Archive for Maj. Gen. Albert N. Stubblebine III
This Tribute was Written by Dr. Laibow
In Honor of Veterans’ Day 2020
Major General Albert N. Stubblebine III (US Army)
February 6, 1930-February 6, 2017
General Bert’s Book
www.GeneralBertSpeaks.com
.
General Bert Stubblebine correctly identified the seminal battle that humankind faces in the 21st Century when he said “Informed Consent is the defining issue of the 21st Century.”
.
That informed consent is about more than medical treatments, vaccinations and the like and the degree to which we surrender our bodies to medical care. It is also very much about whether we live or die and whether we do so on our own terms.
.
The rampant and intentional destruction of the biosphere, the biocidalists, are intent on taking that inalienable right away from us as much as the mandatory vaccinators are. And both were opposed unceasingly until his wrongful death in 2017, offering us a shining example of both leadership and bravery to help us continue to oppose them.
.
Informed consent, for us in our bodily integrity and for us in our biosphere integrity, is a right we cannot afford to relinquish. The only other alternative is slavery. And slaves are disposable.
.
General Bert was the eldest son of a career Army officer who, after graduating from West Point, spent his career in the Quartermaster’s Corps. At age 5, while living on post at West Point while his father directed the building of Stewart Air Field, he decided he, too, would go to West Point and serve in the Army, a decision from which he never wavered.
.
He was graduated from West Point in 1952 and taught chemistry there during the 1960’s just before seeing active duty in Viet Nam as the Intelligence Officer (G2) for the 25th Infantry Division.
.
Intelligence work allowed his fertile, and highly independent, way of seeing the world wide scope and eventually his impact on our understanding of the Soviet Union helped to bring about the end of the Cold War and its fall.
.
As part of that mission, General Bert learned that the Soviets were developing teams of psychic information gatherers whose work was invisible to the target and highly accurate. He reasoned that we had to do the same and, over immense opposition, developed and implemented Remote Viewing, basically the same program in the US, minus the electroshock, torture, drugs, intimidation and other brutalities the Soviets had used.
.
Highly secret at the time, it was highly successful. Upon his retirement from the Army in 1984 as Commanding General of the US Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), he took the technology public although the targets and tasking remained classified.
.
General Bert was fiercely loyal to his country but even more loyal to the truth. In 2001, when 9-11 occurred, he studied the data carefully and announced, as the highest-ranking military person to break with the official narrative, that whatever it was that had hit the Pentagon, his analysis showed that it was not a plane and that he believed it to have been a missile.
.
.
In 1991, General Bert and I encountered each other and, quite literally, instantly fell into each other’s lives and hearts. We married in 1994 and worked together in my practice of drug free medicine and psychiatry. In addition to his other skills and talents, he was an astonishingly powerful energy healer, an art he performed utterly effortlessly through focused intentionality.
.
But perhaps General Bert’s greatest contribution came from 2004 onward when he and I closed our practice of Medicine and founded the Natural Solutions Foundation (NSF) to contend directly with the globalist agenda focused on taking away our right of sovereign ownership and use of our own bodies and handing that right to the Corporate State emerging so rapidly.
.
He believed, and fought for, your right and mine to own our own bodies, breathe fresh, uncontaminated air, eat clean, unadulterated food and drink unpolluted water, have total sovereignty over our own medical and non-medical treatment and that of our minor children and live in a world unmolested by destructive assault, should we so choose.
.
All of that is covered under the Universal Right of Informed Consent and is worth living – and dying – to protect.
.
In fact, lack of Informed Consent in a hospital setting, where, for 158 days I fought minute by minute to prevent his destruction, is what finally killed him.
.
The story is grim, gritty and detailed, but the short version is simple: he was prevented from accessing the treatments that he and I wanted for him (including intravenous Vitamin C) and, in the end, it killed him, slowly, painfully and unnecessarily.
.
There is a case underway in Federal Court over the medical malpractice and neglect which led, ultimately to his wrongful death.
.
He remains a brave and beautiful example of what leadership and loyalty to principle, in this case, Informed Consent, means.
.
I miss him. The world does, too.
Dr. Rima and Gen. Bert
Natural Solutions Foundation
The Voice of Global Health Freedom™
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org
Dr. Rima Reports: http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=4850
DrRima.net
July 8, 2010
An Open Letter To:
Codex Alimentarius Commission Chairwoman Dr Karen L. Hulebak
Vice Chair Mr. Ben Manyindo
Mr. Sanjay Dave
Mr Knud Østergaard
Dear Chairwoman Hulebak and Members of the Codex Alimentarius Executive Committee:
I am writing to you as the President of the Natural Solutions Foundation, the largest health freedom organization in the world, and as an interested consumer and health advocate in shock and puzzlement.
Although Codex repeatedly claims to welcome input from “Stakeholders” and represents itself as an organization which functions transparently, our experience with Codex and Codex procedures belies both of those representations. Further, although Codex personnel and materials make frequent reference to the stated “main purposes” of its work beginning with “protecting health of the consumers” (http://www.codexalimentarius.net/web/index_en.jsp), as Dr. Rolf Grossklaus, former Chair of CCNFSDU, so famously opined, “It would be nice if Codex were about optimal health. It is not. Codex is about trade” (CCNFSDU, 2005, 2006).
Apparently, Codex is also about strong-arming opposing voices and those interested in priorities other than trade, into silence or submission as well.
The Natural Solutions Foundation has a primary email list of about 300,000 members who, upon our alert or request, quickly mobilize millions of people to action in order to protect their interests as consumers and natural health advocates. Several times a year, these supporters fund and send a delegation from our organization to Codex meetings to observe and report to them and their contacts, to national decision makers and to other policy makers what Codex is doing to protect their interests and health, in keeping with its stated main purpose.
We are frequently sharply critical of Codex because although we see its enormous potential as a positive force for health promotion and health protection, we observe that Codex currently acts solely to serve trade goals, not health ones. In keeping with our assessment, we share those observations in the spirit of loyal opposition.
Codex’ response to our organization and to us personally has been nothing short of abusive, becoming more so with each meeting we attend. Let me be specific:
Instead of welcoming reasoned, and reasonable, opposing views, the Codex organization has seen fit to take the astonishing action of assigning armed guards to our delegation, and to us alone, at the Rome meetings of the Codex Alimentarius Commission in 2007 and 2009!
Thus, whether we pre-register (2007) or not (2009), once we arrive at the FAO headquarters, our Medical Director and I are met with armed guards who insist that we “attend” the meeting not in the plenary session room – where there are a great many empty seats – but from an otherwise empty 4th floor balcony which, in the July heat, is usually not air conditioned. When either of us leaves the room, we are followed by one of the guards who stands outside the bathroom door while we use the facilities (!) and follows us through the building to prevent us from speaking with any of the delegates. In fact, when I greeted a personal friend who is also a national delegate to the CAC, the guard came running, hand on pistol, screaming at me, and I quote precisely, “Hey! You! OUT!”, humiliating me and the delegate while interrupting my civil conversation with my colleague and fellow Codex attendee.
In Geneva, the armed guards are missing, at least so far, but at this last meeting, we were rudely and irrationally accosted at 4 PM on July 7, 2010, Day 3 of the CAC meeting, by a hostile, disrespectful and agressive woman who did not bother to introduce herself to us. She was backed up by several guards (not, I might add, obviously armed) and we were removed from the back of the plenary room, where our computers could be used on desks with working electrical plugs, and escorted to the upper reaches of an empty gallery without any such amenities.
Since there were plenty of empty seats in the area in which we were seated, this hostile and totally non-transparent means of dealing with interested parties is both irrational and insulting (to say nothing of bizarre) not only to us personally, but to our hundreds of thousands/millions of interested constituents, all of them stakeholders in health and food and on whose behalf we are attending.
Click on photographs to enlarge for details
Note the empty seats from which we were removed (top row, middle) and the other empty seats indicating that no rational reason for removing us from a practical point of attendance exists.
Now note the area, without computer desks or other expected amenities such as easily available plugs, to which we were shepherded by the hostile guards and female Codex person (who, while keeping her identity a secret snarled at us the rather surprising, “We know who you are!”)
and please note the impossibility of reading any of the documents or slides presented on the screen from this location impairing our participation still further:
Several years ago, the Natural Solutions Foundation applied for NGO Observer Status. We carefully determined that we met all stated requirements for Observer status, only to be rejected by the Codex Executive Committee. We were astonished to listen as then-Chair Claude Moshe not only announced to the CAC that we had not been accepted as an Observer NGO, but returned to the topic at the end of the CAC meeting once again, in what we understand to be an absolutely unprecedented move, to tell the CAC once again that we were not an Observer NGO. No other announcement was deemed worthy of being repeated twice at that or any other CAC meeting which we have attended.
This level of parliamentary aggression was quite astonishing to us, but confirmed what Dr. Laibow, our Medical Director, was quoted as saying in a made-for-Codex film, screened at the Thailand session of the CCNFSDU. She said, quite accurately, that Codex stifles dissident voices. It would certainly seem to spend quite a lot of effort/resources stifling ours.
When we questioned the decision of the Codex Executive Committee in rejecting our application, we were told by Chairman Moshe in writing that we should share the “Health Freedom Table” with its current holder. That organization has refused to allow us to do so, in defiance of the Chair’s direction. We have sought to have them directed to do so, but neither the CEC nor the occupying organization has seen fit to comply with this directive, once again stifling dissent.
The Natural Solutions Foundation expends considerable resources to travel to, and attend, CCFL, CCNFSDU and CAC each year. We come because we are, and we represent, stakeholders whose voices need to be heard. We frequently find the actions of Codex to be in sharp contradistinction to the needs, safety and health of consumers. Input questioning trade-friendly decisions and bringing health-unfriendly ones into sharp focus ought, if Codex is, indeed, focused on its stated primary goal of protecting the health of consumers, to be welcome input. It is not and obstructions like the ones mentioned above are commonplace in dealing with our organization and, by extension, our members’ interest.
In attending the 2010 CCFL, for example, we wrote numerous times to the Canadian Secretariat asking for the location of the Saturday Workshop preceding the CCFL meeting. We were promised, but not actually given, that information despite repeated phone called and emails. We likewise wrote to and called the US Codex Contact Point offices and were also not given that information. We arrived on Friday at the Quebec City Congress Hall and asked the set-up staff where the meeting was to be held. It was only by that means that we were able to locate the session.
On Saturday morning when we arrived, we were told by a member of the Canadian Secretariat that we would not be admitted to the session because there was “no room”. We pointed out that we are a legitimate public observer and that, as a transparent organization, Codex has no reason to exclude us from the meeting.
After some deliberation we were finally admitted to the room, made to sit on chairs without tables on the side of the room although the tables in the center of the room, on which a computer can be easily used, had numerous empty chairs throughout the entire day, a fact which we documented with photographs.
Similarly, we have been relegated to uncomfortable and inappropriate settings at meeting after meeting although we are interested enough, and our constituency is interested enough, to commit significant resources of money, time and expertise, to these meetings.
This year, at the CAC meeting here in Geneva, for the first time, we were told that we were not entitled to conference documents because we were not a National Delegation! When we challenged that, we were told that we would have to sign a special form before we could have access to the documents and that we would have to wait some unspecified amount of time before we could have any of them. Transparent? Reasonable? I think not. Abusive? I think so.
Similarly, this year we were not given a registration packet, and, as in several other years, were excluded from the reception activities. We were told that we could not have access to them as public observers. Why not? Is the public not permitted to associate with delegates or are we, who are entitled to armed guards, not welcome to discuss and dialogue with Codex delegates? Is the interested public not worthy of admission to an opportunity to meet and mingle with people making decisions impacting their lives – and deaths – through their food-related decisions? Where is the transparency so much vaunted by Codex when observers are barred from access to documents, meetings, contact with delegates and reasonable work spaces provided to everyone else at the meetings and available in plentiful supply?
Interestingly, since we also travel to their home countries and meet with their Heads of State, their Members of Parliament and with the Codex Delegates in their official and personal capacities, we have friendly relationships with many of the Codex delegates. We are, as you can see, both interested stakeholders and deeply committed to the process of consumer health protection, or we would not commit these resources and persist in attending the increasingly unpleasant and unaccommodating Codex meetings.
We would ask the CEC that the Natural Solutions Foundation be welcomed on an equal footing with any other serious, widely respected and well-informed NGO representing stakeholders. We speak for our stakeholders who ask us to be at these meetings and we report to them. We impact national and international policy on food and food safety, health policy and other related matters through our sustained efficacy.
We would like to be able to tell our members that Codex is, indeed, the transparent organization it claims to be. We would like to be able to share with them actual progress made toward protecting consumers’ health and we would like to be able to tell them that Codex is fulfilling its potential as a force for that protection.
We will be able to do that only when the abusive and wrong-headed Codex response to the Natural Solutions Foundation, which is critical of many Codex actions, policies and practices, but which sees the Codex potential for health protection, changes and when Codex reorients its decisions toward its stated prime directive, the protection of consumer health.
Since the Natural Solutions Foundation comes to Codex in good faith, it is only appropriate that, whether we are critical of Codex or not, we are dealt with appropriately, transparently and fairly. Armed guards, withheld documents, punitive seating, and so forth do not rebound to Codex’ credit and do not help Codex to openly listen to dissent, rather than stifle it. We look forward to a positive change since will will continue to come to Codex and all involved, including Codex, would benefit by such a change.
Yours in health and freedom,
Maj. Gen. Albert N. Stubblebine III (US Army, Ret.)
President
Natural Solutions Foundation
We urge everyone to follow Gen. Stubblebine’s suggestion and Vote for Health Freedom from through 15, 2009 on Change.org and also on Change.gov through the Inauguration period. This is an important message from Natural Solutions Foundation to health freedom advocates world-wide.
Important update: http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?p=1762
More information: Health Freedom is Our First Freedom
http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?p=1733
Action Item: Until January 15th, visit www.change.org/ideas/view/health_freedom and vote for Health Freedom!
Voting Instructions for both Change.org and Change.gov: http://drrimatruthreports.com/index.php?p=1754
——————
“Dear Health Freedom-Involved Persons and Leaders:
“The Natural Solutions Foundation is writing this letter offering you a unique and important opportunity to bring Health Freedom into the well-deserved limelight of national and international attention. We have a unique and narrow window of opportunity, from January 5 – January 15, 2009 provided to us by the clever and innovative use of the internet by www.Change.org.
“During that time, visitors to the site will be able to determine which of the ideas presented are important to them and vote for those ideas. The top ten ideas will be presented to President Obama on Inauguration Day (and announced at the National Press Club). When we found out about it, the Natural Solutions Foundation instantly asked all of our many supporters and friends to jump on the opportunity. Perhaps you saw our email about this vote. Between the evening of December 30 and close of voting December 31, 2008, we were able to catapult Health Freedom from 98th place to 3rd place, qualifying Health Freedom for the second, and final, round of voting.
“Three organizations were mentioned on that page. To my knowledge, only ours brought attention and focus on the issue but the first stage victory we won is not ours: it belongs to Health Freedom. Despite the rather astonishing fact that there were people among those receiving our information who actually chose to use the opportunity to attempt to siphon off votes from the rapidly increasing total of the page that we were championing, we are hopeful that the long history of fruitless and destructive feuding and competition between members of the Health Freedom community will come to an end with this outstanding opportunity and we can all agree on one thing: that Health Freedom MUST come in as idea number 1 since Health Freedom IS Our First Freedom. All other freedoms derive from it. If we are not the owners of our bodies, then we cannot consider ourselves free men and women, nor the legitimate custodians and guardians of our children.
“During this round of voting, no additional pages can be added so either you and your organization are, literally, “With Health Freedom or you are lost in outer space”. We have talents and skills in this group that are tragically diluted and inactivated when attacks and warfare deflect us from what must be our goal – our only goal: establishment of real Health Freedom in the US and elsewhere. Is there really any other goal for groups and individuals that present themselves as Health Freedom advocates? If there is, are they really Health Freedom advocates?
“So the Trustees of the Natural Solutions Foundation urge you to join us in propagating this opportunity as widely as you can, putting any imagined or real differences between us aside at this historic moment. Flagellating those differences has never served Health Freedom well. We do not need to behave hostilely toward one another. The other side is quite happy when that takes place: why anyone in the Health Freedom Movement would want to give “aid and comfort” to the enemy is beyond me. There are few of us and many of them. We are lightly funded while they have more resources than we can imagine. Please ask your lists, your friends, your groups, your contacts, your associates and everyone else you can think of, to:
“1. Visit www.change.org/ideas/view/health_freedom and vote for Health Freedom by clicking on the box in the upper left hand side of the page that says “Vote”. Please let them know that leaving a comment or trying to set up another page is NOT a vote for Health Freedom. ONLY clicking on the box counts as a vote for Health Freedom.
“2. Visit www.care.com and sign in if already registered, or sign up for an account if not. Then ask them to go to http://www.care2.com/c2c/share/detail/1005813 so that they can leave a comment. When enough people have done that, we can have the information sent to the entire network of 10 million care2 members, asking them to vote, too.
“3. Let me know when you would like to hold an electronic Leadership Meeting to move forward finally as a united movement so that we can accomplish our goal: the institution of choice for everyone on the planet about what happens to their bodies in sickness and in health.
“Yours in health and freedom,
Maj. Gen. Albert N. Stubblebine III (US Army, Ret.)
President
Natural Solutions Foundation
www.HealthFreedomUSA.org
www.GlobalHealthFreedom.org”