Unintended GMO Health Risks
The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.
For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Do you know where to get organic foods and products? http://www/Organics4U.org
————————————-
Codex Alimentarius (the World Food Code) permits GM foods in the international food supply. The United States treats GM and non-GM foods as equivalent and holds that safety and consumer information issues are not relevant matters for Codex to consider since, in the opinion of the US, that body’s mandate is about the international trade of food, not the international trade of safe food.* Many other countries disagree and have created restrictions either forbidding any GM foods in their food supply or requiring labeling before the food can be marketed in their countries. Some countries have declared a moratorium on the importation or growth of GM goods since their dangers – or safety – remain uncharacterized, in other words, a mystery.
Codex allows the use of plants genetically modified to produce increased levels of nutrients even though it acknowledges that such nutrients might not be bio-available, might not be safe and might even be toxic. The report of the Ad Hoc Group on Biotechnology states that laboratory testing is not meaningful in determining the toxicity of these modified plants and their products and therefore reccomends human testing. That testing is being done today: on you. 75-80% of your food contains genetically modified ingredients.
However, good science demands that you know which test animals receive what test substance (or not). In this vast experiment (which you never signed an Informed Consent form for this experiment. In a related post, you will see that the concerns that GM foods might be able to produce new and unexpected diseases is not an idle speculation. In fact, the new (and terrible) entity, Morgellon’s Disease, may well be a result of the widespread dissemination of GM foods and crops.
One of the most significant sources of harmful substances is food – and Genetically Modified (GM) and pesticide laden food heads the top of the list, in my estimation. Their dangers are many, their benefits are few and Jefferey Smith, author of “Seeds of Deception” has compiled an excellent summary of their unintended health risks, presented below.
Simply put, GM foods offer profound and widespread health risks, some of which are known, many of which are not.
Please read the following article and share it widely with anyone interested in their own health or the health of their loved ones. Schools should not serve GM foods or foods with GM components. Neither should hospitals, nor restaurants, nor families. Whether the do is up to you. When you buy organic food, or grow your own clean, chemical free food, when you have healthy, organic food brought to your home through a CSA (Community Supported Agriculture, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community-supported_agriculture) program and when you refused to eat or buy food that is NOT organic, you are creating strong market pressure to make those foods more widely available – and cheaper.
Only one type of food is currently labeled in the US as being GM or not. Produce.
Produce carries a code on the small round sticker affixed to each piece. If the code begins with the number 4, the food has been produced conventionally and carries pesticide residues (which are a significant toxin more dangerous by weight in children). If the code begins with 8, the food is genetically modified and if it begins with 9 the food is organically produced.
Between 75-80% of all foods in the US contain GM ingredients. It is not on the label because the FDA forbids putting that information there. They reason, rightly, that if you know that you are eating GM foods you will not buy that product so the actually forbid manufacturers from telling you what is in their foods!
You can, and should, call the manufacture to ask whether there are GM components in the foods you buy. If there are, explain the hazards and ask to have these substances removed.
The health information below is from the book Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risk of Genetically Engineered Foods, by Jeffrey M. Smith, © copyright Institute For Responsible Technology 2008.
The Natural Solutions Foundation is proud to present this information for your use and dissemination. To make sure you get the latest up to date health freedom information, click here (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=187) to add your name to the Natural Solutions Foundation’s Health Freedom eAlerts.
Please support our efforts with your generous recurring donations. Click here (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189) to make your donation now.
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Unintended GMO Health Risks
Genetically modified foods: YES, you are already eating them.
NO, they are not safe to eat.
Did you know… since 1996 Americans have been eating genetically modified (GM) ingredients in most processed foods.
Did you know… GM plants, such as soybean, corn, cottonseed, and canola have had foreign genes forced into their DNA. And the inserted genes come from species, such as bacteria and viruses, that have never been in the human food supply.
Did you know… genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are not safe. They have been linked to thousands of toxic and allergenic reactions, thousands of sick, sterile, and dead livestock, and damage to virtually every organ and system studied in lab animals.
Find out what the risks are and start protecting yourself and your family today!
Why isn’t the FDA protecting us?
In 1992, the Food and Drug Administration claimed that they had no information showing that GM foods were substantially different from conventionally grown foods and therefore were safe to eat. But internal memos made public by a lawsuit reveal that their position was staged by political appointees under orders from the White House to promote GMOs. FDA scientists, on the other hand, warned that GMOs can create unpredictable, hard-to-detect side effects, including allergies, toxins, new diseases, and nutritional problems. They urged long term safety studies, but were ignored.[1] The FDA does not require any safety evaluations for GMOs. Instead, biotech companies, who have been found guilty of hiding toxic effects of their chemical products, are now in charge of determining whether their GM foods are safe. (The FDA official in charge of creating this policy was Michael Taylor, Monsanto’s former attorney and later their vice president.)
Although these biotech companies participate in a voluntary consultation process with the FDA, it is a meaningless exercise. The summaries of the superficial research they submit cannot identify most of the health risks of GMOs.[2]
Genetic modification is radically different from natural breeding
In contrast to the statements of biotech advocates, FDA scientists and others affirm that genetic modification is not just an extension of the conventional breeding techniques that have been used by farmers for millennia. Genetic engineering transfers genes across natural species barriers, using imprecise laboratory techniques that bear no resemblance to natural breeding. Furthermore, the technology is based on outdated concepts of how genes and cells work.[3]
Widespread, unpredictable changes
Gene insertion is done either by shooting genes from a “gene gun†into a plate of cells or by using bacteria to invade the cell with foreign DNA. The altered cell is then cloned into a plant. These processes create massive collateral damage, causing mutations in hundreds or thousands of locations throughout the plant’s DNA.[4] Natural genes can be deleted or permanently turned on or off, and hundreds may change their levels of expression.[5]
In addition:
*
The inserted gene is often rearranged;[6]
* It may transfer from the food into our body’s cells or into the DNA of bacteria inside us;[7] and
* The GM protein produced by the gene may have unintended properties or effects.
GM foods on the market
The primary reason companies genetically engineer plants is to make them tolerant to their brand of herbicide. The four major GM plants, soy, corn, canola, and cotton, are designed to survive an otherwise deadly dose of weed killer. These crops have much higher residues of toxic herbicides. About 68% of GM crops are herbicide tolerant.
The second GM trait is a built-in pesticide. A gene from the soil bacterium called Bt (for Bacillus thuringiensis) is inserted into corn and cotton DNA, where it secretes the insect-killing Bt-toxin in every cell. About 19% of GM crops produce their own pesticide. Another 13% produce a pesticide and are herbicide tolerant.
There is also Hawaiian papaya and a small amount of zucchini and yellow crookneck squash, which are engineered to resist a plant virus.
GM staple foods like taro and rice are being introduced around the world in places where they form the core of the diet.
Growing evidence of harm from GMOs
GM soy and allergic reactions
* Soy allergies skyrocketed by 50% in the UK, soon after GM soy was introduced.[8]
* A human subject showed a skin prick allergic-type reaction to GM soy, but not to natural soy.[9]
* The level of one known soy allergen is as much as 7-times higher in cooked GM soy compared to non-GM soy.[10]
* GM soy also contains an unexpected allergen-type protein not found in natural soy.[11]
Bt corn and cotton linked to allergies
The biotech industry claims that Bt-toxin is harmless to humans and mammals because the natural bacteria version has been used as a spray by farmers for years. In reality, hundreds of people exposed to Bt spray had allergic-type symptoms,[12] and mice fed Bt had powerful immune responses[13] and damaged intestines.[14] Moreover, Bt in GM crops is designed to be more toxic than the natural spray and is thousands of times more concentrated.
Hundreds of laborers in India report allergic reactions from handling Bt cotton.[15] Their symptoms are identical to those exposed to Bt spray.[16]
GMOs fail allergy tests
No tests can guarantee that a GMO will not cause allergies. Although the World Health Organization recommends a protein screening protocol,[17] the GM soy, corn, and papaya in our food supply fail those tests— because they have properties of known allergens.[18]
GMOs cause immune reactions to non-GM foods
* If proteins “digest†slowly, there is more time for allergic reactions. Because GM soy reduces digestive enzymes in mice,[19] it may slow protein digestion and promote allergies to many foods.
* Mice not only reacted to Bt -toxin, they had immune responses to formerly harmless compounds.[20]
* Similarly, a mouse test indicated that people eating GM peas could develop allergies both to the peas and to a range of other foods. The peas had already passed all the allergy tests normally used to get GMOs on the market. It took this advanced mouse test, which was never used on the GMOs we eat, to discover that the peas could be deadly.[21]
GMOs and liver problems
* Rats fed GM potatoes had smaller, partially atrophied livers.[22]
* The livers of rats fed GM canola were 12-16% heavier.[23]
* GM soy altered mouse liver cells in ways that suggest a toxic insult.[24] The changes reversed after their diet switched to non-GM soy.[25]
GM soy, reproductive problems, and infant mortality
* More than half the offspring of mother rats fed GM soy died within three weeks.[26]
* Male rats[27] and mice[28] fed GM soy showed changes in their testicles; the mice had altered young sperm cells.
* The DNA of mouse embryos whose parents ate GM soy functioned differently than those whose parents ate non-GM soy.[29]
* Many offspring of female rats fed GM soy were considerably smaller,and more than half died within three weeks (compared
to 10% of the non-GM soy controls). [30]
Bt crops linked to sterility, disease, and death
* When sheep grazed on Bt cotton plants after harvest, within a week 1 in 4 died. Shepherds estimate 10,000 sheep deaths in one region of India.[31]
* Farmers in Europe and Asia say that cows, water buffaloes, chickens, and horses died from eating Bt corn varieties.[32]
* About two dozen US farmers report that Bt corn varieties caused widespread sterility in pigs or cows.[33]
* Filipinos in at least five villages fell sick when a nearby Bt corn variety was pollinating.[34]
The stomach lining of rats fed GM potatoes showed excessive cell growth, a condition that may be a precursor to cancer. Rats also had damaged organs and immune systems.[35]
Functioning GM genes remain inside you
Unlike safety evaluations for drugs, there are no human clinical trials of GM foods. The only published human feeding experiment verified that genetic material inserted into GM soy transfers into the DNA of intestinal bacteria and continues to function.[36] This means that long after we stop eating GM foods, we may still have their GM proteins produced continuously inside us.
* If the antibiotic gene inserted into most GM crops were to transfer, it could create super diseases, resistant to antibiotics.
* If the gene that creates Bt -toxin in GM corn were to transfer, it might turn our intestinal flora into living pesticide factories.
* Animal studies show that DNA in food can travel into organs throughout the body, even into the fetus.[37]
GM food supplement caused deadly epidemic
In the 1980s, a contaminated brand of a food supplement called L-tryptophan killed about 100 Americans and caused sickness and disability in another 5,000-10,000 people. The source of contaminants was almost certainly the genetic engineering process used in its production.[38] The disease took years to find and was almost overlooked. It was only identified because the symptoms were unique, acute, and fast-acting. If all three characteristics were not in place, the deadly GM supplement might never have been identified or removed.
If GM foods on the market are causing common diseases or if their effects appear only after long-term exposure, we may not be able to identify the source of the problem for decades, if at all. There is no monitoring of GMO-related problems and no long-term animal studies. Heavily invested biotech corporations are gambling away the health of our nation for profit.
Help end the genetic engineering of our food supply
When the tipping point of consumer concern about GMOs was achieved in Europe in 1999, within a single week virtually all major food manufacturers committed to remove GM ingredients. The Campaign for Healthier Eating in America is designed to reach a similar tipping point in the US before the end of 2009.
Start buying non-GMO today. That means organic and anything labled “Non GMO” or “Contains No GMO”.
Help us stop the genetic engineering of our food supply.
The health information is from the book Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risk of Genetically Engineered Foods, by Jeffrey M. Smith.
© copyright Institute For Responsible Technology 2008. The Institute is a fully tax deductible project of The Coordinating Council, a 501c(3).
[1] See www.biointegrity.org
[2] See Part 2, Jeffrey M. Smith, Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, Yes! Books, Fairfield, IA 2007
[3] See for example 233-236, chart of disproved assumptions, in Jeffrey M. Smith, Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, Yes! Books, Fairfield, IA 2007
[4] J. R. Latham, et al., “The Mutational Consequences of Plant Transformation,†The Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 2006, Article ID 25376: 1-7; see also Allison Wilson, et. al., “Transformation-induced mutations in transgenic plants: Analysis and biosafety implications,†Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering Reviews – Vol. 23, December 2006.
[5] Srivastava, et al, “Pharmacogenomics of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and the cystic fibrosis drug CPX using genome microarray analysis,†Mol Med. 5, no. 11(Nov 1999):753–67.
[6] Latham et al, “The Mutational Consequences of Plant Transformation, Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 2006:1-7, article ID 25376, http://www.hindawi.com/journals/JBB/index.html; Draft risk analysis report application A378, Food derived from glyphosate-tolerant sugarbeet line 77 (GTSB77),†ANZFA, March 7, 2001, www.agbios.com/docroot/decdocs/anzfa_gtsb77.pdf; E. Levine et al., “Molecular Characterization of Insect Protected Corn Line MON 810.†Unpublished study submitted to the EPA by Monsanto, EPA MRID No. 436655-01C (1995); Allison Wilson, PhD, Jonathan Latham, PhD, and Ricarda Steinbrecher, PhD, “Genome Scrambling—Myth or Reality? Transformation-Induced Mutations in Transgenic Crop Plants Technical Report—October 2004,†www.econexus.info; C. Collonier, G. Berthier, F. Boyer, M. N. Duplan, S. Fernandez, N. Kebdani, A. Kobilinsky, M. Romanuk, Y. Bertheau, “Characterization of commercial GMO inserts: a source of useful material to study genome fluidity,†Poster presented at ICPMB: International Congress for Plant Molecular Biology (n°VII), Barcelona, 23-28th June 2003. Poster courtesy of Dr. Gilles-Eric Seralini, Président du Conseil Scientifique du CRII-GEN, www.crii-gen.org; also “Transgenic lines proven unstable†by Mae-Wan Ho, ISIS Report, 23 October 2003, www.i-sis.org.uk
[7] Netherwood et al, “Assessing the survival of transgenic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract,†Nature Biotechnology 22 (2004): 2; Chowdhury, et al, “Detection of genetically modified maize DNA fragments in the intestinal contents of pigs fed StarLink CBH351,†Vet Hum Toxicol. 45 , no. 2 (March 2003): 95–6; P. A. Chambers, et al, “The fate of antibiotic resistance marker genes in transgenic plant feed material fed to chickens,†J. Antimic. Chemother. 49 (2000): 161–164; and Paula S. Duggan, et al, “Fate of genetically modified maize DNA in the oral cavity and rumen of sheep,†Br J Nutr. 89, no 2 (Feb.2003): 159–66.
[8] Mark Townsend, “Why soya is a hidden destroyer,†Daily Express, March 12, 1999.
[9] Hye-Yung Yum, Soo-Young Lee, Kyung-Eun Lee, Myung-Hyun Sohn, Kyu-Earn Kim, “Genetically Modified and Wild Soybeans: An immunologic comparison,†Allergy and Asthma Proceedings 26, no. 3 (May–June 2005): 210-216(7).
[10] A. Pusztai and S. Bardocz, “GMO in animal nutrition: potential benefits and risks,†Chapter 17, Biology of Nutrition in Growing Animals, R. Mosenthin, J. Zentek and T. Zebrowska (Eds.) Elsevier, October 2005.
[11] Hye-Yung Yum, Soo-Young Lee, Kyung-Eun Lee, Myung-Hyun Sohn, Kyu-Earn Kim, “Genetically Modified and Wild Soybeans: An immunologic comparison,†Allergy and Asthma Proceedings 26, no. 3 (May–June 2005): 210-216(7).
[12] M. Green, et al., “Public health implications of the microbial pesticide Bacillus thuringiensis: An epidemiological study, Oregon, 1985-86,†Amer. J. Public Health 80, no. 7(1990): 848–852; and M.A. Noble, P.D. Riben, and G. J. Cook, Microbiological and epidemiological surveillance program to monitor the health effects of Foray 48B BTK spray (Vancouver, B.C.: Ministry of Forests, Province of British Columbi, Sep. 30, 1992)
[13] Vazquez et al, “Intragastric and intraperitoneal administration of Cry1Ac protoxin from Bacillus thuringiensis induces systemic and mucosal antibody responses in mice,†1897–1912; Vazquez et al, “Characterization of the mucosal and systemic immune response induced by Cry1Ac protein from Bacillus thuringiensis HD 73 in mice,†Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research 33 (2000): 147–155; and Vazquez et al, “Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac protoxin is a potent systemic and mucosal adjuvant,†Scandanavian Journal of Immunology 49 (1999): 578–584. See also Vazquez-Padron et al., 147 (2000b).
[14] Nagui H. Fares, Adel K. El-Sayed, “Fine Structural Changes in the Ileum of Mice Fed on Endotoxin Treated Potatoes and Transgenic Potatoes,†Natural Toxins 6, no. 6 (1998): 219–233.
[15] See for example “Bt cotton causing allergic reaction in MP; cattle dead,†Bhopal, Nov. 23, 2005, http://news.webindia123.com/news/showdetails.asp?id=170692&cat=Health;
[16] Ashish Gupta et. al., “Impact of Bt Cotton on Farmers’ Health (in Barwani and Dhar District of Madhya Pradesh),†Investigation Report, Oct–Dec 2005; and M. Green, et al., “Public health implications of the microbial pesticide Bacillus thuringiensis: An epidemiological study, Oregon, 1985-86,†Amer. J. Public Health 80, no. 7(1990): 848–852; and M.A. Noble, P.D. Riben, and G. J. Cook, Microbiological and epidemiological surveillance program to monitor the health effects of Foray 48B BTK spray (Vancouver, B.C.: Ministry of Forests, Province of British Columbi, Sep. 30, 1992)
[17] FAO-WHO, “Evaluation of Allergenicity of Genetically Modified Foods. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation on Allergenicity of Foods Derived from Biotechnology,†Jan. 22–25, 2001; http://www.fao.org/es/ESN/food/pdf/allergygm.pdf
[18] Gendel, “The use of amino acid sequence alignments to assess potential allergenicity of proteins used in genetically modified foods,†Advances in Food and Nutrition Research 42 (1998), 45–62; G. A. Kleter and A. A. C. M. Peijnenburg, “Screening of transgenic proteins expressed in transgenic food crops for the presence of short amino acid sequences indentical to potential, IgE-binding linear epitopes of allergens,†BMC Structural Biology 2 (2002): 8–19; H. P. J. M. Noteborn, “Assessment of the Stability to Digestion and Bioavailability of the LYS Mutant Cry9C Protein from Bacillus thuringiensis serovar tolworthi,†Unpublished study submitted to the EPA by AgrEvo, EPA MRID No. 447343-05 (1998); and H. P. J. M. Noteborn et al, “Safety Assessment of the Bacillus thuringiensis Insecticidal Crystal Protein CRYIA(b) Expressed in Transgenic Tomatoes,†in Genetically modified foods: safety issues, American Chemical Society Symposium Series 605, eds. K.H. Engel et al., (Washington, DC, 1995): 134–47.
[19] M. Malatesta, M. Biggiogera, E. Manuali, M. B. L. Rocchi, B. Baldelli, G. Gazzanelli, “Fine Structural Analyses of Pancreatic Acinar Cell Nuclei from Mice Fed on GM Soybean,†Eur J Histochem 47 (2003): 385–388.
[20] Vazquez et al, “Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac protoxin is a potent systemic and mucosal adjuvant,†Scandanavian Journal of Immunology 49 (1999): 578–584. See also Vazquez-Padron et al., 147 (2000b).
[21] V. E. Prescott, et al, “Transgenic Expression of Bean r-Amylase Inhibitor in Peas Results in Altered Structure and Immunogenicity,†Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry (2005): 53.
[22] Arpad Pusztai, “Can science give us the tools for recognizing possible health risks of GM food,†Nutrition and Health, 2002, Vol 16 Pp 73-84
[23] Comments to ANZFA about Applications A346, A362 and A363 from the Food Legislation and Regulation Advisory Group (FLRAG) of the Public Health Association of Australia (PHAA) on behalf of the PHAA, “Food produced from glyphosate-tolerant canola line GT73,†http://www.iher.org.au/
[24] M. Malatesta, C. Caporaloni, S. Gavaudan, M. B. Rocchi, S. Serafini, C. Tiberi, G. Gazzanelli, “Ultrastructural Morphometrical and Immunocytochemical Analyses of Hepatocyte Nuclei from Mice Fed on Genetically Modified Soybean,†Cell Struct Funct. 27 (2002): 173–180.
[25] M. Malatesta, C. Tiberi, B. Baldelli, S. Battistelli, E. Manuali, M. Biggiogera, “Reversibility of Hepatocyte Nuclear Modifications in Mice Fed on Genetically Modified Soybean,†Eur J Histochem, 49 (2005): 237-242.
[26] I.V. Ermakova, “Diet with the Soya Modified by Gene EPSPS CP4 Leads to Anxiety and Aggression in Rats,†14th European Congress of Psychiatry. Nice, France, March 4-8, 2006; “Genetically modified soy affects posterity: Results of Russian scientists’ studies,†REGNUM, October 12, 2005; http://www.regnum.ru/english/526651.html; Irina Ermakova, “Genetically modified soy leads to the decrease of weight and high mortality of rat pups of the first generation. Preliminary studies,†Ecosinform 1 (2006): 4–9.
[27] Irina Ermakova, “Experimental Evidence of GMO Hazards,†Presentation at Scientists for a GM Free Europe, EU Parliament, Brussels, June 12, 2007
[28] L. Vecchio et al, “Ultrastructural Analysis of Testes from Mice Fed on Genetically Modified Soybean,†European Journal of Histochemistry 48, no. 4 (Oct–Dec 2004):449–454.
[29] Oliveri et al., “Temporary Depression of Transcription in Mouse Pre-implantion Embryos from Mice Fed on Genetically Modified Soybean,†48th Symposium of the Society for Histochemistry, Lake Maggiore (Italy), September 7–10, 2006.
[30] I.V. Ermakova, “Diet with the Soya Modified by Gene EPSPS CP4 Leads to Anxiety and Aggression in Rats,†14th European Congress of Psychiatry. Nice, France, March 4-8, 2006; “Genetically modified soy affects posterity: Results of Russian scientists’ studies,†REGNUM, October 12, 2005; http://www.regnum.ru/english/526651.html; Irina Ermakova, “Genetically modified soy leads to the decrease of weight and high mortality of rat pups of the first generation. Preliminary studies,†Ecosinform 1 (2006): 4–9.
[31] “Mortality in Sheep Flocks after Grazing on Bt Cotton Fields—Warangal District, Andhra Pradesh†Report of the Preliminary Assessment, April 2006, http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=6494
[32] Mae-Wan Ho, “GM Ban Long Overdue, Dozens Ill & Five Deaths in the Philippines,†ISIS Press Release, June 2, 2006; and Mae-Wan Ho and Sam Burcher, “Cows Ate GM Maize & Died,†ISIS Press Release, January 13, 2004, http://www.isis.org.uk/CAGMMAD.php
[33] Personal communication with Jerry Rosman and other farmers, 2006; also reported widely in the farm press.
[34] See for example Mae-Wan Ho, “GM Ban Long Overdue, Dozens Ill & Five Deaths in the Philippines,†ISIS Press Release, June 2, 2006; “Study Result Not Final, Proof Bt Corn Harmful to Farmers,†BusinessWorld, 02 Mar 2004; and “Genetically Modified Crops and Illness Linked,†Manila Bulletin, 04 Mar 2004.
[35] Arpad Pusztai, “Can science give us the tools for recognizing possible health risks of GM food,†Nutrition and Health, 2002, Vol 16 Pp 73-84; Stanley W. B. Ewen and Arpad Pusztai, “Effect of diets containing genetically modified potatoes expressing Galanthus nivalis lectin on rat small intestine,†Lancet, 1999 Oct 16; 354 (9187): 1353-4; and Arpad Pusztai, “Facts Behind the GM Pea Controversy: Epigenetics, Transgenic Plants & Risk Assessment,†Proceedings of the Conference, December 1st 2005 (Frankfurtam Main, Germany: Literaturhaus, 2005)
[36] Netherwood et al, “Assessing the survival of transgenic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract,†Nature Biotechnology 22 (2004): 2.
[37] Ricarda A. Steinbrecher and Jonathan R. Latham, “Horizontal gene transfer from GM crops to unrelated organisms,†GM Science Review Meeting of the Royal Society of Edinburgh on “GM Gene Flow: Scale and Consequences for Agriculture and the Environment,†January 27, 2003; Traavik and Heinemann, Genetic Engineering and Omitted Health Research; citing Schubbert, et al, “Ingested foreign (phage M13) DNA survives transiently in the gastrointestinal tract and enters the bloodstream of mice,†Mol Gen Genet. 242, no. 5 (1994): 495–504; Schubbert et al, “Foreign (M13) DNA ingested by mice reaches peripheral leukocytes, spleen, and liver via the intestinal wall mucosa and can be covalently linked to mouse DNA,†Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94, no. 3 (1997): 961–6; Schubbert et al, “On the fate of orally ingested foreign DNA in mice: chromosomal association and placental transmission to the fetus,†Mol Gen Genet. 259, no. 6 (1998): 569–76; Hohlweg and Doerfler, “On the fate of plants or other foreign genes upon the uptake in food or after intramuscular injection in mice,†Mol Genet Genomics 265 (2001): 225–233; Palka-Santani, et al., “The gastrointestinal tract as the portal of entry for foreign macromolecules: fate of DNA and proteins,†Mol Gen Genomics 270 (2003): 201–215; Einspanier, et al, “The fate of forage plant DNA in farm animals; a collaborative case-study investigating cattle and chicken fed recombinant plant material,†Eur Food Res Technol 212 (2001): 129–134; Klotz, et al, “Degradation and possible carry over of feed DNA monitored in pigs and poultry,†Eur Food Res Technol 214 (2002): 271–275; Forsman, et al, “Uptake of amplifiable fragments of retrotransposon DNA from the human alimentary tract,†Mol Gen Genomics 270 (2003): 362–368; Chen, et al, “Transfection of mEpo gene to intestinal epithelium in vivo mediated by oral delivery of chitosan-DNA nanoparticles,†World Journal of Gastroenterology 10, no 1(2004): 112–116; Phipps, et al, “Detection of transgenic and endogenous plant DNA in rumen fluid, duodenal digesta, milk, blood, and feces of lactating dairy cows,†J Dairy Sci. 86, no. 12(2003): 4070–8.
[38] William E. Crist, Toxic L-tryptophan: Shedding Light on a Mysterious Epidemic, http://www.seedsofdeception.com/Public/L-tryptophan/index.cfm; and Jeffrey M. Smith, Seeds of Deception, Yes! Books, Fairfield, IA 2003, chapter 4, Deadly Epidemic.
Jeffrey M. Smith is the author of publication Genetic Roulette: The Documented Health Risks of Genetically Engineered Foods, which presents 65 risks in easy-to-read two-page spreads. His first book, Seeds of Deception, is the top rated and #1 selling book on GM foods in the world. He is the Executive Director of the Institute for Responsible Technology. www.responsibletechnology.org, which is spearheading the Campaign for Healthier Eating in America. Go to www.seedsofdeception.com to learn more about how to avoid GM foods.
———————————
* As is often the case, the US position is not verified by the underlying international agreement: according to the Codex Statute, the first purpose of Codex is “protecting the health of the consumers and ensuring fair practices in the food trade.†(Codex Statute, Article 1(a))
————————————————————
You know we need your support if you want us to go to Codex meetings to represent Natural Solutions to pressing social health and wellness concerns. Please click to our Support Page and help us as you can: http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189.
The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.
For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Six authors at a Dutch University have published a paper showing changes in the EEG (brain waves, hence, brain function) of healthy males when exposed to Diesel Exhaust. The article says that 10 healthy young men were exposed to the nano particles typically produced by diesel engines.
The point of this very interesting article, which was published on March 14 is that there are no free lunches on the road or off it. Either we get smart and start using real alternatives to fossle fuel or we will choke ourselves collectively and individually to death.
Years ago, during the 1973 gasoline “crisis” when gas was rationed in New York State and elsewhere in the US, I was interested in purchasing a diesel automobile since diesel was much more available and cheaper than gasoline. I did a lot of research on the impact of the particulates in gasoline and diesel and discovered that diesel was far, far worse when inhaled.
You can imagine my distress, then, when Gen. Bert and I were driving from Adis Ababa in Ethiopia to the second city of Adama about an hour away. Gen. Bert was sitting in the front passenger seat because of his long legs and had the window cracked an inch or so because of the intolerable, sweltering heat. The road was almost invisible because of the black diesel and gasoline exhaust pouring from the tail pipes of every vehicle on the road – and there were a lot of them – despite the fact that it was early afternoon on an otherwise clear day.
When we arrived at the hotel in Adama which has been selected for our meeting with the Ethiopian Codex Contact Point and his staff, Gen. Bert got out of the car and turned around to open the back door for me (yes, he really is that kind of gentleman!). I looked at horror at the greasy black gum which covered his right collar and his right shoulder on his otherwise spotless white business shirt. Imagine what was in our lungs! (As it happens, two weeks later we met someone who wanted to show us their new version of the iontophoresis detox footbaths that we and others use for detoxification purposes. Gen. Bert and I took off our socks and shoes and put our feet in their footbaths and, lo and behold, what came out was what had gone in two weeks before: black, gummy, diesel smelling gunk through the pores of our feet! I can assure you that had never happened before and has not happened since!)
At any rate, the point I am making is that we, as a species, are unwise to the point of madness. There is literally no excuse for not protecting your health and mine, our neighbors down the block and our cousins in Adis Ababa and Katmandu from the “death in the air” that we have allowed to take down so many of us through respiratory and degenerative diseases and now, it would appear, neurodegenerative ones as well.
here is the text of this excellent article. Pollution is, after all, a lot like forced drugging and violates your right to breath clean air and drink clean water.
The Natural Solutions Foundation is working hard with you and for you to tackle the issues that no one can take on alone. It is only by joining together that the truth we speak to power becomes audible. Check out our site at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org. If you are not already on the Health Freedom eAlert distribution list, go to http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=187 and sign up. Your data will NEVER be shared with others for any purpose. If you are already on the list, why not get 10 of the people in your circle of influence to join the distribution list, too. As we grow, we become more powerful.
Natural Solutions Foundation: More than just talk!
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
www.Organics4U.org
Here is the text of this interesting and important article” http://www.particleandfibretoxicology.com/content/5/1/4
The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.
For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
“Stand for science by all means. That is why you should reject vaccines by the way, instead of accept them.”
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/02/311032.shtml
Polio “Disappearance” Only Statistical Medical Fraud: depopulation covert op via vaccines
This article deconstructs the politics around creating the so-called ‘polio vaccine success’ which is still widely heralded as a success. However, any simple cursory analysis of its history and the effects of the vaccine show that it was a dismal failure and that any success was based on medical fraud of reclassification of expanded cases of polio (filed away under other diseases) to make it appear that polio “went away.” The World Health Organization does this to the present, despite skyrocketing ‘polio’ everywhere. Widely known by the researchers even at the time, this is the story of the cover-up of the century: within this cover up, can be traced the expansion of using knowingly contaminated vaccines for depopulation everywhere.
POLIO DISAPPEARANCE IDEA IS ONLY STATISTICIAL MEDICAL RECLASSIFICATION FRAUD TO HIDE POLLUTION VECTORS AND PESTICIDE VECTORS THAT CAUSED IT. POLIO SYMPTOMS CAN BE MYCOPLASMA AS WELL.
POLIO DISAPPEARANCE IDEA IS ONLY A COVER FOR SPREADING KNOWINGLY CONTAMINATED VACCINES WORLDWIDE–FROM ONLY US/UK LABS THAT KNOWINGLY USED MONKEY VIRUS CONTAMINATED SUPPLIES, AND THROUGH THE UNITED NATIONS W.H.O (WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION). W.H.O. ‘VACCINES’ TESTED IN INDIA IN 2003 WERE FOUND TO BE LACED WITH INFERTILITY AND STERILITY AGENTS.
Polio Special Parts 1-4:
PART 1: A shot in the dark
Janine Roberts
from the UK Magazine The Ecologist (2004)
POLIO DISAPPEARANCE IDEA IS ONLY STATISTICAL MEDICAL RECLASSIFICATION FRAUD TO HIDE POLLUTION VECTORS
Date Published: 01/05/2004
Author: Janine Roberts
“Polio is a devastating disease; the preferred method for fighting it is vaccination. Yet there is a mass of historic evidence that suggests it is not caused by a virus but by industrial and agricultural pollution…”
–AT THE AUTHOR’S REQUEST, THE REPOSTING OF THE ENTIRE ARTICLE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THIS ARCHIVE–
The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.
For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based campaigns, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Scientists – they’re not always right
Date Published: 22/05/2002
Author: Peter Mansfield
Why do we assume scientists have all the answers? And what do we do if those scientists are the problem?
Last week I was asked by a group of anti-vivisectionists to discuss on radio a WHO report about the use of primates in medical research. I declined, despite strongly held views. Sound bites may be the oxygen of broadcasters, but they make for very unsatisfactory debates.
It always comes down to what you choose to assume. No science is possible without making some assumptions from which questions are framed for the scientist to answer. To start with, we assume that the methods of science are appropriate for answering questions.
That in itself may not be a problem. The trouble is that we let scientists ask the questions as well as answer them. That is unwise, because scientists tend to ignore the big picture in favour of their special interests. Inevitably, they frame questions which they will enjoy tackling. They then invariably find that the answer, at least in part, is the need for more research.
In consequence, we find ourselves endorsing a huge haze of abstract ideas we do not understand. We, our politicians and commentators avoid challenging these ideas, lest we appear foolish. The scientific establishment, meanwhile, seldom admits to the fragility of its ideas – far less its assumptions. It has awarded itself a god-like status, and we tolerate that.
But what if scientists’ undeclared assumptions are in fact false? In that case, any questions and answers that follow from them will merely compound the initial falsehood.
Take research on primates – or any other animals, come to that. The initial assumption goes like this: human rights supersede animal rights. It matters not that the human disease being researched might result from self-abuse – the wrong food, or too little exercise, for instance. No, we conduct research on animals to find cures for our self-inflicted illnesses, instead of looking at what we are doing wrong so as to stop these illnesses from occurring in the first place.
Secondly, we assume that similar genetic codes mean similar animals. Yet the few genes that distinguish us from other mammals cannot possibly account for the striking contrasts in form, function and talent. Genes are the same in all the cells of one individual, yet different cells within the same animal have radically different forms and functions. What makes one cell part of your eye, another your heart and another your brain? Hi-tech gene-speak only camouflages our ignorance.
OSTRICH MENTALITY
In September 1997 The Lancet – an internationally-respected journal of medical science – published an analysis of the findings of a series of scientific trials of homoeopathic medicine. It set out to check whether the apparent benefits of homoeopathic medicine were actually just examples of the placebo effect – in plain language, self-delusion.
The result was positive. The studies found that homoeopathic remedies did indeed have a net positive effect after self-delusion, bias and all other confounding factors had been carefully ruled out. The paper then survived review by at least two other experts before The Lancet agreed to publish.
Even then, in the same edition The Lancet published not one but two leading articles by placebo sceptics. One simply refused to accept the result at face value – ultimately, because ‘the “infinite dilutions” of the agents used cannot possibly produce any effect’. The other conceded that ‘there is enough in the study to [ask] for good controlled trials’, but doubted whether ‘resources [for] these trials can be justified when a rational basis for… homoeopathy… is lacking’.
In other words, even though a system of medicine has effectively been acquitted of quackery in the highest available scientific court, it remains in the dock because the scientists don’t know how it works.
That’s as philosophical as it gets. Fixed mind-sets and vested interests are the usual obstacles. The UK’s Medical Research Council (MRC) is, for example, about to publish its thoughts on how to fill the embarrassing black hole in research on the fluoridation of water.
A fabric of dogma, constructed through 70 years of tendentious research, hailed water fluoridation as the best way to correct inequalities in dental health. That dogma began [you can guess where!] in the US with the then reasonable assumption that people only obtained fluoride from water. But Americans don’t drink much tea, which is a rich source. And then toothpaste became fluoridated anyway, and food items began to be processed and manufactured with fluoridated water.
Now, the facts are that many people in non-fluoridated areas consume as much fluoride as those with fluoridated water supplies. Sometimes they consume a lot more flouride than could ever possibly be good for them. This effectively rubbishes all the studies that compared populations simply on the basis of the fluoride content of their water supply.
Yet it took a systematic scientific review and about five years to force dental academics – their banners long nailed to fluoridation – to take into account personal consumption of fluoride from all sources. We have yet to see if this concession finally makes it into the MRC report.
I can’t help noting the parallels between the fluoridation saga and the way the MMR story is unfolding. Creating MMR was little more than an act of technical cleverness. But it also exceeded nature, and was, therefore, wrong in principle. But so little do its protagonists care for public opinion that they intend to compound the error by adding chicken pox vaccine to MMR. It will then become a quadruple hit. A pathologist friend of mine reacted to this proposal with dismay: ‘Two immuno-suppressant viruses in the same vaccine? Whose bright idea was that?’ Were he a Pharmaceutical industry employee instead of a private practitioner, he wouldn’t have to ask.
This sort of ‘science’ abuses both the resources and trust of the public. As Richard Asher said: ‘If you can’t explain a complex technicality to your landlady’s daughter, you don’t understand it yourself.’ Nor are you earning your corn.
MORE DETAIL ON BIOWARFARE VECTOR OF VACCINES AND CANCER VIRUSES KNOWLEDGE
Frankly I think all the data says it very clearly. Merely from above: [ http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/02/311032.shtml]
First, From 1911, US military vaccines made manditory. Psychopathic USA elites (you know, the people who brought you German eugenics and the USSR funding simultaneously*) think that with all the information they got about their own ‘quarantine experiments’ in the late 1800s in the USA (see below***), they were ready to spread the disease?
Second, it states in comments that the flu pandemic started in the USA among troops ready to be sent into Europe, and thus, ready to be sent (intentionally? likely) to infect the entire world like an overglorified bunch of tainted mosquitoes. It further states that this was ignored at the time, for some “unknown” purpose, though they were sent overseas anyway. The U.S. in later wars has experimented on its troops with unknown vaccines, likely for “perfecting” various debilitations by design–since all these vaccines that were used both in Bush I’s Gulf War and Bush II’s Gulf War Ongoing were entirely unauthorized and untested by the way. The military operation makes a nice social environment of command and control to test out illegal human experimentation.
Third, it states in other comments about the influenza as well as the treatment frameworks themselves combined being responsible for high mortality since other treatment ideas that are far less destructive and far more naturopathic (and thus no money to be made in them by the pharma-companies that have always been conected to eugenics interests**) led to much better survival rates.
citations:
*
Wall Street and Hitler, by Antony Sutton;
http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-hitler.html
Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, by Antony Sutton,
http://www.reformation.org/wall-st-bolshevik-rev.html
free copies at a website I have nothing to do with, they are only free here.
**
War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race, by Edwin Black;
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1568582587/qid=1108792104/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/102-2617314-8848149
State Origin: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS, by Boyd E. Graves, J.D.
http://www.boydgraves.com/
MORE ON VACCINES AS THE VECTOR IN PLANNED HOLOCAUSTS:
***
The History of the Development of AIDS–AND THE HISTORY OF EUGENICS/MYCOPLASMA ALWAYS CONNECTED, FROM 1889 WHEN MYCOPLASMA FIRST ISOLATED
Chapter Excerpt from “State Origin: The Evidence of the Laboratory Birth of AIDS”
by Boyd E. Graves, J.D.
The true history of the origin of AIDS can be traced throughout the 20th Century and back to 1878. On April 29 of that year the United States passed a “FEDERAL QUARANTINE ACT”.
The United States began a significant effort to investigate “causes” of epidemic diseases. In 1887, the effort was enhanced with the mandate of the U.S. “LABORATORY OF HYGIENE”. This lab was run by Dr. Joseph J. Kinyoun, a deep rooted-racist, who served the eugenics movement with dedication.
Two years later, 1889, we were able to identify “mycoplasmas”, a transmissible agent, that is now found at the heart of human diseases, including (AIDS) HIV.
In 1893, we strengthened the Federal Quarantine Act and [LO AND BEHOLD, SUSPICIOUSLY] suddenly there was an explosion of polio. [THAT COULD BE TEST MANAGED AND DATA GATHERED THANKS TO THE LAWS QUICKLY PUT IN PLACE BEFOREHAND.] [This mycoplasma=’polio’ symptom is a vector that The Ecologist’s article fails to go into by the way, even though it was mentioned that the symptoms of polio get thrown around in multiple classifications and are attitubed to many different things. “Polio” merely as the same type of operation as the AIDS’s “grab bag” category of later 20th century?]
In 1898, we knew we could use mycoplasma to cause epidemics, because we were able to do so in cattle, and we saw it in tobacco plants. [Then, we see wider cattle experimentation perhaps, as mentioned in the early 1900s where the US Government killed off all those cattle with vaccine programs…to see if they could….]
In 1899, the U.S. Congress began investigating “leprosy in the United States”.
In 1902, We organized a “Station for Experimental Evolution” and we were able to identify diseases of an ethnic nature.
In 1904, we used mycoplasma to cause an epidemic in horses.
In 1910, we used mycoplasma to cause an epidemic in fowl/birds.
In 1911, Vaccines made mandatory in the US military.
In 1917, we formed the “Federation of the American Society for Experimental Biology” (FASEB).
In 1918, the influenza virus killed millions of unsuspecting. It was a flu virus modified with a bird mycoplasma for which human primates had no “acquired immunity”. It started in the USA military camps in the American Midwest, and was spread to Europe. Caused more deaths as a percentage of population than Europe’s Black Death bubonic plague of 1348-50s.
In 1921, lead eugenics philosopher, Betrand Russell, publicly supported the “necessity for “organized” plagues” against the Black population.
In 1931, we secretly tested African Americans and we tested AIDS in sheep.
In 1935, we learned we could crystallize the tobacco mycoplasma, and it would remain infectious.
In 1943, we officially began our bio-warfare program. Shortly thereafter, we were finding our way to New Guinea to study mycoplasma in humans.
In 1945, before the U.S. dropped bombs dropped on civilians of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Atomic Energy Commission writes a classified report on a covert human test of a “small atomic bomb” on Black Americans at Port Chicago, California. It was intentionally detonated in the middle of the night, when only Black American “dispensible” porters would be in the harbor. The Atomic Energy Commission refuses to say why it was flown there to conduct the investigation and report, of what was publically was discussed as only an “accidental munitions explosion.”
In 1945, we witnessed the greatest influx of foreign scientists in history into the U.S. biological program. Operation Paperclip will live in infamy as one of the darkest programs of a twisted parallel government fixated on genocide.
In 1946, the United States Navy hired Dr. Earl Traub, a notorious racist biologist.
A May appropriations hearing confirms the existence of a “secret” biological weapon.
Same year, future pharmaceutical czar George Merck reported to the US Secretary of War, that he’d managed to weaponise the toxin extracted from the Brucella bacterium and to isolate it into an indestructible crystalline form using only the DNA particles–exactly the same technique of crystallization for the tobacco mycoplasma in 1935. Merck of course was making the first polio vaccines as well…that were knowingly contaminated with the monkey virus.
In 1948, we know that the United States confirmed the endorsement of “devising a scheme” in which to address the issue of overpopulation in certain racial groups. State Department’s George McKennan’s memo will forever illuminate the eugenics mendacity necessary for genocide of millions of innocent people.
In 1949, Dr. Bjorn Sigurdsson isolates the VISNA virus. Visna is man made and shares some “unique DNA” with HIV. See, Proceedings of the United States, NAS, Vol. 92, pp. 3283 – 7, (April 11, 1995).
In 1950s, aerial spraying of the Brucella crystals via chemtrails was deployed on Chinese and Korean populations during the Korean War (a war actually run as a “police action” from the United Nations, not the United States, and the United Nations person in charge of organizing police action aginst USSR incursions into South Korea was…surprisingly a USSR general.) Many U.S. veterans of the war later developed Multiple Sclerosis. The army recognized that the MS was Brucella-related and paid the veterans compensation. Although the Brucella micoplasma can lay dormant for decades, it was learned that it can be usefully triggered by vaccines. That set some people to thinking…
In 1951, we now know our government conducted its first virus attack on African Americans. Crates in Pennsylvania were tainted to see how many Negro crate handlers in Virginia would acquire the placebo virus.. They were also experimentally infecting sheep and goats. According to author Eva Snead, they also held their first world conference on an AIDS-like virus.
In 1954, Dr. Bjorn Sigurdsson publishes his first paper on Visna virus and establishes himself as the “Grandfather of the AIDS virus.” He will encounter competition from Dr. Carlton Gajdusek.
In 1955, they were able to artificially assemble the tobacco mosaic virus. Mycoplasmas will forever be at the heart of the U.S. biological warfare program.
In 1957, future U.S. president, Rep Gerald Ford and others gave the U.S. Pentagon permission to aggressively deploy offensive biological agents. There are no recorded cases of AIDS prior to the 1957 creation of “Special Operation-X.” (The SOX) program served as the immediate prototype program for the Special Virus program to begin in 1962.
By 1960, Nikita Kruschev had been let in on the biological weapon. His 1960 statement will long reflect the arrogance of the secret blend of communism and democracy. The two countries would go to a November 1972 agreement to cull the Black Population.
In 1961, scientist Haldor Thomar publishes that viruses cause cancer. In 1995, he and Carlton Gajdusek informed the National Academy of Sciences that “the study of visna in sheep would be the best test for candidate anti-HIV drugs.”
In 1962, under the cover of cancer research, the United States charts a path to commit premeditated murder, the “Special Virus” program begins on February 12th. Dr. Len Hayflick sets up a U.S. mycoplasma laboratory at [Skull and Bones founded] Stanford University. Many believe the “Special Virus” program began in November 1961 with a Phizer contract.
Beginning in 1963 and for every year thereafter, the “Special Virus” program conducted annual progress reviews at Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA. [Hershey, PA, was an entirely privately and corporate run city, run by Mr. Hershey, thus without any public government so it was a politically safe test site for mass experimentation.] The annual meetings are representative of the aggressive nature in which the United States pursued the development of AIDS.
In 1964, the United States Congress gave full support for the leukemia/lymphoma (AIDS) virus research.
In 1967, the National Academy of Sciences launched a full scale assault on Africa. The CIA (Technical Services Division) acknowledged its secret inoculator program.
In 1969, Fort Detrick told world scientists and the Pentagon asked for more money, they knew they could make AIDS. Nixon’s July 18 secret memo to Congress on “Overpopulation” serves as the start of the paper trail of the AIDS Holocaust.
In 1970, President Nixon signed PL91-213 and John D. Rockefeller, III became the “Population Czar.” Nixon’s August 10 National Security Memo leaves no doubt as to the genocidal nature of depopulation.
In 1971, Progress Report #8 is issued. The flowchart (pg. 61) will forever resolve the true laboratory birth origin of AIDS. Eventually the Special Virus program will issue 15 reports and over 20,000 scientific papers. The flowchart links every scientific paper, medical experiment and U.S. contract. The flowchart would remain “missing” until 1999. World scientists were stunned. The flowchart will gain in significance throughout the 21st Century. It is also clear the experiments conducted under Phase IV-A of the flowchart are our best route to better therapy and treatment for people living with HIV/AIDS. The first sixty pages of progress report #8 of the Special Virus program prove conclusively the specific goal of the program.
By June 1977, the Special Virus program had produced 15,000 gallons of AIDS. The AIDS virus was attached as complement to vaccines sent to Africa and Manhattan. However, because of the thoroughness of authors, like Dr. Robert E. Lee, we also learn the Stanford Mycoplasma Laboratory issues one of the first papers with AIDS in the title. “Viral Infections in Man Associated with Acquired Immunological Deficiency States.” The primary scientist, Dr. Thomas Merigan, was a “consultant” to the Special Virus program.
Progress Report # 8 at 104 – 106 proves Dr. Robert Gallo was secretly working on the development of AIDS with full support of the sector of the U.S. government that seeks to kill its citizens. Dr. Gallo can not explain why he excluded his role as a “project officer” for the Special Virus program from his biographical book. Dr. Gallo’s early work and discoveries will finally be viewed in relation to the flowchart. We now know where every experiment fits into the flowchart. The “research logic” is irrefutable evidence of a federal “Manhattan-style project” to develop a “contagious” cancer that “selectively” kills.
Dr. Gallo’s 1971 paper is identical to his 1984 AIDS announcement.
Progress Report #8 at 273 – 286 proves we gave AIDS to monkeys. Since 1962, the United States and Dr. Robert Gallo have been inoculating monkeys and re-releasing them back into the wild.
Thus, even government scientists are baffled that both HIV-1 and HIV-II would “suddenly emerge” from two distinct monkey ancestral relatives during the last 100 years. A 1999 Japanese study will ultimately prove the Man to Monkey origin of Monkey AIDS. The monkey experiments summary definitively proves Monkey AIDS is also man-made.
In 1972, the United States and the Soviet Union entered into a biological agreement that would signal the death knell for the Black Population. The 1972 agreement for collaboration and cooperation in the development of offensive biological agents is still U. S. policy.
In 1973, we find that world scientist, Garth Nicolson reports on his project, “Role of the Cell Surface in Escape From Immunological Surveillance.” His report is accompanied by seven published papers. Dr. Nicolson worked in conjunction with the Special Virus program from 1972 until 1978. Dr. Nicolson is considered by some to be Dr. Gallo’s “West Coast” counterpart. It is strongly held that because of Dr. Nicolson, Dr. Robert Gallo and Dr. Luc Montagnier would secretly meet in Southern California to coordinate what they would and would not say about the special virus development program.
In 1974, Furher Henry Kissinger releases his NSSM-200 (U.S. Plan to Address Overpopulation). It is the only issue of discussion at the World Population Conference in Bucharest, Romania. The men in the shadows had won, the whole world agrees to secretly cull Africa’s population. Today it is Africa and other undesirables. Tomorrow it may be you.
In 1975, [unelected and entirely appointed] President Gerald Ford signs National Security Defense Memorandum #314. The United States implements the Kissinger NSSM-200. Dick Cheney is made Ford’s Chief of Staff. Ford’s Secretary of Defense is Donald Rumsfeld. Rumsfeld helps to bring Cheney on board the Ford White House.
In 1976, the United States issues Progress Report #13 of the Special Virus program. The report proves the United States had various international agreements with the Russians, Germans, British, French, Canadians and Japanese. The plot to kill Black people has wide international support. In March, the Special Virus began production of the AIDS virus, by June 1977, the program will have produced 15,000 gallons of AIDS. President Jimmy Carter allows for the continuation of the secret plan to cull the Black Population. The background on Carter: the appointed Ford’s appointed VP is Nelson Rockefeller–who almost becomes President in a coup within a year or so after three assassination attempts on Ford’s life. When that didn’t work, the next elected president, Carter, has his whole Administration full of personal appointees of David Rockefeller, called “Trilaterials”. David Rockefeller is the early 1970s organizer of the Trilaterial Commission, an internationalist “global harmonization” policy organization between The U.S. , Japan, and Europe. All Trilaterals are personally picked by David Rockefeller. Carter, along with over 20 of his appointees to his administration, are Trilaterals. George H. W. Bush is appointed as CIA Director by the unelected and strictly appointed Ford White House. Carter removes Bush from this position. George H. W. Bush was a Trilateral. Trilaterial Commission organizer David Rockefeller and Ford appointed VP Nelson Rockefeller (who as Governor of NY State, with his financier brother David Rockefeller, built the WTCs) are both in turn brothers of John D. Rockfeller, III, the “Population Czar.” George H. W. Bush has been connected to the Rockefellers since the early 1900s, through railroad connections via the Harrimans.
In 1977, Dr. Robert Gallo and the top Soviet Scientists meet to discuss the proliferation of the 15,000 gallons of AIDS. They attach AIDS as complement to the Small pox vaccine for Africa, and the “experimental” hepatitis B vaccine for Manhattan. According to authors June Goodfield and Alan Cantwell, it is Batch #751 that was administered in New York to thousands of innocent people. This government will never be able to repay the people for the social rape, humiliation and out right prejudice people with HIV/AIDS face on a daily basis. The men in the shadows of the AIDS curtain accurately calculated that you would not care if only Blacks and gays are dying. In fact you don’t care that nearly a half million Gulf War veterans are encumbered with something contagious. Soon there will be no more Black people and a confused military, older White people will start suddenly dying and you still won’t get it. Be here now for us, give us a chance to be there for you.
Suddenly, just as President Nixon had predicted, there was explosive death. On November 4, 1999, the U.S. White House announced,…. “Within a period as short as five years, all new infections of HIV in the United States will be African American….” At some point our experts must be allowed to begin the interface process of allowing the history of this virus program to count. It is ludicrous and preposterous to fail to review the U.S. virus program in which to elucidate the etiology of AIDS.
More of the history of the secret virus program can be found in the archives of Dr. John B. Moloney. A review of the files under Dr. Moloney’s name would further pinpoint additional dates and records consistent with one of the greatest hunts, capture and proliferation of disease in the history of the human race. We have found the missing link. It is the guts of the research logic of a federal program that seeks to kill. We have found a curtain of AIDS. We can identify some of the people who work in the shadows of the curtain. Dr. Robert Gallo and Dr. Garth Nicolson must lead us in review. In light of the attack mechanisms available in which to inhibit AIDS, it is time that not another person be stricken with this relic, synthetic mycoplasma chimera.
Help those of us who are still here to realize full and contributory lives. We are all one people.
In May of 1987 the austere Times of London reported on its front page that the smallpox vaccine administered by the World Health Organization had triggered AIDS. 100 million vaccinated Africans were at risk. Areas with the largest amount of inoculations showed the greatest concentrations of AIDS cases. Robert Gallo was quoted in the article as endorsing the figures and stating that, “AIDS researchers…will keep their mouths shut because they are paid to do so.”
In 1992 WHO director David Heymann stated that, “The origin of AIDS is of no importance to science today.”
In 1995 the Catholic charitable organization Human Life International accused the WHO of attempting population control in Africa and elsewhere.
On September 28, 1998 Boyd Graves filed suit against the United States for the “creation”, “production” and “proliferation” of AIDS. On November 7, 2000, the appeals court agreed with the lower court and held AIDS bioengineering as “frivolous.” The world continues to wait for the court to rule on the resubmitted issues. The court can not continue to simply brush aside our experts and the government’s flowchart.
In April 2000 the Observer newspaper reported that the pharmaceutical leviathan GlaxoSmithKline sponsored experiments on children at Incarnation Children’s Center in New York City. Children as young as four were given multi-drug cocktails. In other experiments, six-month old babies were injected with double doses of a measles vaccine. More than 100 orphans and babies were used in 36 experiments.
March 2003, Haruna Kaita, a pharmaceutical scientist and dean of a Nigerian university took samples of the latest WHO vaccine to India for analysis. Serious contaminants were found including sterility agents.
2004: This sort of experimentation has occurred with increasing frequency. Last year, 2004, the Environmental Protection Agency received $2.1 million from the American Chemistry Council to conduct studies on children from impoverished families in Duval County, Florida. The children will be exposed to a variety of known toxins over a two year period. The study will determine how chemicals are absorbed, ingested and inhaled by children ranging in age from infants to 3 year olds. For taking part in the study, families will receive $970 and a tee-shirt.
December 2004: The Times also reported last December that Gulf War Syndrome had been positively linked to vaccines. More than 100,000 veterans currently suffer from the syndrome contracted in 1991 during Desert Storm. 20,000 veterans have died so far.
Boyd Graves writes: I have been asked to give my perspective with regard to the federal program MK-NAOMI . MK-NAOMI is the code for the development of AIDS. The “MK” portion stands for the two co-authors of the AIDS virus, Robert Manaker and Paul Kotin. The “NAOMI” portion stands for “Negroes are Only Momentary Individuals.” The U.S. government continues to orchestrate silence from the very top echelons of the Congress and military. At present there is no accountability. The good people will ultimately create a tsunami of public outrage. We can not allow the state an autocratic right to govern outside of the Constitution. Our society is structured to hide crimes committed by the state, while punishing citizens for minor indiscretions. Their strategy focuses on the general confusion they can create via manipulation of the media. They are very good at what they do. We must become more focused in our continued presentation of the flowchart. The flowchart is the absolute missing link in proving the existence of a coordinated research program to develop a cancer virus that depletes the immune system. New diseases do not create old illnesses.
This compilation of court documents and correspondence is the true effort of one man’s achievement in solving the mystery of the origin of AIDS. We have found the origin of AIDS, it is us.
http://www.boydgraves.com/timeline/
Fortune Presents Gifts Not According To The Book
Luis de Gongora (1561-1627)
Fortune Presents Gifts Not According To The Book
When you expect whistles it’s flutes
When you expect flutes it’s whistles
What various paths are followed in distributing honours and possessions
She gives awards to some and penitent’s cloaks to others
When you expect whistles it’s flutes
When you expect flutes it’s whistles
Sometimes she robs the chief goatherd of his cottage and goatpen
And to whomever she fancies the lamest goat has born two kids
When you expect whistles it’s flutes
When you expect flutes it’s whistles
Because in a village a poor lad has stolen one egg
He swings in the sun and another gets away with a thousand crimes
When you expect whistles it’s flutes
When you expect flutes it’s whistles
The Natural Solutions Foundation, the leading Global Health Freedom organization, is proud to present this information to you. We protect your right to know about – and to use – natural ways to maintain and regain your health, no matter where in the world you live. Among your freedoms is the right to clean, unadulterated food free of genetic manipulation, pesticides, heavy metals or other contaminants and access to herbs, supplements, frequency devices and other means as therapies that may benefit or to protect your well-being without drugs and other dangerous interventions, if you choose.
Genetically Modified (GM) foods, crops and animals are one of those items you must be able to chose to put in your body (and your environment) or not. Because the US refuses to label GM knowing that consumers will refuse to eat it, they FORBID the labeling of such “FrankenFoods”. But it is not just food. Cotton is a GM crop mutated to kill a major pest. Supposedly, GM plants will never have their pests become immune to their changes because…. well, because the Biotech Industry says so.
But Mother Nature says differently. Read the article below and then recall that the biotech pollen blows wild and we are seeing super pests and super weeds evolve because of them. Now what? More pesticides? More mutated DNA? More mutated bacteria and genes to serve the short term, and very short sighted, biotech transformation of Nature into commodity for the benefit of global corporations and the detriment of us all? Remember, these products undergo NO safety testing before they are put into the food supply, your bodies and the environment.
Remember, too, that although cotton is a non-food crop, cotton seed oil is a cheap food oil which is heavily used in our food supply. There is no limit to the amount of pesticide which can be used on cotton. There is no assurance that the mutated proteins and other products (including viruses and drug-resistant genes as well as proteins that have never, NEVER, been produced on earth before) are not present in that cheap oil. There is also every assurance that horrific pesticides ARE at fantastic levels can be, may be, are present in that oil and hence in you and everyone else who eats the food made with the oil treated with the pesticides and mutated for profit.
Organic is not perfect, but it is the only assurance that you have that the food that you are eating does not contain more than 10% of these contaminants. “10 %?”, you may ask. “Isn’t that an awful lot of contamination by GM foods in organic food, for which I am paying a hefty premium?” You bet it is. That is what the US Government allows for organic food to still be called “Organic”. Most other countries in the developed world set a limit of 0.09%. Quite a difference.
Do we need reform in this area? You bet. But “Organic” is still a great deal better than conventional, pesticided, GM ridden, trans fat laden, pesticide laced “food”. This investment in health is cheap at twice the price. After all, how expensive is cancer?
Recall that Codex Alimentarius allows a wide range of fearsome pesticides at horrifyingly high levels. And then recall that many of these biological disasters are permitted with no upper limits. Recall, too, that Codex, following the guiding hand of the US, with a Monsanto representative sitting on the delegation, is trying to force the rest of the world to agree that any fodd already on the market (i.e., GM food) is “safe” and does not require labeling.
There will be a meeting in April, 2008, of the Codex Committee on Food Labeling at which the friends of declaratory GM labeling with face down the US as they successfully began to do at the meeting on this topic in Africa last month. The battle continues.
If you want to know what happens from a source you can trust, the Natural Solutions Foundation needs to raise the money to get there so we need your tax deductible donations (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189) for that purpose. Since the Natural Solutions Foundation is much more than just talk, we’ll be there for you IF we have the money to get there and cover our costs. That is up to you. We are about 5 weeks away from the start of that meeting. Now would be a good time to show your enthusiastic support for our being there with a recurring donation.
For more information on our global programs, including the International Decade of Nutrition, and our US based ones, please visit us at www.HealthFreedomUSA.org and www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org and join the free email list for the Health Freedom eAlerts to keep you in the loop, informed and active defending your right to make your own decisions about your health and wellbeing!
Our activities are supported 100% by your tax deductible donations. Please give generously (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation. Thank you for your support.
Feel free to disseminate this information as widely as possible with full attribution.
Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
PEST RESISTANCE TO GM COTTON AND MAIZE
An insect that is supposed to be killed by a genetically modified (GM)
cotton crop with an in-built poison gene (the plant is the insecticide) has
developed resistance and is beginning to spread in parts of the United
States of America, a scientific study has found. A study by the Agricultural
Research Council (ARC) has found similar results for Bt GM maize in South
Africa.
Bt GM plants are developed by inserting a gene into the plant that is
normally found in a bacterium called Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). The
bacterial gene produces a protein poison that kills certain insects but is
normally harmless to others.
In South Africa the Agricultural Research Council (ARC) has published trial
results that indicate stalk-borer larvae have developed the ability to
survive the Bt poison contained in GM maize plants.
Researchers in the ARC study collected larvae from Bt maize fields in
Christiana in the North West and Ventersdorp, about 320 km away, where Bt
maize was not being grown.
Their field and greenhouse trials showed the same results. Most of the
bollworm larvae collected from non-Bt crops survived only to the eighth day
of the trial (which involved being exposed to Bt maize). But a substantial
number of larvae collected from Bt maize survived over the whole trial
period.
In the USA, a study from the University of Arizona, to be published in
Nature Biotechnology, focused on Bt cotton. This study found that the
bollworm insect developed resistance because of the huge area of land in the
USA – and elsewhere – under Bt GM crop cultivation.
According to the study, the land area under Bt GM cultivation has generated
one of the largest forces of natural selection for insect resistance that
the world has ever known.
The resistant form of bollworm larvae was found in fields in the southern
states of Mississippi and Arkansas between 2003 and 2006, when the surveys
were conducted.
Other major pests attacking Bt crops had not evolved resistance, the
researchers said. The bollworm is a major pest in south-eastern USA and
Texas.
(sources: Farmer’s Weekly 7 March 2008, GMWatch 4 Februa