Will there be a violent revolution in the US? If there is, will it be triggered by violations of your health freedom so devastating and so dangerous that Americans will, at last, say, “Enough”, just as they did with the imposition of new taxes at the end of the unopposed British Colonial era and the beginning of that difficult and dangerous period glorified in grade school history books as “The American Revolution”?

Whether you are a liberal, a progressive, a conservative, a Constitutionalist, a libertarian or a six foot scaly reptile, if you are watching (and that means living through) the political, social, economic, constitutional and social upheaval besetting the United States right now, you will find this provocative and thought-provoking article worth reading. Asking if we are heading for a revolution does not mean that I advocate one. Let me be very clear on that score: revolutions damage us all deeply and leave scars which may not heal for hundreds of years. But think about what happens if the US Government starts yelling, “Pandemic! Pandemic”, for example, saying there is an Avian Flu outbreak. Although the Indonesian Health Minister, Mme. Siti Fadila Supari, states unequivocally that the US is manipulating the Avian Flu situation for its own gain and greed, and that the World Health Organization provided Indonesian Avian Flu samples to a US Bioweapons lab at Los Alamos, New Mexico, most people will be so spooked and stampeded by the public “Wag the Dog” outcry created to drive people to compliance that we can expect the majority of them to roll up their sleeves and beg, literally bet, to be inoculated. Or will they?

Liberty after liberty, trusted source after trusted source, civil protection after civil protection have all been rapidly eroding through the heavy hand of an increasingly dictatorial “protection” mentality by government and agencies. On that we all can agree, no matter what our political stance or belief system. At the same time, global and local health freedoms have been undergoing the same erosion for the supposed benefit of our health and well being but with personal freedom and the right to make our own health decision as the victims. Quick, real and frightening examples:
– The rapidly arriving onslaught of compulsory vaccinations of children and adults in the US and elsewhere with the specter of “Avian Flu vaccine” on a universal compulsory basis lurking in the not-too-distant background
– The FDA literally forbidding labeling of genetically modified ingredients and foods (other than raw produce which has a code on the little oval label produce carries. If it begins with the number “8” it has been genetically modified) because they recognize, according to FDA employee Barbara Schneeman, PhD [head of Office of Dietary Supplements and frequent Codex Delegate for the US] that if you knew your food was genetically modified you would refuse to buy it. By the way, if it begins with the number “4”, the produce has been raised conventionally, which means with pesticides and other chemicals. If it begins with the number “9” the produce is organic and has not been treated with chemicals although it may have been irradiated or “pasteurized” without label notification.
– Your medical records, all of them, becoming public property which the Federal Government can sell for commercial purposes and which doctors offices can now transmit on special, $600 computers now available, directly to Google where they will be stored and accessed without your knowledge or your doctors (which is not such a huge departure from where we are now, after all, since if your doctor (or anyone else in the office) tells you that your records have been accessed, that person has committed a felony crime
– Your access to foods which have not been raised with undeclared pesticides or irradiated (now called “pasteurization” to make it sound less frightening) is nearly impossible to assure. All fruits and vegetables imported into the US must be irradiated, but that fact is not declared on any label
– Compulsory “mental health screening” followed by drugging with dangerous psychiatric drugs for children, adults and adolescents mandated by at least 6 Federal and numerous State laws. Parents who resist this dangerous imposition on their rights face criminal charges and potential loss of their children to the State. The same imposition of State over personal interests has led to numerous cases of forced chemotherapy treatment despite the wishes of patients and parents
– The disappearance of free speech to allow you to learn about and tell others about health benefits associated with a food or food component (currently forbidden by the FDA and Codex as “Health Claims” and “advertising” respectively) without having the potentially benefical substance classified as an “untested drug” by the FDA
– The right to sue manufacturers of devices, drugs and vaccines for the damage they have caused whether or not the drug, vaccine or device has been approved by the FDA for any purpose. Currently, if a device, drug or vaccination has been approved by the FDA for any use at all, the manufacturer has no liability, none, for any damage – even death – that the device or drug caused.

Could these basic human, American, personal rights, especially the right to refuse vaccination for oneself and one’s children be so dearly held by Americans, and could the distrust and loathing of government be so strong that, despite marshal law, despite propaganda and despite the police power of the state enforcing it, Americans might refuse in enough numbers, and with enough force to create a revolution? Well, that all depends on whether American discontent has reached a boiling point, rather than a roiling malaise.

Students of social movements and change (and revolutions certainly quality for those descriptions) ask the question, “What are the conditions necessary to create a full blown revolution and have we reached them in the United States. Please read on to learn more about whether the US is, in fact, in critical “blow up” mode.

When Change Is Not Enough: The Seven Steps to Revolution

by Sara Robinson

“Those who make peaceful evolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable.”

– John F. Kennedy

There’s one thing for sure: 2008 isn’t anything like politics as usual.

The corporate media (with their unerring eye for the obvious point) is fixated on the narrative that, for the first time ever, Americans will likely end this year with either a woman or a black man headed for the White House. Bloggers are telling stories from the front lines of primaries and caucuses that look like something from the early 60s – people lining up before dawn to vote in Manoa, Hawaii yesterday; a thousand black college students in Prairie View, Texas marching 10 miles to cast their early votes in the face of a county that tried to disenfranchise them. In recent months, we’ve also been gobstopped by the sheer passion of the insurgent campaigns of both Barack Obama and Ron Paul, both of whom brought millions of new voters into the conversation – and with them, a sharp critique of the status quo and a new energy that’s agitating toward deep structural change.

There’s something implacable, earnest, and righteously angry in the air. And it raises all kinds of questions for burned-out Boomers and jaded Gen Xers who’ve been ground down to the stump by the mostly losing battles of the past 30 years. Can it be – at long last – that Americans have, simply, had enough? Are we, finally, stepping out to take back our government – and with it, control of our own future? Is this simply a shifting political season – the kind we get every 20 to 30 years – or is there something deeper going on here? Do we dare to raise our hopes that this time, we’re going to finally win a few? Just how ready is this country for big, serious, forward-looking change?

Recently, I came across a pocket of sociological research that suggested a tantalizing answer to these questions – and also that America may be far more ready for far more change than anyone really believes is possible at this moment. In fact, according to some sociologists, we’ve already lined up all the preconditions that have historically set the stage for full-fledged violent revolution.

It turns out that the energy of this moment is not about Hillary or Ron or Barack. It’s about who we are, and where we are, and what happens to people’s minds when they’re left hanging just a little too far past the moment when they’re ready for transformative change.

Way back in 1962, Caltech sociologist James C. Davies published an article in the American Sociological Review that summarized the conditions that determine how and when modern political revolutions occur. Intriguingly, Davies cited another scholar, Crane Brinton, who laid out seven “tentative uniformities” that he argued were the common precursors that set the stage for the Puritan, American, French, and Russian revolutions. As I read Davies’ argument, it struck me that the same seven stars Brinton named are now precisely lined up at midheaven over America in 2008. Taken together, it’s a convergence that creates the perfect social, economic, and political conditions for the biggest revolution since the shot heard ’round the world.

And even more interestingly: in every case, we got here as a direct result of either intended or unintended consequences of the conservatives’ war against liberal government, and their attempt to take over our democracy and replace it with a one-party plutocracy. It turns out that, historically, liberal nations make very poor grounds for revolution – but deeply conservative ones very reliably create the conditions that eventually make violent overthrow necessary. And our own Republicans, it turns out, have done a hell of a job.

Here are the seven criteria, along with the reasons why we’re fulfilling each of them now, and how conservative policies conspired to put us on the road to possible revolution.

1. Soaring, Then Crashing

Davies notes that revolutions don’t happen in traditional societies that are stable and static – where people have their place, things are as they’ve always been, and nobody expects any of that to change. Rather, modern revolutions – particularly the progressive-minded ones in which people emerge from the fray with greater rights and equality – happen in economically advancing societies, always at the point where a long period of rising living standards and high, hopeful expectations comes to a crashing end, leaving the citizens in an ugly and disgruntled mood. As Davies put it:

“Revolutions are most likely to occur when a prolonged period of objective economic and social development is followed by a short period of sharp reversal. The all-important effect on the minds of people in a particular society is to produce, during the former period, an expectation of continued ability to satisfy needs – which continue to rise – and, during the latter, a mental state of anxiety and frustration when manifest reality breaks away from anticipated reality….

“Political stability and instability are ultimately dependent on a state of mind, a mood, in society…it is the dissatisfied state of mind rather than the tangible provision of ‘adequate’ or ‘inadequate’ supplies of food, equality, or liberty which produces the revolution.”

The American middle class was built on New Deal investments in education, housing, infrastructure, and health care, which produced a very “prolonged period of objective economic and social development.” People were optimistic; generations of growing prosperity raised their expectations that their children would do even better. That era instilled in Americans exactly the kind of hopeful belief in their own agency that primes them to become likely revolutionaries in an era of decline.

And now, thanks to 28 years of conservative misrule, we are now at the point where “manifest reality breaks away from anticipated reality;” and the breach is creating political turbulence. The average American has seen his or her standard of living contract by fits and starts since about 1972. This fall-off that was relieved somewhat by the transition to two-earner households and the economic sunshine of the Clinton years – but then accelerated with the dot-com crash, followed by seven years of Bush’s overt hostility toward the lower 98 percent of Americans who aren’t part of his base. Working-class America is reeling from the mass exodus of manufacturing jobs and the scourge of predatory lending; middle-class America is being hollowed out by health-care bankruptcies, higher college costs, and a tax load far heavier than that of the richest 2 percent. These people expected to do better than their parents. Now, they’re screwed every direction they turn.

In the face of this reversal, Davies tells us, it’s not at all surprising that the national mood is turning ominous, from one end of the political spectrum to the other. However, he warns us: this may not be just a passing political storm. In other times and places, this kind of quick decline in a prosperous nation has been a reliable sign of a full-on revolution brewing just ahead.

2. They Call It A Class War

Marx called this one true, says Davies. Progressive modern democracies run on mutual trust between classes and a shared vision of the common good that binds widely disparate groups together. Now, we’re also about to re-learn the historical lesson that liberals like flat hierarchies, racial and religious tolerance, and easy class mobility not because we’re soft-headed and soft-hearted – but because, unlike short-sighted conservatives, we understand that tight social cohesion is our most reliable and powerful bulwark against the kinds of revolutions that bring down great economies, nations and cultures.

In all the historical examples Davies and Brinton cite, the stage for revolution was set when the upper classes broke faith with society’s other groups, and began to openly prey on them in ways that threatened their very future. Not surprisingly, the other groups soon united, took up arms, and rebelled.

And here we are again: Conservative policies have opened the wealth gap to Depression levels; put workers at the total mercy of their employers; and deprived the working and middle classes of access to education, home ownership, health care, capital, legal redress, and their expectations of a better future for their kids. You can only get away with blaming this on gays and Mexicans for so long before people get wise to the game. And as the primaries are making clear: Americans are getting wise.

Our current plutocratic nobility may soon face the same stark choice its English, French, and Russian predecessors did. They can keep their heads and take proactive steps to close the gap between themselves and the common folk (choosing evolution over revolution, as JFK counsels above). Or they can keep insisting stubbornly on their elite prerogatives, until that gap widens to the point where the revolution comes – and they will lose their heads entirely.

Right now, all we’re asking of our modern-day corporate courtiers is that they accept a tax cut repeal on people making over $200K a year, raise the minimum wage, give us decent health care and the right to unionize, and call a halt to their ridiculous “death tax” boondoggle. In retrospect, their historic forebears might have counseled them to take this deal: their headless ghosts bear testimony to the idea that’s it’s better to give in and lose a little skin early than dig in and lose your whole hide later on.

3. Deserted Intellectuals

Mere unrest among the working and middle classes, all by itself, isn’t enough. Revolutions require leaders – and those always come from the professional and intellectual classes. In most times and places, these groups (which also include military officers) usually enjoy comfortable ties to the upper classes, and access to a certain level of power. But if those connections become frayed and weak, and the disaffected intellectuals make common cause with the lower classes, revolution becomes almost inevitable.

Davies notes that, compared to both the upper and lower classes, the members of America’s upper-middle class were relatively untouched by Great Depression. Because of this, their allegiances to the existing social structure largely remained intact; and he argues that their continued engagement was probably the main factor that allowed America to avert an all-out revolution in the 1930s.

But 2008 is a different story. Both the Boomers (now in their late 40s to early 60s) and Generation X (now in their late 20s to late 40s) were raised in an economically advancing nation that was rich with opportunity and expectation. We spent our childhoods in what were then still the world’s best schools; and A students of every class worked hard to position ourselves for what we (and our parents and teachers) expected would be very successful adult careers. We had every reason to believe that, no matter where we started, important leadership roles awaited us in education, government, the media, business, research, and other institutions.

And yet, when we finally graduated and went to work, we found those institutions being sold out from under us to a newly-emerging group of social and economic conservatives who didn’t share our broad vision of common decency and the common good (which we’d inherited from the GI and Silent adults who raised us and taught us); and who were often so corrupted or so sociopathic that the working environments they created were simply unendurable. If wealth, prestige, and power came at the price of our principles, we often chose instead to take lower-paying work, live small, and stay true to ourselves.

For too many of us, these thwarted expectations have been the driving arc of our adult lives. But we’ve never lost the sense that it was a choice that the America we grew up in would never have asked us to make. In Davies’ terms, we are “deserted intellectuals” – a class that is always at extremely high risk for fomenting revolution whenever it appears in history.

Davies says that revolutions catalyze when these deserted intellectuals make common cause with the lower classes. And much of the energy of this election is coming right out of that emerging alliance. The same drive toward corporatization that savaged our dreams also hammered at other class wedges throughout American society, creating conditions that savaged the middle class and ground the working class toward something resembling serfdom. Between our galvanizing frustration with George Bush, our shared fury at the war, and the new connections forged by bloggers and organizers, that alliance has now congealed into the determinedly change-minded movements we’re seeing this election cycle.

4. Incompetent Government

As this blog has long argued, conservatives invariably govern badly because they don’t really believe that government should exist at all – except, perhaps, as a way to funnel the peoples’ tax money into the pockets of party insiders. This conflicted (if not outright hostile) attitude toward government can’t possibly lead to any outcome other than bad management, bad policy, and eventually such horrendously bad social and economic outcomes that people are forced into the streets to hold their leaders to account.

It turns out there’s never been a modern revolution that didn’t start against a backdrop of atrocious government malfeasance in the face of precipitously declining fortunes. From George III’s onerous taxes to Marie Antoinette’s “Let them eat cake,” revolutions begin when stubborn aristocrats heap fuel on the fire by blithely disregarding the falling fortunes of their once-prosperous citizens. And America is getting dangerously close to that point now. Between our corporate-owned Congress and the spectacularly bad judgment of Bush’s executive branch, there’s never been a government in American history more inept, corrupt, and criminally negligent than this one – or more shockingly out of touch with what the average American is going through. Just ask anyone from New Orleans – or anyone who has a relative in the military.

Liberal democracy avoids this by building in a fail-safe: if the bastards ignore us, we can always vote them out. But if we’ve learned anything over the last eight years, it’s that our votes don’t always count – especially not when conservatives are doing the counting. If this year’s election further confirms the growing conviction that change via the ballot box is futile, we may find a large and disgruntled group of Americans looking to restore government accountability by more direct means.

5. Gutless Wonders in the Ruling Class

Revolution becomes necessary when the ruling classes fail in their duty to lead. Most of the major modern political revolutions occurred at moments when the world was changing rapidly – and the country’s leaders dealt with it by dropping back into denial and clinging defiantly to the old, profitable, and familiar status quo. New technologies, new ideas, and new economic opportunities were emerging; and there came a time when ignoring them was no longer an option. When the leaders failed to step forward boldly to lead their people through the looming and necessary transformations, the people rebelled.

We’re hard up against some huge transformative changes now. Global warming and overwhelming pollution are forcing us to reconsider the way we occupy the world, altering our relationship to food, water, air, soil, energy, and each other. The transition off carbon-based fuels and away from non-recyclable goods is going to re-structure our entire economy. Computers are still creating social and business transformations; biotech and nanotech will only accelerate that. More and more people in the industrialized world are feeling a spiritual void, and coming to believe that moving away from consumerism and toward community may be an important step in recovering that nameless thing they’ve lost.

And, in the teeth of this restless drift toward inevitable change, America has been governed by a bunch of conservative dinosaurs who can’t even bring themselves to acknowledge that the 20th century is over. (Some of them, in fact, are still trying to turn back the Enlightenment.) Liberal governments manage this kind of shift by training and subsidizing scientists and planners, funding research, and setting policies that help their nations navigate these transitions with some grace. Conservative ones – being conservative – will reflexively try to deny that change is occurring at all, and then brutally suppress anyone with evidence to the contrary.

Which is why, every time our current crop of so-called leaders open their mouths to propose a policy or Explain It All To Us, it’s embarrassingly obvious that they don’t have the vision, the intelligence, or the courage to face the future that everyone can clearly see bearing down on us, whether we’re ready or not. Their persistent cluelessness infuriates us – and terrifies us. It’s all too clear that these people are a waste of our tax money: they will never take us where we need to go. Much of the energy we’re seeing in this year’s election is due to the fact that a majority of Americans have figured out that our government is leaving us hung out here, completely on our own, to manage huge and inevitable changes with no support or guidance whatsoever.

Historically, this same seething fury at incompetent, unimaginative, cowardly leaders – and the dawning realization that our survival depends on seizing the lead for ourselves – has been the spark that’s ignited many a violent uprising.

6. Fiscal Irresponsibility

As we’ve seen, revolutions follow in the wake of national economic reversals. Almost always, these reversals occur when inept and corrupt governments mismanage the national economy to the point of indebtedness, bankruptcy, and currency collapse.

There’s a growing consensus on both the left and right that America is now heading into the biggest financial contraction since the Great Depression. And it’s one that liberal critics have seen coming for years, as conservatives systematically dismantled the economic foundations of the entire country. Good-paying jobs went offshore. Domestic investments in infrastructure and education were diverted to the war machine. Government oversight of banks and securities was blinded. Vast sections of the economy were sold off to the Saudis for oil, or to the Chinese for cheap consumer goods and money to finance tax cuts for the wealthy.

This is no way to run an economy, unless you’re a borrow-and-spend conservative determined to starve the government beast to the point where you can, as Grover Norquist proposed, drag it into the bathtub and drown it entirely. The current recession is the bill come due for 28 years of Republican financial malfeasance. It’s also another way in which conservatives themselves have unwittingly set up the historical preconditions for revolution.

7. Inept and Inconsistent Use of Force

The final criterion for revolution is this: The government no longer exercises force in a way that people find fair or consistent. And this can happen in all kinds of ways.

Domestically, there’s uneven sentencing, where some people get the maximum and others get cut loose without penalty – and neither outcome has any connection to the actual circumstances of the crime (though it often correlates all too closely with race, class, and the ability to afford a good lawyer). Unchecked police brutality (tasers, for example) that hardens public perception against the constabulary. Unwarranted police surveillance and legal harassment of law-abiding citizens going about their business. Different kinds of law enforcement for different neighborhoods. The use of government force to silence critics. And let’s not forget the unconstitutional restriction of free speech and free assembly rights.

Abroad, there’s the misuse of military force, which forces the country to pour its blood and treasure into misadventures that offer no clear advantage for the nation. These misadventures not only reduce the country’s international prestige and contribute to economic declines; they often create a class of displaced soldiers who return home with both the skills and the motivation to turn political unrest into a full-fledged shooting war.

This kind of capricious, irrational ineptitude in deploying government force leads to public contempt for the power of the state, and leads the governed to withdraw their consent. And, eventually, it also raises people’s determination to stand together to oppose state power. That growing solidarity and fearlessness – along with the resigned knowledge that equal-opportunity goons will brutalize loyalists and rebels alike, so you might as well be a dead lion rather than a live lamb – is the final factor that catalyzes ordinary citizens into ready and willing revolutionaries.

* * *

“A revolutionary state of mind requires the continued, even habitual but dynamic expectation of greater opportunity to satisfy basic needs…but the necessary additional ingredient is a persistent, unrelenting threat to the satisfaction of those needs: not a threat which actually returns people to a state of sheer survival but which put them in the mental state where they believe they will not be able to satisfy one or more basic needs….The crucial factor is the vague or specific fear that ground gained over a long period of time will be quickly lost… [This fear] generates when the existing government suppresses or is blamed for suppressing such opportunity.”

When Davies wrote that paragraph in 1962, he probably couldn’t have imagined how closely it would describe America in 2008. Thirty years of Republican corporatist government have failed us in ways that are not just inept or corrupt, but also have brought us to the same dangerous brink where so many other empires have erupted into violent revolution. The ground we have gained steadily over the course of the entire 20th Century is eroding under our feet. Movement conservatism has destroyed our economic base, declared open war on the middle and working classes, thwarted the aspirations of the intellectual and professional elites, dismantled the basic processes and functions of democracy, failed to prepare us for the future, overseen the collapse of our economy, and misused police and military force so inconsistently that Americans are losing respect for government.

It’s not always the case that revolution inevitably emerges wherever these seven conditions occur together, just as not everybody infected with a virus gets sick. But over the past 350 years, almost every major revolution in a modern industrialized country has been preceded by this pattern of seven preconditions. It’s fair to say that all those who get sick start out by being exposed to this virus.

Hillary Clinton is failing because this is a revolutionary moment – and she, regrettably, has the misfortune to be too closely identified with the mounting failures of the past that we’re now seeking to move beyond. On the other hand, Ron Paul’s otherwise inexplicable success has been built on his pointed and very specific critique of the kinds of government leadership failures I’ve described.

And Barack Obama is walking away with the moment because he talks of “hope” – which, as Davies makes clear, is the very first thing any would-be revolutionary needs. And then he talks of “change,” which many of his followers are clearly hearing as a soft word for “revolution.” And then he describes – not in too much detail – a different future, and what it means to be a transformative president, and in doing so answers our deep frustration at 30 years of leaders who faced the looming future by turning their heads instead of facing it.

Will he deliver on this promise of change? That remains to be seen. But the success of his presidency, if there is to be one, will likely be measured on how well his policies confront and deal with these seven criteria for revolution. If those preconditions are all still in place in 2012, the fury will have had another four years to rise. And at that point, if history rhymes, mere talk of hope and change will no longer be enough.

–Sara Robinson

Please note that the political opinions are those of Sara Robinson, not mine or the Natural Solutions Foundation. We are deeply concerned by what is happening to the United States and, with it, the rest of the developed world. Please note, too, that the Natural Solutions Foundation does not endorse or support candidates for office because, as a tax exempt organization, we are prohibited by the IRS from doing so. We do, however, work closely with the candidates and other important figures on issues pertaining to health freedom. For example, we wanted to know what the 16 Presidential Candidates had to say about Health Freedom so we asked them in our Health Freedom Score Card. We sent more than 93,000 faxes to the candidates then running for President of both parties asking them 19 tough questions about Health Freedom.

Only Ron Paul answered those questions. And, in fact, only Ron Paul has a health freedom plank in his campaign specifically addressing such issues as compulsory vaccination and other burning health freedom issues. While we cannot endorse any politicians, we can note their behavior and statements. We can also note with dismay that while Barack Obama’s campaign promised several times that the Senator would respond to our faxes shortly, that never happened. Hillary Clinton and all the Republican candidates with the exception of Dr. Paul chose to ignore our repeated requests for clarification on these issues with a strong consistency which does not, we fear, bode well for your health freedom no matter who becomes president. it is for this reason that our Congressional Education campaign is so vital to our health freedom. In fact, we are asking you not only for your tax deductible donations (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=189) to the Natural Solutions Foundation to keep us active and effective, but we are also asking you to support a non-tax deductible activity of the Natural Solutions Foundation, the creation of the Natural Solutions Health Freedom Alliance, a lobbying 501 (c) 4 organization which will be able to take our message about legislation we support and legislation we oppose directly to Congress at a whole new level of intensity. If you are interested in supporting a lobbying effort for our side, not just the drug and Codex industry side, send Ralph Fucetola an email at ralph.fucetola@usa.net with “Lobbying” as the subject line. Don’t forget to include your contact information.

Articles and analysis like this are important because they can generate thoughts and responses clarifying both the questions and the answers of our time. Please feel free to respond to this opinion piece by email to dr.laibow@gmail.com with “BLOG RESPONSE” to let us know your thoughts on this topic and perhaps we will publish them in “Your Stories” on our web page, www.HealthFreedomUSA.org.

Living in a free society means defending freedom on a continuing basis. That’s what you and we are doing together. The Natural Solutions Foundation is the largest, and most effective health freedom organization in the English speaking world. And we are that effective only because of you – your actions, your input and your financial support.

Thanks for your continuing support. Don’t forget to let the people on your list know that they can join the Natural Solutions Foundation Health Freedom eAlerts list (http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?page_id=187) to find out what is happening and how to take meaningful action.

Yours in health and freedom,
Dr. Rima

Rima E. Laibow, MD
Medical Director
Natural Solutions Foundation

www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org