Dr. Rima Truth Report
VACCINE VIRAL SHEDDING PUTS ALL AT RISK
Vaccine Risk Inserts Admit Viral Shedding
WHO Says Vaccine Conscientious Objectors Threat to Global Health
GUESS WHAT? YOU ARE #1 ON THE LIST!
.
“The World Health Organization rolled out its top ten threats to global health in 2019, and vaccine hesitancy made the list. … Since 2009, the number of ‘philosophical-belief’ vaccine non-medical exemptions has risen in 12 of the 18 states that currently allow this policy… ” www.theblaze.com/news/who-anti-vaccine-threat-health
.
Irrationally, WHO has cited measles “outbreaks” as “proof” that increased conscientious objections to vaccination is harmful to public health, despite scientific evidence to the contrary.
.
Was a historic apparent ‘decrease’ in measles caused by vaccines, or despite it? Here is evidence-based science view, rather than the pro-vaxx position of pharmaceutical-supported WHO.
“What is clear is that the official figures for the incidence of measles during the 1960s are probably highly inaccurate, and thus unreliable. Atypical measles [caused by vaccines] was not taken into account, and doctors likely overlooked or misdiagnosed many cases of measles in children who had been vaccinated for the disease. …While the number of reported cases of measles went up and down from year to year, the overall trend line was downward. In fact, the trend line had been going down since 1941, when the number of reported cases totaled 894,134. Interestingly, in 1964 (the year after the introduction of the first killed measles vaccine), the number of reported cases of measles actually went up to 458,083. … In short, what happened with reported measles cases in the 1960s is similar to what happened with reported polio cases in the 1950s. In both cases, a vaccine was introduced that was given credit for nearly wiping out the disease it was designed to combat. The vaccines were so widely hailed that the public came to view them as miracle cures to infectious disease, when, in fact, the evidence does not confirm that belief.” www.thevaccinereaction.org/2016/04/the-story-of-measles-sharp-decline-2/
Virtually all (over 90%) of USA measles cases have been vaccinated ‘against’ measles. Clearly, recent outbreaks have been triggered by vaccination and viral shedding. Information provided by both manufacturers and the CDC identifies measles disease as a “side effect” of measles vaccination.
.
If vaccination “works” then the vaccinated have nothing to fear from those who choose to reject this medical intervention. Every person has the legally protected universal right of Informed Consent to accept or reject any medical intervention for any reason, or no reason at all, see: https://tinyurl.com/AVDcard
.
Another irrational and deceptive claim is that “only” live-virus vaccines can cause viral shedding and possibly infect others. There is no such thing as a “live” virus. Any shed viral particle is potential infectious.
.
Yet another propaganda-based claim is that vaccine-spread disease is “rare.” There is clear evidence that viral shedding is a common, not a rare event, and occurs in a significant number of vaccinated persons.
.
This is not limited to any particular vaccine, but occurs in all viral vaccines. In the case of the MMR vaccine, here is what Merck informs the public in the product insert: “Excretion of small amounts of the live attenuated rubella virus from the nose or throat has occurred in the majority of susceptible individuals 7 to 28 days after vaccination…” www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/m/mmr_ii/mmr_ii_pi.pdf
.
Evidence-based science demands that WHO amend its 2019 Threats to Global Health list to remove vaccine conscientious objectors and include vaccines and the dangerous people who use them instead. Since courts around the world have held vaccines to be “unavoidably unsafe”* once you are informed how can you consent?
.
Unless you assert your right to Informed Consent correctly that right will be deemed waived. Learn how to do so here: https://tinyurl.com/AVDcard
.
Protecting the right of Informed Consent against unscientific pro-vaxx propaganda should be the policy of every enlightened public health agency. That is what is required by the UN Bioethics Declaration.
.
Vaccine conscientious objectors are a “threat” to the globalist agencies and crony drug companies, pushing vaccination as a public policy is bad science, violates the law and is just plain wrong.
.
SHARE THIS MESSAGE ON YOUR SOCIAL MEDIA: http://drrimatruthreports.com/who-says-vaccine-conscientious-objectors-threat-to-global-health/
.
Ralph Fucetola JD
Trustee and Counsel
Natural Solutions Foundation
President Institute for Health Research
.
* See Justice Sotomayor’s 2011 dissent in Bruesewitz vs Wyeth, 562 U.S. 223, where she discusses the history of “unavoidably unsafe.”