend classes and with about 9000 living on campus. The Campus Health Service provides the primary healthcare services on the 55,000-student Tempe Campus and collaborates with its healthcare partners at the 3 other campus locations. ASH decided to partner with both a vaccine manufacturer (CSL Biotherapies) and an advertising agency (Hal Lewis Group) to improve messaging and increase the vaccination numbers on our campus.
Methods [Emphasis mine -REL]
ASU was approached by CSL Biotherapies* with the concept of developing a more comprehensive program to distribute vaccine to students, faculty, and staff. [Emphasis mine- REL] We used a marketing theme called “Season Pass.” The strategy for increasing vaccination rates was multifaceted:
* Influenza vaccine distribution events: Campus Health Service held 2 week-long events at the Student Union. Timing was done during the peak period of student activity from 10:00 am to 2:00 pm.
* Giveaway strategy: All students who received a vaccine received an ASU T-shirt that displayed the Season Pass logo and passed on the message to make the campus “Flu-less.” Students also received a postage-paid postcard that they could send home to inform parents that they had received their flu shot.
* Residence hall distribution: Nursing staff planned days to administer vaccine in the residential halls.
* Campus signage and advertising campaign: ASU, in association with a professional branding and marketing team, developed signage and media advertising that included student newspapers and radio stations marketing the Season Pass campaign.
Results
In the 2006-2007 season, ASU ran a number of employee flu clinics and distributed vaccine through our health center and the Student Union to students. Nine hundred twenty-seven vaccines were distributed to students, and 1416 were distributed to employees for a total of 2343 doses of vaccination.
During the fall 2007 season, using the new methodology above, 2049 students were vaccinated and 1931 employees were vaccinated, for a total of 3980 vaccinations distributed (Figure). These results occurred despite an increase in price from $10/vaccination in 2006 to $18/vaccination for students and $20/vaccination for employees in 2007.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/568193_2
*CSL Biotherapies is a subsidiary of CSL Limited, which operates one of the world’s largest flu vaccine manufacturing facilities for supply to global markets … http://www.cslbiotherapies-us.com/s1/cs/becs/1160756085082/content/1160756085001/home.htm
The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.
For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Organic sounds quite nice: clean, pure and healthy. I think of it as a social and biological value system manifested in food and soap and face cream. In point of fact, as the USDA has taken pains to point out, it is a legal definition and nothing more.
I think it is something more: it is a way to avoid most pesticides, eat food that is 90% or more GM free (the US, alone among nations, allows 10% contamination with GM “Frankenfoods” in what it will allow to be called “Organic” while most other countries insist on no more than 0.09% contamination, a 111 fold increase in permitted contamination).
And I would hope that “Organic” is a meaningful certification system, backed by the supposed integrity of the United States Government, upon which the consumer can rest because they can trust a nation as mighty, as committed to the rule of law as the US, as gigantically powerful as the US in setting global agricultural policy, through Codex and elsewhere, to protect me from contamination and deceitful practices including contamination of my organic purchases with known carcinogens, right? After all, when the US passed a law which said that no state (read California, Colorado, Pennsylvania) could have a law more stringent than the US Government’s own standards, part of the argument for that law was that the resources of the Federal Government were so much more powerful and vast than those of any State that it could do the best job possible of assuring standards we could rely upon when we looked for “Organic” products. OF course, that would mean that you could rely on the presence of the word “Organic” to mean that the product was, in fact, tested by some government agency and found to be, in fact, in compliance with the standards for Organic products.
Remember, the chemical found in this study is approved for use by Codex Alimentarius. In fact, when I did a search on the Codex Alimentarius website for Ethylene Oxide, the result was “Too Many Results!”. Codex Alimentarius>Food Additives> Residue Limits gave the same result: “Too Many Results!”. Searching for Standards and Standard Measurements yielded the same frightening results: the stuff is absolutely ubiquitous. Food Additives> Guidelines – same results. Food Additives> Advisory and Other Texts> same results. When I searched Ethylene Oxide > Organic > Food Additives > Recommended Codes of Practice > Certification I got the same answer: “Too Many Results!”
Checking in the official Codex Alimentarius
we find no mention of either Ethylene Oxide or 1,4-Dioxane so either the search engine is malfunctioning or there are really too many results to list. Hmmm.
Either way, however, it’s bad, bad stuff and has no place in food or preparations that we come in contact with, let alone in Organic ones!
Here is what the World Health Organization has to say in a Technical Monograph about Ethylene Dioxide:
Summary
Ethylene oxide is a colourless, highly reactive gas at room temperature and pressure. Almost all of ethylene oxide produced is used in the manufacture of ethylene glycol, but some amount is used as a sterilant for health care materials and other heat-sensitive products. Ethylene oxide is an alkylating agent and forms protein and DNA adducts. [Meaning that it changes the DNA and protein in the body, which is where part of its ability to cause cancer comes from – REL ] Based on studies in animals, cancer is considered the critical end-point for effects of ethylene oxide on human health for long-term exposure of the general population. [Meanng that what happens when you are exposed to it is that your chances of getting cancer from it go up. – REL]
http://www.who.int/bookorders/anglais/detart1.jsp?sesslan=1&codlan=1&codcol=38&codcch=54
In the following report on the important study commissioned by the Organic Consumer’s Association of natural and organic products, the level and frequency of contamination with 1,4-Dioxane, a known carcinogen, is shocking. Companies like JASON Pure Natural & Organic; Giovanni Organic Cosmetics; Kiss My Face; Nature’s Gate Organics all were found to be marketing products containing the deadly chemical despite their self-styled “Organic” status – for which you pay extra, of course. Shame on them!
I nominate each of these companies for the Natural Solutions Foundation Hall of Shame and, at the same time, nominate the Organic Consumers Association for our Hall of Fame for doing the study and making it public.
By the way, consumers have driven the outstanding growth of the organic food sector (20-24% growth annually while the conventional food sector is generally flat) because they believe that such food is better for them. Michael Pollan, in The Omnivore’s Dilemma, a truly outstanding book, discusses the good, the bad, the ugly, the questionable and the perplexing in organic. But, all in all, fewer pesticides, fewer contaminants and , perhaps most of all, no GM Frankenfood would make the financial premium for organic worth it, at least to consumers who realize that GM foods are dangerous and their dangers are ignored by our government. Genetically modified foods (GM) were first defined as identical to the foods they resemble, real foods, that is, by George H. W. Bush who declared them to be equivalent. That led to the FDA deciding that no safety testing or data was required for any patented food to be introduced into the diet of the American (or any other ) people and that food would be sold to them without any labeling to make it clear that they were eating food which, although it could be patented, was administratively declared to be identical. I actually do not get that at all: if a plant or animal is so distinctive that a patent can be granted to give exclusive ownership to the company that holds that patent, what makes it identical to a food that cannot be patented because the world owns it?
Following that logic, of course, cloned, patented meats and milk are identical because the FDA said they are and consumers have no right to know what they are eating because, according to the FDA, they would not be able to tell the difference.
So the USDA, which houses the progressively more emasculated National Organics Standards Board (http://www.ams.usda.gov/nosb/) certifies products “Organic” and assures us that they are free of carcinogenic chemicals. In fact, we have a weak agency which is better than nothing and the words “organic” and “natural” without certification mean exactly that: nothing. My advice: Don’t buy them. Don’t use them.
Period.
Note that Cummins and Steinman say: All USDA Certified brands tested in this study were 1,4-Dioxane-free, including: Dr. Bronner’s, Sensibility Soaps (Nourish), Terressentials. All German Natural “BDIH” Certified brands tested were found to be 1,4-Dioxane-free: Aubrey Organics, Dr. Hauschka.
This kind of information deserves to be shared. Please share it widely and, while you are at it, take a moment to ask the people you share it with to join the hundreds of thousands of supporters of the Natural Solutions Foundation by signing up for the free, secure information-packed Health Freedom eAlerts at http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=187. And don’t forget to make your tax deductible donation now. Recurring donations are a huge help. Give what your heart and your head tell you is right: click here (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189) to support the Natural Solutions Foundation. Please do it now, while you are thinking about it.
Natural Solutions: We are more than just talk: We are the most effective health freedom voice in the world!
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Ronnie Cummins, 218-226-4164 (Organic Consumers Association)
David Steinman, 310-455-8952
Carcinogenic 1,4-Dioxane Found in Leading ‘Organic’ Brand Personal Care Products
USDA Certified Products Test Dioxane-Free
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA – March 14 – A newly released study commissioned by the Organic Consumers Association (OCA), a watchdog group with over 500,000 members, and overseen by environmental health consumer advocate David Steinman (author of The Safe Shopper’s Bible), analyzes leading “natural” and “organic” brand shampoos, body washes, lotions and other personal care products for the presence of the undisclosed carcinogenic contaminant 1,4-Dioxane. A reputable third-party laboratory known for rigorous testing and chain-of-custody protocols, performed all testing.
Ethoxylation, a cheap short-cut companies use to provide mildness to harsh ingredients, requires the use of the cancer-causing petrochemical Ethylene Oxide, which generates 1,4-Dioxane as a by-product. 1,4-Dioxane is considered a chemical “known to the State of California to cause cancer” under proposition 65, and has no place in “natural” or “organic” branded personal care products. 1,4-dioxane is also suspected as a kidney toxicant, neurotoxicant and respiratory toxicant, among others, according to the California EPA, and is a leading groundwater contaminant. Although previous studies have revealed 1,4-Dioxane is often present in conventional personal care products, this new study indicates the toxin is also present in leading “natural” and “organic” branded products, none of which are certified under the USDA National Organic Program. The products/brands tested are listed on the attached page with the level of 1,4-Dioxane detected, if any, along with ethoxylated ingredients listed on the label.
Some of the Leading Brands Found to Contain 1,4-Dioxane: JASON Pure Natural & Organic; Giovanni Organic Cosmetics; Kiss My Face; Nature’s Gate Organics.
Both the OCA and Steinman are calling for misleadingly labeled “Organic(s)” brands which include ethoxylate ingredients or otherwise utilize petrochemicals in their ingredients, to drop all organic claims from their branding and labeling. “The practice of ethoxylating ingredients or using other petroleum compounds must end for natural personal care, and is that much more outrageous in so-called ‘organics’ brand products,” says Ronnie Cummins, Executive Director of the OCA. “At a time when our nation is dangerously dependent on foreign oil and attempting to wean itself off unnecessary dependence on petroleum-based ingredients in major consumer products for national security reasons, it is self-defeating that we are literally bathing ourselves and our children in toxic petroleum compounds,” says Steinman. “But consumers should also take heart in the emergence of a growing number of companies who’ve received the message and who are seeking to completely avoid petrochemicals in their cosmetic and personal care products. Your best bet is to purchase products whose ingredients you can pronounce or better yet are certified under the USDA National Organic Program.”
Brands Found not to Contain 1,4-Dioxane: All USDA Certified brands tested in this study were 1,4-Dioxane-free, including: Dr. Bronner’s, Sensibility Soaps (Nourish), Terressentials. All German Natural “BDIH” Certified brands tested were found to be 1,4-Dioxane-free: Aubrey Organics, Dr. Hauschka.
A visit to any health food store unfortunately reveals the majority of products in the personal care section with “organic” brand claims are not USDA certified, and contain only cheap water extracts of organic herbs and maybe a few other token organic ingredients for organic veneer. The core of such products are composed of conventional synthetic cleansers and conditioning ingredients usually made in part with petrochemicals. According to market statistics, consumers are willing to pay significantly more for products branded “natural” or “organic” which they believe do not contain petrochemical-modified ingredients or toxic contaminants like 1,4-Dioxane.
To avoid 1,4-Dioxane, the OCA urges consumers to search ingredient lists for indications of ethoxylation including: “myreth,” “oleth,” “laureth,” “ceteareth,” any other “eth,” “PEG,” “polyethylene,” “polyethylene glycol,” “polyoxyethylene,” or “oxynol,” in ingredient names. In general, the OCA urges consumers to avoid products with unpronounceable ingredients. “When it comes to misbranding organic personal care products in the US, it’s almost complete anarchy and buyer beware unless the product is certified under the USDA National Organic Program,” says Cummins.
The study builds on the extensive survey conducted by Steinman for his book Safe Trip to Eden (Perseus Books 2007), in association with the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, the Breast Cancer Fund and the Environmental Working Group, which found that many mainstream children’s bubble bath and shampoo products contain dangerous amounts of this undisclosed carcinogen.