Natural Solutions Foundation is proud to be the initiating organization and a principle plaintiff in the Stop the Shot law suit to prevent the FDA from using dangerous, improperly tested and ineffective vaccines either for influenza in general or specifically for the virus created in a laboratory and loosed on the world as if it were a genuine killer pandemic virus, A/2009/H1N1 or Swine Flu. And, as our advisers and co-plaintiffs, we are deeply fortunate to have a team of outstanding lawyers and scientists who have been with us every step of the way, perfecting this critically important legal challenge to bad science, failed public policy and commercialized, but potentially deadly science. One of those advisers is the remarkable Paul G. King, PhD. His credentials and professional experience are impressive. See http://dr-king.com/ to be impressed,
But far, far more impressive to me is his passion for freedom, for truth and for scientific accuracy. Dr. King is the Scientific Adviser for CoMeD, the Coalition for Mercury Free Drugs, http://mercury-freedrugs.org/, and is principle adviser in their legal effort to protect mothers and babies from mercury-containing vaccinations since the dangers of mercury to the fetus are widely recognized and very well known except, of course, to Federal and State Officialdom.
His passion for truth is exceeded only by his passionate belief in the power of that truth if we, the People, persist in our quest for that truth and for our enduring freedom. We of the Natural Solutions Foundation share that passion and that belief. So it is a great pleasure to share with you Dr. King’s resounding statement of the reason that we who question vaccination and who vehemently oppose mandatory medical treatment of any sort, even if we favor it, are already the victors in this battle for truth and freedom and how that victory will manifest!
And it will, you know. We, the people questioning vaccinations, especially untested novel ones, will be the majority. Here is why and here is how.
—————————— Health Freedom: The Enduring Opposition to Forced Vaccination
By Paul G. King, PhD
“Never, never, never give up” — Sir Winston Churchill
Arrayed against today’s forced-vaccination mandates stands a small, but growing, group of hundreds of doctors, lawyers, nurses, researchers, scientists, teachers, and other professionals who are affected by various vaccine issues.
Behind this growing group stand hundreds of thousands of citizens who, at a minimum, have a possibly vaccine-damaged child, grandchild, niece, nephew, brother, sister, first, second, third or fourth cousin, other family member, or a friend or acquaintance who has one or more of these injured persons in their family.
Moreover, the public officials and others behind vaccination mandates, such as the ones in New Jersey, West Virginia and US Air Force daycare centers, have consciously chosen to use their “control” of the governmental health agencies and the mainstream media to ridicule any who oppose their near-religious, but scientifically unsupported, belief in the sanctity of vaccines and mandated vaccination programs.
In addition, these individuals are blind to the flaws in most of the vaccines and vaccination programs.
The flaws include:
– The need for multiple doses to provide “protection” from the “disease” or “disease component”,
– The limited duration of the protection provided,
– The lack of any protection for some percentage of those vaccinated,
– The need for “booster” doses, and
– The serious collateral damage to the immune, neurological and other systems of some who are inoculated with vaccines from the non-disease components in the vaccine (e.g., Thimerosal, polymeric hydroxyaluminum compounds, gelatin, egg protein, extraneous DNA, adventitious viruses, cell debris, and formaldehyde – to name a few).
Worse, they have conveniently “forgotten” the established Public Health principle that no vaccine should even be recommended for a mass vaccination program unless, including the worst-case long-term costs from the adverse events that that vaccine may cause, the vaccination program is truly cost effective.
Moreover, these vaccination apologists have “forgotten” that those who oppose forced vaccination range from:
– Those who simply oppose such mandates on constitutional grounds to:
– Those who oppose mass inoculation for vaccines for diseases, like influenza and herpes Varicella zoster, where the vaccines are not clinically effective, much less cost effective, to:
– Those who are simply opposed to forcing anyone to get any vaccine under any circumstance because:
—Vaccination violates their deeply held religious/ philosophical beliefs or
—Based on their research and study,
– Vaccines cause more long-term chronic disease, harm and death than the few childhood diseases for which we have a vaccine that is truly cost-
effective to use for mass vaccination, and/or
– Exposure to these childhood diseases is safer than inoculation with a vaccine for a childhood disease because:
– In a truly healthy environment where: a) there is no smallpox; b) measles and rubella are rare; c) there have been no confirmed diphtheria cases or paralytic polio cases in the last half decade; and d) tetanus occurs mostly in the elderly, the risk of harm from the disease is vanishingly small and/or,
– Several of mass childhood vaccination programs are not cost effective (e.g., the programs for: herpes Varicella zoster, rotavirus, and seasonal influenza) and/or
– Several vaccines are not effective in preventing those inoculated from contracting the disease (e.g., the current live virus vaccines for influenza and rotavirus, which give all of those inoculated an infection of the disease against which those being inoculated are supposed to be being protected) and/or
– Once you have had:
a) a mumps infection on both sides of your neck, or
b) a pertussis infection promptly treated with the appropriate antibiotics, or
c) a promptly treated rotavirus infection, or d) an untreated acute Hepatitis A or B or an untreated HPV infection from which you recover, you have near-lifetime immunity, and/or
– For many reasons, vaccines provide, at best, only limited protection and/or only limited-duration protection from contracting a “vaccine preventable” disease if they are subsequently exposed to it, and/or,
– Vaccines weaken rather than strengthen the capability of the immune systems of those who are inoculated with said vaccines to differentiate between self and not self – significantly contributing to the observed increases in a variety of immune and autoimmune diseases that, before 1950 where very rare (< 1 in10,000) but are increasingly common (e.g., asthma occurring at a rate of about 1 in 9 in today’s vaccinated children), and/or
- In today’s environment in America, healthy kids should contract the remaining “vaccine preventable” childhood diseases to which those born in America before 1950 were most certainly exposed, and/or to:
- Those who hold some combination of the preceding views or other vaccine-questioning views.
Finally, it is important to understand that, today, with each attempt to compel some group to be inoculated with some vaccine(s), the number of people who oppose forced vaccination grows along with the public’s:
- Loss of trust in vaccination and
- Determination to:
---Actively oppose forced vaccination and, increasingly, most vaccination programs, and
---Teach their children and all with whom they are acquainted to oppose:
- The forced vaccination that is currently imposed on any group as well as
- Any and all attempts to increase vaccine mandates.
Thus, unless the Establishment abandons its attempts to mandate vaccination on additional groups and reverses course by making all vaccination voluntary with incentives for those vaccines that are reasonably safe and truly cost effective, then, not tomorrow, but in the not-too-distant future, the number of people that are opposed to forced vaccination will grow until they are the majority.
In closing, let us remind the establishment that we, the People, know the value of Benjamin Franklin’s admonishment, “We must all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately”.
Moreover, on the issue of forced vaccination, though diverse in our views on vaccines and vaccination, we, the People, shall hang together and continue to grow our numbers daily.
Furthermore, we understand Franklin’s admonishment “They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety”.
Therefore, we are striving to take back all of the essential liberties that, since September 11, 2001, if not before, the federal government has been, and is, attempting to take from us.
Let us remind the federal government and the governments of the states that the Constitution of the United States of America begins by stating:
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America”.
Moreover, the Tenth Amendment clearly states:
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”.
However, though the Federal Courts have repeatedly recognized the coercive police powers of the “States” in the area of forced vaccination, we, the People, have not forgotten that we, the People, who are citizens of these “States”:
- Retain the powers not delegated by us to the federal government or to the “States” and
- Also, directly or indirectly, retain the right to retake any power that we have delegated to the “States” or, for that matter, to any other governmental unit.
Further, let all be assured that, no matter what the cost or how long it may take, we, the People, will: a) stop the attempts to mandate more vaccines and b) roll back all vaccination mandates where, in the United States of America, mass vaccination is not truly cost-effective when all the costs are considered.
Therefore, we will resist until we, the People, become the majority in all of the States, Commonwealths, Districts and Territories. Then, we will: a) outlaw all mandatory vaccination programs in America and b) only allow voluntary “opt in” vaccination policies.
Awakened from our complacence, we, the People, who oppose forced vaccination and our children, and our children’s children unto seven generations and beyond, will:
Never, never, never, never, never, never give up until forced vaccination is universally banned everywhere in the United States of America.
This important article highlights three different problems: First, drugs and vaccines which have NOT been either studied or approved for pregnant woman are being used as if their unique biochemical and physiological needs (remember, their bodies have adapted to the unique stress of feeding and forming another being within their own bodies) and those of the baby within can be ignored because it is more convenient to forget about them and just use drugs and vaccines that are handy, or with which the doctor is familiar. Second, marketing pressures and propaganda lead doctors and their associates to use vaccines and drugs in pregnant woman and their babies EVEN THOUGH they are know to be dangerous to these woman and their babies. Third, safe, effective and well-known treatments exist for each of the conditions for which dangerous pharmaceutical treatments are widely, and unwisely, used. For example, if there were a danger from a virus like H1N1 or from urinary tract (or other) infections, the use of nano silver would eliminate it since it safely kills pathogens while leaving vital probiotics in place without danger to the fetus or mother.
Antibiotics, psychiatric medication and vaccines are three perfect examples of dangerous drugs widely, but unwisely, used in these vulnerable people: mothers and unborn babies. In the PDR (Physicians’ Desk Reference (R) ) and package inserts pertaining to such drugs, caution is urged stating that the drugs in these classes should be used in pregnant woman, and in the case of psychiatric drugs, in women of child bearing age, only where there are no other options or when the benefit overrides the risks to mother and child.
What are the risks? Well, since no testing has been done on the safety of the vaccines in pregnant women and on fetuses, the risks are, as the vaccine package inserts make clear, totally unknown. ALL multidose vials of injectable H1N1 vaccine contain mercury and the risks of mercury to the fetus are well characterized and well known. Astonishingly, the FDA and CDC now say that pregnant women should expose their fetuses to the well established dangers of mercury in order to receive the “benefits” of the H1N1 vaccines without explaining how the risks of mercury have been either eliminated or overcome.
Additionally, GSK’s vaccine is adjuvanted with squalene and under an Emergency Use Authorization, the FDA now permits its store of injectable squalene to be used as an additive to the injectable vaccines in the 90,000 injection stations. Since the only way that squalene can be drawn up and mixed with the vaccine is to add it to the mercury-containing multi-does vials, and it is the multidose vials which contain mercury, this guarantees that mothers and babies will be dosed with high doses of mercury AND squalene.
Since squalene is known to cause severe disease when injected and has previously never been approved for injection in humans, there is little or nothing known about its impact on either pregnant mothers or their babies. What is known, however, is that squalene injected at the doses which are indicated in the 1998 patents for its use, which appear to be the same doses in the planned admixture with the vaccines, can also cause to cause permanent, irreversible sterility. That means that the pregnancies these woman are carrying will be their last. Will their children also be permanently and irreversibly sterile? We do not know.
Psychiatric drugs are strongly contraindicated in pregnant woman and in women who might become pregnant. Yet the United States Congress, under the influence, I presume, of the huge numbers of pharmaceutical lobbyists and their even more vast funding abilities have passed a bill which requires psychiatric “screening” to detect and drug pregnant women and new mothers with drugs to “treat” post partum depression with drugs whose impact on the fetus and nursing child can be literally cataclysmic.
This study makes it clear that antibiotics are similarly dangerous. They, like vaccines and psychiatric drugs, have been little studies in pregnant women, but what is known makes it clearly inadvisable to use any of them in pregnancy without the strongest of indications.
The article below makes it clear that drugs taken for granted by patients and doctors for safety in pregnancy should not be lightly regarded despite the general mistaken consensus that they are safe, effective and harmless. Vaccines, antibiotics, psychiatric drugs, and, indeed, all drugs require such caution and replacement by safe, effective and widely available non-pharmaceuticals for pregnant and nursing women. My own preference, of course, as a physician who has practiced drug-free medicine and psychiatry for the best part of 40 years, is that all drugs, except those in the ER, should be so replaced.
Common antibiotics tied to birth defects
Study: Drugs to treat urinary infections could cause heart, brain problems
Mon., Nov . 2, 2009
CHICAGO – Researchers studying antibiotics in pregnancy have found a surprising link between common drugs used to treat urinary infections with birth defectshttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2.gif. Reassuringly, the most-used antibiotics in early pregnancy — penicillins — appear to be the safest.
Bacterial infections themselves can cause problems for the fetus if left unchecked, experts said, so pregnant women shouldn’t avoid antibiotics entirely. Instead, women should discuss antibiotics choices with their doctors.
The new study is the first large analysis of antibiotic use in pregnancy. It found that mothers of babies with birth defects were more likely than mothers with healthy babies to report taking two types of antibiotics during pregnancy: sulfa drugs (brand names include Thiosulfil Forte and Bactrim) and urinary germicides called nitrofurantoins (brand names include Furadantin and Macrobid).
It was the first time an association had been seen between urinary tract treatments and birth defects, said lead author Krista Crider, a geneticist with the Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2.gif, which funded the research. “Additional studies are going to need to be done to confirm these findings.”
Before rigorous safety testing
Used for many decades, the antibiotics in question predate the Food and Drug Administration and its requirements for rigorous safety testing. The FDAhttp://images.intellitxt.com/ast/adTypes/2.gif now grades all drugs for safety to the fetus based on available research, but rigorous studies are so lacking in many cases, that no antibiotics get the highest grade of “A.”
Sulfa drugs are the oldest antibiotics and some animal studies have found harm during pregnancy. Nitrofurantoins previously have been viewed by doctors as safe to treat urinary tract infections during pregnancy.
The study, appearing in November’s Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, may cause doctors to change the drugs they choose to treat pregnant women with infections. The findings were released Monday.
Dr. Susan Mehnert-Kay, a family practice doctor in Tulsa, Okla., who has written about diagnosing and managing urinary tract infections, said the research is “very interesting” and would cause her to reconsider antibiotic choices in early pregnancy.
The study is important because it looked at drugs that have been used for decades without large studies of their safety in pregnant women, said Dr. Michael Katz of the March of Dimes.
“Some physicians are not as attuned to this as they ought to be, so patients have the right to ask questions,” Katz said.
The researchers analyzed data from more than 13,000 mothers whose infants had birth defects and nearly 5,000 women who lived in the same regions with healthy babies.
The women were interviewed by phone from six weeks to two years after their pregnancies. Those who remembered taking antibiotics during the month before conception through the first three months of pregnancy were identified as exposed to antibiotics.
The women’s memories could have been faulty, a substantial weakness of the study, which the authors acknowledged. About one-third of the women who took antibiotics couldn’t remember the specific type of drug they took.
It’s also unclear whether the birth defects were caused by the drugs or by the underlying infections being treated, Crider said.
Birth defects linked to sulfa drugs included rare brain and heart problems, and shortened limbs. Those linked to nitrofurantoins included heart problems and cleft palate. The drugs seemed to double or triple the risk, depending on the defect.
“These defects are rare. Even with a threefold increase in risk, the risk for the individual is still quite low,” Crider said.
Katz of the March of Dimes said anencephaly, a fatal brain problem linked to sulfas, affects about 1 in 10,000 births in the United States. Cleft palate occurs about 20 per 10,000 births.
Crider said the findings give doctors another opportunity to caution against overuse of antibiotics. Viral illnesses like colds and flus shouldn’t be treated with antibiotics, she said.
Women in 10 states, including California, Texas and New York, were interviewed as part of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.
The FDA recommends that pregnant women discuss medications with their doctors, said FDA spokeswoman Sandy Walsh. The agency has proposed changes to prescription drug labeling that would require more complete information for women of childbearing age, pregnant women and those who breastfeed, Walsh said.
September 16, 2009 – URGENT NOTE: Your Action Required Now to Secure Your Right to Refuse the Swine Flu Vaccine Without Incarceration
Health Freedom’s best friend in Congress has responded to our Push Back. We’ve sent more than 2 million emails demanding the right to say “NO!” to vaccines without punishment, incarceration or involuntary quarantine. The Congressman knows how important that is to health, liberty and, we have to imagine, sanity. We have been in discussion with his office about introducing a bill modeled on our Draft Legislation to prevent pandemic vaccination which is mandatory, compulsory or taken under duress of any type.
We received a call today from the Congressman’s office telling us that he is close to introducing a new No Compulsory Vaccine Bill to the House. Given the fact that we have sent well over 2 million emails to our State and Federal legislators, HHS Secretary Sebelius, DHS Secretary Napolitano, President Obama and the Governors of every State in the Union, we anticipate that his bill will garner a good deal of support.
NOW IS THE TIME TO TURN UP THE HEAT. WE NEED 2 MILLION MORE EMAILS IN THE NEXT WEEK. CAN WE DO IT? YOU KNOW WE CAN! WE ARE THE NET ROOTS OF HEALTH FREEDOM!
Have you already sent this Action Item once for every member of your household demanding the right to self shield instead of facing mock-voluntary Swine Flu vaccination with incarceration as the consequence of vaccine refusal? If so, thank you. If not, now, more than ever, we need your help in taking this action right now. We need every bit of support we can muster. Once we get Dr. Paul’s bill number and text, we will publish it and then we’ll ask you to do the same thing again: click on the link we’ll give you to support that Action Item as if your life depended upon it. It will.
And don’t forget that we are 100% supporter supported.
Please set up two (2) recurring donations, whether large or small: one tax deductible donation to support our legal challenge of the legality of the FDA’s approval of the vaccines Secretary Sebelius is referring to in her testimony below. That one should end in the number 6 to ear mark it for our legal fund. The other tax deductible donation can end in any number and it keeps the Natural Solutions Foundation keeping-on. Here is the link: http://drrimatruthreports.com/?page_id=189
Now, on to the all too real, but still very surreal, testimony authorizing the Pandemic Swine Flu vaccines without any, that’s right, any safety testing. On September 15, 2009, a terrible, tragic and tyrannical event in America’s history took place. HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius testified before the US House of Representatives Committee on Energy and Commerce and, in that testimony, announced the “licensing” of the “Swine Flu” vaccines. Secretary Sebelius, please allow me to remind you that it is a crime to provide false testimony before Congress.
I was not in the chamber when the Secretary announced the approval of several Swine Flu vaccines using a combination of untruth, falsehood, illogic and deceit. But I would like to present my virtual interview of Secretary Sebelius as she reads her testimony before that Committee and I question her about it. Remember that every word following SKS (Secretary Kathleen Sebelius) is her unedited testimony, with nothing altered or changed in context. I guess she is counting on the declining quality of the educational system in the US to see her through.
Watch for the new Youtube.com.naturalsolutions series in which Secretary Sebelius and I have a virtual interview. Here is the text of that virtual interview. Please read and share as widely as you can.
A virtual Interview with Secretary Sebelius on the “Swine Flu” Vaccine Licensing
My comments are in italics, labeled “REL”
Secretary Sebelius’ comments are labeled SKS.
SKS: Preparing for the 2009-2010 Influenza Season
Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius
Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
SKS: Chairman Waxman, Ranking Member Barton, Chairman Emeritus Dingell, members of the Committee, thank you for this opportunity to update you on the public health challenges of 2009 H1N1 influenza. I want to assure the Committee that the Administration is taking these challenges seriously…
REL: These challenges do not exist, Secretary Sebelius. They have been manufactured as a kind of, at best, a cynical windfall of unprecedented proportions for Big Pharma. At worst, you and your conspirators are playing Doctor Death with America, starting with our next generation, children and pregnant mothers.
SKS: and has mounted an aggressive plan to address H1N1 throughout this fall and winter.
REL: The challenges you speak of do not exist. Without any challenge, an aggressive plan is totally unnecessary.
SKS: HHS has a leading role because this is a health event, and we are working in close partnership with virtually every part of the federal government under a national preparedness and response framework for action that builds on the efforts and lessons learned from this spring. Working together with governors, mayors, tribal leaders, state and local health departments, the medical community and our private sector partners, the federal government has been actively preparing for possible H1N1 virus outbreak scenarios that may develop over the next few months.
REL: Madam Secretary, you are saying “MAY develop” but your use of the phrase, “MAY DEVELOP” shows there is no sufficient scientific evidence that the so-called “Swine Flu” is a pandemic threat. You have called it a “novel” virus, which is a condition for there to be a pandemic potential, but you are not treating this vaccine as thought it were a novel vaccine, requiring safety testing. Given the costs in human and financial terms, I am afraid that “MAY DEVELOP” is not sufficient for vaccination of the population, starting with our most vulnerable population.
SKS: Since the initial spring outbreak of 2009 H1N1 influenza, the virus has triggered a worldwide pandemic,
REL: Well, no. Actually a world wide pandemic has been declared without any clear evidence that there actually IS a world wide pandemic. There is NO world-wide pandemic; there is a only legally declared pandemic, made possible only because the W.H.O. changed the definition of a “pandemic” for political reasons. The “pandemic” has been declared without any clear evidence that there is any world-wide threat. How has the Secretary ascertained, in the absence of accurate testing, that H1N1 is the “DOMINANT” flu strain? Australian authorities do not confirm your claim.
SKS: and has been the dominant flu strain in the southern hemisphere during its winter flu season.
REL: Just how is this ascertained in the absence of accurate testing, not just testing, mind you, but accurate testing that H1N1 is the “DOMINANT” flu strain? Australian authorities do not agree with or substantiate your claim.
SKS: The evidence to date shows that the virus has not changed to become more deadly.
REL: At last, Madam Secretary, we have common ground. We agree, and therefore, since both WHO and CDC has said that this H1N1 virus causes a disease that is milder than seasonal flu, requiring no medical intervention, why is major medical intervention required for something that poses no dangers and may, MAY, become a problem at some time, somewhere in the future?
I am sorry, Madam Secretary, but this is absurd, unscientific, dangerous and a ferocious waste of money, sort of like TARP and other corporate welfare programs, but this time for Big Pharma.
SKS: Unlike our typical seasonal flu, we continued to see flu activity in the United States over the summer, notably in summer camps.
REL: But since diagnosis is not being carried out, is it Swine Flu? Allergies to GMO junk food fed to children, perhaps, common colds, maybe? How would you know? The best tests we have are wrong 9 times out of 10. WHO and CDC requested countries not to test for the virus and not to keep accurate counts, just to guess – and it is on these guesses that you apparently are making your pronouncements, judgments and decisions.
SKS: More recently, we have seen an increase in 2009 H1N1 influenza activity in several states
REL: Based on what independently verified data? If you have no lab tests, you would have no idea of what you are seeing.
SKS: and expect this to continue across the United States during the coming months.
REL: All respiratory cases are being assigned the unscientific label of “Swine Flu” without testing. No one has any idea if any of these cases are causes by H1N1, except, apparently you, Secretary Sebelius. Assuming, however, that all of them are, there are no deaths which are not caused by underlying disease or treatments with toxic, but approved drugs such as Tamiflu, which killed a pregnant mother and the baby she gave birth to in Mumbai, India recently.
Diagnosis by symptom picture alone. Right. That is not exactly good science and it certainly is terrible medicine. Swine Flu walks like a duck, coughs like a duck and has a fever like a duck. What makes it a swine? Public relations and nothing else!
SKS: As fall begins, we anticipate that even more communities may be affected than those that saw cases this past spring and summer.
REL: Again I ask you, Secretary, based on exactly, precisely, what?”
SKS: In addition, communities may be more severely affected, reflecting wider transmission and causing potentially greater impact.
REL: I am afraid I have to ask again, based on what? You say that communities may be more severely affected, but the truth is that they may also be less severely affected. Where do you get your crystal ball serviced, Madam Secretary? Could it be the same place that Novartis used when they decided to patent a vaccine for the Swine Flu in 2008 when CDC and WHO declare that this is a novel, never-before-seen virus which arose, de novo, like Athena from the forehead of Zeus, in April, 2009? Could the same shop be servicing Baxter’s decision-making Magic 8 Ball so that they were able to apply for a patent for a Swine Flu vaccine in 2007? If so, Madam Secretary, this crystal ball is a national treasure and should be made available to “We the People of These United States.”
SKS: Seasonal influenza viruses may cause illness concurrently with 2009 H1N1 this fall and winter and it will not be possible to determine quickly if ill individuals have 2009 H1N1 influenza, seasonal influenza, or other respiratory conditions based on symptoms alone.
REL: It may. Or, then again, it may not. There is no hard data on which to make these predictions and the consequences of these predictions, including vaccines are dangerous and unwarranted by any level of fact or reality. I repeat, there is simply no hard data, or at least none that you have presented on your websites, public statements, press releases or here today.
SKS: It is also difficult to predict the severity of the disease that we will see in the coming months from either 2009 H1N1 or seasonal influenza.
REL: Right again, Madam Secretary. So why poison the populace for something whose dreadful menace did not materialize and is not showing any signs of materializing. In fact, its dreadful menace is a lot like the bogyman under the bed: a product of your big brother’s desire to scare you witless so that you will do whatever he says. The parallel is uncanny.
SKS: Influenza is an unpredictable disease and we know that things will change and we will learn more throughout the fall.
REL: So unpredictable, in fact, that seasonal flu vaccines are accurate less than 40% of the time although the toxins injected (mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, foreign protein, MSG, etc., fluoride, etc.) are toxic 100% of the time and become more so with more shots, which are increasingly r4commended by conflict-of-interest-laden ACIP (Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices) and others of their stripe. By the way, Secretary Sebelius, what is your financial interest in the medical and pharmaceutical industries?
SKS: Shared Responsibility and Science-Based Guidance Slowing the spread and reducing the impact of H1N1…
REL: From nothing to nothing?
SKS: …and seasonal flu is a shared responsibility…
REL: Exactly what does that mean? There is no meaningful impact from H1N1, but there certainly will be from yet another round of vaccines, even if those vaccines are, as falsely stated, but a strain change variation on a theme. Children vaccinated with attenuated live virus vaccines, specifically influenza vaccines, are many times more likely to be admitted to hospitals for all causes, many times more likely to develop serious asthma, etc. There is nothing trivial about influenza shots but, with the guidance of ACIP they are increasingly passed out as if they were either safe or effective. In fact they are neither and, if it is merely a strain change variation, then H1N1 is also neither safe nor effective. It it is a novel vaccine for a novel virus, it is clearly neither safe nor effective since it has never had any safety testing concluded. Were such safety testing to show that it were not safe or effective, then the sales and administration of it would pierce the veil of liability free manufacture, distribution and use which the Federal government has accorded to itself, its agents and to the manufacturers and distributors of these dangerous vaccines as we.. It is therefore in the ir best interest not to have any safety data (or data showing the lack of safety).
SKS: …and we all need to plan for what would need to be done when the flu impacts our community, school, business or home this fall.
REL: When? Shouldn’t the word be “IF” or “just in case” or “In the unlikely chance that it might, given the lack of evidence that it can”?
SKS: Given that flu already is circulating in the United States this fall, it’s important for every American family and business to prepare their own household and business plans and think through the steps they will have to take if a family member or co-worker contracts the flu.
REL: Tuberculosis is also circulating this fall. So are impetigo, gonorrhea, athlete’s foot, head lice and zits. Is the US Government offering a TARP bailout, at the expense of our lives, to the the very wealthy, very powerful Pharmaceutical Industry?
SKS: CDC has provided specific recommendations for what individuals, communities, clinicians, and other professionals can do.
REL: In the face of trivial disease, if it indeed exists in community distribution, for which there is no evidence that has forensic or scientific credibility, these common sense wash-yours-hands, cover your mouth and nose when you sneeze recommendations are more than sufficient the help out a perfectly unthreatened population. My mother taught me that, too, and it sufficed.
SKS: Individuals can take actions to prevent respiratory infections. We emphasize frequent hand-washing as an effective way to reduce transmission of disease. It is very important for sick individuals to stay at home,
REL: Really? Do employers know that and do they refrain from docking them?
SKS: and for parents to keep children who have a fever or flu-like illness home from school, childcare, the playground, or other places children gather.
REL: Flu is not necessarily Swine Flu.
SKS: Similarly, sick individuals should not get on an airplane or any public transport.
REL:This benign-sounding provision will result in persons who have not been vaccinated being denied boarding privileges on public transport in the United States unless we stop this medical fascism now. There is already talk of stainless steel RFID chipped bracelets at state trooper checkpoints. Where accurate or not, this suggestion illustrates how easily this type of tyranny would be to install. Tyrannical control never presents itself as that. it always wants to help, to take care of, to protect you. This process of constitutional abrogation, so well advanced at the state and federal levels, is receiving another set of supporting members in this document, Madam Secretary, and in this dangerous and unwarranted approval.
SKS: Taking personal responsibility for these things will help reduce the spread of this new virus as well as other respiratory illnesses.
We have issued new guidance from the CDC on www.flu.gov for schools, child care settings, colleges and universities, and large and small businesses that also includes strategies for preventing the spread of flu, especially in the early fall when the 2009 H1N1 vaccine will not yet be ready. These comprehensive guidelines provide advice on how individuals and institutions can guard against the flu and mitigate its spread. The CDC also has issued guidance for healthcare providers about appropriate use of anti-viral drugs to treat patients who are at highest risk from complications from the seasonal and 2009 H1N1 flu.
REL: These guidelines offer dangerous pharmacological usage practices which, like the vaccine approval itself, is not supported by science. In fact, the science of the antivirals suggests very strongly that they should not be used and their use, while increasing the liklihood of serious complications and death, does little or nothing to shorten or minimize the severity of the purported “Swine Flu” infection. Remember, it can only be purported because the laboratory testing is not being done, based on the recommendations of the CDC and W.H.O. Why? Because the testing is so inaccurate. Therefore any suggestion about incidence, prevalence or impact is mere fantasy. Tamiflu and Relenza have not been shown to bring about positive outcomes in this diagnostic fantasy matrix, in fact, quite the contrary.
SKS: Additional work is being done on critical guidelines to address infection control and worker safety in healthcare settings. Our recommendations and action plans are based on the best scientific information…
REL: Please refer to what I have said above and my comments below, Madam Secretary.
SKS: …available to help our nation respond aggressively and effectively to the 2009 H1N1 virus.
REL: This may sound awfully familiar by now, Madam Secretary, but why? Where is the justification for aggressive action or the demonstration that effective action is not achieved by the “Personal responsibility” suggestions and by the protection of the collective immune system through avoiding junk foods, chemicals, GMOs and other health degradation substances and processes permitted by your agency, the same FDA which is now so sanctimoniously declaring its benign intent here?
In fact, the same FDA has literally criminalized communications which offer non-vaccine, non-drug options to prevent, treat, mitigate or cure the Swine Flu. It is hard to see how the FDA is working to help our nation respond aggressively and effectively to anything except the need to make the population docile, obedient, sick and profitable in its chronic illness.
SKS: We are working to ensure that Americans are informed and consistently updated with information in clear language. This is a dynamic situation, but it is essential that the American people are fully engaged so they can be part of the response.
REL: Really? To my mind, being fully engaged would require clear, accurate information and, I am very much afraid that your testimony makes it clear that the intention of the FDA is to provide anything but that. You are providing information in easily understood words, but it is distorted and dangerous. If your FDA were interested in that goal, it would be offering abundant information on nutrition, antioxidants, homeopathy, Foods, nutrients, nano silver and supplements designed to support the immune system.
SKS: The federal government, particularly the CDC, will be conducting weekly and, when necessary, daily briefings that will be available at flu.gov to get critical information out to the American people.
Vaccination Campaign The federal government is also preparing for a voluntary national vaccination campaign for the 2009 H1N1 virus starting in October.
REL:The Federal Government has backed off from its earlier stance for mandatory vaccination, which was articulated by HHS on July 23, 2008 and by DHS on the following day in advisory communications.
SKS: With unprecedented speed, we have completed key steps in the vaccine development process — we have characterized the virus, identified a candidate strain, expedited manufacturing, and performed clinical trials.
REL: Clinical trials have not been performed. Brief dose response trials have been initiated, is some cases not even completed before this authorization.
SKS: The speed of this vaccine development was possible due to the investments made through ASPR/BARDA over the past six years in advanced research and development and infrastructure building.
REL: How convenient!
SKS: One-hundred ninety-five (195) million doses of H1N1 vaccine have been purchased from five manufacturers by the U.S. government.
REL:Vaccines have already been purchased, BEFORE their approval? That makes their approval sound very much as if it were pre arraigned. Why the haste? Why the collusion? Your agency declared a national state of health emergency on April 25, 2009, just 11 days after the first so-called death from the so-called novel virus in Mexico. A level 6 pandemic was declared on June 11, just shy of 2 months after the first alleged death. The death toll was reduced in Mexico from 168 to 16, a percentage decrease in mortality of 90.5%. This miracle of biblical proportions was not only ignored, but the decrease in observed mortality was apparently not factored into the response of either WHO or FDA.
SKS: Two types of vaccine will be available: vaccine made from killed virus for injection (flu shot) and vaccine with live, weakened virus administered by nasal spray.
REL: Madam Secretary, our information is that this is simply not correct. We have been informed that there is more than one inactivated live virus preparation. We are checking this out now.
SKS: The vaccines are being manufactured by the same methods used for the production of the seasonal flu vaccines administered every year.
REL: I am afraid that this is simply not true. Conventional influenza vaccines are cultured in eggs. Cell based, rather than egg based, vaccines are not the norm and are not just a simple “strain change” variation of the same old vaccine. MF59, and oil and water adjuvant, is not the norm. The virus is said by both WHO and FDA to be unpredictable and to be a totally novel virus. In that case, there is no possibility that all approved vaccines are merely strain change variations on a well proven, but not particularly safe, theme. FDA can only have it one way or the other, but not both, Madam Secretary.
SKS: NIH is conducting a series of clinical trials on the vaccine to determine the safety and number of doses needed to induce a protective immune response.
REL: Safety trials will not, according to the FDA< be completed until June, 2010. Approval of the novel vaccines before that point constitutes irresponsible dereliction of duty at the very least. Since full disclosure and informed consent are not possible under the conditions of secrecy which prevail in these tests, it is possible that they are illegal and that they constitute crimes against humanity.
SKS: Trials in healthy adults and the elderly began in the first week of August. Complete immune response data from the first trials—those studying two doses in healthy adults—are expected in late October.
REL: The approval of 5 different vaccines was announced today, September 15, 2009. There is no possibility that even the preliminary dosage trials in healthy adults have been completed. No trials in immuno compromised or suppressed people, vaccine injured persons, infants, people with atopic disorders like asthma, eczema, egg allergies, organ transplant recipients, cancer chemotherapy patients or those on steroids, etc., have been conducted. No safety information exists to guide usage or administration. This is consistent with the lack of information which would pierce the veil of liability protection as mentioned before.
SKS: Preliminary data indicate that the vaccines are safe
REL: What preliminary data. Is that sufficient to jeopardize the health of a nation for a non existent threat of a disease?
SKS: and that a single 15-microgram dose induces what is likely to be a protective immune response in healthy adults between the ages of 18 and 64.
REL: We should note that no one says that the dose will be protective since vaccines have never been shown to be protective of diseases for which they are administered. Not a single double blind, placebo controlled study on this question has ever been done. But the antibody production generated by vaccines is assumed, not know, to provide protection. Given the dangerous nature of these novel vaccines for a novel virus, don’t ou think, Madam Secretary, that more information about the conclusive results of carefully designed safety testing, with fully informed consent, would be in order before these vaccines were approved?
SKS: For adults aged 65 and over, the preliminary data indicate that the immune response to the 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccine is somewhat less robust, as is the case with seasonal influenza vaccine.
REL: And there is no intermediate or long term safety data on the adjuvanted vaccines whatsoever since no adjuvanted vaccine has ever been approved before in the US. the only two adjuvanted vaccines available in Europe are for patients on dialysis, whose immune function is so suppressed that they are deemed to need the extra “punch” of the squalene adjuvant and, according tot he controlling agency, have such a reduced life span that they are not expected to live long enough to develop side effects and complications from the vaccine and Cervavax, GSK’s competitor to Garadsil, the HPV vaccine.
Parents who continue to state that their daughters were either killed by, or seriously damaged by Cervavax administration are being warned that if they continue to disseminate that information their children will be taken from them.
The suggestions in this data is that although dangerous, the danger is being hidden. Without a good deal of further clarification, the approval of adjuvanted vaccines, or the potential administration of adjuvants by themselves or mixed with unadjuvanted vaccines, as being discussed now by CDC, makes the purchase some months ago of nearly $1/2 billion worth of squalene adjuvants make sense in the limited fashion that injecting a a known poison into large number of humans might be said to make sense.
Squalene, when injected into animals, causes such severe auto immune illness that its use is standard in laboratories where the induction of such disease is desired for research purposes. In that context, it is named after the scientist who discovered that it had that impact and is known as “Freund’s Adjuvant.
SKS: Trials in children began in mid-August, and trials in pregnant women have just begun.
REL:Does that mean that approval for the use of these vaccines for unrestricted use is based on …what? Certainly not science or data.
SKS: Our expectation is that vaccine will be a good match for the virus currently circulating in the United States based on intensive monitoring of the virus.
REL: But the expectation of the FDA and WHO for a “good match” between a circulating influenza virus and the next season’s disease is wrong well over 70% of the time. Secretray Sebelius, you and your Staff’s expectations are less than compelling. The regular administration of the seasonal flu vaccine that ACIP and CDC, both units of FDA, recommend year after year has been shown to increase the incidence of Alzheimer’s Disease by more than 600% while its accuracy in predictng which virus will be circulating is less than 30%.
FDA standards are not very high: according to your official website, the H1N1 vaccine will be considered a success if the anticipated antibody titer response (1:40) is found in 28% of the population. That means that these vaccines are being approved even if the number of people who do not show a robust laboratory antibody response (which is not associated with protection) is as high as 72%. So the risks of these vaccines are not accounted for and the efficacy is not required.
Furthermore, FDA has announced that the unadjuvanted vaccine, the strain change variety, is expected, under the best case scenario, to kill at least 30,000 people. The number who are expected to be maimed and crippled by this is not specified on the offical FDA website. If the 1976 disaster, which Secretary Sebelius says the FDA is looking to for guidance, is any indication, we can expect at least a thousand people sickened and crippled for each person who dies from the Vaccine. The math is hardly conducive to confidence in the FDA.
SKS: We are coordinating this 2009 H1N1 vaccination campaign with the seasonal influenza vaccination campaign, and are working hard with state and local authorities and the clinical community to address the challenges this presents.
From what we know as of today, 2009 H1N1 virus preferentially affects a population different from that affected by seasonal flu. In particular, this virus is infecting more young people including children, younger adults and pregnant women.
REL: What is this data based upon, given the lack of diagnostic specificity and the fact that symptoms are not distinguishable from all other types of colds or flus?
SKS: Typically these groups, particularly young children and pregnant women, are at greater risk of serious complications from any influenza, including the 2009 H1N1.
REL: Again I must ask, Secretary Sebelius, without diagnosis, how can that be ascertainined?
SKS: CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended on July 29 providing initial doses of the new H1N1 vaccine to five groups—approximately 159 million people.
REL: That is over one half of the entire population of the US. Wouldn’t it be more prudent, given that there is no legitimate health emergency, to not vaccinate more than half of the country, specifically the most vulnerable half, with an untested, unnecessary and uninsurable group of vaccines?
SKS: CDC endorsed these recommendations.
REL: Rather than reassuring me, this seems to me to be a clear cause for an overhaul of FDA and CDC with the possibility of criminal charges being investigated.
SKS: These groups are:
people who live with or care for children younger than 6 months of age,
health care and emergency services personnel,
persons between the ages of 6 months through 24 years of age, and
people from ages 25 through 64 years who are at higher risk for novel H1N1.
REL: Note your use of the term “Novel”, Secretary Sebelius. As stated above, that precludes the claim that these vaccines are mere strain change variations on a well-worn theme.
SKS: because of chronic health disorders like asthma and diabetes or compromised immune systems.
REL: These are the very groups to whom squalene is the most dangerous and the crops to whom contaminates like leukemia-causing virus SV40, found in the line of monkey kidney cells that the Novartis Vaccine has been cultured.
SKS: The H1N1 virus is particularly dangerous to healthy women who are pregnant. Not only has this virus caused greater numbers of pregnant women to be hospitalized, it has also been fatal in a higher percentage of this population than in other affected groups.
REL: Does squalene cross the placenta. Does it damage the fetus? In what way? At what age? It is known that mercury does cross the placenta and does damage the Fetus. Yet the CDC is advising women to take the H1N1 vaccine(s) regardless of whether it has the preservative known as “Thimerisol” (49.6% mercury by weight). No mention has been made of the dangers of aluminum adjuvants, nor of the fact that polysorbate 80 (also called “Tween 80) is associated with infertility when injected?
SKS: The federal government will be working in partnership with states, territories, tribes, and local communities as well as the private sector to help distribute and administer the new H1N1 vaccine. Thanks to support from Congress, the federal government has allocated $1.444 billion for states and hospitals to support planning and preparation efforts. TARP AGAIN.
The large scale 2009 H1N1 vaccine program will begin mid-October with small amounts of vaccine becoming available the first full week in October. The vaccine itself will be available free of charge to the American people, but some public and private providers may charge an administration fee. It will be distributed to providers and state health departments in a manner similar to how federally purchased vaccines are distributed in the Vaccines For Children program. The CDC and states will work with a contractor to get vaccine to where it needs to go. The number of doses shipped will be reported to the CDC daily, and the number of doses administered will be reported to the CDC weekly.
REL: Where will the adverse relations be reported for the general public to track?
SKS: The fact that vaccine won’t begin distribution until October makes preventing the spread of flu even more critical. Again, we need to remind all Americans about the things they should be doing right now: washing hands, staying home if you’re sick, and taking the necessary precautions to stay healthy and avoid getting sick. Flu.gov has good tips for what you need to do to avoid getting the flu.
While the 2009 H1N1 flu virus has been the focus of attention since the spring, it is important that we do not forget the risks posed by the seasonal flu viruses. More than 36,000 people die each year from complications associated with the flu.
REL:This statistic is totally false and misleading. About 600 people per year from the complications of influenza, but marketing concerns have created this oft-repeated number from which bears little relationship to reality as the swine flu case numbers or death numbers.
SKS: CDC continues to recommend vaccination against seasonal influenza viruses, especially for all infants, children, and people at greater risk for influenza complications. Seasonal flu vaccine already is becoming available in many places.
It is not too early to get a seasonal flu shot as soon as it is available. The protection you get from the vaccine will not wear off before the flu season is over.
REL: There is no evidence that the seasonal flu strain in the vaccines is the one circulating but there is considerable evidence that the vaccines are dangerous, despite insistent government and industry denial.
SKS: Closing Remarks – At HHS, we are simultaneously working hard to understand and control this outbreak…
REL: What outbreak? See above.
SKS: …while also keeping the public and the Congress fully informed about the situation and our response. We are working in close collaboration with our federal partners as well as with other organizations with unique expertise that helps us provide guidance for multiple sectors of our economy and society. It is important to recognize that there have been enormous efforts in the United States and abroad to prepare for this kind of an outbreak and a pandemic.
REL: One would have to wonder why.
SKS: Our nation’s current preparedness is a direct result of the investments and support of the Congress and the hard work of state and local officials across the country. While we must remain vigilant throughout this and subsequent outbreaks, it is important to note that at no time in our nation’s history have we been more prepared to face this kind of challenge.
REL: Or more over-prepared to face a challenge which does exist.
SKS: But the government cannot solve this alone and, as I have noted, all of us must take constructive steps. Taking all of those reasonable measures will help us mitigate how many people actually get sick in our country.
We look forward to working closely with the Congress to best address the situation as it evolves in the weeks and months ahead. Again, Mr. Chairman, thank you for the opportunity to participate in this conversation with you and your colleagues. I look forward to taking your questions.
REL: Thank you Madam Secretary. I do think you have told us quite enough disinformation.
Donate:http://drrimatruthreports.com/?page_id=189 Support Court Challenge to Prevent FDA from Approving Swine Flu Vaccines Before Safety Testing is Complete (July 2010) -make your recurring tax deductible donation ending in the number “6” to earmark it for the legal fund
Make your recurring tax deductible donation ending in any other number to support the Natural Solutions Foundation
Today there was a treat and a terror in my email box: a new article from William Engdahl. A treat, because William Engdahl is one of my heroes. I do not know whether to admire him most as a writer who researches or a researcher who writes. Looked at either way, however, he is an honest and fearless man whose works tell us what we need to know – and what the self-anointed elite does not want us to know. And they do so with passion, clarity but without the faintest hint of panic or hysteria.
A terror because of the subject: mercury and aluminum in our babies and our own bodies through the mechanism of vaccination. You have heard it before: mercury and aluminum are neurotoxins. The restatement of this information in the context of a clear and focused historical and scientific review of just what we are talking about when we talk about mercury, aluminum and autism. It must be read and shared.
There are a few more facts which help to frame the cataclysmic disaster called “Vaccine Injury”, which is by no means limited to children. Think for a moment of healthy young men and women in coma, developing demyelinating neurological disorders like MS, ALS (now seen in children and adolescents for the first time in history as a new disease called “Juvenile ALS, but only in girls and women who have received Gardasil), diabetes, encephalitis, meningitis, persistent and debilitating rashes, swollen, painful joints everywhere in the body, brain fog, memory loss, depression, loss of IQ, lupus and other auto immune disorders, Alzheimer’s Disease, etc.
They Would Have Died Anyway
Let’s start with the origins of Thimerisol, which is 49.6% mercury by weight. Mercury is more toxic by far to tissues, including the brain, than lead.
It was patented by Eli Lilly, a so called “ethical” drug company (so named because they sell patented medicines) in the 1920s. In 1930, it was administered IV to 22 meningococcal meningitis patients, all of whom were in coma. All 22 patients died.
Eli Lilly, an “ethical” drug company, concluded that Thimerisol was safe because although all patients died, none showed any adverse response to the injected Thimerisol since they WOULD HAVE DIED FROM OTHER CAUSES ANYWAY. Therefore, none died from Thimerisol and it was deemed to be safe. When the FDA was founded, this information was presented to it and accepted. Thimerisol was grandfathered into use. The FDA, always compliant to the desires of industry, bought the insane logic of the “ethical” drug company, to the endless tragedy of our children, our elders and ourselves. This horrific substance is added to our vaccines as a “preservative”.
As a simple side thought, if vaccine manufacturing were strictly clean and sterile, not careless, contaminated and dirty, why would a preservative be necessary? Thimerosal was subsequently introduced for use in vaccines and in over the counter remedies as a preservative to kill bacteria in the product without any additional safety testing of any kind since it had been “grandfathered”. The 1930 study, in which every patient died, remains the only safety testing done on the substance even after being in use for over 84 years.
Aluminum is added to vaccines in order to irritate the immune system and increase the production of antibodies which are ASSUMED to be associated with immune competence with respect to the disease entity on which the vaccine is focused. No compelling (or even non-compelling) scientific evidence exists which demonstrates that this type of antibody production is associated with protection from the disease. In fact, virtually every epidemic in modern times has occurred in fully vaccinated populations.
Aluminum is neurotoxic and is strongly associated with the epidemic of a previously unknown type of dementia which will impact more than half of those who reach the age of 80: Alzheimer’s Disease.
When combined with fluoride, also added to many vaccines, the two toxic metals are strongly synergistic, increasing the neurotoxicity of the other substance by many times, creating a much higher level of impact than either one alone could produce. Since nearly everyone in the US drinks fluoridated water and brushes their teeth with fluoride-containing toothpaste, even without added injected fluoride, the synergistic potential is both untested and very frightening.
These metals are not the only toxins found in vaccines, but they are, individually and in combination, enough to create the public health and private home tragedies which can be laid directly at the feet of Big Pharma and criminal regulators.
Please disseminate this blog as widely as possible with full attribution AND with the Action Items above: they are vital to our ability to stay unvaccinated, all of us, with the new and much deadlier Swine Flu vaccines. Safety testing, if you can call it that, will not be completed until July of 2010. Yet the WHO and FDA (CDC is part of FDA) are rushing to vaccinate our precious children, pregnant women and the chronically ill with a vaccine containing aluminum, mercury AND a million times more squalene than the wildly toxic anthrax Vaccine A which caused the horrific, and frequently lethal, Gulf War Syndrome in hundreds of thousands of Gulf War vets and is still causing the same damage in our soldiers now.
Despite that, the Department of Defense, Governor after Governor and employer after employer are making these untested vaccines mandatory even while the President and Secretary Sebelius of Health and Human Services intone solemnly that vaccinations will be “voluntary”, defining “voluntary” as one option of a pair of options which offer you the unsafe, untested, unnecessary and uninsurable vaccine, all liability for which both the government and the manufacturers have been relieve of in a convenient legislative and regulatory pirouette. The other option is involuntary internment or incarceration, as the public documents from Iowa, Florida, North Carolina and other states makes clear is already being prepared for you. Indeed, “vaccine refusers” in Massachusetts may, under a pending law, be liable to fines of $1000 per day for refusing to be vaccinated AND jailed for up to 30 days [Per day of refusal? For all days of refusal? – REL]
So, indeed, “it IS the Vaccines, Stupid!” as William Engdahl tells the FDA, the media and the rest of the deaf establishment.
F. William Engdahl
September 6, 2009
Part I: Evidence Linking Autism Rise in Children to Vaccinations
The WHO and US Government CDC are escalating a public psychological
conditioning to create hysteria and panic among an uninformed public about an
alleged “virus” H1N1 Influenza A, aka Swine Flu, whose alleged effects to
date appear comparable with a common cold. Before people line up in the
streets demanding their vaccinations for their children and themselves, it
would be wise to remember, to paraphrase a 1992 campaign statement of Bill
Clinton to George H.W. Bush: “It’s the vaccination, Stupid!”
By countless scientific accounts, far more dangerous to human health than any
reported incidences of Swine Flu are the dangers of severe health issues
including paralysis, brain damage and even death arising from what is added to
vaccines by virtually every major vaccine maker. Almost without exception, all
commercial vaccines today contain various substances known as adjuvants
designed to make the vaccine “work.” These adjuvants are the source of
horrendous and sometimes deadly damage.
It has been speculated for some time that there might be a link in the
alarming rise in cases of autism among tiny infants and children and massive
multiple vaccinations today given routinely to infants and children from the
first hours of birth. There is clear and
shocking evidence of the link between the two. If you do not have a strong
constitution, you are advised not to read further.
A new study shows a direct link between standard childhood vaccination series,
MMR, and autism-like symptoms in monkeys. The principal scientist involved in
the study, Dr. Laura Hewitson of the University of Pittsburgh, presented the
alarming conclusions as an abstract pending publication at the International
Meeting for Autism Research. It has been presented at scientific conferences
in both London and Seattle, USA.
The study compared vaccinated macaque monkeys with non-vaccinated macaques. No
major flaws in the study have been revealed by any attending scientist. The
vaccines included the popular MMR series. The study found a marked increase in
“gastrointestinal tissue gene expression” and “inflammation issues”
with those monkeys which received vaccinations. They are a common symptom of
children with regressive autism.
The study also found marked behavior changes and development differences in
those monkeys given the vaccines versus those who were not. “Compared with
unexposed animals, significant neuro-developmental deficits were evident for
exposed animals in survival reflexes, tests of color discrimination and
reversal, and learning sets,” the study`s authors reported. “Differences
in behaviors were observed between exposed and unexposed animals and within
the exposed group before and after MMR vaccination.”
US Government-mandated research approved by Congress was t
o begin this year, but the funds were rescinded in early January. Claiming
“conflict of interest” because of ongoing court cases, the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), a long-time supporter of infant
vaccinations, withdrew the research plans.
The most shocking of all is the recent and now common medical practice,
reinforced by an aggressive pharmaceutical industry, of giving multiple
vaccines, often virtually within hours of birth, to infants despite the fact
that no study including all of the vaccine series commonly given to children
in the US and UK, about 30 in all, has been conducted until now. The practice
of newborn multiple vaccinations has become widespread in Germany and other EU countries over the past decade. Significantly there have surfaced reports of dramatically increased instances of autism in newborn and infants in various German hospitals over the past decade, precisely the period multiple
vaccinations of newborn and infants has become routine.
US Government coverup
Tragically, the US Government agency theoretically entrusted with guarding
public health, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as with the case of
health dangers of GMO foods, as well with the dramatic evidence of the link
between autism and adjuvants used in typical vaccines, is accepting the
argument of big and politically powerful Pharmaceutical companies.
The Food and Drug Administration considers vaccines safe but, just as with
GMO, they have done no studies into the effects of multiple vaccinations as given in the common childhood series which started in the 1990s in
the USA and spread to the UK and now across the EU.
According to Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., son of the late Attorney General and an
attorney active in campaigning to expose mercury (Thimerosal) and other
toxicity dangers in vaccines, recently stated, “as autism is a behavioral
affliction rather than a precisely defined biological injury —
epidemiological studies are critical to establishing its causation. But the
greatest source of epidemiological data is the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD)
— the government maintained medical records of hundreds of thousands of
vaccinated children — which Health and Human Services Department has gone to great lengths to keep out of the hands of plaintiffs’ attorneys and
independent scientists…The raw data collected in the VSD would undoubtedly
provide the epidemiological evidence needed to understand the relationship
between vaccines and autism. The absence of such studies makes it easy for
judges to say to plaintiffs they have not met
their burden of proving causation.”
Autism was virtually unknown in the United States until 1943 when it was
diagnosed and identified eleven months after Thimerosal, a mercury-based
vaccine “adjuvant” was first added to baby vaccines along with various
aluminum compounds in the United States. Thimerosal is often used to stem
fungi and bacterial growth in vaccines despite massive evidence of its severe
effects as a potent neurotoxin. Following independent studies, Russia, Japan, Austria, Denmark, Sweden and Britain have banned Thimerisol from children’s vaccines. Germany to date has no such ban. The toxin was developed in 1930 by Eli Lilly. Tragically in 1991, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary the US Government’s Center for Disease Control (CDC), the same agency fueling the current hysteria over the non-proven H1N1 Swine Flu virus danger, recommended that infants be injected with a series of mercury-containing vaccines in some cases within 24 hours of birth for Hepatitis B and two months for diphtheria-tetanus- pertussis.
Before 1989 US pre-school children received eleven vaccinations— polio,
diphtheria-tetanus- pertussis, measles-mumps- rubella (MMR). By 1999, because of the various CDC recommendations, the number of vaccinations was twenty two before first grade of school. Parallel with this explosive rise in
vaccinations of the very young in the United States, according to Kennedy, the
rate of autism among children. The state of Iowa reported a 700% increase in
autism in children beginning in the 1990’s and along with California has
banned mercury in vaccines. Despite evidence, however the US FDA continues to allow drug makers to include Thimerosal in numerous over-the-counter
non-prescription medications as well as steroids and injected collagen. The US
Government ships vaccines preserved with Thimerosal to numerous developing
countries as well, where some are reporting sudden explosion of autism rates
as well. In China,20where autism was unknown before introduction of Thimerosal by US drug makers in 1999, press reports indicate there are almost two million autistic children.
Instances of autism in the US exploded as some 40 million children were
injected during the 1990’s with Thimerisol-based vaccines, giving them
unprecedented accumulations of mercury poison. The level of ethylmercury in a
vaccine routinely given then to children of two months age was 99 times
greater than the US Government’s daily limit for exposure. As with the
current WHO pandemic declaration around H1N1 Swine Flu, the CDC Vaccine
Advisory Committee is filled with scientists with close ties to the
pharmaceutical industry. Dr. Sam Katz, chairman of the committee was a paid consultant to most companies producing the vaccines he “recommended.”
The aluminum danger remains
While vaccines available in the US today exist with no Thimerosal (50%
mercury), virtually all vaccines still contain aluminum, which has been linked
to impaired neurological development in children. Aluminum has not replaced
thimerosal as a vaccine preservative; it has always been used in vaccines.
In the recent past, most US children got exposed to both thimerosal and
aluminum simultaneously with the hepatitis B, Hib, DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus
and pertussis) and pneumococcal vaccines. Combining mercury with aluminum
increases the likelihood that the mercury will damage human tissue.
According to a recent report by Michael Wagnitz, an American chemist, “Currently eight childhood vaccines that contain aluminum ranging from 125 to 850micrograms (mcg). These vaccines are administered 17 times in the first 18months of life, an almost six-fold increase compared to the vaccine schedule
of the 1980s.”
Wagnitz adds, “According to the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral
Nutrition, based on IV feeding solutions, a child should not exceed a maximum
daily dose of 5 mcg of aluminum per kilogram of weight per day. That means if
a child weighs 11 pounds, the child should not exceed 25 mcg in a day. This
level was determined to be the maximum safety limit based on a study publishedin the New England Journal of Medicine titled “Aluminum Neurotoxicity in Preterm Infants Receiving Intravenous Feeding Solutions.”
The hepatitis B vaccine, administered at birth, contains 250 mcg.
In a 1996 policy statement, “Aluminum Toxicity in Infants and Children,”
the American Academy of Pediatrics states, “Aluminum can cause neurological
harm. People with kidney disease who build up bloodstream levels of aluminum
greater than 100 mcg per liter are at risk of toxicity. The toxic threshold of
aluminum in the bloodstream may be lower than 100 mcg per liter.” What level
of aluminium toxicity is contained in vaccines routinely given German, French
and other children n the EU is not known. It might be time for a public demand
for such information to be disclosed, and before governments launch mass
vaccination campaigns for untested vaccines against a non-proven H1N1 Swine Flu threat.
Natural Solutions Foundation
The Voice of Global Health Freedom™
Mike Adams, a good friend and fellow freedom fighter, is now saying publicly what I have been saying for months: the US is set for mandatory vaccinations, despite their denial of any such intent. They will call them “voluntary” because you can take them or accept involuntary quarantine instead. That is called “duress” in the law and invalidates any agreement you might make under that condition. How does that work? Very well if we let it! Read Push Back Truth and the Ministry of Lies, http://drrimatruthreports.com/?p=3279, for more detail on this DoubleThink deceit.
Try telling that to the trooper or military person who is hauling you off to a prison or FEMA camp after you said you did not want a vaccine with 1 million times more squalene than the vaccines that felled so many healthy young men and women with Gulf War Syndrome after they were injected with Vaccine A by the military in a heinous experiment from which hundreds of thousands of young men and women have suffered and died. 1 million times more.
Make no mistake. The H1N1 “Pandemic” is only the first of many. You will hear again and again that there is another “mystery” plague which we need to be vaccinated against or it will kill hundreds of millions of people. Medicago, for example, is testing a new type of vaccine for Avian Flu (we are anything but done with that one!) and the bonanza will continue, pushing poison into us and our children while we sicken and, oh-so-profitably die. http://www.lsblog.org/blog/?p=6980
The first of the blatant fascist States, given an excuse to become an anti Constitutional land of terror by the absurd and possibly non-existent H1N1 “pandemic” is Massachusetts. Please read what my good friend, and fellow freedom fighter, Mike Adams, has to say about the evaporation of your freedoms, in MA, and outside of it.
Once a cradle of liberty, today a bill awaiting passage by the MA House of Representatives could signal the rapid and final collapse of the Constitution of the United States.
Tyrannies always cloak their misdoings in high-minded words meant to delude and mislead the gullible. This time is no exception. Violating one Amendment after another, authorizing warantless search and seizure, incarceration without trial, punitive fines for protecting your body’s integrity, the list goes on and on. And it is, of course, all for the best purpose: for protecting you from the “deadly” “pandemic” H1N1 virus.
Except it is not deadly. It may not even exist, since I have yet to find a solid, unbiased scientific paper which documents that it actually exists, it certainly is not diagnosed with any accuracy by any available means (which would make good sense if it is a total hoax, a complete fraud) and the untested, unnecessary and unsafe vaccines which are being touted – at gunpoint, it would seem – to either prevent or treat it are far worse, according to UK and Australian doctors and nurses, than the supposedly lethal disease.
New York Nurses, too, state that they see no need for the jab in light of the nature of the disease (trivial) and the risks of the squalene-laced vaccine.
Please take a few minutes to read the full article below which, although it pertains to Massachusetts, actually is a blue print for every State in the Union.
This bill conforms nicely to the State Emergency Medical Health Powers Act, of which nearly every state has already passed some version. As previously reported in these health freedom blogs, under these acts, warantless invasion and property seizure is permitted, mandatory forced vaccination or incarceration are permitted and the closure of all roads into or out of cities, towns and states are permitted. That is precisely what the MA law sets up.
Take action while there is still time. Organize signing events in your community to get every person you can reach to sign the Action Item demanding the right to reject this false and diabolical “choice” of either accepting a potentially deadly vaccine or being incarcerated for an indefinite period.
Once these laws are passed in your state, and the CDC is shipping vaccines, there will not be any legal action you can take. Time is extraordinarily short.
Act now. Mobilize your neighbors. Now.
And, while you are thinking about it, please make a tax deductible recurring donation to the Natural Solutions Foundation, http://drrimatruthreports.com/?page_id=189, to help defray our costs, including our legal costs.
If your donation ends in “$6” we will know that it is for legal defense. That’s $5006, $16, $256 or whatever you can afford. It’s your health. It’s your freedom. Health Freedom IS your First Freedom.
PS – In case you think we are going off the “deep end” here, take a look at this Federal Government web page that has a form on it for the States to use to force you from your home, violate your Right to Self Shield and, in general, set up the apparatus of Medical Fascism:
The CDC “recommends” the jab and then the States mandate it… all quite legal and all very fascistic.
Forced Vaccinations, quarantine camps, MA Senate reportedly passes “Pandemic Response Bill 2028”
Natural News | August 29, 2009 | Natural News Staff
NaturalNews) The United States of America is devolving into medical fascism and Massachusetts is leading the way with the passage of a new bill, the “Pandemic Response Bill” 2028, reportedly just passed by the MA state Senate and now awaiting approval in the House. This bill suspends virtually all Constitutional rights of Massachusetts citizens and forces anyone “suspected” of being infected to submit to interrogations, “decontaminations” and vaccines.
It’s also sets fines up to $1,000 per day for anyone who refuses to submit to quarantines, vaccinations, decontamination efforts or to follow any other verbal order by virtually any state-licensed law enforcement or medical personnel. You can read the text yourself here: http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/senate/186/st02/st02028.htm
Here’s some of the language contained in the bill:
(Violation of 4th Amendment: Illegal search and seizure)
During either type of declared emergency, a local public health authority… may exercise authority… to require the owner or occupier of premises to permit entry into and investigation of the premises; to close, direct, and compel the evacuation of, or to decontaminate or cause to be decontaminated any building or facility; to destroy any material; to restrict or prohibit assemblages of persons;
(Violation of 14th Amendment; illegal arrest without a warrant)
…an officer authorized to serve criminal process may arrest without a warrant any person whom the officer has probable cause to believe has violated an order given to effectuate the purposes of this subsection and shall use reasonable diligence to enforce such order. [Gunpoint]
(Government price controls)
The attorney general, in consultation with the office of consumer affairs and business regulation, and upon the declaration by the governor that a supply emergency exists, shall take appropriate action to ensure that no person shall sell a product or service that is at a price that unreasonably exceeds the price charged before the emergency.
“Involuntary Transportation” (also known as kidnapping)
Law enforcement authorities, upon order of the commissioner or his agent or at the request of a local public health authority pursuant to such order, shall assist emergency medical technicians or other appropriate medical personnel in the involuntary transportation of such person to the tuberculosis treatment center.
$1,000 / day in fines
Any person who knowingly violates an order, as to which noncompliance poses a serious danger to public health as determined by the commissioner or the local public health authority, shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 30 days or a fine of not more than one thousand dollars per day that the violation continues, or both.
Furthermore, when the commissioner or a local public health authority within its jurisdiction determines that either or both of the following measures are necessary to prevent a serious danger to the public health the commissioner or local public health authority may exercise the following authority: (1) to vaccinate or provide precautionary prophylaxis to individuals as protection against communicable disease…
Forced quarantine for those who refuse (illegal imprisonment without charge)
An individual who is unable or unwilling to submit to vaccination or treatment shall not be required to submit to such procedures but may be isolated or quarantined pursuant to section 96 of chapter 111 if his or her refusal poses a serious danger to public health or results in uncertainty whether he or she has been exposed to or is infected with a disease or condition that poses a serious danger to public health, as determined by the commissioner, or a local public health authority operating within its jurisdiction.
Arrest for refusal to be “decontaminated”
If an individual is unable or unwilling to submit to decontamination or procedures necessary for diagnosis, the decontamination or diagnosis procedures may proceed only pursuant to an order of the superior court… During the time necessary to obtain such court order, such individual may be isolated or quarantined pursuant to section 96 of chapter 111 if his or her refusal to submit to decontamination or diagnosis procedures poses a serious danger to public health or results in uncertainty whether he or she has been exposed to or is infected with a disease or condition that poses a serious danger to public health.
When the commissioner or a local public health authority within its jurisdiction reasonably believes that a person may have been exposed to a disease or condition that poses a threat to the public health, in addition to their authority under section 96 of chapter 111, the commissioner or the local public health authority may detain the person for as long as may be reasonably necessary for the commissioner or the local public health authority, to convey information to the person regarding the disease or condition and to obtain contact information… If a person detained under subsection (1) refuses to provide the information requested, the person may be isolated or quarantined pursuant to section 96 of chapter 111 if his or her refusal poses a serious danger to public health…
Forced isolation and quarantine
An order for isolation or quarantine may include any individual who is unwilling or unable to undergo vaccination, precautionary prophylaxis, medical treatment, decontamination, medical examinations, tests, or specimen collection and whose refusal of one or more of these measures poses a serious danger to public health or results in uncertainty whether he or she has been exposed to or is infected with a disease or condition that poses a serious danger to public health.
Forced entry into any home or building…
There’s a lot more in this bill, including language that allows Mass. police to enter any home or building without a search warrant, to destroy any object or building they suspect may pose a threat to public safety, to order the closing and / or decontamination of any facility using highly toxic chemical decontamination agents, and to arrest, detain and interrogate anyone who gets in their way.
Meanwhile, all state law enforcement and medical personnel are granted complete immunity from prosecution for their part in violating your Constitutional rights. So if they violate your right to due process, or they accidentally destroy your home, or they kill your family dog because they suspect it might be infected, you have absolutely zero recourse.
Under this bill, Massachusetts becomes a medical police state. There is no debating it. It’s all written, clear as day, in this law: The citizens of Massachusetts will have no rights, period. The Constitution is ancient history. You are now the property of the State.
Kiss your freedoms goodbye Massachusetts, it seems, has never met a vaccine it didn’t like. This is the same state that rounded up the parents of schoolchildren who hadn’t been vaccinated, then corralled them into a courtroom (with attack dogs standing guard outside) and forced vaccine injections onto all the schoolchildren under the threat of jail time for parents who resisted.
Remember, readers, that this is all taking place in the “land of the free,” a nation that former President George Bush claimed was so envied around the world that terrorists attacked America because they “hate freedom” and wanted to destroy our way of life. But terrorists need no help attacking freedom as long as Massachusetts is in the vaccine game, because this latest form of “gunpoint medicine” destroys freedom for everyday Americans in a way that terrorists could have never hoped to accomplish with all the bombs in the world.
Massachusetts, it seems, has done what terrorists could not: It has turned “free” Americans into medical slave subjects who no longer have any freedom to decide the details of their own medical care. All options have been stripped from them but one: The Big Pharma option. That’s the one that involves using untested, unproven and potentially dangerous vaccines that could paralyze you or even kill you. All to defend you against a virus that’s so weak, almost anyone with decent levels of vitamin D and basic nutrition can resist the virus without incident.
But Massachusetts, as you’ll see below, is just the beginning. It turns out that the whole nation could soon find itself under a similar forced vaccination policy…
Isolation camps, forced vaccinations and more In 2006, former President George Bush signed into law the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP). It gives power to the Secretary of the U.S. government’s Health and Human Services department (HHS) to declare any infectious disease a “national emergency” and therefore require mandatory vaccination of the entire population. Because of the existence of this PREP Act, the entire population of the USA is now but one pen stroke away from being subjected to mandatory swine flu vaccinations at gunpoint.
Those who resist such vaccines will be arrested and taken away for “isolation” in domestic prison camps. They can’t just leave vaccine refusers free to live among the population, of course, because that would send the message that anyone can refuse the vaccines without consequence. So they’ll arrest those who refuse the vaccine, labeling them “a threat to national security” (enemies of the state) and imprison them without trial, without charges and without any legal representation whatsoever.
Meanwhile, all those who take part in enforcing these crimes against the American people will be granted complete immunity. From the HHS website: “[the Secretary may] issue a declaration… that provides immunity from tort liability (except for willful misconduct) for claims of loss caused, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from administration or use of (vaccine or other pharmaceutical) countermeasures to diseases, threats and conditions determined by the Secretary to constitute a present, or credible risk of a future public health emergency…”
There are other laws already on the books that strip Americans of virtually all Constitutional rights in a “pandemic emergency” scenario. One such act is The Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness Act (S. 3678), which probably merits another article altogether.
Have no illusions: At the stroke of a pen, the Constitutional rights of all Americans will be immediately suspended.Mandatory vaccinations and “decontaminations” will kick in and the mass arrest of resisters will begin. There will be no court, no trial, no jury and no due process. Your actions will be dictated to you by a law enforcement officer or a health care worker who has been granted complete immunity, so if you just happen to get kicked around a bit (or shot), there’s really nothing you can do about it.
Some might argue these are necessary actions to save a nation from a deadly pandemic. And yet they forget that the pandemic has been intentionally allowed to worsen by censoring information about vitamin D and natural remedies that could stop it. Somebody at the top, in other words, wants this pandemic to get really bad, perhaps because it allows them to invoke precisely the draconian response I’ve outlined in this article. Seizing power in a Democracy cannot be accomplished by simply declaring war on the rights of the People. Rather, a situation must be engineered where the People are so desperate that they beg to be controlled. Releasing a pandemic into the wild is the perfect way to accomplish precisely that.
None of these laws will be invoked before the vaccines are ready in large numbers, of course. Part of the purpose in all this is to prop up Big Pharma profits with massive vaccination efforts, so until the vaccines are actually available, don’t expect to see any declarations of a public emergency.
It might take until October or November before the vaccines are readily available in sufficient quantity to inject just half the U.S. population. But once that milestone is reached, a declaration of a pandemic emergency is imminent. Trust me on this point: They won’t let all those hundreds of millions of vaccines sit around unused; they’ll make sure they get injected into the People as soon as possible, because that’s the only way to justify making more.
So the sequence of events we’re likely to see here are:
#1) Waiting on vaccine manufacturing to procure at least 150 million doses in the U.S. Probable time frame = October.
#2) Hyping up a few local swine flu breakouts in schools in order to justify step #3. Probable time frame = November / December.
#3) Declaring a full-blown national emergency and announcing mandatory vaccinations for everyone (to use up the vaccines that are now available). Probable time frame = January / February / March.
#4) If the disease continues to spread, this is when you’ll see forced entry into homes and buildings, forced “decontamination” sprayings, widespread arrests and forced quarantine of resisters, Martial Law and a complete crackdown on freedoms (especially in the inner cities). This will likely continue through the winter until Spring arrives, bringing the sunshine that will suppress the virus around the May 2010 time frame.
All this is written in black ink. It’s already part of the pandemic response plan. Body bags, FEMA camps and much more.
Two years ago, this was all the domain of conspiracy theory “wingnuts.” Now it’s State law. Now it’s being openly discussed in security conferences and health care meetings. What will we do when the hospital beds are full? How will we accomplish the “involuntary transportation” of those who are infected? Are there enough zip-tie handcuffs to go around? How do we disarm and arrest citizens who refuse to be vaccinated? How do we prevent National Guard troops from becoming infected themselves?
These are the questions circulating now at high levels, all across the world. And the answers are always the same: Abandon freedoms. Strip the People of any rights. Dictate from the top down and arrest anyone who gets in your way.
Welcome to the Land of the Free. I hope you are prepared for what looks to be coming, because this isn’t America anymore, folks. This is Amerika, and the Constitutional rights you thought you had are about to be written right off the books. http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2327811/posts