REGULATION AND RESULTS
The Real Costs of Medical Decision Making in a
Commercialized, Politicized Health Care system
Paper Delivered February 2015 by Invitation
To the All India Medical Education Congress
Short URL for this Page: http://tinyurl.com/DrRimaIndiaPaper
Scroll Down for Dr. Rima’s Paper
.
NEW! DR. RIMA CONVENES 40 ANNIVERSARY SYMPOSIUM
Restoring Science, Reversing Genomicide
MYSORE, INDIA – DECEMBER 19 -23, 2016
www.EndGenomicideCongress.com
http://www.drrimatruthreports.com/advancevaccinedirectiveDr. Rima’s Paper Given at the Conference
Dr. Rima’s Reports on Her Trip to India

“Vaccination is a barbarous practice and one of the most fatal of all the delusions current in our time. Conscientious objectors to vaccination should stand alone, if need be, against the whole world, in defense of their conviction.” Mahatma Gandhi
“We are facing a crisis of enormous proportions.”
Dr. Rima’s India Lecture: http://youtu.be/UdKDS1yzO7Q
.
On February 8, 2015 Dr. Rima E. Laibow, MD presented a paper at the All India Medical-Education Congress on Regulation of Medicine as a cause of infertility and death, giving her analysis of the pseudo-science of vaccination as the example.
.
Short link to this page: http://tinyurl.com/DrRimaIndiaPaper
.
You can access the paper here: http://drrimatruthreports.com/wp-content/uploads/Final-All-India-Medical-Congress-Paper.020415.pdf
.
Here is a link to an Advance Copy of the Slide Presentation for the Lecture:
http://drrimatruthreports.com/wp-content/uploads/Regulation-and-Results20520151a.pdf
.
Chart: Reduction in Pandemic Disease Before Mass Public Vaccination Programs Began
Dr. Rima’s Reports on Her Trip to India
5. http://drrimatruthreports.com/ayurvedic-adventures-coming-to-an-end-or-just-beginning/
4. http://drrimatruthreports.com/dr-rimas-ayurvedic-adventures-continue/
3. http://drrimatruthreports.com/dr-rimas-ayurveda-adventures-continue/
2. http://drrimatruthreports.com/continuing-ayurveda-adventures-start-of-week-three/
1. http://drrimatruthreports.com/dr-rima-and-gen-bert-on-their-way-to-india/
Here is a note I just placed on Huffington Post Responding to a Pro-Vax Interview with Melinda Gates *
.
I am firmly opposed to vaccines not because I am ignorant and uninformed (I am an MD with a great deal of accurate information which informs my position) but because I am capable of looking beyond the hype and drug company science at the realities of vaccines.
.

.
Let’s start with smallpox and polio, the two shining stars of “disease eradication.”
.
Smallpox has disappeared from the earth, has it? No, actually, it has not. The diagnosis of “smallpox” has been officially replaced by “monkeypox”, a viral disease indistinguishable from smallpox because it IS smallpox. Don’t believe me? Check out the New England Journal of Medicine here: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199808203390811
.
Then there’s polio. CDC’s website on the topic points out that the principle cause of polio is the polio vaccine. But we don’t call it “polio” any longer. We call it “Non Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis” (NPAFP) which is by every measure except the name, polio. In 14 months of vaccination before India was declared a “polio free zone” by the WHO on April 9, 2014, 53,563 of her children were crippled or killed by the non-polio polio which shows a direct, linear relationship to vaccination: the more vaccines, the more NPAFP until in the Indian state with the highest polio vaccination coverage, 37 children out of every 100,000 vaccinated develop this disease. Oh, yes, the vaccine-induced polio is twice as deadly as the wild type. Reference: start here: http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/the-vaccine-myth-of-polio-free-status-polio-vaccine-caused-53000-paralysis-victims-in-india-last-year/
.
Then there is meningitis: last year the CDC said that since 2010 the vaccination program has “saved” 9 lives. The cost of that salvation is approximately $30Million US per life “saved”. In an equivalent period, however, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, VAERS reported the following due specifically to the Meningitis vaccine use:
.
20 deaths reported in VAERS
98 life-threatening adverse events
49 cases of permanent disability
3007 hospitalizations
19 extended hospitalizations
2,412 emergency-room visits
.
VAERS captures between 1 and 10% of the adverse events which occur. Choose the higher figure and you do that math.
.
Epidemiology of the vaccine results is truly horrifying since it: “annually causes in excess of 66 deaths, 161 permanent disabilities, 312 life threatening events, 1,006 hospitalizations, 63 extended hospitalizations and 7,900 emergency room visits”
.
Let’s see… saves 9 lives in 5 years, kills 330 people and permanently disables 806 at a cost of about $1.4Billion US per year. What a deal!
.
Every single vaccine you look at, once you allow the induced righteous anger to fall from your eyes, is a similar atrocity.
.
All the name calling in the world does not make these facts go away.
.
Oh, yes, autism and the full range of neurological tragedy imposed upon the unwary. Nearly forgot the mercury and aluminum.
.
Take your propaganda blinders off and look at the data.
.
Frankly, if you are honest, you’ll join the ranks of the anti vaxxers as I have.
.
Ah, just one final thought: Bill and Melinda Gates are huge and very public proponents of drastic population reduction and Bill very famously stated in a TED talk that “properly used …vaccines could reduce the population of the planet by 15%”. Yep. His words.
.
Melinda has abandoned her Catholic dogma to push a vaccine that ends the ability of women to ever bear children again calling it reproductive choice, which, after all, I suppose it is. But the globalists are making the choice.
.
Yours in health and freedom,
.
Dr. Rima
Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.DrRimaTruthReports.com
.
* http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/01/22/melinda-gates-anti-vaccine_n_6519464.html
.

Let’s talk about abortion and Health Freedom.
.
It’s a tough subject and right about now, half the people giving me their attention are getting ready to be angry because I might propose the RIGHT to have an abortion and half the people reading this far are getting ready to be upset because I might propose a woman has NO RIGHT to have an abortion. But before we consider the legal rights and wrongs, we need to consider how we got where we are.
.
Let me set out some historical facts on the subject: I was born in 1943 and for the next 30 years, until Roe v. Wade was decided by the Supreme Court in 1973, abortion was not only a huge taboo and a bad, shameful thing to even contemplate, much less actually do, abortion was also pretty much unavailable for ordinary women unless they resorted to illegal medical procedures, foreign travel or what were literally back alley procedures or attempted desperate , often deadly, measures for inducing one.
.
I entered Medical School in 1966, 7 years before Roe v Wade and, as you can imagine, spent a lot of time in the Emergency Rooms of the hospitals I was assigned to, as well as their obstetrics and gynecology wards.
.
I was mostly trained in the New York City Hospital System. Conditions were terrible, the doctors varied from horrific to superb and the “teaching material”, which is what patients were called, were in desperate need of whatever services they were lucky enough to receive.
.
Women who get pregnant and do not want to remain pregnant WILL have abortions. They WILL exert the most fundamental of rights over their own Health Freedom. I personally have had my hands on the dying body a 14 year old victim of rape and repeated incest with a wire coat hanger protruding from her vagina as she expired. She died from sepsis (massive infection) but not before she told me that she induced an abortion because she wanted to stay in school so she could become a doctor.
.
She was, in a primitive and ultimately lethal fashion, attempting to exercise her Health Freedom: the right to total self-determination over her body, its uses, its past, its present and its future. So please understand: while I am concerned with legal rights, I am passionate about pain and suffering. As a doctor, that is my first concern. That is why I believe in Health Freedom, to stop the suffering. As a woman, that is why I believe in Health Freedom, to stop the suffering of unwilling mothers and unwanted children.
.
You believe in Health Freedom. At least for yourself.
.
Do you have enough charity and jsutice in your heart to offer it to other people? Do you have enough passionate commitment to the basic right of every human being on the planet to shape their own body’s experience as they see fit, to look past the rhetoric and both the historical and current patriarchy to see that women, like men, are capable people who can do as they want with their own bodies?
.
Ah, but what about the fetus? And what about the new born? Are you aware that the United States has the absolute worst child and infant mortality of any developed nation on the planet?
.
Somehow it is fine to let society kill babies by neglect, poverty, maternal malnutrition and idiotic, outdated medical practices once they have reached full term, but it is wrong to allow women to control their own lives?
.
We may not like the way those choices are made (certainly preventing conception is better than accepting the risks inherent in ending it), but we must respect a woman for making the choice. No one else has any right to make that choice for her, to prevent that choice or to insist on it for her so long as she is not a minor.
.
“The United States has a higher infant mortality rate than any of the other 27 wealthy countries, according to a new report from the Centers for Disease Control. A baby born in the U.S. is nearly three times as likely to die during her first year of life as one born in Finland or Japan. That same American baby is about twice as likely to die in her first year as a Spanish or Korean one. Despite healthcare spending levels that are significantly higher than any other country in the world, a baby born in the U.S. is less likely to see his first birthday than one born in Hungary, Poland or Slovakia. Or in Belarus. Or in Cuba, for that matter. The U.S. rate of 6.1 infant deaths per 1,000 live births masks considerable state-level variation. If Alabama were a country, its rate of 8.7 infant deaths per 1,000 would place it slightly behind Lebanon in the world rankings. Mississippi, with its 9.6 deaths, would be somewhere between Botswana and Bahrain.”1
.
Our maternal mortality is a similar disgrace. While most modern industrial countries lose 12 or fewer mothers in delivery, we average 21 per 100,000 live births, right around Brunei, Grenada, Saudi Arabia, Hungary and Iran.2
.
Somehow it makes some sort of social “sense” to allow children to come into a world where they are not wanted, resulting, according to a vast number of studies, in disastrous outcomes for those children without providing for them in any meaningful way while women are prevented from life courses that make sense for them?
.
It also makes “sense” to the very same people who want to control what happens to every woman’s body in the United States and make massive life decisions for her use of that body (sound like life on the plantation to anyone?) that we should impose sanctions on countries so that their children starve to death by the millions. It makes “sense” to them that we should use depleted uranium munitions on their countries so that massive numbers of children are either unviable or so damaged that they can never lead lives even vaguely approaching normal. It makes “sense” to them to pass laws allowing such massive pollution, and such dangerous drugs and vaccines that there may not be any normal DNA left on the planet, including yours, mine and theirs.
.
It makes “sense” to fund programs to destroy the earth, like geoengineering so that ALL of Earth’s children will die, unless they live deep in the happy bunkers below the earth that these mad men have prepared for themselves.
.
You are not invited.
.
And they tell me, and you, your wife, daughter, sister and mother that our lives are restricted – and our choices are criminalized – because they are protecting babies?
.
That is, to me, precisely like telling the assembled slaves in their shacks next to the cotton fields that you are keeping them safe from the problems they would face in the world if they were free.
.
Oh, wait. That is why we are told we are in an eternal and borderless war at the cost of our lives, our economy and our liberties. We are being, like the women and the fetuses, protected. I forgot.
.
Wrap it in any historical or medical or religious or social or mythic justification you like. If you believe, to your core, as you should, that you own your own body, then any restriction on what you can do with it is inconsistent with that belief.
.
Roe vs Wade was the Supreme Court’s attempt at judicial compromise for a very difficult issue, where deeply-held, sincere beliefs conflict.
.
Under that rule, government has no interest in restricting a woman’s right to choose, at least during the first and possibly the second trimester, until viability outside the womb is an issue. We must continue to support Roe v Wade as the least a civil society can do to protect the right to choose Health Freedom for herself as the woman sees fit.
.
I support the broadest possible right to choose. That is, IMHO, the essence of Health Freedom: the right to choose to use or not use vaccines; the right to use safe nutrients or dangerous prescription drugs for health; the right to control what happens to your health and your body.
.
It also includes the right to breathe uncontaminated air and live in natural weather, eat food that does not impact my DNA in unnatural ways, not have my life shortened by radiation if I do not wish to have it so shortened.
.
To me, these are all the same right: Health Freedom — freedom to determine, without any exceptions, what happens to my body.
.
We have, at least nominally, in the US, the right to express our opinions, positions and beliefs. We have, for the most part, surrendered the right to respectful discourse.
.
You may disagree with me. Or not. I can only presume that you agree with my right to express my considered views. I welcome your response. Please email it to me at releyes3@gmail.com.
.
I extend my defense of freedom to you. How far do you extend that freedom to others?
.
Yours in health and freedom,
.
Dr. Rima
.
1 http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/09/29/our-infant-mortality-rate-is-a-national-embarrassment/
2 http://www.indexmundi.com/g/r.aspx?v=2223
The Present Situation of Fukushima
All Nuclear Facilities Pose Terrorist Threat Opportunities
Fukushima-Released Radioactivity Continues to Grow
Academics Join Call for “Honorable Retreat” from 2020 Olympics
Mitsuhei Murata
.
The Japanese government is now vigorously promoting the restart of nuclear reactors shut down after the Fukushima disaster. It controls the media effectively. The recent nuclear accidents in Ukraine (Zaporizhia) and Belgium (Tihange) were completely ignored in the Japanese media, as was the menace of an attack against the Chernobyl nuclear plant in war-plagued Ukraine.
.
In Belgium, there was an incident attributed to sabotage last August. On August 8th of last year, a number of rockets were fired at a nuclear plant in Israel (Reuter). These facts are sufficient to support the assertion that the mere existence of more than 440 nuclear reactors in the world constitutes a serious global security problem. Nuclear reactors are no less dangerous than nuclear weapons.
.
According to the Asahi Newspaper of December 25, the Japanese Nuclear Regulatory Authority envisages the release of “treated” contaminated water (241,000 tons out of 590,000 tons) into the sea. The treatment of the contaminated water through Multi-nuclide Removal Equipment (ALPS) cannot remove tritium. The International Atomic Energy Association (IAEA) is advising the release into the sea if the tritium is removed to a level less than the concentration limit set in the public notice.
.
Civil society is naturally opposed to this move in view of the extremely dangerous consequences tritium could bring about. In the joint petition against ITER — International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor — issued by Dr. Masatoshi Koshiba, Nobel Prize Laureate, and Prof. Akira Hasegawa, Maxwell Prize Laureate, we notice that ITER containing two kilograms of tritium could kill up to two million people. What matters is not the level of concentration, but the total volume. The consequences of the radioactive contamination of the Pacific Ocean from Japan to the West Coast of the United States is drawing increased attention. The sheer volume of radioactive materials flowing daily into the sea makes one feel the crisis of our global environment.
.
.
Civil society is naturally opposed to this move in view of the extremely dangerous consequences tritium could bring about. In the joint petition against ITER — International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor — issued by Dr. Masatoshi Koshiba, Nobel Prize Laureate, and Prof. Akira Hasegawa, Maxwell Prize Laureate, we notice that ITER containing two kilograms of tritium could kill up to two million people. What matters is not the level of concentration, but the total volume. The consequences of the radioactive contamination of the Pacific Ocean from Japan to the West Coast of the United States is drawing increased attention. The sheer volume of radioactive materials flowing daily into the sea makes one feel the crisis of our global environment.
.
The removal of fuel rods including damaged ones from Unit 4 at Fukushima has been completed. Progress has been made. We are now reminded, however, that we are confronted with much more serious problems. Units 1, 2 and 3 remain inaccessible because of lethal levels of radiation surrounding the buildings. Their containment vessels need a constant flow of nitrogen to maintain low levels of oxygen in order to prevent hydrogen explosions.
.
The whereabouts of the melted fuel rods remain unknown. We face a situation humanity has never before experienced. Human knowledge, skill, expertise, and wisdom must be mobilized on the widest possible scale.
.
Probing the ground beneath the site is urgently needed. Although an expert working at the site recommends the use of technology used in the development of shale oil for this purpose, as of yet it has not been utilized. The urgent need for international cooperation in this crisis is undeniable.
.
As Executive Director of the Japan Society for a Global System of Ethics, I was present on December 20, 2014 when Associate Lecturer Hiroaki Koide of Kyoto University made an outstanding lecture. He is one of the most respected nuclear experts in the world, particularly after having stuck to his anti-nuclear position following the Fukushima disaster, sacrificing a promotion in the process. After the lecture, I spoke to him about his view on the Tokyo?Olympic?Games.
He pointed out?that?there?exists in Japan an atmosphere that?considers it?unpatriotic?to?pose?this question, but he readily accepts this risk. He then answered, considering the huge problem of procuring workers for the Fukushima site and the ordeal that such workers are going through under terribly difficult conditions.
.
He expressed the opinion that holding of Olympic Games in Tokyo should be considered definitely out of question. The audience was deeply impressed by Mr. Koide’s lecture. I am widely disseminating it, including to top decision makers.
.
.
The problem of workers on the site is very serious. Last November, the average number of daily workers was 6,600. This requires numerically more than 2.4 million workers a year. Decommissioning of the reactors on the site will take decades. It makes one shudder. The lack of the sense of crisis over Fukushima is in stark contrast to the gravity of the crisis.
.
I have the feeling that in Japan there now exists a taboo against questioning the security of the Tokyo Olympic Games. The Tokyo Olympic Games seems to be being utilized to divert attention from Fukushima and to give out the impression to the world that Fukushima no longer poses a threat.
.
Shrewd observers point out that there is ‘the front and the back’ relationship between Tokyo Olympic Games and nuclear reactors. The two are interrelated. The setback of the one will mean that of the other. This is why I am pinning hopes on the move of the IPPNW (International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War) to approach the IOC.
.
Earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, and floods are increasing in number.
.
.
Under such circumstances, it is absolutely reckless to promote nuclear reactors. However, the state specific secrets protection law that took effect on December 10 of last year inclines the media toward self-imposed censorship regarding nuclear issues.
.
Fukushima is now undeniably a global security issue. It is a crisis for Japan as a nation. It is a crisis of the global environment for the international community. It is surprisingly being treated merely as a crisis for the management of our electric utilities. Much is expected of the role the international community could play in this regard.
.
I have received a communique from the UN confirming my participation in the coming Sendai Conference of next March. I am to make a speech on ‘Nuclear Disasters and Global Ethics’ on March 16.
.
I hope that UN will play a central role in coping with Fukushima.
.
See also General Bert’s comment at: http://drrimatruthreports.com/murata-san-abolish-nuclear-power-to-stop-ultimate-terror-attack/
.