Natural Solutions Foundation Response to Response from Carolyn Buppert NP, JD
Attorney, Law Office of Carolyn Buppert, PC, Bethesda, Maryland
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/729453?src=ptalk&uac=117629CN

Medscape’s Predictable Defense of Mandating Vaccines…

“Yes, it is legal for a hospital to require the influenza vaccine for employees. Your employer cannot force you to receive the vaccine, but the employer can make vaccination a condition of employment. So, if you refuse, understand that it may cost you your job. Some employers will consider exceptions on the basis of religion… You could sue an employer for negligence if the employer subjected you to unsafe working conditions. But the flu vaccine has been proven safe, and one could argue that it is a safety precaution to require the vaccination.” Counsel Buppert NP, JD

As professionals working in the health care field, we are deeply concerned by the mis-information contained in the above noted Medscape article. For example, Counsel Buppert asserts that flu vaccines “have been proven safe”. By what means, by whom, under what circumstances? For the past twenty or more years, flu vaccines (since after the deadly fiasco of the first “Swine Flu” vaccine in 1976) have been approved as “mere” change of strain vaccines without any significant safety testing. This was true even for the 2009 “Swine Flu” which the government, speaking out of both sides of its mouth, declared to be both a “novel” virus and a “mere change of strain…” at the same time. Where is the alleged safety “proof” published? A citation would be most welcome.

Insteady, we cite the only published review of the record in a peer-reviewed journal, which shows that the influenza vaccines have not been shown to be effective. That conclusions is found in Geier DA, King PG, Geier MR. Influenza Vaccine: Review of effectiveness of the U.S. immunization program and policy considerations. J American Physicians and Surgeons 2006 Fall; 11(3): 69-74

Thus these FDA-approved and CDC-recommended drugs are not proven to be either effective or safe.

In fact, the reason that the organization of which we are the Medical Director and Counsel, the Natural Solutions Foundation, www.HealthFreedomUSA.org, has twice brought suit against the FDA and related agencies and officials, to prohibit the use of flu vaccines precisely because, in addition to posing unisurable risks, failing to show any clinical efficacy, increasing the all-cause death rate and serious consequence incidence (including asthma) in pediatric and other groups, these vaccines have never been proven to be either safe or effective. The 2009 “Swine Flu” vaccine has over 165 miscarriage VAER reports, although a “normal” flu vaccine usually has between 0 and 7 such reports.

Reading Ms. Buppert’s response, which hinges upon the notion that these vaccines have, “in fact,” been proven safe, the immediate conclusion of the informed reader must be that since they have not been proven to be safe, mandating these shots can never be consistent with either US law or international humanitarian law.

The assertion that mandating vaccines is legal is a misreading of a 1905 court case which was about the legality of levying a small fine on someone who does not submit to a required vaccine during an emergency. In that case, the United States Supreme Court actually reserved to the Courts the authority to intervene in vaccination issues. See Jacobson v Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905) — the high court held that the judiciary is “competent to interfere and protect the health and life of the individual concerned” if there is a showing of potential harm to the individual. Since the safety of vaccines was not raised in that case, the issue remains open and the general principle of law that one cannot be forced to accept a trespass to exercise a right remains inviolate.

We challenge the proponents of mass vaccination to openly debate this controversial policy which does not have “significant scientific agreement” behind it — especially if those scientists who are dependent upon vaccine money are excluded from consideration due to their conflict of interest.

Could it be that such conflicts have permitted the drug company and government-supported portion of the scientific community to turn a blind eye to the disasterous pandemic of autism, clearly caused by the extraordinary toxic load to which many children are being subjected, from toxic foods, a toxic environment and the toxins that abundantly remain in vaccines? For the sake of the children, the government’s mass vaccine policy and its supporters must carry a heavy burden of proof in these matters; and we assert they have failed to meet that burden.

Yours in health and freedom,
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Ralph Fucetola JD
Counsel
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomPortal.org